 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneousDiscussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK ScubaDirectoryScuba Clubs |
Scuba Forum / General / September 2006Golden Oldies
320 From: Popeye - view profile Date: Tues, Oct 3 2000 12:00 am Email: buzcutt...@aol.com (Popeye) Groups: rec.scuba >And why did Popeye call me an instigator? >Dan Bracuk And, did you notice that the gun control threads are always started by the Canadians or the British? Popeye Drink and be merry, for life is short, and death lasts forever. 239 From: Popeye - view profile Date: Thurs, Sep 5 2002 5:06 pm Email: buzcutt...@aol.com (Popeye) Groups: rec.scuba Not yet ratedRating: show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author >From: Brian Wagner brian.wag...@cle.philips.com Date: 9/5/02 2:00 PM >Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: <3D779B7F.82D65...@cle.philips.com> >ben bradlee wrote: >> Let's just put it another way. What you say means nothing: You talk thru >> your a.s. Your ideas are not credible or plausible. Your statistics are >> fabricated. You are, generally, just plain full of sh.t. >And yet, you can't seem to come up with one single, lucid, relevant, >logical rebuttal, and can only respond with profane name-calling. In other >words, my backside, acting alone, can reduce you to infantile tantrums of >frustration. That's pretty sad for you, Ben. Backsides influence him greatly, he's just not used to seeing one without fur. Popeye Privileged to be on Team 3. The pit crew from hell.  SignaturePopeye Listen, strange woman lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Monty Python www.finalprotectivefire.com > And, did you notice that the gun control threads are always started by the > Canadians or the British? That would be a lie of monumental proportions, but well-suiting the beleaguered ego of the writer. Most if not all of the gun control threads have been started by some nonsense from someone looking to validate the position of gun freaks. Before you ask, or demand, look up your own cites. You made the posit, now prove it. And be honest, cuz if you try to play sillybugger with the quotes it's too easy to prove the lie. Have at it, big shooter. JF >> And, did you notice that the gun control threads are always started by >> the [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > now prove it. And be honest, cuz if you try to play sillybugger with > the quotes it's too easy to prove the lie. Have at it, big shooter. Woooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwww. How frothy was that? I just posted an old thread, a statement from 6 -years- ago, 2000, IIRC. -You- made the claim it was a "monumental lie". Now, prove it. Or I should say, put it on your list... SignaturePopeye Listen, strange woman lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Monty Python www.finalprotectivefire.com > > And, did you notice that the gun control threads are always started by the > > Canadians or the British? > > That would be a lie of monumental proportions, but well-suiting the > beleaguered ego of the writer. No where near the magnitude of monuments you have erected to yourself and your beleaguered ego. > Most if not all of the gun control > threads have been started by some nonsense from someone looking to > validate the position of gun freaks. You mean antigun freaks. > Before you ask, or demand, look up your own cites. You made the posit, > now prove it. And be honest, cuz if you try to play sillybugger with > the quotes it's too easy to prove the lie. Have at it, big shooter. Got you on the ropes again, eh? http://makeashorterlink.com/?G5A642AAD SignaturePopeye Listen, strange woman lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Monty Python www.finalprotectivefire.com -- 20 From: Popeye - view profile Date: Sat, Apr 29 2000 12:00 am Email: buzcutt...@aol.comMJBBITZ (Popeye) Groups: rec.scuba Not yet ratedRating: show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author >I responded after, maybe the 10th or so, and suggested that the >conversation get>back to SCUBA. I did NOT start the thread. . . notice, >even when I'm not participating there, the thread continues. Fish, the reason you and I can't have a rational discussion is because you aren't rational on this subject. The statement you just made above is one of the most bald face lies ever told on Rec.scuba.Your fuckin nose must look like an MX missle. I can, and anyone can, easily prove these facts: Your first post was the sixth in the thread, in which you gave the first of over one hundered opinions on off topic gun control. As of tonight there are 1137 posts in this thread of which you generated about 120, or about ten fuckin percent, out of thirty or forty posters. The most recent of your posts were this Wednesday and Thursday, the 27th and 28th. You have participated in this thread for a God Damn month. You have some sort of compartmented insanity on this