Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Buddy check - do you check your buddies air?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
bluNOboxSPAMthief - 28 Aug 2006 12:12 GMT
Hi,

Slightly philosophical question (maybe even stupid? but
I'll found out soon enough)..

Do you check your buddie's air/allow your buddy to check
your air?

Not that I have any issue with it (not at all), but,
to try and draw an example, do parachuters get
their "buddy" to check their chute before they jump?

I'll put on my flame retardent suite and wait for replies.

thanks
bBt
Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 13:12 GMT
What the hell are we supposed to call you?

> Do you check your buddie's air . . .

Sometimes.  It's relatively easy to do unobtrusively.  You just take a look
as you swim by.  On occasion, when I both want to know and want to be sure
my buddy is monitoring his own gas, I'm a bit more obviou.

> allow your buddy to check your air?

For most configurations, it would be difficult to prevent.  Regardless, a
buddy has a right to know how much gas you have available for your own use
or in case you need to share.  It's part of the buddy concept.

On the other hand, someone that does it more than occasionally during a dive
is a lot less likely to be my buddy for subsequent dives.

> Not that I have any issue with it (not at all), but,
> to try and draw an example, do parachuters get
> their "buddy" to check their chute before they jump?

I don't know.  Do they?

Lee
bluNOboxSPAMthief - 28 Aug 2006 14:21 GMT
Hi Lee,

> What the hell are we supposed to call you?

You can call me whatever the hell you like, but I answer to Bernard faster than
anything else ;)

>> Do you check your buddie's air . . .
>
> Sometimes.  It's relatively easy to do unobtrusively.  You just take a look
> as you swim by.  On occasion, when I both want to know and want to be sure
> my buddy is monitoring his own gas, I'm a bit more obviou.

And when you go through a buddy check on land?

>> allow your buddy to check your air?
>
> For most configurations, it would be difficult to prevent.  Regardless, a
> buddy has a right to know how much gas you have available for your own use
> or in case you need to share.  It's part of the buddy concept.

You see whats exactly what I was looking for.

> On the other hand, someone that does it more than occasionally during a dive
> is a lot less likely to be my buddy for subsequent dives.

Yup, I get what you mean.

>> Not that I have any issue with it (not at all), but,
>> to try and draw an example, do parachuters get
>> their "buddy" to check their chute before they jump?
>
> I don't know.  Do they?

I am not willing to take it up to try to find out ;)

Thanks for the answer. As I thought, it's all down to trust. Thats got to be there for
a basis for a good buddy partnership.

thanks for the response.
bernard
Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 16:28 GMT
> You can call me whatever the hell you like, but I answer to Bernard faster
> than
> anything else ;)

Works for me.  I can't even pronounce bluNOboxSPAMthief.

> And when you go through a buddy check on land?

I don't usually do a buddy check on land or on most boat dives.  On the
other hand, on our recent spearfishing trip, I checked my gas and the gas
used by three other divers (I had the only O2 analyzer) and set my buddy's
computer before every dive.  This was his first year using nitrox and his
computer, which is the same as mine, resets to 78% nitrogen 50% oxygen 10
minutes after any nitrox dive.  You have to reset it each time.  So, on that
trip, I knew my predive pressure and theirs for all 16 dives.

> I am not willing to take it up to try to find out ;)

Me neither.  I truly enjoy things that scare me a bit, but I have to be in
control of the risk elements.  I don't feel like I can control whether the
chute opens or not.

Lee
Greg Mossman - 28 Aug 2006 19:59 GMT
> Me neither.  I truly enjoy things that scare me a bit, but I have to be in
> control of the risk elements.  I don't feel like I can control whether the
> chute opens or not.

I take it you don't ever fly as a passenger either?  It sucks to be under
the control of a commercial pilot who can't even figure out which runway to
take.
Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 22:43 GMT
> I take it you don't ever fly as a passenger either?  It sucks to be under
> the control of a commercial pilot who can't even figure out which runway
> to take.

Flying doesn't scare me, so I don't need to be in control.

Besides, I don't have to worry.  I only fly Comair.  They'd never make a
mistake like that.  8^(

Lee
Limey - 29 Aug 2006 04:08 GMT
>> Me neither.  I truly enjoy things that scare me a bit, but I have to be
>> in control of the risk elements.  I don't feel like I can control whether
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the control of a commercial pilot who can't even figure out which runway
> to take.

You're flying with the wrong commecial pilots!

LD.
Greg Mossman - 30 Aug 2006 17:20 GMT
>>> Me neither.  I truly enjoy things that scare me a bit, but I have to be
>>> in control of the risk elements.  I don't feel like I can control
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>
> You're flying with the wrong commecial pilots!

I've never flown Comair, never plan to, and now there's 48 others that never
will fly with them again.

"Polehinke's mother, Honey Jackson, said her son is not to blame for the
crash, and she asked people to be patient until all the facts were
revealed."

What kind of guy has a mother named Honey?
Limey - 02 Sep 2006 00:45 GMT
>>>> Me neither.  I truly enjoy things that scare me a bit, but I have to be
>>>> in control of the risk elements.  I don't feel like I can control
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> What kind of guy has a mother named Honey?

A guy named Polehinke?

LD.
bluNOboxSPAMthief - 28 Aug 2006 20:10 GMT
> Works for me.  I can't even pronounce bluNOboxSPAMthief.

Take out the NO and SPAM. Its a nickname from um, a long time ago..

> I don't usually do a buddy check on land or on most boat dives.  On the
> other hand, on our recent spearfishing trip, I checked my gas and the gas
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> minutes after any nitrox dive.  You have to reset it each time.  So, on that
> trip, I knew my predive pressure and theirs for all 16 dives.

Right, so you were the more experienced of the dive group.  If you dive with less experienced
divers, you do buddy checks?

> Me neither.  I truly enjoy things that scare me a bit, but I have to be in
> control of the risk elements.  I don't feel like I can control whether the
> chute opens or not.

But with diving, you can check your own gear..

ok, thanks for the responses guys.

bernard
Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 22:47 GMT
>> I don't usually do a buddy check on land or on most boat dives.  On the
>> other hand, on our recent spearfishing trip, I checked my gas and the gas
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> that
>> trip, I knew my predive pressure and theirs for all 16 dives.

> Right, so you were the more experienced of the dive group.  If you dive
> with less experienced
> divers, you do buddy checks?

