Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is diving dangerous?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dillon Pyron - 17 Sep 2006 12:38 GMT
This topic came up during the party.  My response was "when done
properly, no more so than many complicated tasks".  Then I started
thinking.

My CFI had a student in his Citabria get into an inverted flat spin
and hit the water a mile off the Pacific Palisades.  His hangermate
was a DC10 pilot for American who picked the wrong day to take off in
Chicago.

Two guys I climbed with a lot came unglued on El Capitan.

Three guys I've raced all died on the track, including one in front of
me.

But diving?  Lee, until we split a beer, I only know one person who's
been bent.  And the only guy I know who died while diving had a
massive stroke at age 80, on the GBR.

So, dangerous?  Sure, if done wrong.  But that applies to everything
in life.
Signature

dillon

If you can't figure out how to unmunge my
address, email me and I'll explain it.

Dave C - 17 Sep 2006 14:02 GMT
> This topic came up during the party.  My response was "when done
> properly, no more so than many complicated tasks".  Then I started
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> --
> dillon

I agree, but your analogies may have been misleading, don't you think,
since _general_ scuba diving doesn't usually involve such high levels
of complexity and high risk. Plus, a diver can usually employ simple
steps to save oneself.

A better analogy might be the drive to the dive site.

Or the drive home from the party.   8^)

Dave C
Lee Bell - 17 Sep 2006 19:09 GMT
>> So, dangerous?  Sure, if done wrong.  But that applies to everything in
>> life.

Not quite.  In most sports, the things that will kill you quick, if there
are any, are obvious.  In flying, you don't have to be real bright to know
that falling out of the sky will hurt.  In shooting, you don't have to be
real bright to know that pulling the trigger while the gun is pointed at
some part of you, is a bad idea.  In climbing, you don't have to be a rocket
scientist to know that falling a long way down will not be real great for
your health.  When driving, you know you don't want to hit something at high
speed without a lot of training.  What makes each of these sports dangerous
is the less obvious things, the things that can kill you unexpectedly, the
things you have to go out of your way to know and avoid.

In flying, which is not one of my sport, a flat spin is probably one of
those things that make the sport dangerous.  I'm reasonably sure wind shear
as you make your landing approach is another.  In shooting, the possibility
of a barrel blockage or multiple shots due to a damaged sear might qualify.
I don't know what the unexpected risks are in climbing, but I bet there are
some.  In driving, not everyone understands the risk that your vehicle will
lose contact with the ground due to nothing more than a little wind under
it, or how steering changes at very high speeds.  You get the idea.

What makes diving dangerous is not the obvious, that you can't breath
underwater, but the not so obvious, things like ascending while  holding
your breath, more nitrogen in your blood than your body can eliminate
without bending you, the toxicity of oxygen above certain presures and what
happens if, in trying to deal with it, you let the pressure of O2 in your
system drop much below .16 ATA.

Diving certainly can be done safely, as can all of the other sports we've
mentioned, but each of them requires a bit more attention to less obvious
details than, say, bowling.

Lee
Dave C - 17 Sep 2006 21:44 GMT
> >> So, dangerous?  Sure, if done wrong.  But that applies to everything in
> >> life.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Lee

Wrong attribution again, Lee, but nobody's counting.  8^)

My point was that scuba diving, in general, is not as complicated or as
dangerous as the other activities mentioned by the OP. Plus, bad
situations can usually be survived if simple steps are taken.

Dave C
Limey - 18 Sep 2006 14:59 GMT
>> >> So, dangerous?  Sure, if done wrong.  But that applies to everything
>> >> in
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> Wrong attribution again, Lee, but nobody's counting.  8^)

Not so. He may not have seen Dillons OP but quoted yours anyway when
answering his points by leaving in the *two* sets of chevrons. Nice try tho.

LD.
Dave C - 18 Sep 2006 15:35 GMT
> Not so. He may not have seen Dillons OP but quoted yours anyway when
> answering his points by leaving in the *two* sets of chevrons. Nice try tho.
>
> LD.

You're right!

Dave C
Limey - 22 Sep 2006 00:43 GMT
>> Not so. He may not have seen Dillons OP but quoted yours anyway when
>> answering his points by leaving in the *two* sets of chevrons. Nice try
>> tho.
>
> You're right!

It does happen occasionally.  ;)

LD.
-hh - 18 Sep 2006 15:23 GMT
> This topic came up during the party.  My response was "when done
> properly, no more so than many complicated tasks".  Then I started
> thinking.

FWIW, for better or worse, Scuba Diving gets groups by the Insurance
Folk into a category of "Risk Takers".  It has nothing to do (per se)
with the risk of diving, but actually the (statistical aggregate)
personality of one who chooses to scuba dive:  they're more likely to
engage in "risky" activities which would cause the Insurance company to
have to pay off their Life Insurance Policy sooner rather than later.

> But diving?  Lee, until we split a beer, I only know one person who's
> been bent.  And the only guy I know who died while diving had a
> massive stroke at age 80, on the GBR.

