Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / August 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Deadliness in the deep - thank you US Navy

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Geo - 29 Jul 2006 00:45 GMT
Thought this was an interesting carry through as there was so much
weeping and gnashing of teeth at the time...

UN says yet to decide on Auschwitz camp renaming

WARSAW (Reuters) - The United Nations said on Friday it would decide
next year whether to rename the Auschwitz death camp, a U.N. World
Heritage site in Poland, to make clear that it was operated by Germans
not Poles.

Earlier this month Poland said it had won approval to change the site's
name from "Auschwitz Concentration Camp" to "the Former Nazi German
Concentration Camp of Auschwitz." But a United Nations spokesman denied
a decision had been made.

Roni Amelan, a press officer at the U.N.'s Paris-based education and
culture arm        UNESCO, said its World Heritage Committee formally
acknowledged Poland's request but that a final decision would only be
taken next year.

"Poland had informed the Committee through UNESCO it wants to change
the name of the concentration camp and the Committee decided that such
a decision would require more consultations internationally," Amelan
told Reuters.

Six decades after the Holocaust, many Poles fear the world is
forgetting that it was German Nazis who set up the Auschwitz death camp
in occupied Poland during World War Two.

More than a million Jews from across Europe died at Nazi hands in
Auschwitz and the linked camp of Birkenau.

Warsaw points to references to "Polish gas chambers" or the "Polish
concentration camps" popping up in world media as evidence Poles are
wrongly portrayed as collaborators in the Nazis' drive to exterminate
European Jewry.

In April, Poland formally asked UNESCO to change the camp's name on the
list of World Heritage sites. After initial reservations, Jewish
organizations and        Israel backed the plan and UNESCO's World
Heritage Committee agreed to consider it.

In a communique following its meeting in Vilnius earlier this month,
the committee said it "welcomed" the proposal but that it needed
further international consultations. It said a final decision would be
made at its next year's meeting.

Warsaw saw the statement as a sign of agreement, prompting Culture
Minister Kazimierz Ujazdowski to call it a "victory for both Poland and
historical truth."

German forces occupying Poland set up Auschwitz in southern Poland in
1940 as a labor camp for Polish prisoners, gradually expanding it into
a vast labor and death camp that became the centerpiece of their plans
to kill all European Jews.

Between 1.2 and 1.5 million people died there, most of them Jews.
Polish political prisoners, Soviet prisoners of war, Gypsies,
homosexuals, people with disabilities and prisoners of conscience or
religious faith were also killed.

Poland has long battled accusations by some Jewish and Western
commentators that Poles were willing Nazi helpers during the war --
accusations driven by documented incidents of Polish anti-Semitism and
complicity in the Holocaust.

Poles argue that such cases were isolated and point out that 3 million
of their ethnic kin perished during the bloody German occupation. Some
were killed for trying to save their Jewish compatriots.

George
Popeye - 29 Jul 2006 00:54 GMT
There wasn't any question on this subject at all, but how does that go?

 It's nice to know you've got Spike and Chester on your mind.

 And that you still honor your Jew-hating champion fondly.

Signature

                                       Popeye
     I like to listen. I have learned a great deal from listening
         carefully. Most people never listen.   -Hemingway
                        www.finalprotectivefire.com

> Thought this was an interesting carry through as there was so much
> weeping and gnashing of teeth at the time...
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
>
> George
Geo - 29 Jul 2006 01:10 GMT
> There wasn't any question on this subject at all, but how does that go?
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>           carefully. Most people never listen.   -Hemingway
>                          www.finalprotectivefire.com

Nice to see you're on the ball, what was it, two minutes before you
leapt up barking mindlessly? Funnily enough, you and Chester never
entered my mind, but the thread context was memorable for its
ignorance.

This is a copy straight from a Reuters article that appeared today, but
of course you know better. What a surprise... And how strange you would
want to instantly dispute the article, probably without bothering to
engage in something so strenuous as reading it.

Mundus Vult Decipi

And of course, "most people never listen".

But you knew that, didn't you.