Actually, it was close to a tie.  I rarely dive with anyone who's been
diving longer.  I've been at it since 1962.  Most people I dive with,
however, are very good diver.  My buddy on the spearfishing trips is the
lead diver on a local police dive team.  The other two divers have been
doing the trip two or three times as long as I have.  None of us are what
you'd call novices.  All four of us took our nitrox course together.  I
probably dive it more often than the other three, but only one, my buddy,
was relatively inexperienced in doing multiple dives on nitrox.  The concept
of experience is sometimes hard to pin down.

Lee
Dillon Pyron - 30 Aug 2006 00:13 GMT
Thus spake bluNOboxSPAMthief
<newsgroups-spambaiter@runningIHATEwithSPAMbulls.com> :

>> Works for me.  I can't even pronounce bluNOboxSPAMthief.
>
>Take out the NO and SPAM. Its a nickname from um, a long time ago..

I used to be able to whistle up 2600.  And I still have my Capt Crunch
whistle.

>> I don't usually do a buddy check on land or on most boat dives.  On the
>> other hand, on our recent spearfishing trip, I checked my gas and the gas
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>bernard
Signature

dillon

If you can't figure out how to unmunge my
address, email me and I'll explain it.

bluNOboxSPAMthief - 03 Sep 2006 23:10 GMT
>>> Works for me.  I can't even pronounce bluNOboxSPAMthief.
>>
>>Take out the NO and SPAM. Its a nickname from um, a long time ago..
>
> I used to be able to whistle up 2600.  And I still have my Capt Crunch
> whistle.

hea cool dillon.

I come from the era (and country) of no capt crunch whistles.

I managed to get my nick from knicking a linesman handset (beigebox)
out of the back of a telco van.

While it wasn't a proper beigebox, it was blue :)

And now everyone is lost :)
b
Popeye - 04 Sep 2006 00:01 GMT
>>>> Works for me.  I can't even pronounce bluNOboxSPAMthief.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> And now everyone is lost :)
> b

 You got your nickname because you nicked/swiped/thieved a blue linemans'
handset from a telecommunications van?

 No problem for those for us with basic reading comprehension. :-)
Dillon Pyron - 05 Sep 2006 07:12 GMT
Thus spake bluNOboxSPAMthief
<newsgroups-spambaiter@runningIHATEwithSPAMbulls.com> :

>>>> Works for me.  I can't even pronounce bluNOboxSPAMthief.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>And now everyone is lost :)
>b

I've got a blue handset.  Use it in security assessments.  I'm always
amazed at the number of companies that have unlocked telco closets.
Signature

dillon

If you can't figure out how to unmunge my
address, email me and I'll explain it.

bluNOboxSPAMthief - 05 Sep 2006 15:44 GMT
> Thus spake bluNOboxSPAMthief
><newsgroups-spambaiter@runningIHATEwithSPAMbulls.com> :
>
> I've got a blue handset.  Use it in security assessments.  I'm always
> amazed at the number of companies that have unlocked telco closets.

Try having your national Telco using a standard triangular key to lock their
cabs! And leaving yellow security jackets inside themÂ!

Its probably the same make as mine.

b
Limey - 28 Aug 2006 19:10 GMT
> And when you go through a buddy check on land?

I don't usually do them, period. I check my gear and most, if not all divers
I know check theirs.
If you dive from a boat in Florida, either the dm or the deck-hand will
"usually" check yer air is turned on as they help you to the platform.

LD.
bluNOboxSPAMthief - 28 Aug 2006 20:14 GMT
>> And when you go through a buddy check on land?
>>
> I don't usually do them, period. I check my gear and most, if not all divers
> I know check theirs.
> If you dive from a boat in Florida, either the dm or the deck-hand will
> "usually" check yer air is turned on as they help you to the platform.

thanks good to know.

bernard
Limey - 29 Aug 2006 03:52 GMT
>>> And when you go through a buddy check on land?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> thanks good to know.

np, but having said that......don't assume somebody else will *ever* check
anything as well as you will.

LD.
Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 22:39 GMT
> I don't usually do them, period. I check my gear and most, if not all
> divers I know check theirs.
> If you dive from a boat in Florida, either the dm or the deck-hand will
> "usually" check yer air is turned on as they help you to the platform.

One of the guys I used to dive with fairly often, had the valves from his
manifold on his tanks.  For those that aren't familiar with manifolds, the
valve handles point in opposite directions.  One is different from what DMs
usually see.  On this particular day, the DM got confused and turned the
guy's gas off instead of on.  Lucky for everyone involved, he practices
shutdowns and knew he could reach the valve underwater.

Lee
Limey - 29 Aug 2006 03:56 GMT
>> I don't usually do them, period. I check my gear and most, if not all
>> divers I know check theirs.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> the guy's gas off instead of on.  Lucky for everyone involved, he
> practices shutdowns and knew he could reach the valve underwater.

You may or may not know, Curtis certainly does..... the tanks I own both
have H valves, one is left handed and one right. Either way, one of the
things I give Capt. PADI (if that is AJ) credit for, is looking at them and
saying, "Hey, if you know it's on, I tust ya".
I liked that about him too. Hands off!

LD.
Lee Bell - 29 Aug 2006 12:03 GMT
> You may or may not know, Curtis certainly does..... the tanks I own both
> have H valves, one is left handed and one right. Either way, one of the
> things I give Capt. PADI (if that is AJ) credit for, is looking at them
> and saying, "Hey, if you know it's on, I tust ya".
> I liked that about him too. Hands off!

One side of the valves is left handed and one is right handed, or one H
valve is the reverse of the other?

Either way, when I had cause to shut your air off briefly last weekend, I
had to stop and think a minute about which valve did what and which way it
turned.

Lee
Magilla - 29 Aug 2006 23:38 GMT
>> You may or may not know, Curtis certainly does..... the tanks I own both
>> have H valves, one is left handed and one right. Either way, one of the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> had to stop and think a minute about which valve did what and which way it
> turned.

   Think clockwise as you're looking at the valve to close.

   Believe they're about all like that, it's where the left post rolls shut
& the right post rolls open comes from, the "H" closes same as an isolation
valve.

   Hey Limey, oughtta plug that 'H' with a nice shiny first stage.   ;-)

Curtis
Limey - 30 Aug 2006 02:25 GMT
>    Hey Limey, oughtta plug that 'H' with a nice shiny first stage.   ;-)

Yeah, I have one for it. The dive didn't warrant the use this time.  ;)

LD.
Lee Bell - 30 Aug 2006 04:17 GMT
>    Think clockwise as you're looking at the valve to close.