subject. You have continually embarrassed yourself with innaccuracy and outright lunacy while posting on this subject, to the point that many comment on your idiocy as a laughing stock. Just stop. Please. Just stop. If you promise not to post one more opinion on gun control, I will, I swear, turn in one handgun to the Gatlinburg Police for disposal. This will be the only act of gun control you will ever intentionally accomplish. If we do this deal, you may not post on gun control, or mention guns even in jest or spite in a non related thread. I will provide irrefutible evidence of the forfiture. Now, in a bitter childlike response eerily reminicent of MJQUACKSTER's embarrassing immature pouts, you drag this sh.t to another thread, posting about OT threads which you regularly participate. You do more harm to handgun control efforts than Charlton Heston. No wonder the NRA has no problem with the political system when defending my rights. Fish, Just Say No!!!! Popeye I Dive, Therefore I Am www.ssminnowcharters.com www.divers-supply.com My favorite dive boat and shop Popeye Listen, strange woman lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Monty Python www.finalprotectivefire.com > 320 From: Popeye - view profile > Date: Tues, Oct 3 2000 12:00 am [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > And, did you notice that the gun control threads are always started by the > Canadians or the British? The recent thread on "received this from a friend (gun deaths)" was started by Chris Guynn - woud that be counted as a gun control thread? > Popeye > Drink and be merry, for life > is short, and death lasts forever. Dennis > > 320 From: Popeye - view profile > > Date: Tues, Oct 3 2000 12:00 am [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > The recent thread on "received this from a friend (gun deaths)" was started > by Chris Guynn - woud that be counted as a gun control thread? Nope, but I am British. ;-) > > Popeye > > Drink and be merry, for life > > is short, and death lasts forever. > > Dennis > > > 320 From: Popeye - view profile > > > Date: Tues, Oct 3 2000 12:00 am [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Nope, but I am British. ;-) I'd no idea - I figured you were, American by birth, Southern by the Grace of God ;-) Dennis > > > > 320 From: Popeye - view profile > > > > Date: Tues, Oct 3 2000 12:00 am [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Dennis That too. Also, I'm more German and Irish than British and I've luckily managed to avoid the "Southern Drawl" so at least I don't sound like a doofus. This is hysterical when I think of chilly telling me how much I "changed and turned on my friends". :-) 9 From: OldSalt - view profile Date: Mon, Jul 31 2000 12:00 am Email: OldSalt <chil...@sent.net> Groups: rec.scuba Not yet ratedRating: show options Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:30:51 -0700, "Scott" <sco...@hctc.removethis.com> wrote and since I have Supernews, it's amazing that I could even see it: >We'll see wont we. BTW, I am not the only person who is in on this >"project" Black, its going to be you against everyone else. Scott...I understand that you and Black are feuding. I also thought I heard you say that he tried to contact your employer. While I disapprove of this and many things Black has said here, I don't think that you are being fair to me ( and some others possibly but I can't speak for them ) when you state that everyone here is in on this "project." I would never get involved in doing anything to anyone here that would hurt them in real life. Please do not imply that everyone on this NG is involved in this thing. I most certainly am not...nor would I help Black if he tried to do the same to **you**. I find this type of behavior borders on "stalking" and I want it clear that I want no parts of it. Things have gone a bit too far IMHO. Reply Rate this post: Text for clearing space > 320 From: Popeye - view profile > Date: Tues, Oct 3 2000 12:00 am [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > And, did you notice that the gun control threads are always started by the > Canadians or the British? http://tinyurl.com/hnntf http://tinyurl.com/j8pup http://tinyurl.com/znz4c http://tinyurl.com/j3acv http://tinyurl.com/fptjj http://tinyurl.com/zapsq http://tinyurl.com/zwmy2 http://tinyurl.com/fyo6t http://tinyurl.com/ecsyk 8) JF >> 320 From: Popeye - view profile >> Date: Tues, Oct 3 2000 12:00 am [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > JF I hate to correct you, as usual, but, Did you find any within the context that was clearly stated? The one that you snipped off in your usual intellectual dishonesty? Have you found any justification for the other two lies you told? Would you like me to post your lies again? In black and white? SignaturePopeye Listen, strange woman lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Monty Python www.finalprotectivefire.com >>> 320 From: Popeye - view profile >>> Date: Tues, Oct 3 2000 12:00 am [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >>> the >>> Canadians or the British? penis envy? > >>> 320 From: Popeye - view profile > >>> Date: Tues, Oct 3 2000 12:00 am [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > penis envy? Why would anyone be envious of a prick? JF > Why would anyone be envious of a prick? Ask Chilly... She's the one who keeps trying to convince herself that multiple orgasms is better than being able to write your name in the snow... >> Why would anyone be envious of a prick? > > Ask Chilly... She's the one who keeps trying to convince herself that > multiple orgasms is better than being able to write your name in the > snow... Do y'all get much snow there in Texas? > >> Why would anyone be envious of a prick? > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Do y'all get much snow there in Texas? They do in the panhandle. Does that count? >> Why would anyone be envious of a prick? > Ask Chilly... She's the one who keeps trying to convince herself that > multiple orgasms is better than being able to write your name in the > snow... Hey, we can have multiple orgasms too. One today, one tomorrow, one the day after . . . Lee >>>>> 320 From: Popeye - view profile >>>>> Date: Tues, Oct 3 2000 12:00 am [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Why would anyone be envious of a prick? we are not jealous. thats a canadian thing. > JF > I hate to correct you, as usual, but, > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > In black and white? I'll bet the grass grows really really fast around your house. And sure, why not. Post what you think I lied about, again. Why only two? You've accused me of lying daily it seems. You really are starting to sound lame. And speaking of lame, get back to me with all the obscure reasons why my cites are invalid. It sure looks to me like you made yerself a liar - again. JF > >> And, did you notice that the gun control threads are always started by > >> the > >> Canadians or the British? > Did you find any within the context that was clearly stated? Which part of "And, did you notice that the gun control threads are always started by the Canadians or the British?" did I misunderstand? JF >> >> And, did you notice that the gun control threads are always started >> >> by [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > always started by the > Canadians or the British?" did I misunderstand? The part, clearly stated twice, where the post was from 6 years ago? SignaturePopeye Listen, strange woman lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Monty Python www.finalprotectivefire.com > The part, clearly stated twice, where the post was from 6 years ago? I see in the header from the old message that it was from 6 years ago and I see by the little arrow thingies that part of it was quoting DB, but it looked to me that your part was new. At least it did until you pointed out the problem and I looked up the original for myself. Perhaps you should learn to put quotes around quotes so as to avoid confusion, unless confusion is the only way you can score points. So what was the point of this thread anyway? You post a quote from 6 years ago with no commentary and we're supposed to read your mind, or were you just hoping to open up another pointless thread about guns so you could vacuously claim another ass-kickin'? JF > > The part, clearly stated twice, where the post was from 6 years ago? > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > were you just hoping to open up another pointless thread about guns so > you could vacuously claim another ass-kickin'? Yep. >> The part, clearly stated twice, where the post was from 6 years ago? > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Perhaps you should learn to put quotes around quotes so as to avoid > confusion, unless confusion is the only way you can score points. John, I get tire of correcting you, leading you by the hand. You're going to have to learn to do some of this for yourself. First, the thread is labeled GOLDEN OLDIES, so, what was your first clue? Then, after your first panty wad, I wrote (complete posts below): > "Woooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwww." > > "How frothy was that?" > > "I just posted an old thread, a statement from 6 -years- ago, 2000, > IIRC." "I just posted an old thread, a statement from 6 -years- ago, 2000, IIRC." "I just posted an old thread, a statement from 6 -years- ago, 2000, IIRC." "I just posted an old thread, a statement from 6 -years- ago, 2000, IIRC." Now, tell us John, was there maaaaaaaaaybe a little hint in there? > "I just posted an old thread, a statement from 6 -years- ago, 2000, > IIRC." "I just posted an old thread, a statement from 6 -years- ago, 2000, IIRC." "I just posted an old thread, a statement from 6 -years- ago, 2000, IIRC." "I just posted an old thread, a statement from 6 -years- ago, 2000, IIRC." -THEN- I posed this: "Feel free to do your own check. Some of the threads run into eachother, some decay into gun threads. I stand by to be corrected, with the appropriate cite, of course. I GAGSd "Gun" for content, Popeye for author, till the date of the post." I GAGSd "Gun" for content, Popeye for author, till the date of the post." I GAGSd "Gun" for content, Popeye for author, till the date of the post." I GAGSd "Gun" for content, Popeye for author, till the date of the post." And anyone with a clue, that checked my cites, would have noticed the dates. I'm sorry, John, really, I can't lead you along any better than that. I can't help it if you made a fool of yourself for the third time in ten days There is a silver lining, though, you actually checked a cite, and corrected your own stupidity. Even if still trying to blame me (but of course, that's nothing new). > So what was the point of this thread anyway? You post a quote from 6 > years ago with no commentary and we're supposed to read your mind, Or the thread title, or thread content, or any of that sh.t. Actually, I was researching the bitchslap for that other lie you told (still waiting, BTW), and came across -several- old posts, and posted them Then, you got frothier than usual, and made yourself like a dumbass. > or > were you just hoping to open up another pointless thread about guns so > you could vacuously claim another ass-kickin'? > > JF Poor John. We're way, way past your "vacuous" claims. Next, having done it twice in ten days, you'll be claiming you don't -scurry-. Besides, this time, you kicked your -own- a.s. I was just here to take the credit. Uh, did you get those other cites yet? "Popeye" <popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message news:... > 320 From: Popeye - view profile > Date: Tues, Oct 3 2000 12:00 am [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Drink and be merry, for life > is short, and death lasts forever. =============================== "Popeye" <popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message news:... >> Popeye wrote: >>> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > Or I should say, put it on your list... =========== Dear Lying John: So sad, too bad: http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q15622AAD http://makeashorterlink.com/?M47621AAD http://makeashorterlink.com/?K4D616AAD http://makeashorterlink.com/?H5F622AAD John Goodwin http://makeashorterlink.com/?D32722AAD Chilly http://makeashorterlink.com/?Y29752AAD ?????????????? http://makeashorterlink.com/?R24823AAD Non-argument gun thread- no Canadians. =========== Feel free to do your own check. Some of the threads run into eachother, some decay into gun threads. I stand by to be corrected, with the appropriate cite, of course. I GAGSd "Gun" for content, Popeye for author, till the date of the post. =========================== "Popeye" <popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message news:... >> Popeye wrote: >>> 320 From: Popeye - view profile [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > In black and white? >> The part, clearly stated twice, where the post was from 6 years ago? "And speaking of lame, get back to me with all the obscure reasons why my cites are invalid. It sure looks to me like you made yerself a liar - again." Here's a John Francis lie, cited by himself. > I see in the header from the old message that it was from 6 years ago > and I see by the little arrow thingies that part of it was quoting DB, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > were you just hoping to open up another pointless thread about guns so > you could vacuously claim another ass-kickin'? "And sure, why not. Post what you think I lied about, again. Why only two? You've accused me of lying daily it seems. You really are starting to sound lame." -JOF WHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEE... > "And sure, why not. Post what you think I lied about, again. Why only > two? You've accused me of lying daily it seems. You really are starting > to sound lame." -JOF > > WHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEE... That pretty much proves my point. JF Popeye wrote: > "And sure, why not. Post what you think I lied about, again. Why only > two? You've accused me of lying daily it seems. You really are starting > to sound lame." -JOF > > WHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEEHEE... That pretty much proves my point. Maybe in some delusional Candia-code. Talk about "vacuous". But John, this part you snipped? About you outing yourself on your own lie? Where you accused me of lying, again, but you were wrong, again? Did you have any comment on that? "JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1157114671.073560.290360@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com... >> The part, clearly stated twice, where the post was from 6 years ago? "And speaking of lame, get back to me with all the obscure reasons why my cites are invalid. It sure looks to me like you made yerself a liar - again." Here's a John Francis lie, cited by himself. > I see in the header from the old message that it was from 6 years ago > and I see by the little arrow thingies that part of it was quoting DB, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > were you just hoping to open up another pointless thread about guns so > you could vacuously claim another ass-kickin'? Popeye You can get much further with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. -Capone www.finalprotectivefire.com > Here's a John Francis lie, cited by himself. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > were you just hoping to open up another pointless thread about guns so > > you could vacuously claim another ass-kickin'? Pkay. I think we're getting somewhere now. The problem appears to be that you don't know what constitutes a lie. Just to help us out here, or me, if I'm the only one confused by your frequent accusations, how is the above a lie? JF >> Here's a John Francis lie, cited by himself. >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Pkay. I think we're getting somewhere now. The problem appears to be > that you don't know what constitutes a lie. Oh, don't worry, you provide plenty of examples. I've been posting others, daily, while you try to pretend they don't exist. Unlike you, I have a cite, and an example, with the accusation. > Just to help us out here, > or me, if I'm the only one confused by your frequent accusations, how > is the above a lie? Like other posts today, you trimmed pertinent context. Here's the lie you trimmed: "And speaking of lame, get back to me with all the obscure reasons why my cites are invalid. It sure looks to me like you made yerself a liar - again." Then you have the audacity to accuse -me- of not knowing what constitutes a lie. ;-) What you left, was you proving that you're a liar. John, stop embarrassing yourself. This what "clubbing the baby seals" is like, eh? SignaturePopeye You can get much further with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. -Capone www.finalprotectivefire.com > This what "clubbing the baby seals" is like, eh? I suspect the baby seals offer better resistance. JF >> This what "clubbing the baby seals" is like, eh? > > I suspect the baby seals offer better resistance. probably true. on the other hand, popeye would not club the baby seals. you just keep on begging. > JF > >> This what "clubbing the baby seals" is like, eh? > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > on the other hand, popeye would not club the baby seals. > you just keep on begging. Careful Bob. You're on the cusp of doing something original. JF >>>> This what "clubbing the baby seals" is like, eh? >>> I suspect the baby seals offer better resistance. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Careful Bob. You're on the cusp of doing something original. you would never know, nor long remember what that meant. you are hardly a beacon of intelligence and comprehension. > JF > > Careful Bob. You're on the cusp of doing something original. > > you would never know, > nor long remember what that meant. Do you have any clue what you just said, cuz I gotta admit it blew right by me. > you are hardly > a beacon of intelligence and comprehension. Damn. Now you sound like the teachers I had for about 18 torturous years. JF >> > Careful Bob. You're on the cusp of doing something original. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Do you have any clue what you just said, cuz I gotta admit it blew > right by me. Another one of those claims that's long been tedious. Everybody else gets it. >> you are hardly >> a beacon of intelligence and comprehension. > > Damn. Now you sound like the teachers I had for about 18 torturous > years. No doubt. Listen, you asked me to cite some of your lies, and I have over and over. Were you going to respond to any of them? Here's another one of them, which you have repeated several times: 28 From: Popeye - view profile Date: Thurs, Apr 13 2006 1:16 am Email: "Popeye" <Pop...@Finalprotectivefire.com> Groups: rec.scuba "JOF" <jofran...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ppfr329uebfj5m4rthc54sbdlu1ahj0e1u@4ax.com... >> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:15:08 -0400, "Popeye" >> <Pop...@Finalprotectivefire.com> wrote: >>> You're as much of a liar as Francis is. >> I've come to realize that to you anyone who disagrees with you is a de >> facto liar. Must be tough to live in a world filled with liars. >Actually... >That's a lie. >It's also been evidenced thoroughly, recently, and repeatedly here. >Must be tough to live in a world filled with delusions. >>> Careful Bob. You're on the cusp of doing something original. >> you would never know, >> nor long remember what that meant. > > Do you have any clue what you just said, cuz I gotta admit it blew > right by me. (not surprising...) >> you are hardly >> a beacon of intelligence and comprehension. > > Damn. Now you sound like the teachers I had for about 18 torturous > years. and you succeeded in ignoring most of what they tried to teach you. also not surprising... > JF > > Do you have any clue what you just said, cuz I gotta admit it blew > > right by me. > > (not surprising...) It's how I usually react to some moron trying to blow smoke up my a.s. > >> you are hardly > >> a beacon of intelligence and comprehension. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > also not surprising... No. I absorbed it, and eventually understood it. The difference is that my teachers actually knew what they were talking about. It just took me a while to figure that out. JF >> > Do you have any clue what you just said, cuz I gotta admit it blew >> > right by me. >> >> (not surprising...) > > It's how I usually react to some moron trying to blow smoke up my a.s. Check. With your perception, it must be a perpetual state. >> >> you are hardly >> >> a beacon of intelligence and comprehension. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > my teachers actually knew what they were talking about. It just took me > a while to figure that out. Hasn't seemed to help here. SignaturePopeye You can get much further with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. -Capone www.finalprotectivefire.com >>> Do you have any clue what you just said, cuz I gotta admit it blew >>> right by me. >> (not surprising...) > > It's how I usually react to some moron trying to blow smoke up my a.s. again, lacking any understanding. mostly concerned with your a.s. not surprising... >>>> you are hardly >>>> a beacon of intelligence and comprehension. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > my teachers actually knew what they were talking about. It just took me > a while to figure that out. your conduct here does not support that. here you show little ability to communicate and understand. just illogical yammering on and on. and it also appears here that you can not remember what others said before, much less what you yourself said before. perhaps you pay little attention to your posts. many others here also pay little attention to your posts. they just do not inspire attention. > JF > perhaps you pay little attention to your posts. > many others here also pay little attention to your posts. > > they just do not inspire attention. But I sure seem to have yours and Popeye's, in spades. What does that tell you? JF >> perhaps you pay little attention to your posts. >> many others here also pay little attention to your posts. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > But I sure seem to have yours and Popeye's, in spades. What does that > tell you? It would tell me about your rose colored glasses, but there's nothing left for you to tell. Neither am I "inspired" to attend your posts any more than I'm periodically "inspired" to urinate. A simple and somewhat necessary chore to be periodically attended to. SignaturePopeye You can get much further with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. -Capone www.finalprotectivefire.com > And, did you notice that the gun control threads are always started by the > Canadians or the British? I started this one. Lee >Is it the touching pictures of the little seals' huge eyes, their apparent >lack of resistance to being killed, or just that it's one of the myriad >nasty things done by man that can be blamed on a very isolated and small >group of individuals therefore safely distancing the critics from the >likelihood of accusations of hypocrisy. Oh. You mean like handgun crime? What a fuckin hypocritical a.shole you are. 201 From: Popeye - view profile Date: Mon, Feb 6 2006 10:56 pm Email: "Popeye" <Pop...@Finalprotectivefire.com> Groups: rec.scuba "JOF" <jofran...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ti0gu1h1m12qis2g5tl6nk7u625dkepccm@4ax.com... > On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 01:57:57 +0100, Matthias Voss <spammat.v...@gmx.de> > wrote: >>I'd love to have one from me when training fast roping technique at a >>greenpeace training camp in Hamburg. > "Greenpeace training camp"? That explains the fervour with which you > defend the other terrorists. Mercy. mercy. Ah god. Stop it. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahahaahahha aplllllelpleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaseses Maybe Canadian Special Forces can go after their fuckin -boat-. Oh. Wait. They'd be fuckin out gunned. WWWWWhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo............HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhhoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.... Oh. Hey. Seal Teams. Get it? SEAL TEAMS. S E A L T E A M S !!!! AaaahhhhhhHAHAHAHA. HA HA HA ha ha. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.Please.Please. I cant teka much more. Yar killin me.>> JF>> |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.