Pathetic. Resume your usual programming, sparse though may be.

Thanks for playing.

Geo
Popeye - 29 Jul 2006 02:11 GMT
I didn't debate it then or now.

 The most pathetic part of the thread was your pandering to Janez, tell him
I said hello.

Signature

                                       Popeye
     I like to listen. I have learned a great deal from listening
         carefully. Most people never listen.   -Hemingway
                        www.finalprotectivefire.com

>> There wasn't any question on this subject at all, but how does that go?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Geo
Geo - 29 Jul 2006 02:31 GMT
> I didn't debate it then or now.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>           carefully. Most people never listen.   -Hemingway
>                          www.finalprotectivefire.com

Of course you have an excuse for not paying attention. Whether you
choose to debate is irrelevant. You are obviously well schooled:

"All propaganda has to be popular and has to adapt its spiritual level
to the perception of the least intelligent of those towards whom it
intends to direct itself."
-Adolf Hitler

You fit right in. Have a nice day.

As an aside, for a young guy like yourself, prostate cancer frequently
tends to be pretty aggressive. How's it going?

Geo
Popeye - 29 Jul 2006 02:59 GMT
>> I didn't debate it then or now.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> intends to direct itself."
> -Adolf Hitler

 I was never of the opinion Auschwitz was run by the Poles, nor did I state
otherwise.

 Januz clearly stated that all the Jews (men, women, children) that were
killed by Poles were "communist sympathizers", and that Holocaust victims in
general -deserved- (direct quote) what they got.

 You and Francis cheered him on like drunken frat boys.

 It certainly wasn't a shining moment for you here.

 He was your champion, not mine, and your selective memory and application
of the above quote to me instead of him (despite the Godwin violation)
exhibits your same intellectual dishonesty that was rampant throughout the
thread.

> You fit right in. Have a nice day.
>
> As an aside, for a young guy like yourself, prostate cancer frequently
> tends to be pretty aggressive. How's it going?

 Haven't had it checked in over almost two years, but it was almost gone
then. :-)
Geo - 29 Jul 2006 03:32 GMT
>   I was never of the opinion Auschwitz was run by the Poles, nor did I state
> otherwise.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> exhibits your same intellectual dishonesty that was rampant throughout the
> thread.

Check. I don't do either drunken or frat. Its a legitimate quote that
speaks to the point and I could care less about Godwin.

Please speak to the point yourself, not to the propoganda.

I also don't do "bullying" well and you seem to spend most of your time
on here as a bully these days. Januz was just one of your many victims
and was a particularly easy target for you as English was clearly a
second language for him. Before responding, take a quiet moment to
consider why your audience is so sparse now compared to a few years
ago.

"It doesn't require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires to people's minds."
-Samuel Adams

You do a heck of a job as the "tireless minority" and you always did do
"irate" particularly well.

Qudos to you for that, but lets not confuse your heroic efforts with
the truth. If you weren't worried about reality setting in you would
not have been so quick to attack me this evening for posting a totally
neutral news article.

>   Haven't had it checked in over almost two years, but it was almost gone
> then. :-)

You should. They can do a great deal with a rising PSA these days. If
you aren't a member of the Yahoo group "Prostate Cancer Support" you
might consider it. Good people there with an exceptional depth of
knowledge.

If on the other hand your PSA is still undetectable you have my
heartfelt and unconditional congratulations!!!!!!!

Geo
Scott - 29 Jul 2006 04:32 GMT
> You do a heck of a job as the "tireless minority" and you always did do
> "irate" particularly well.

Almost as well as you do senile, jealous Canadian.
Popeye - 29 Jul 2006 06:52 GMT
>>   I was never of the opinion Auschwitz was run by the Poles, nor did I
>> state
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>
> Check. I don't do either drunken or frat.

 It's -all- in black and white, especially your ad hom attacks.

> Its a legitimate quote that
> speaks to the point and I could care less about Godwin.
>
> Please speak to the point yourself, not to the propoganda.
>
> I also don't do "bullying" well

 No sh.t.

>and you seem to spend most of your time
> on here as a bully these days.