Righty tighty and lefty loosey works just fine.  First I had to figure out
which valve to turn and then had to decide which way to turn it.  I got it
right, but it wasn't automatic.  Besides, when you're turning a buddy's air
on or off, how many times are you looking at the end of the valve you're
using?  8^)

Lee
Limey - 30 Aug 2006 02:25 GMT
>> You may or may not know, Curtis certainly does..... the tanks I own both
>> have H valves, one is left handed and one right. Either way, one of the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> One side of the valves is left handed and one is right handed, or one H
> valve is the reverse of the other?

Yeah, I put that poorly. They are both regular on/ off wise, but one mirrors
the other in set-up.

> Either way, when I had cause to shut your air off briefly last weekend, I
> had to stop and think a minute about which valve did what and which way it
> turned.

Yeah, the point. AJ knew well enough to leave it alone.

LD.
Lee Bell - 30 Aug 2006 04:13 GMT
> Yeah, I put that poorly. They are both regular on/ off wise, but one
mirrors
> the other in set-up.

Why is that?  Are they designed to be used like a manifold?

> Yeah, the point. AJ knew well enough to leave it alone.

AJ was the captain, right?  If so, what was the mate's name?

Lee
Limey - 30 Aug 2006 14:15 GMT
> > Yeah, I put that poorly. They are both regular on/ off wise, but one
> mirrors
>> the other in set-up.
>
> Why is that?  Are they designed to be used like a manifold?

Yup, they were originally manifolded.

>> Yeah, the point. AJ knew well enough to leave it alone.
>
> AJ was the captain, right?  If so, what was the mate's name?

AJ was the Capt, yes. The mate? I have no clue.

LD.
Lee Bell - 30 Aug 2006 14:51 GMT
>> > Yeah, I put that poorly. They are both regular on/ off wise, but one
>> > mirrors the other in set-up.

>> Why is that?  Are they designed to be used like a manifold?

> Yup, they were originally manifolded.

I'll have to look more closely next time.  Are the second valves an
addition, attached where the manifold would normally be or was the
attachment something different?  Do you have the rest of the manifold?

I can't imagine picking up twin, overfilled 120s.  You'll have to get a
Tommy Lift for the truck.

Lee
Limey - 02 Sep 2006 00:45 GMT
>>> > Yeah, I put that poorly. They are both regular on/ off wise, but one
>>> > mirrors the other in set-up.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> addition, attached where the manifold would normally be or was the
> attachment something different?  Do you have the rest of the manifold?

Yes, no and no.

> I can't imagine picking up twin, overfilled 120s.  You'll have to get a
> Tommy Lift for the truck.

As you can probably guess, Curtis had something to do with me obtaining
them.  ;)

LD.
Magilla - 02 Sep 2006 02:50 GMT
>> I can't imagine picking up twin, overfilled 120s.  You'll have to get a
>> Tommy Lift for the truck.

> As you can probably guess, Curtis had something to do with me obtaining
> them.  ;)

   Hell, them bitty little HP 120s, try my LP 125s on for size.

   Guarantee with them, we could have both done the whole mile swim
underwater, with you on the long hose.

Curtis
Limey - 02 Sep 2006 13:35 GMT
>>> I can't imagine picking up twin, overfilled 120s.  You'll have to get a
>>> Tommy Lift for the truck.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>    Hell, them bitty little HP 120s, try my LP 125s on for size.

No thanks, I already know the size. I'm too small!

>    Guarantee with them, we could have both done the whole mile swim
> underwater, with you on the long hose.

Yeah, a personal bodyguard/ Hokkah system. That's what I need!  ;0)

LD.
ben bradlee - 28 Aug 2006 15:28 GMT
> What the hell are we supposed to call you?

Anything you want.  That's one of the great things about this group.
Members make up names and information for other posters.  Just use what you
feel comfortable with.
Popeye - 28 Aug 2006 15:55 GMT
>> What the hell are we supposed to call you?
>
> Anything you want.  That's one of the great things about this group.
> Members make up names and information for other posters.  Just use what
> you feel comfortable with.

 Like Dr. Quack or the Sheepmeister?

 You always seem to get upset when we do that.

 Baaaaaaaaaaaad Kenny.

 Baaaaaaaaad.
ben bradlee - 28 Aug 2006 19:12 GMT
>  Like?

You're limited by your imagination.
Popeye - 28 Aug 2006 20:58 GMT
>>  Like?
>
> You're limited by your imagination.

 I'm glad for it, too, as opposed to being limited only by one's delusions,
like you and Francis.

 Trimming replies for context, and then responding to them, is the second
to last bastion of the absolute whining usenet bitch.

Signature

                                        Popeye

        Listen, strange woman lying in ponds distributing swords
         is no basis for a system of government.  Monty Python
                            www.finalprotectivefire.com

ben bradlee - 29 Aug 2006 00:05 GMT
>  Trimming replies for context, and then responding to them, is the second
> to last bastion of the absolute whining usenet bitch.

With number one being?  Oh, cross-posting from a trucker group to rec.scuba.
Popeye - 29 Aug 2006 00:12 GMT
>>  Trimming replies for context, and then responding to them, is the second
>> to last bastion of the absolute whining usenet bitch.
>
> With number one being?  Oh, cross-posting from a trucker group to
> rec.scuba.

 I was gonna say, posting for ten years under an assumed name, when
everybody already knows your real name anyway...

 Kenny...

 But to each his own.
Grumman-581 - 29 Aug 2006 21:16 GMT
>   Trimming replies for context, and then responding to them, is the second
> to last bastion of the absolute whining usenet bitch.

Do you mean "trimming replies OUT OF context", perhaps?
Limey - 28 Aug 2006 19:10 GMT
> What the hell are we supposed to call you?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> look as you swim by.  On occasion, when I both want to know and want to be
> sure my buddy is monitoring his own gas, I'm a bit more obviou.

I assumed he meant check "air is on" before entering the water. During the
dive, I will glance at the spg of another diver if it's convenient, and
depending on the type of diver and the type of dive. I asked Curtis (by
pointing at my spg, then at him) yesterday 'during' but that was because I
knew he started with less gas than either of us and he'd likely be low
first. I wanted to do the swim in on the bottom but it didn't end up making
much difference.

LD.
bluNOboxSPAMthief - 28 Aug 2006 20:16 GMT
> I assumed he meant check "air is on" before entering the water.

that is actually what I meant but, the other discussion is useful too.

During the
> dive, I will glance at the spg of another diver if it's convenient, and
> depending on the type of diver and the type of dive. I asked Curtis (by
> pointing at my spg, then at him) yesterday 'during' but that was because I
> knew he started with less gas than either of us and he'd likely be low
> first. I wanted to do the swim in on the bottom but it didn't end up making
> much difference.

thanks,
bernard
Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 22:36 GMT
> I assumed he meant check "air is on" before entering the water. During the
> dive, I will glance at the spg of another diver if it's convenient, and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> first. I wanted to do the swim in on the bottom but it didn't end up
> making much difference.

