> >> http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14834763/?GT1=8506?GT1=8506
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I'll buy the boat and fly you all in via its helicopter.
Would an aircraft carrier make a reasonably decent dive boat, or is the deck too high off the water?
Scott - 20 Sep 2006 17:12 GMT
> Would an aircraft carrier make a reasonably decent dive boat, or is the deck too high off the water?
As is usual, our Marine Corps is on top of the job;
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/lha-1.htm
Chris Guynn - 20 Sep 2006 17:16 GMT
> > Would an aircraft carrier make a reasonably decent dive boat, or is the
> deck too high off the water?
>
> As is usual, our Marine Corps is on top of the job;
>
> http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/lha-1.htm
How damaging to the coral would the anchor on that thing be?
Scott - 20 Sep 2006 17:19 GMT
> > > Would an aircraft carrier make a reasonably decent dive boat, or is the
> > deck too high off the water?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> How damaging to the coral would the anchor on that thing be?
We'd live boat it, and drop off/pickup by helicopter, RIB or LVT.
Jerome's Sock Puppet - 21 Sep 2006 02:14 GMT
> Would an aircraft carrier make a reasonably decent dive boat, or is the deck too high off the water?
It'd make a fabulous wreck, but a lousy dive boat. The impact from
the water after your giant stride off the flight deck would probably
pull your BC crotch strap somewhere around the top of your liver.
They have water activated life preservers for flight deck crew to
prevent such pains. Your other option is a May West and a retaining
line.
I actually got in trouble over this specific issue while I was in the
Navy. I had a guy ask a question of the saftey officer about which
life vests were appropriate for flight deck watches. The Navy has
regulations on that. My chief at the time was a spastic screamer, and
went ape sh.t about "the chain of command" and wrote him up. Dumb
bastard didn't know the Navy also has standing orders about contacting
the safety officer regarding any safety questions. When it came to my
guy's XOI, I showed up and explained what happened. So then I got on
the dumb bastard's sh.t list.
Lee Bell - 21 Sep 2006 02:30 GMT
> It'd make a fabulous wreck, but a lousy dive boat. The impact from
> the water after your giant stride off the flight deck would probably
> pull your BC crotch strap somewhere around the top of your liver.
A good reason not to wear one, not that it would matter much. The tank
would surely crush the back of your head or break your back on impact.
Lee
Jerome's Sock Puppet - 21 Sep 2006 16:13 GMT
> > It'd make a fabulous wreck, but a lousy dive boat. The impact from
> > the water after your giant stride off the flight deck would probably
> > pull your BC crotch strap somewhere around the top of your liver.
>
> A good reason not to wear one, not that it would matter much. The tank
> would surely crush the back of your head or break your back on impact.
Excellent point.
For those of us in drysuits, it would also be a bit of a ball breaker.
I used to dive off a boat that had about a 6 or 7 foot drop from the
dive platform to the water. Even that would sometimes contact nads on
landing. We would take extra care to squeeze as much air out of the
suit as possible. You could always tell the new guys on the boat by
the massive ejection of air from their neck seals, and that painfull
"just took a shot to the jewels" look in their eye.
Dillon Pyron - 22 Sep 2006 04:21 GMT
>> >> http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14834763/?GT1=8506?GT1=8506
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>Would an aircraft carrier make a reasonably decent dive boat, or is the deck too high off the water?
That's one f.ck of a giant stride.

Signature
dillon
If you can't figure out how to unmunge my
address, email me and I'll explain it.
Chris Guynn - 22 Sep 2006 14:51 GMT
> >> >> http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14834763/?GT1=8506?GT1=8506
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> That's one f.ck of a giant stride.
I was thinking much the same thing...
You could fit a hell of a lot of divers on it though.
Lee Bell - 22 Sep 2006 16:05 GMT
>>Would an aircraft carrier make a reasonably decent dive boat, or is the
>>deck too high off the water?
> You could fit a hell of a lot of divers on it though.
The ultimate cattle boat. Just think, you could put enough divers on a reef
to trash it in a single trip. It would have to be one of the outside reefs,
though. Carriers draw something like 30 or more feet.
Lee
Chris Guynn - 22 Sep 2006 17:57 GMT
> >>Would an aircraft carrier make a reasonably decent dive boat, or is the
> >>deck too high off the water?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Lee
If you're trashing the coral anyway...
Grumman-581 - 03 Oct 2006 05:56 GMT
> Would an aircraft carrier make a reasonably decent dive boat, or is the deck too high off the water?
About 85 ft from the flight deck to the water... From the hangar deck, it's
perhaps 55 ft... It should make for an interesting giant stride...
Seriously though, there are other ways to get to the water without having to
jump off the hangar or flight decks... I can remember not being able to pull
into port, so we had landing craft ferrying us back and forth to the dock...
El Mecky - 03 Oct 2006 09:51 GMT
>> Would an aircraft carrier make a reasonably decent dive boat, or is the
> deck too high off the water?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> into port, so we had landing craft ferrying us back and forth to the
> dock...
Lot of place to put your gear though, on the flight deck. Maybe only for
"tdeck-divers"?
lol.
Maybe ad the 85 ft to your max depth. Looks good in your logbook. And
striding of a deck 85ft above water should about imply the same extra risk
as going down an extra 85ft under you max safe depth.
Frank
Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick - 03 Oct 2006 10:28 GMT
>Grumman-581" <grumman581@DIE-SPAMMER-SCUM@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:O3mUg.1566$5o5.1553@tornado.texas.rr.com...
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> into port, so we had landing craft ferrying us back and forth to the
> dock...
Minor modification to the port elevator.