 So said Kramer in 99, and then MJB, and then Chilly, and then Salty, and
then Francis.

 Too many others to count.

 Get in line, I've never been any different, and they've each been as bad
or worse, as you've become.

>Januz was just one of your many victims
> and was a particularly easy target for you as English was clearly a
> second language for him. Before responding, take a quiet moment to
> consider why your audience is so sparse now compared to a few years
> ago.

 It's not sparse that I can tell.

 I met my, I dunno, 86th nor 87th Rec.scuban this morning, and may see a
slew of them this weekend, or in the coming week.

 They must like bullies.

 Lots of lame a.ses left for moderated boards that didn't previously exist,
and good riddance.

 Maybe that's where you belong.

> "It doesn't require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
> tireless minority keen to set brush fires to people's minds."
> -Samuel Adams
>
> You do a heck of a job as the "tireless minority" and you always did do
> "irate" particularly well.

 I'll be happy to take that as a compliment.

 And prevail I will.

> Qudos to you for that, but lets not confuse your heroic efforts with
> the truth. If you weren't worried about reality setting in you would
> not have been so quick to attack me this evening for posting a totally
> neutral news article.

 Totally neutral, sure.

 That's why you went to the trouble of posting it under a year old thread
flame thread title.

 What a bullshit artist.

 Stay out of the flame wars, George, it just doesn't work for you.
Scott - 29 Jul 2006 14:15 GMT
>   It's -all- in black and white, especially your ad hom attacks.

Bingo.

>   No sh.t.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>   Get in line, I've never been any different, and they've each been as bad
> or worse, as you've become.

Funny, isnt it? They sling ad hom attacks, throw blankets of sh.t on the
nation and good people that make their lives free, easy, and cheap (almost
no defense budget, the rest of it they screw up all by themselves), and when
we defend against their obvious insults and attempts at self aggrandizement,
we get the bully label.
We have since seen how well their terrorist appeasement plan has worked out
for them.

Better to be a smiling bully than a whimpering pussy.

>   It's not sparse that I can tell.

Thinned out of a few self defined, self important,
wanna-be-intellectual-phony-sophiticate pussies, maybe.

> I met my, I dunno, 86th nor 87th Rec.scuban this morning, and may see a
> slew of them this weekend, or in the coming week.
>
>   They must like bullies.

Obviously more than they like stuffed-shirt pricks from Canada.

> Lots of lame a.ses left for moderated boards that didn't previously exist,
> and good riddance.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>  That's why you went to the trouble of posting it under a year old thread
>  flame thread title.

I saw the header, marked it read, because coming from this a.shole, with
that title, we all knew it was another attempt at another lame cheap shot.

Once you responded to it, then I read it.

>   What a bullshit artist.

Something they put in the water up there makes them stupid and obvious when
they get old.

>   Stay out of the flame wars, George, it just doesn't work for you.
Dennis (Icarus) - 29 Jul 2006 13:47 GMT
<snip>

> Check. I don't do either drunken or frat. Its a legitimate quote that
> speaks to the point and I could care less about Godwin.

Was there any question as to who ran Auschwitaz?

I thought it was more to the point that there were Polish collaborators
helping the Nazis (as there were French, Belgian, Dutch, Austrian, and even
Russian). Heck, many Russians initially welcomed the Nazis as liberators,
until they proved to be worse than the Communists.

> Please speak to the point yourself, not to the propoganda.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> consider why your audience is so sparse now compared to a few years
> ago.

I thought he was a particularly easy target because of his "blame the US for
anything & everything, every time" stance.

<snip>

Dennis
Popeye - 29 Jul 2006 19:58 GMT
> <snip>
>> >
>> Check. I don't do either drunken or frat. Its a legitimate quote that
>> speaks to the point and I could care less about Godwin.
>
> Was there any question as to who ran Auschwitz?

 No, there wasn't.

> I thought it was more to the point that there were Polish collaborators
> helping the Nazis (as there were French, Belgian, Dutch, Austrian, and
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> for
> anything & everything, every time" stance.