It's now clear that you were right and I wasn't.  Still, it's been an
interesting discussion and it's not over yet.

Assuming you were wearing your 120, that it's rated for 3,000 psi and that
you started with 2,500, you and I had the same amount of gas at the
beginning of the dive.  I was using one of my HP 100s.  If I recall Curtis's
starting pressure, and did the math right, he began the dive with only 64
cubic feet of gas.  He would have been better off, gas wise, if he had used
one of Rick's 80s.

Lee
Limey - 29 Aug 2006 03:50 GMT
>> I assumed he meant check "air is on" before entering the water. During
>> the dive, I will glance at the spg of another diver if it's convenient,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> It's now clear that you were right and I wasn't.  Still, it's been an
> interesting discussion and it's not over yet.

We're friends....there's no 'right or wrong'. And there are many valid
points, if we choose to listen. (don't forget the smiley  ;)  )

> Assuming you were wearing your 120, that it's rated for 3,000 psi and that
> you started with 2,500, you and I had the same amount of gas at the
> beginning of the dive.  I was using one of my HP 100s.  If I recall
> Curtis's starting pressure, and did the math right, he began the dive with
> only 64 cubic feet of gas.  He would have been better off, gas wise, if he
> had used one of Rick's 80s.

There's more than one assumption in there that's incorrect so we'll discuss
the rest over rum tomorrow.   ;0)

LD.
Popeye - 28 Aug 2006 13:49 GMT
> Hi,
>
> Slightly philosophical question (maybe even stupid? but
> I'll found out soon enough)..

 -Great- question, even for experienced divers.

> Do you check your buddie's air/allow your buddy to check
> your air?

 I have a couple home made handsignals that I share with buddies.

 One, tapping my own regulator, is a signal to check your SPG and see what
it reads.

 Then you signal me "OK", or an amount, with the correct one handed hand
signal.

 I don't care what the amount is, I only care that I know you know.

 In some instances, if you're a dumbass, I will swim over, yank your SPG
out of its stowed position, and read it myself.

 This would wisely be interpreted as a signal that you should check it more
often.

 Conversely, while no one checks mine, I wouldn't mind a whit if they did.

 The way my rig is set up, I can see my SPG at all times, handsfree.

> Not that I have any issue with it (not at all), but,
> to try and draw an example, do parachuters get
> their "buddy" to check their chute before they jump?

 In the military, every single time.

 Civilian sky divers, I haven't a clue.

 When I dive with a new diver, I check their gear completely, and explain
how mine works.

 When I dive with a different, but experienced diver, the first time, I
mutter a quick appropriate sentence for good form.

> I'll put on my flame retardent suite and wait for replies.

Signature

                                        Popeye

        Listen, strange woman lying in ponds distributing swords
         is no basis for a system of government.  Monty Python
                            www.finalprotectivefire.com

Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 13:55 GMT
> One, tapping my own regulator, is a signal to check your SPG and see what
> it reads.

Interesting.  I'd not get the meaning.  If you were to do the same with your
SPG, I'd know right away.  Perhaps it's another reason for my preference for
analog SPGs.

>  Conversely, while no one checks mine, I wouldn't mind a whit if they did.

Just goes to show you're not as observant as you thought.  I've checked
yours several times even though I don't think we've ever, technically, been
buddies.  Hell, I checked yours several times during one dive.  It was the
time we were on the Grove and you were having some equipment issue, I've
forgotten what.

Lee
Popeye - 28 Aug 2006 15:12 GMT
>> One, tapping my own regulator, is a signal to check your SPG and see what
>> it reads.
>
> Interesting.  I'd not get the meaning.  If you were to do the same with
> your SPG, I'd know right away.  Perhaps it's another reason for my
> preference for analog SPGs.

 I go over it pre-dive, if we're buddies.

>>  Conversely, while no one checks mine, I wouldn't mind a whit if they
>> did.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> was the time we were on the Grove and you were having some equipment
> issue, I've forgotten what.

 I don't think it was me.

 I know on the first trip, you and Curtis were nowhere near me (60 ft
deeper, IIRC).

 I had my friend from Dallas with me, no dives in 5 years.

 In before me, out after me.

 You guys always go low and long.

 On the second, maybe on safety stop, but I don't remember having a
(memorable) gear problem on either trip.

 On the other hand, just as long as I'm getting a semi-usable amount of
air, I'm pretty unconcerned.

 No, cause that's when the guy was injured, and we were up on top waiting
for you and Curtis.

 The way my SPG stows (left armpit, clipped to chest d-ring, facing my
chin), the only way you could possibly see it is if you were above me on the
right, looking down past my right ear and chin.

 You couldn't see it from below, directly above, or to the left.

 But what I meant was, if someone swam up and grabbed it, I wouldn't be
offended.

> Lee
Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 18:18 GMT
>  I don't think it was me.

I'm sure of it.  I just don't remember what the issue was.  It wasn't
anything major or you wouldn't have been there.  I wasn't with you the
entire dive, I just came by to see that everything was still fine a few
times during the dive.

>  The way my SPG stows (left armpit, clipped to chest d-ring, facing my
> chin), the only way you could possibly see it is if you were above me on
> the right, looking down past my right ear and chin.

Where there's a will, there's a way.

> But what I meant was, if someone swam up and grabbed it, I wouldn't be
> offended.

I understood.

Lee
Popeye - 28 Aug 2006 18:52 GMT
>>  I don't think it was me.
>
> I'm sure of it.  I just don't remember what the issue was.  It wasn't
> anything major or you wouldn't have been there.  I wasn't with you the
> entire dive, I just came by to see that everything was still fine a few
> times during the dive.

  Well, thank you!  :-)

>>  The way my SPG stows (left armpit, clipped to chest d-ring, facing my
>> chin), the only way you could possibly see it is if you were above me on
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> I understood.
Signature


                                        Popeye

        Listen, strange woman lying in ponds distributing swords
         is no basis for a system of government.  Monty Python
                            www.finalprotectivefire.com

Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 22:29 GMT
>   Well, thank you!  :-)

Well, you're welcome.  That's what friends are for.

Lee
Grumman-581 - 28 Aug 2006 19:16 GMT
>   The way my SPG stows (left armpit, clipped to chest d-ring, facing my
> chin), the only way you could possibly see it is if you were above me on the
> right, looking down past my right ear and chin.