I had a friend who died of a heart attack (alone at home) while he
packing his dive gear to go on a trip ... half seriously, how should
this one be counted?

-hh
Lee Bell - 18 Sep 2006 16:25 GMT
> FWIW, for better or worse, Scuba Diving gets groups by the Insurance
> Folk into a category of "Risk Takers".  It has nothing to do (per se)
> with the risk of diving, but actually the (statistical aggregate)
> personality of one who chooses to scuba dive:  they're more likely to
> engage in "risky" activities which would cause the Insurance company to
> have to pay off their Life Insurance Policy sooner rather than later.

It is my opinion that we are risk takers.  Seeking risky activities does not
necessarily mean those risks are realized.

Just consider the number of people here who have, over the years, admitted
to being race car drivers, motorcycle drivers, motorcycle racers, sky
divers, mountain and rock climbers, law enforcement officers, firemen and
volunteer solidiers.  Hell, take a poll of those in this group that still
smoke if you want to know who the real risk takers are.

So far, all of us have survived the risks we take.  That does not make them
any less risky or any more appropriate for those that don't understand the
risks or can't adjust to avoid them.

Lee
Grumman-581 - 28 Sep 2006 08:54 GMT
> So, dangerous?  Sure, if done wrong.  But that applies to everything
> in life.

Certain endeavors are not very forgiving of mistakes... Certain types of
dives are more unforgiving than others... I knew two other sailors while I
was stationed in Orlando that didn't make it back from a cave dive... I
wouldn't be surprised that I might have made the same mistakes that they
made back then -- the only difference was that Darwin wasn't waiting there
for me at the time...
Dillon Pyron - 02 Oct 2006 23:24 GMT
>> So, dangerous?  Sure, if done wrong.  But that applies to everything
>> in life.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>made back then -- the only difference was that Darwin wasn't waiting there
>for me at the time...

rec.scuba lost a great guy by the name of Bill Maynes to a cave
accident about 13 years ago (when we actually spent most of our time
talking about scuba).  He was in the cave with a student.  I don't
remember any of the other details.  I've tried to find it in Google,
but haven't ever had much luck searching for anything there.  May of
93 if anyone wants to try.

The only thing that saved my life in 1973 was an improved firesuit and
the newly mandated  fire bottles.  It doesn't even take Darwin to
snuff you out without mercy.
Signature

dillon

If you can't figure out how to unmunge my
address, email me and I'll explain it.

Lee Bell - 03 Oct 2006 14:29 GMT
From various archives:

Published in the Tallahassee Democrat on 7/19/1993.

The bodies of two cave divers were recovered Sunday afternoon, ending two
days of searching at a sinkhole in Wakulla County....
According to (the Sheriff's Dept.), one of the bodies at Clearcut Sink was
identified as Bill Mayne, 39, of Tallahassee....the (second) unidentified
victim was a 29-year-old student at Florida State University (Ariel
Goldberg).  "We're still investigating the case, and the divers' equipment
will be examined.  We're also waiting on autopsies," (a spokesman) said.
"When we find out further information, we will be able to comment more."
Autopsies are scheduled for this morning at Tallahassee Memorial Regional
Medical Center. Officials said both victims at Clearcut Sink had recently
received their certification as cave divers.  They had been expected to
return from a diving expedition at 10:30 pm on Friday. When neither of the
divers returned Friday night, a relative of Mayne's called the Leon County
Sheriff's Dept.... Teams of divers, including volunteers, began searching
for the two victims at Clearcut Sink at 10:30 am Saturday and continued
until 8 pm. The search resumed at 9 am Sunday, and divers first located
Mayne's body downstream, at a depth of 90 feet, and 550 feet inside a cave.
(The spokesman) said divers did not bring Mayne's body to the surface until
5:30 pm, in order to avoid stirring up sediment on the bottom of the cave,
which would have impeded the search for the unidentified victim. The
unidentified FSU student was located 50 feet from a cave opening at Venture
Sink, which connects with Clearcut Sink, at 5:30 pm.  His body was removed
from the water upon recovery. Officials said these were the first sinkhole
deaths in the area since Parker Turner, a world record-setting cave diver,
died at Indian Springs last year....

This started as a private e-mail that was copied, with permission, to
rec.scuba on 8/17/1993.  It's by Bill's brother Charlie Mayne.

My brother was killed in a SCUBA diving accident on July 16th.  He was a
highly skilled technical diver with over 150 cave dives logged, twenty in
the system in which the accident occurred.  Evidently he and his dive
partner (who was also a certified cave diver, but with less experience)
became separated and Ariel became disoriented and got lost.  Bill pushed it
too far in trying to find him before starting out of the cave and ran out of
air a few minutes before he could reach the additional tanks they had
stashed on the way in to be used for decompression.  Ariel also ran out of
air before finding his way.  I talked at length with the recovery team, who
were friends of Bill and Ariel.  There were no signs of panic or fear.  The
equipment was checked by the Navy and there was no malfunction.  I believe
that Bill died as he lived: aware, awake, and totally absorbed in what he
was doing at the moment.

Lee
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.