 And blame the Polish for nothing.

 From Januz's first post, in a thread that was AA from it's inception,
which George, in his newfound selective memory and intellectual dishonesty,
has conveniently forgotten.

 I could easily cite it, but I have cited each of the above points
previously, and no less than a half dozen times.

 Mr. "attack the neutral post Geo" is perfectly aware of this.

> <snip>
>
> Dennis
Dennis (Icarus) - 29 Jul 2006 20:55 GMT
> > <snip>
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>   No, there wasn't.

<whew> Glad to hear that.

<snip>

> > I thought he was a particularly easy target because of his "blame the US
> > for
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>   Mr. "attack the neutral post Geo" is perfectly aware of this.

Guess its too bad there's dejanews (now Google groups) hmm? :-)

Dennis
janusz_w@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2006 12:27 GMT
> > <snip>
> >> >
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> which George, in his newfound selective memory and intellectual dishonesty,
> has conveniently forgotten.

Selective memory is still your speciality, Chief. Go back and read my
first post (or ask somebody who can read to help you).

>   I could easily cite it, but I have cited each of the above points
> previously, and no less than a half dozen times.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> >
> > Dennis
janusz_w@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2006 12:20 GMT
> <snip>
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> I thought he was a particularly easy target because of his "blame the US for
> anything & everything, every time" stance.

Check first messages in the cited thread.

> <snip>
>
> Dennis
Dennis (Icarus) - 30 Jul 2006 14:41 GMT
> > <snip>
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Check first messages in the cited thread.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.scuba/browse_frm/thread/d15e437e52ee4df8/394e
ee6a3e997de1?lnk=st&q=&rnum=1&hl=en#394eee6a3e997de1


Dennis
janusz_w@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2006 12:09 GMT
> >   I was never of the opinion Auschwitz was run by the Poles, nor did I state
> > otherwise.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> consider why your audience is so sparse now compared to a few years
> ago.

I have to protest. I don't feel like a victim, especially easy. ;-)

> "It doesn't require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
> tireless minority keen to set brush fires to people's minds."
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Geo
Don - 29 Jul 2006 19:50 GMT
>>> I didn't debate it then or now.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>  Haven't had it checked in over almost two years, but it was almost gone
> then. :-)

Jesas porkchop..............cancer too?
janusz_w@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2006 12:04 GMT
> >> I didn't debate it then or now.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>   I was never of the opinion Auschwitz was run by the Poles, nor did I state
> otherwise.

????????

>   Januz clearly stated that all the Jews (men, women, children) that were
> killed by Poles were "communist sympathizers", and that Holocaust victims in
> general -deserved- (direct quote) what they got.

direct quote - from whom?  Are you still so stupid or just playing one?

>   You and Francis cheered him on like drunken frat boys.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> exhibits your same intellectual dishonesty that was rampant throughout the
> thread.

selective memory, dishonesty, unprovoked attacks etc. - it sounds like
Popeye's description.

> > You fit right in. Have a nice day.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>   Haven't had it checked in over almost two years, but it was almost gone
> then. :-)
Scott - 29 Jul 2006 04:30 GMT
> As an aside, for a young guy like yourself, prostate cancer frequently
> tends to be pretty aggressive. How's it going?

Better than your senility, you f.cking prick.
janusz_w@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2006 12:12 GMT
> > As an aside, for a young guy like yourself, prostate cancer frequently
> > tends to be pretty aggressive. How's it going?
>
> Better than your senility, you f.cking prick.

Scotty, my poor boy do you have cancer, as well?
Scott - 30 Jul 2006 15:54 GMT
> Scotty, my poor boy do you have cancer, as well?

Jannie, my little man; no I do not, but my son did.