I remember quite a few years ago, some SPGs were manufactured such
that the hose screwed into the back of the SPG housing (i.e. opposite
of the dial) instead of on the bottom of the housing like you see
these days... Seems that that sort of SPG would be better for clipping
off to a D-ring and automatically being lined up at the right viewing
angle...
Popeye - 28 Aug 2006 21:05 GMT
>>   The way my SPG stows (left armpit, clipped to chest d-ring, facing my
>> chin), the only way you could possibly see it is if you were above me on
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> off to a D-ring and automatically being lined up at the right viewing
> angle...

 The way my rig is set, that wouldn't work.

 Or maybe it's my chest and shoulder geometry.

 What you describe would, on me, face the gauge straight to the front.
Signature


                                        Popeye

        Listen, strange woman lying in ponds distributing swords
         is no basis for a system of government.  Monty Python
                            www.finalprotectivefire.com

bluNOboxSPAMthief - 28 Aug 2006 14:31 GMT
>   -Great- question, even for experienced divers.

Not something that I am just yet. But I hope to be.

>   I have a couple home made handsignals that I share with buddies.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>   I don't care what the amount is, I only care that I know you know.

While I see the logic of tapping your regulator, the signal that our instructor
(at least in the AOW) has used, is signal your attention (usually by banging on his
on his tank), gesture to his SPG, and then two fingers on the palm of his opened hand.

This may be 2 seperate movements, while yours is one, but I have gotten to understand it.

Most important thing I guess is that you and your buddy understand the signals.

>   In some instances, if you're a dumbass, I will swim over, yank your SPG
> out of its stowed position, and read it myself.
>
>   This would wisely be interpreted as a signal that you should check it more
> often.

And be followed with "hmm, no I can't make it this weekend, I am, um, watching paint
dry". ;)

>   Conversely, while no one checks mine, I wouldn't mind a whit if they did.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>   Civilian sky divers, I haven't a clue.

Ok, this is good to know.

My reasoning behind *not* having a buddy check my air (up-top during pre-dive buddy
check) was some mental thought of, "if my buddy makes a mistake, then I am in trouble".

But as mentioned earlier, it has to be down to trust..

>   When I dive with a new diver, I check their gear completely, and explain
> how mine works.
>
>   When I dive with a different, but experienced diver, the first time, I
> mutter a quick appropriate sentence for good form.

But you do mention it. And they check it?

I know it may sound strange, but its just a question (what do "experienced" divers do?)
I ask myself a few times.

thanks for the reply,
bernard
Popeye - 28 Aug 2006 15:43 GMT
> My reasoning behind *not* having a buddy check my air (up-top during
> pre-dive buddy
> check) was some mental thought of, "if my buddy makes a mistake, then I am
> in trouble".

 The thing is, you should -both- check it, not one or the other.

 Your problems will be your buddy's, and vice-versa.

> But as mentioned earlier, it has to be down to trust..

 Bullshit.

 Trust, but verify.

 Trust in God, but keep your powder dry.

 In the movie "The Professional", there's a great line.

 The shooter picks up a weapon from his friend.

 The friend says "you want to check that".

 The shooter says "no problem, I trust you".

 And the friend says:

 "ONE THING'S GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH THE OTHER".

 If you run out of air, it'd -your- problem.

 If your buddy runs out of air, he's going to -make- it your problem.

 Both should check both, and then be happy when the mate checks it as well.

>>   When I dive with a new diver, I check their gear completely, and
>> explain
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> But you do mention it. And they check it?

 There's guys I dive with here, I don't give it a second thought.

 Not because they're "experienced", but because I know them personally, and
I'm not afraid they'll try to kill me if a problem arises.

 Now for your education today :-), a frequently missed paradigm about
"experienced" divers.

 What if a guy has been diving for 30 years?

 Is he "experienced"?

 What if he has 120 dives in 30 years?

 How experienced is he now?

 What if all those dives are warm water Caribbean dives?

 Does he have more experience than a two year Scapa Flow diver with 50
dives?

 What if your instructor, whom you -assume- is an experienced diver, has
700 dives, mostly with classes in 20-40 feet of water, rarely if ever below
100 feet, no cold water, dark water, overhead or mixed gas experience,

 How "experienced" is he?

 Moral of the story?

 Question, politely if possible, but however necessary, anyone's claim of
"experience".

 And don't worry about your own.

 We don't, if you're at all humble, and everyone here had 4 or 8 or 20
dives at some point.

> I know it may sound strange, but its just a question (what do
> "experienced" divers do?)
> I ask myself a few times.

 Every one has different preferences, you'll have to narrow the question.
:-)

> thanks for the reply,
> bernard
Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 18:20 GMT
>  There's guys I dive with here, I don't give it a second thought.  Not
> because they're "experienced", but because I know them
> personally, and I'm not afraid they'll try to kill me if a problem arises.

8^)

Lee
bluNOboxSPAMthief - 28 Aug 2006 21:09 GMT
>   The thing is, you should -both- check it, not one or the other.
>
>   Your problems will be your buddy's, and vice-versa.

Ok, its starting to sink-in. It was a kinda of bad way to learn.

>> But as mentioned earlier, it has to be down to trust..
>
>   Bullshit.

I guess thats spot-on actually.

>   Trust, but verify.
>
>   Both should check both, and then be happy when the mate checks it as well.

You see this was the part I was having a problem in figuring out. Both check.

>   Not because they're "experienced", but because I know them personally, and
> I'm not afraid they'll try to kill me if a problem arises.
>
>   Now for your education today :-), a frequently missed paradigm about
> "experienced" divers.

<snip>

>   What if your instructor, whom you -assume- is an experienced diver, has
> 700 dives, mostly with classes in 20-40 feet of water, rarely if ever below
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>   We don't, if you're at all humble, and everyone here had 4 or 8 or 20
> dives at some point.

Gotcha. All is relative I guess. I can understand the trust but verify idea.
If you hear someone saying that over and over again in Belize in September, it'll
probably be me ;)

>> I know it may sound strange, but its just a question (what do
>> "experienced" divers do?)
>> I ask myself a few times.
>
>   Every one has different preferences, you'll have to narrow the question.

Diving is a pretty logical sport/pasttime/profession, but somethings I still have
to figure out why. And when you're put in circumstances that you're not at home in
it kinda difficult.

thanks for the explanations and the advice,

bernard
Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 23:07 GMT
Bernard wrote:

> Diving is a pretty logical sport/pasttime/profession, but somethings I
> still have
> to figure out why. And when you're put in circumstances that you're not at
> home in
> it kinda difficult.

