:Battery life is incredible ... took more than 200 pics, many with flash &
:loads of video and battery still showing full.
> "Rick Hughes" <rick_hughes@btconnect.com> pounded away at his keyboard
> resulting in:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Or maybe your battery indicator doesn't work properly. 200 pics, and
> still fully charged? That seems unrealistic to me.
Modern cameras are pretty amazing at this - especially those at the
so-called "prosumer" end of the market. I have a Nikon D70s, and even
taking a mixture of flash and non flash, and focussing a big lens, the
battery charge lasts at least a thousand exposures. In the year that
I've had it, I think I've charged the battery four, maybe five times -
and I use the camera most weekends.
The tiny little compact cameras are more limited, of course.
Ben

Signature
Ben Panter, Garching, Germany.
Email false, http://www.benpanter.co.uk
or you could try ben at ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Grumman-581 - 06 Sep 2006 07:41 GMT
> The tiny little compact cameras are more limited, of course.
<crossposting-snipped>
Only to the engineering challenged... I built an 8 amp-hr rechargable
battery pack that I use for my digital camera (among other things)... Yeah,
it's a couple extra pounds to carry around with me and a cord connecting it
to the camera, but I definitely do not have to worry about running out of
battery power, even if every shot uses flash... With the 2G memory card, I
don't have to download to the laptop that often anymore either... I get
about 2800 images in full resolution, if I remember correctly...
Bardo - 06 Sep 2006 15:19 GMT
>> "Rick Hughes" <rick_hughes@btconnect.com> pounded away at his keyboard
>> resulting in:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> The tiny little compact cameras are more limited, of course.
The problem with the compact cameras is that they tend to have small
batteries driving very large screens. I've got a little IXUS 65 which has to
continuously drive a large 3.0" screen - it still amazes me that the battery
lasts as long as it does!
Rick Hughes - 06 Sep 2006 17:12 GMT
> The problem with the compact cameras is that they tend to have small
> batteries driving very large screens. I've got a little IXUS 65 which has
> to continuously drive a large 3.0" screen - it still amazes me that the
> battery lasts as long as it does!
Just come back from a weeks diving ... the battery on the F30 is really
amazing, used it on every dive and used the video mode loads ... so screen
on for long periods.
Most of photos used the intelligent flash ..
In total more than 200 pics and 11 videos ... and battery display still
shows full.
I bought a spare battery - and now wish I hadn't bothered .... it really is
very good indeed.
Ken - 06 Sep 2006 18:59 GMT
>> The problem with the compact cameras is that they tend to have small
>> batteries driving very large screens. I've got a little IXUS 65 which has
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I bought a spare battery - and now wish I hadn't bothered .... it really
> is very good indeed.
Yes, absolutely excellent - until it fails. By which time, the (I may be
speaking out of turn here, but it will apply to many if not specifically
THIS camera) dedicated battery which is used in a few models of camera only,
which are bought at a permium as are their dedicated chargers, will no
longer be available as the cameras are no longer made. You are then left
with a camera that WOULD work absolutely perfectly - if only you could power
it up!
That's why I prefer cameras that are powered by stock items such as AA
cells. You can keep up with advances in battery technology simply by
purchasing higher capacity cells as the need arises. In the event you
mistreat your cells as we all do sooner or later, their reduced working life
is not an issue because they are easily and inexpensively replaced. In the
event that your charger fails, just about any (inexpensive) generic charger
will do, and failing that you can also buy a set of alkalines to keep you
going in the remotest parts of the world!
Ken
Rick Hughes - 08 Sep 2006 23:00 GMT
> That's why I prefer cameras that are powered by stock items such as AA
> cells. You can keep up with advances in battery technology simply by
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> charger will do, and failing that you can also buy a set of alkalines to
> keep you going in the remotest parts of the world!
Well as mentioned I have a spare ... so no problem is there ?
Charger failing .... won't even bother taking the charger ... 350 + pictures
per battery ... I ain't ever going to take 700+ pictures.
In years to come ? ... don't really care that much... I seem to change out
my camera every 5 years or so, and batteries have so far never needed
replacing for any of the previous cameras I had in the time I owned them.
I seem to remember reading that any product sold with a CE mark (i.e.
anything sold in EU) has to maintain spares for 10 years.
Ken - 09 Sep 2006 09:54 GMT
>> That's why I prefer cameras that are powered by stock items such as AA
>> cells. You can keep up with advances in battery technology simply by
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Well as mentioned I have a spare ... so no problem is there ?
Bet you forked out more for your spare than you would for a set of AAs!
> Charger failing .... won't even bother taking the charger ... 350 +
> pictures per battery ... I ain't ever going to take 700+ pictures.
Brave man!
> In years to come ? ... don't really care that much... I seem to change out
> my camera every 5 years or so, and batteries have so far never needed
> replacing for any of the previous cameras I had in the time I owned them.
You may wish to change your camera, others may not wish to or might not be
able to afford to. Certain your options are limited if you simply can't use
it, or pass it on to a youngster for them to learn the rudiments.
> I seem to remember reading that any product sold with a CE mark (i.e.
> anything sold in EU) has to maintain spares for 10 years.
. . . which isn't much use if your battery fails next year when you're in
Indonesia - where I suspect you could buy some AAs.
K