Thanks for asking.
janusz_w@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2006 11:55 GMT
> > I didn't debate it then or now.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> intends to direct itself."
> -Adolf Hitler

or maybe
"A lie, repeated often enough, will end up as truth." - Dr Paul Joseph
Goebbels

> You fit right in. Have a nice day.
>
> As an aside, for a young guy like yourself, prostate cancer frequently
> tends to be pretty aggressive. How's it going?
>
> Geo
Scott - 30 Jul 2006 15:54 GMT
> or maybe
> "A lie, repeated often enough, will end up as truth." - Dr Paul Joseph
> Goebbels

Goebbels and his BS are a product of your continent and people.
janusz_w@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2006 11:53 GMT
> I didn't debate it then or now.
>
>   The most pathetic part of the thread was your pandering to Janez, tell him
> I said hello.

You can do it directly, Chief.

> --
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> >
> > Geo
Geo - 29 Jul 2006 01:11 GMT
> There wasn't any question on this subject at all, but how does that go?
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>           carefully. Most people never listen.   -Hemingway
>                          www.finalprotectivefire.com

Nice to see you're on the ball, what was it, two minutes before you
leapt up barking mindlessly? Funnily enough, you and Chester never
entered my mind, but the thread context was memorable for its
ignorance.

This is a copy straight from a Reuters article that appeared today, but
of course you know better. What a surprise... And how strange you would
want to instantly dispute the article, probably without bothering to
engage in something so strenuous as reading it.

Mundus Vult Decipi

And of course, "most people never listen".

But you knew that, didn't you.

Pathetic. Resume your usual programming, sparse though may be.

Thanks for playing.

Geo
Scott - 29 Jul 2006 03:17 GMT
> Thought this was an interesting carry through as there was so much
> weeping and gnashing of teeth at the time...

Man, are you easy.
Geo - 29 Jul 2006 03:33 GMT
> > Thought this was an interesting carry through as there was so much
> > weeping and gnashing of teeth at the time...
>
> Man, are you easy.

Man, are you brainless.

So nice to see predictable responses. I would call you the peanut
gallery, but even monkeys are semi-sentient.

Woof-Woof. :)

Geo
Scott - 29 Jul 2006 04:30 GMT
> Man, are you brainless.

I'll match wits with a senile old shithead like you any day.

> So nice to see predictable responses. I would call you the peanut
> gallery, but even monkeys are semi-sentient.
>
> Woof-Woof. :)

f.ck off.
Dennis (Icarus) - 29 Jul 2006 13:42 GMT
> > Man, are you brainless.
>
> I'll match wits with a senile old shithead like you any day.

You can do that if you want, Scott - be sure to use only half of 'em though,
so you & Geo will be on equal terms.

<snip>

Dennis
JOF - 29 Jul 2006 19:49 GMT
> > > Man, are you brainless.
> >
> > I'll match wits with a senile old shithead like you any day.
>
> You can do that if you want, Scott - be sure to use only half of 'em though,
> so you & Geo will be on equal terms.

But wouldn't that make him a halfwit?

JF
Popeye - 29 Jul 2006 20:00 GMT
>> > > Man, are you brainless.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> But wouldn't that make him a halfwit?

 George wasn't always like that.

                                       Popeye
     I like to listen. I have learned a great deal from listening
         carefully. Most people never listen.   -Hemingway
                        www.finalprotectivefire.com
Dennis (Icarus) - 29 Jul 2006 20:53 GMT
> > > > Man, are you brainless.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> But wouldn't that make him a halfwit?

No, of course not.

> JF

Dennis
Joe English - 30 Jul 2006 15:09 GMT
>>>>Man, are you brainless.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> JF

Only by your math
janusz_w@hotmail.com - 30 Jul 2006 12:18 GMT
> > > Man, are you brainless.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Dennis

Wrong advice. If I do my math correctly half of zero is still zero.
Dennis (Icarus) - 30 Jul 2006 14:36 GMT
> > > > Man, are you brainless.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Wrong advice. If I do my math correctly half of zero is still zero.

Your math is correct, but your premise is wrong.

Dennis
JOF - 29 Jul 2006 16:55 GMT
> I'll match wits with a senile old shithead like you any day.

I'm sure you know you're under-rating George's intellectual capacity,
but that's your favoured methodology here, isn't it, insulting
hyperbole in the absence of sound argument?