You've sure come to the right place to ask your questions.  If there's one
common trait shared by most people in this forum, it's their need to
understand their options and why one is better for them than another.  Some
of what new divers learn in their entry level training isn't quite what it
seems.  Chances are, when that's the case, someone, or several someone's
here will know all about it.

Example, since I know someone will want one.  There's a rule, a hard and
fast rule as taught to most new divers.  Always breathe.  Never hold your
breath.  I'd bet you've heard it already.  The thing is, it's not what it
seems.  Actually, it's a device to keep new divers from holding their breath
while ascending.  There's nothing at all wrong with holding your breath
while you descend.

Lee
John Hanson - 03 Sep 2006 02:48 GMT
>Bernard wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>while ascending.  There's nothing at all wrong with holding your breath
>while you descend.

Or while having your picture taken:-)

http://yohan.northernlinks.com/diving/wpb/ScubaJohn.jpg
Scott - 03 Sep 2006 03:28 GMT
> Or while having your picture taken:-)

> http://yohan.northernlinks.com/diving/wpb/ScubaJohn.jpg

Can you look at that picture and see all the many opportunities for
entaglement?

Dragging your backup and SPG?

The flying hoses, the hanging plastic d-rings on every strap end, ad
infinitum.
Rod - 03 Sep 2006 03:41 GMT
>> Or while having your picture taken:-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>The flying hoses, the hanging plastic d-rings on every strap end, ad
>infinitum.

Dam look at all the stuff hanging all over
JRE - 03 Sep 2006 13:59 GMT
>>Or while having your picture taken:-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> The flying hoses, the hanging plastic d-rings on every strap end, ad
> infinitum.

You mean, compared to *these* guys?

http://gue.com/Galleries/Wakulla/042306/index.html

Especially, check out the 10th and 12th pictures (grin).

(Sorry, couldn't resist.  We're in complete agreement about
unnecessarily dangling gear.  And the guys doing *those* dives have
probably forgotten more than I am ever likely to know!)

John Eells
John Hanson - 03 Sep 2006 16:53 GMT
>> Or while having your picture taken:-)
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>The flying hoses, the hanging plastic d-rings on every strap end, ad
>infinitum.

I've actually added a snap hook to my spg now.
Popeye - 03 Sep 2006 17:45 GMT
>>> Or while having your picture taken:-)
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
> I've actually added a snap hook to my spg now.

 Now put a snaps on your lpi inflator and back up regulator.

 And your thumbs.

 Tuck your back up reg hose under your arm.

http://www.finalprotectivefire.com/fredpix/Largo%20OK.jpg

 Look how closely my hoses are routed

 If you look close, you'll see both my thumbs are in my d-rings, even while
signaling "okay".

 Who ever it was that e-mailed me, that's how you stow your SPG so you can
read it without moving it.

http://www.finalprotectivefire.com/fredpix/PropOK.jpg

 I learned all this stuff here in Rec.scuba, BTW, over a period of years.

Signature

                                Popeye
   You can get much further with a kind word and a gun
        than you can with a kind word alone. -Capone
                     www.finalprotectivefire.com

Lee Bell - 03 Sep 2006 12:32 GMT
>> There's nothing at all wrong with holding your breath while you descend.

> Or while having your picture taken:-)

Yep.

My statement above is actually less to the point than it should have been.
There's nothing wrong with holding your breath if you're not ascending.

There is, of course, always that holding your breath tends to lead to CO2
buildup which, over time, can cause problems of its own.  Holding your
breath repeatedly, without flushing that CO2, often leads to headaches and
other problems and, contrary to what you'd think, results in higher, rather
than lower gas consumption over the duration of the dive.

Lee
Popeye - 03 Sep 2006 12:54 GMT
> Or while having your picture taken:-)
>
> http://yohan.northernlinks.com/diving/wpb/ScubaJohn.jpg

 Would you like constructive advice on your diving?
Limey - 03 Sep 2006 14:08 GMT
>> Or while having your picture taken:-)
>>
>> http://yohan.northernlinks.com/diving/wpb/ScubaJohn.jpg
>
>  Would you like constructive advice on your diving?

I honestly don't know if that was *meant* to be funny.....but I just lost a
mouthfull of OJ.

LD.
Popeye - 03 Sep 2006 15:26 GMT
>>> Or while having your picture taken:-)
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I honestly don't know if that was *meant* to be funny.....but I just lost
> a mouthfull of OJ.

 I was trying to be nice. :-)

 Everybody else beat me to it.
Grumman-581 - 05 Sep 2006 00:09 GMT
> I just lost a mouthfull of OJ.

Uhhhh.... Don't ask, don't tell?
Limey - 12 Sep 2006 15:30 GMT
>> I just lost a mouthfull of OJ.
>
> Uhhhh.... Don't ask, don't tell?

Ewwww, only you.....and maybe me, could've come up with that! ;0)

LD.
bob crownfield - 03 Sep 2006 20:27 GMT
>> Or while having your picture taken:-)
>>
>> http://yohan.northernlinks.com/diving/wpb/ScubaJohn.jpg
>
>   Would you like constructive advice on your diving?

(  get drink and popcorn...  )
dazed and confuzzed - 03 Sep 2006 13:02 GMT
>>Bernard wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> http://yohan.northernlinks.com/diving/wpb/ScubaJohn.jpg

Dangling gear all over.

Not too streamlined.

Signature

“TANSTAAFL”

“All I can say is there had better be some cheese at the end of this maze……”
____________________________________________________________________________

"A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them;
The simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3

Magilla - 03 Sep 2006 13:48 GMT
> Would you like constructive advice on your diving?

> Dangling gear all over.
>
> Not too streamlined.

  Heck, he got to see a pretty good example of  stowed & streamlined, I
remembered my V weight this trip.  All mine needs is a tummy tuck, working
on that one.   :-)

Curtis
Limey - 03 Sep 2006 14:22 GMT
>> Would you like constructive advice on your diving?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> remembered my V weight this trip.  All mine needs is a tummy tuck, working
> on that one.   :-)

I still laugh every time i think of the lead balls.   ;0)
You do know I almost drowned, right?

LD.
Limey - 03 Sep 2006 14:05 GMT
>>Bernard wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> http://yohan.northernlinks.com/diving/wpb/ScubaJohn.jpg

Hey, I recognize that guy!

LD.
Limey - 03 Sep 2006 14:06 GMT
>>Bernard wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> http://yohan.northernlinks.com/diving/wpb/ScubaJohn.jpg

John, say it ten times fast.......
Bubbles 'n' arms, bubbles 'n' arms.