I am a little surprised that you didn't think through your claim to
being only comparable to a senile old man in the wits department
though. Perhaps you underestimate yerself as well.

JF
Popeye - 29 Jul 2006 17:38 GMT
>the absence of sound argument?

 You're the last person here who has any right to reference sound argument.
JOF - 29 Jul 2006 19:48 GMT
> >the absence of sound argument?
>
>   You're the last person here who has any right to reference sound argument.

I just can't seem to get the hang of "me too" and "f.ck you".

JF
Popeye - 29 Jul 2006 19:59 GMT
>> >the absence of sound argument?
>>
>>   You're the last person here who has any right to reference sound
>> argument.
>
> I just can't seem to get the hang of "me too" and "f.ck you".

 You may tack on a few syllables, but you do quite well with it.
Signature


                                       Popeye
     I like to listen. I have learned a great deal from listening
         carefully. Most people never listen.   -Hemingway
                        www.finalprotectivefire.com

Scott - 29 Jul 2006 23:40 GMT
> I just can't seem to get the hang of "me too" and "f.ck you".

What a joke.

You are right here to jump onto the back of George's bullshit, and you dont
have the balls or temerity to do anything but waffle.
Carl Nisarel - 29 Jul 2006 23:52 GMT
rec.scuba's resident pussy "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com>:

> "JOF" <jofrancis@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
>> I just can't seem to get the hang of "me too" and "f.ck you".
>
> What a joke.

Everyone knows you're a joke, Scotty.

We laughed our a.ses off when you ran away from meeting me at the
Peace Arch.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

JOF - 30 Jul 2006 05:06 GMT
> > I just can't seem to get the hang of "me too" and "f.ck you".
>
> What a joke.
>
> You are right here to jump onto the back of George's bullshit, and you dont
> have the balls or temerity to do anything but waffle.

That wasn't George's bullshit I jumped on.

And we must have a different definition of waffling. I've made my
position clear on a number of things. It's your reinterpretation of my
meaning that gets you angry.

Paraphrasing what George has said in the past, it only takes a word or
two about almost anything from some people to get some folks here all
bent out of shape.

BTW. I introduced a friend of mine to the pleasures of diving a plate
and wing last weekend. He was blown away by the SS travel unit you
created. He used the Halcyon 18#  wing I bought from Popeye. He's a
little muscley dude who doesn't need any lead with his shorty but he
liked the idea of the 6 pounder and especially liked the weighted STA I
use with a single in cold water. I doubt he'll ever go back to the bcd
again. He wants to buy the dogbone but I wouldn't give it up. It was
perfect with a short veeweight, a 3/2 and double 80's for cave diving
in Mexico. With the light battery I was heavy enough that I didn't want
a belt.

JF
Popeye - 30 Jul 2006 05:30 GMT
>> > I just can't seem to get the hang of "me too" and "f.ck you".
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> And we must have a different definition of waffling. I've made my
> position clear on a number of things.

 Oh, you've made the positions (insinuations, innuendos, whatever) quite
clear.

 You've just been grossly unable to justify any number of them.

> It's your reinterpretation of my  meaning that gets you angry.

 Or we just call a spade a spade.
Scott - 30 Jul 2006 15:13 GMT
> > It's your reinterpretation of my  meaning that gets you angry.
>
>   Or we just call a spade a spade.

Although he likes to think he is making us angry, he doesnt understand how
we really pity him.
Scott - 30 Jul 2006 15:12 GMT
> That wasn't George's bullshit I jumped on.

OK, whatever you say. Again, you and your motives are as transparent as a
clean sheet of glass.

> And we must have a different definition of waffling. I've made my
> position clear on a number of things. It's your reinterpretation of my
> meaning that gets you angry.

I know it is your fondest wish that you feel like you have the control to
make me so, but I am far from angry. Disgusted, weary of your bullshit, and
wondering how miserable your life must be to feel the need create all the
petty bullshit you create here, and aim at Popeye and I, would be far more
accurate.

> Paraphrasing what George has said in the past, it only takes a word or
> two about almost anything from some people to get some folks here all
> bent out of shape.