LD.
bluNOboxSPAMthief - 03 Sep 2006 23:32 GMT
> Bernard wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> seems.  Chances are, when that's the case, someone, or several someone's
> here will know all about it.

Thanks to all who replied to my question

I have thought long and hard about this. At the moment we're in Guatemala
before we go diving to Belize.

All the advice and responses have been very valuable.

And I like having plenty of options when something goes wrong :)

bernard
Limey - 29 Aug 2006 04:17 GMT
"bluNOboxSPAMthief" <newsgroups-spambaiter@runningIHATEwithSPAMbulls.com>
wrote >
>>> I know it may sound strange, but its just a question (what do
>>> "experienced" divers do?)
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> home in
> it kinda difficult.

Sorry to throw a spanner in the works but, although it *is* a very logical,
easy-to-digest bookwise sport, it is also a great learning experience. I am
still reconfiguring gear/ techniques after probably over a thousand dives.
Oh, and btw, there's always someone with thousands more!

LD.
bluNOboxSPAMthief - 03 Sep 2006 23:06 GMT
> "bluNOboxSPAMthief" <newsgroups-spambaiter@runningIHATEwithSPAMbulls.com>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> still reconfiguring gear/ techniques after probably over a thousand dives.
> Oh, and btw, there's always someone with thousands more!

Hi Limey,

Well I said logical, I didn't mean in a "follow the steps, dummies to guide" way.

My point is you do something, and if something is needed/changes, then it required a
logical approach to do stuff.

Like underwater engineering :)

bernard
Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 18:13 GMT
Bernard wrote:

> I know it may sound strange, but its just a question (what do
> "experienced" divers do?)

Most of us have had an occasional short fill or been given a tank that's not
been refilled since it was last used.  We've pretty much learned to check
our own gas.  I don't think I've ever done a dive that, sometime before I
stepped to the side of the boat, I didn't open my valve and check the
pressure.  I pretty much assume that others do to.  In other words, I'm not
a real great buddy.  8^)

As for my buddy's lack of air getting me in trouble, that's another issue.
It's possible, but not particularly likely, at least not on a recreational
dive.  First, the buddy has to have a tank that's not full.  I suppose it
happens, but not often.  Then he has to fail to notice that he has less than
a full tank before he is ready to enter the water.  Then he has to fail to
check to ensure he's got gas available from both regulators.  Since the
recommended way to do this is to take a few breaths from each while watching
the pressure gauge, a low pressure tank should be noticed.  Finally, for it
to be a real problem, my buddy also has to run low after I'm low enough that
I can't easily get both of us to the surface safely.  That's a lot of things
to go wrong.  I haven't run out of gas by accident in about 30 years.  I've
done it twice on purpose during that period.

There's been a lot of talk about the complexities of sharing gas, what
regulator you get, how you control it and, if the now unpopular buddy
breathing is still a worthwhile skill.  The fact is, however, that
experienced divers either practice these things or have experienced them in
a real situation.  Two experienced divers are not likely to have much of a
problem getting everything sorted out and if even one of the pair is really
experienced, the odds are, he'll get things sorted out quickly even if his
buddy isn't real calm.  As for buddy breathing, I think it's a viable skill,
the training agencies disagree.  There's no such thing as too many ways to
get out of trouble.

> I ask myself a few times.

Asking yourself what an experienced person would do is not a bad habit, but,
as you can see from the first paragraph, experienced divers don't always do
what they know they should.  Thinking about what you might do is also a good
idea.

Lee
HotRod - 28 Aug 2006 18:49 GMT
Heck. During my third dive class the other day I check my buddies air and he
only had 2000 psi, the tank had been refilled and the dust cap re-fitted to
indicate it was full. I asked the instructor and he swares it wasn't part of
the learning curve. Not much an issue in the pool but a good learning
experience...

> Bernard wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Lee
Lee Bell - 28 Aug 2006 22:28 GMT
> Heck. During my third dive class the other day I check my buddies air and
> he only had 2000 psi, the tank had been refilled and the dust cap
> re-fitted to indicate it was full. I asked the instructor and he swares it
> wasn't part of the learning curve. Not much an issue in the pool but a
> good learning experience...

Beware of the dust cap rule.  It was invented by those that fill tanks, not
by those that use them.  When I'm on a dive boat, where somebody needs to
know which tank is empty and which is full, I honor the convention.
Otherwise, my dust caps serve as . . . well, dust caps.  They're on the
valves when the valves don't have something else in them.

Your SPG tells you how much gas is in a tank.  Don't depend on anything
else, including memory.

I breathe a variety of gases.  At any give point in time, my tanks may
contain pretty much anything from 21% (air) to 50%.  I've got one tank
that's full of O2.  I needed a way to be sure I know what's in each tank
before I put it in the car.  Here's what I came up with.  YMMV.

The tank is filled, hopefully, but not always, with what I requested.  The
fill monkey checks the gas.  If he doesn't do it automatically, then I ask
him to.  It's part of his job.  Then I check it.  If we don't agree, the
difference is resolved while I'm still at the shop.  I've not been wrong
yet, but you never know.  At that time, the fill monkey, or I, put whatever
the shop uses for a sticker on the tank and somebody writes the mix on the
sticker.  Here's where my method gets a bit different.

When I get my tanks home, after they have temperature stabilized and fully
mixed, if you believe they aren't in the shop, I test them again, this time
with my analyzer.  I also check the pressure.  I then remove the shop's
sticker and add my own.  I use yellow duct tape . . . always.  I include the
mix, the pressure and the date.  No shop or boat I know of uses yellow duct
tape, so when I see it there, I know who put it there.  When it's time to
use the tank, I check the sticker, set my computer, plan my dive, whatever,
based on what it says and take the sticker off the tank just before I put my
plate and wing on it.  If I follow my process consistently, which I normally
do, I know what is in the tank if it has a yellow sticker and know I can't
be sure if it doesn't.

Simple, no?

For those that want to be even more anal about it, do some Google searches
until  you come up with the fill, testing and labeling process used by
George Irvine III.  He does what he does for the same reasons I do, but has
an even more detailed process for doing it.  He should.  He also dives to
depths and into places that I don't even consider.

Lee
Art Greenberg - 28 Aug 2006 23:26 GMT
>  take the sticker off the tank just before I put my plate and wing on it.

I do pretty much the same, up to this point. I remove my sticker after I
finish the dive. That way, I don't mark a cylinder as empty while there is
still a chance I won't be using it. I usually set up my gear for the first
dive of the day while the boat is still in the marina. Can't see the ocean
from there, and sometimes, we thumb the dive just outside the inlet.

Signature

Art Greenberg
artg at eclipse dot net

Limey - 29 Aug 2006 11:36 GMT
>>  take the sticker off the tank just before I put my plate and wing on it.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> dive of the day while the boat is still in the marina. Can't see the ocean
> from there, and sometimes, we thumb the dive just outside the inlet.

Same here.

LD.
Limey - 29 Aug 2006 11:35 GMT
>> Heck. During my third dive class the other day I check my buddies air and
>> he only had 2000 psi, the tank had been refilled and the dust cap
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Simple, no?

Yup, great method. But why not leave the duct tape on until after the dive?
That way, if yopu happen to come up earlyy ou may have say, half a tank of
useable gas that you only need put yer reg onto to get the pressure. You
still know the mix and that there's a useable amount from the sticker. Just
a thought.
Lee Bell - 29 Aug 2006 12:25 GMT
> Yup, great method. But why not leave the duct tape on until after the
> dive? That way, if yopu happen to come up earlyy ou may have say, half a
> tank of useable gas that you only need put yer reg onto to get the
> pressure. You still know the mix and that there's a useable amount from
> the sticker. Just a thought.

No particular reason.  When I developed the process, the key focus was that
if there's yellow duct tape on the tank, the writing on the tape is correct.
If there isn't, I have to check, whether it's pressure or mix.  Taking the
tape off just before I use the gas is one way to do that.  Originally, I
thought this out step by step.  These days, I just do it, usually.  Just
doing it is an advantage of experience.  The word "usually" is a
disadvantage of experience.  The key is consistency, not the details.

Lee
Chris Guynn - 30 Aug 2006 21:20 GMT
> Heck. During my third dive class the other day I check my buddies air and he
> only had 2000 psi, the tank had been refilled and the dust cap re-fitted to
> indicate it was full. I asked the instructor and he swares it wasn't part of
> the learning curve. Not much an issue in the pool but a good learning
> experience...

Were you already in teh water when you checked?  If so, maybe your buddy is just a hoover.
bluNOboxSPAMthief - 28 Aug 2006 21:17 GMT
> Bernard wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> pressure.  I pretty much assume that others do to.  In other words, I'm not
> a real great buddy.  8^)

But once you tell people that, I guess its their own outlook? Or is that
*a bad thing*?

*Should* you be checking them?

> As for my buddy's lack of air getting me in trouble, that's another issue.
> It's possible, but not particularly likely, at least not on a recreational
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> the training agencies disagree.  There's no such thing as too many ways to
> get out of trouble.

Why did the Kerry man put on two condoms? To be sure, to be sure.
(You may not get the humour...don't worry..Irish humour:))

>> I ask myself a few times.
>
> Asking yourself what an experienced person would do is not a bad habit, but,
> as you can see from the first paragraph, experienced divers don't always do
> what they know they should.  Thinking about what you might do is also a good
> idea.

The only way I think that I'll be happy we don't have a repeat performance will be
if we *both* check. Trust but verify (sorry its going
to be a mantra from now on).

thanks again,
bernard
Popeye - 28 Aug 2006 22:51 GMT
>> Most of us have had an occasional short fill or been given a tank that's
>> not
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> *Should* you be checking them?

 You'll find that many of us advocate solo diving, which is something that
you might, at this point, be well warned away from by your training agency.

 As an extensively researched and careful decision made by more experienced
divers...

 Speaking for my self, but possibly for the majority, we focus of
forethought, preparedness and self-reliance.

 When two solo-oriented divers dive together, we may not pay quite the same
attention to each other as we would if we were diving with someone who
regularly buddies.

 But make no mistake- when agreed upon before hand, we can and will buddy
by the numbers.

 Conversely also, no scuba diver, who chooses to buddy, should have
the -slightest- objection to you -double- checking his gear.

 Not the slightest objection, just as long as he knows...

 We don't like people touching our gear, either. :-)

 Emphasis on -double- check.

 He should have already checked it thoroughly.

 If he didn't, that's not a good sign.

 If he gets raspy about you doing it, that's -really- bad.

 Be diplomatic, or if necessary, act stupid, and ask, "how does your octo
work?"

 Or, "Cool SPG, can I see it?"

 Or, "Let me check your tank valve, or I'll choke the sh.t out of you".

 You get the idea.
Limey - 29 Aug 2006 11:38 GMT
>  Conversely also, no scuba diver, who chooses to buddy, should have
> the -slightest- objection to you -double- checking his gear.
>
>  Not the slightest objection, just as long as he knows...
>
>  We don't like people touching our gear, either. :-)

Lighten up, Francis!   ;0)

LD.
Popeye - 30 Aug 2006 00:14 GMT
>>  Conversely also, no scuba diver, who chooses to buddy, should have
>> the -slightest- objection to you -double- checking his gear.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> LD.

 :-)

Psycho: The name's Francis Sawyer, but everybody calls me Psycho. Any of you
guys call me Francis, and I'll kill you. You just made the list, buddy.
Also, I don't like no one touching my stuff. So just keep your meathooks
off. If I catch any of you guys in my stuff, I'll kill you. And I don't like
nobody touching me. Any of you homos touch me, and I'll kill you.
Sergeant Hulka: Lighten up, Francis.

Signature

                                        Popeye

        Listen, strange woman lying in ponds distributing swords
         is no basis for a system of government.  Monty Python
                            www.finalprotectivefire.com

Limey - 30 Aug 2006 02:25 GMT
>>>  Conversely also, no scuba diver, who chooses to buddy, should have
>>> the -slightest- objection to you -double- checking his gear.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> you.
> Sergeant Hulka: Lighten up, Francis.

Beautiful performance!
Popeye - 30 Aug 2006 13:07 GMT
> "Popeye" <popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message

>>>>  Conversely also, no scuba diver, who chooses to buddy, should have
>>>> the -slightest- objection to you -double- checking his gear.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>>
> Beautiful performance!

 Sgt. Hulka is one of my personal heroes.

Signature

                                        Popeye

        Listen, strange woman lying in ponds distributing swords
         is no basis for a system of government.  Monty Python
                            www.finalprotectivefire.com

Limey - 30 Aug 2006 14:16 GMT
>> "Popeye" <popeye@finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
>  Sgt. Hulka is one of my personal heroes.

lol, I thought he was *everybody's*?

LD.
Chris Guynn - 30 Aug 2006 22:03 GMT
> >>  Conversely also, no scuba diver, who chooses to buddy, should have
> >> the -slightest- objection to you -double- checking his gear.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> nobody touching me. Any of you homos touch me, and I'll kill you.
> Sergeant Hulka: Lighten up, Francis.

Then again, maybe one of