Keep hoping. What is far more illuminating is the joy you take in thinking
you have anyone bent out of shape.

> BTW. I introduced a friend of mine to the pleasures of diving a plate
> and wing last weekend. He was blown away by the SS travel unit you
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> in Mexico. With the light battery I was heavy enough that I didn't want
> a belt.

Good for him.
JOF - 30 Jul 2006 16:35 GMT
> I know it is your fondest wish that you feel like you have the control to
> make me so, but I am far from angry.

I'm glad to hear that my nonsense doesn't anger you. I'm also glad that
I was able to duck in time to avoid another of those dadburned flying
pigs.

JF
Scott - 30 Jul 2006 18:53 GMT
> I'm glad to hear that my nonsense

At last, an honest admition.

> doesn't anger you. I'm also glad that
> I was able to duck in time to avoid another of those dadburned flying
> pigs.

Followed by more of your typical bullshit.
Joe English - 30 Jul 2006 15:08 GMT
>>>the absence of sound argument?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> JF

we know - it has been obvious for sometime now
JOF - 30 Jul 2006 19:31 GMT
> > I just can't seem to get the hang of "me too" and "f.ck you".
> >
> we know - it has been obvious for sometime now

You've done well with it though. I guess there's not much left in the
wishbook, huh?

JF
Joe English - 30 Jul 2006 23:51 GMT
>>>I just can't seem to get the hang of "me too" and "f.ck you".
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> JF

I have several wishes left

One is to win the lottery - at least 45 million (after taxes)

Then I am I going to pay for all the players here to go on a scuba
diving trip

Those that return home are th ewinners!

And yes John - you would definitely be invited (and paid for!)
JOF - 31 Jul 2006 03:12 GMT
> I have several wishes left
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> And yes John - you would definitely be invited (and paid for!)

Then I'll keep my fingers crossed for you (and the rest of us). A
gathering of the whole herd might be pretty entertaining.

JF
Joe English - 31 Jul 2006 13:06 GMT
>>I have several wishes left
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> JF

and dangerous - don't forget your clubs! ;-)
JOF - 31 Jul 2006 21:23 GMT
> > Then I'll keep my fingers crossed for you (and the rest of us). A
> > gathering of the whole herd might be pretty entertaining.
> >
> > JF
>
> and dangerous - don't forget your clubs! ;-)

I like to throw caution to the winds and go unarmed on holidays. My
luck's been good so far.

JF
Some Random Dude - 01 Aug 2006 02:35 GMT
>>>>I just can't seem to get the hang of "me too" and "f.ck you".
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>And yes John - you would definitely be invited (and paid for!)

you gonna provide wings and BP's? sounds worth trying, even if I'm
currently happy with my current BC

besides everyone knows the real reson we dive is so we can spend
insane amounts of money, you may as well give me another reason to
blow by savings :P
Scott - 29 Jul 2006 23:39 GMT
> I'm sure you know you're under-rating George's intellectual capacity,
> but that's your favoured methodology here, isn't it, insulting
> hyperbole in the absence of sound argument?

Soon as either of you senile Canadian *punks* put forth a "sound argument",
you'll get a debate on equal terms.

> I am a little surprised that you didn't think through your claim to
> being only comparable to a senile old man in the wits department
> though. Perhaps you underestimate yerself as well.

<yawn>

Dig a little deeper.
Carl Nisarel - 29 Jul 2006 23:50 GMT
rec.scuba's resident pussy "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com>
whined:

> Soon as either of you senile Canadian *punks* put forth a
> "sound argument",

They did. That's why you're whining about it.

> you'll get a debate on equal terms.

That's impossible. They aren't a pussy like you.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Carl Nisarel - 29 Jul 2006 23:51 GMT
Hwæt! "Geo" <ghmorris@candlelight.ca>, men ne cunnon secgan to
soðe:

>> "Geo" <ghmorris@candlelight.ca> smacked Scotty around:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Man, are you brainless.

Scotty's easy to identify.

He's a pussy as well.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.