Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

LA SCUBA ADP programme

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Shawn B. - 22 Jun 2006 05:07 GMT
I've been looking at the LA scuba Advanced Diver Program
http://www.lascuba.com/adp.html

and it looks intense, seeing as it is 10 weekends in length, but it looks
like it encompasses everything I have an interest in and is very reputable.
Looks that way, anyway.

What is y'all's opinion on this program?  My wife and I just got certified
last weekend NAUI open water and we're looking for the next steps (in
training).

Thanks,
Shawn
Carl Nisarel - 22 Jun 2006 04:15 GMT
Is túisce deoch ná scéal, "Shawn B." <leabre@html.com> rista:

> What is y'all's opinion on this program?  My wife and I just
> got certified last weekend NAUI open water and we're looking
> for the next steps (in training).

This is going to be hiliarious to watch.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Shawn B. - 22 Jun 2006 05:46 GMT
>> What is y'all's opinion on this program?  My wife and I just
>> got certified last weekend NAUI open water and we're looking
>> for the next steps (in training).
>
> This is going to be hiliarious to watch.

So what you're saying is: don't go?

Thanks,
Shawn
Some Random Dude - 22 Jun 2006 11:57 GMT
>>> What is y'all's opinion on this program?  My wife and I just
>>> got certified last weekend NAUI open water and we're looking
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Thanks,
>Shawn

no... he's a troll with a perverted view of whats gonna happen :P
accurate but still perverted :D

a lot of the regulars here have been diveing before most of the
certifying agencies existed, back when it was jump in the water and
hope the life insurace small print didn't specify scuba being
excluded. They have a prejudiced view of modern dive schools with
zero-to-hero programs. as such, you're going to get a lot of solid
gold information and opinions scattered between a lot of swearing,
flames, guns and ammo discussions, and miscellanious argument.
the trick is to have a thick enough hide to hang around, and enough
intelligence to separate the gold from the dross.
Rick Simms - 22 Jun 2006 15:45 GMT
>>>> What is y'all's opinion on this program?  My wife and I just
>>>> got certified last weekend NAUI open water and we're looking
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>the trick is to have a thick enough hide to hang around, and enough
>intelligence to separate the gold from the dross.

Probably the best description I've seen to date.

Rick Simms
*****************************  
These days about half the stuff in my shopping cart says, "For fast relief."
Greg Mossman - 22 Jun 2006 18:07 GMT
> a lot of the regulars here have been diveing before most of the
> certifying agencies existed, back when it was jump in the water and
> hope the life insurace small print didn't specify scuba being
> excluded. They have a prejudiced view of modern dive schools with
> zero-to-hero programs.

Modern?  L.A. County has been certifying divers since 1954.  How many of the
regulars have been diving longer than that?
Lee Bell - 23 Jun 2006 03:20 GMT
> Modern?  L.A. County has been certifying divers since 1954.  How many of
> the regulars have been diving longer than that?

Does snorkeling count?  I had one of those masks with the two snorkels built
around that time.

Lee
Grumman-581 - 23 Jun 2006 18:13 GMT
> Does snorkeling count?  I had one of those masks with the two snorkels built
> around that time.

Was one snorkle for the air supply and the other for exhaust?
Lee Bell - 24 Jun 2006 02:45 GMT
>> Does snorkeling count?  I had one of those masks with the two snorkels
>> built
>> around that time.

> Was one snorkle for the air supply and the other for exhaust?

Nope.
Carl Nisarel - 22 Jun 2006 14:53 GMT
Is túisce deoch ná scéal, "Shawn B." <leabre@html.com> rista:

>>> What is y'all's opinion on this program?  My wife and I just
>>> got certified last weekend NAUI open water and we're looking
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> So what you're saying is: don't go?

No, Shawn, what I'm saying is that the rec.scuba regulars here are
going to treat you like a typical newbie - they'll be rude
a.sholes.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Grumman-581 - 22 Jun 2006 05:58 GMT
>  My wife and I just got certified
> last weekend NAUI open water
> and we're looking for the next
> steps (in training).

http://www.geocities.com/grumman581/welcome-rec-scuba.htm

Next step?  Hmmm... How about you just go diving?  After you get a
hundred dives under your belt, then you can decide whether you really
need more training... You've got a C-card, you can now get your tanks
filled... That's all you really need...
John Hanson - 23 Jun 2006 05:33 GMT
>>  My wife and I just got certified
>> last weekend NAUI open water
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>need more training... You've got a C-card, you can now get your tanks
>filled... That's all you really need...

Hey, that's what I've been doing.  But, I'll be taking my AOW before I
have one hundred dives.  I figure that I'll then do my first deep
water dive with an experienced instructor instead of on my own.  I'm
sure Lee will find fault with this but that's okay.
Dillon Pyron - 25 Jun 2006 02:31 GMT
>>>  My wife and I just got certified
>>> last weekend NAUI open water
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>water dive with an experienced instructor instead of on my own.  I'm
>sure Lee will find fault with this but that's okay.

My first deep dive was my second open water dive after getting certed.
105 feet on Santa Rosa.  My first night dive was my sixth or seventh
dive.  The airplane off La Cieba.  I'm guessing there aren't even any
scraps left.
Signature

dillon

JAFO

Shawn B. - 22 Jun 2006 06:00 GMT
> I've been looking at the LA scuba Advanced Diver Program
> http://www.lascuba.com/adp.html
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> last weekend NAUI open water and we're looking for the next steps (in
> training).

I want to make myself clear.  I'm not saying I want to become and advanced
diver after just a few classes, however intense.  I'm much more interested
in learning as much as I can and this looks like a good program that
encapsulates just about everything.  I want to learn this stuff and do some
more advanced type of diving and log dives.  I really have no interest in a
particular certification saying I'm an advanced diver (for now) nor am I
interested in bragging rights.

This class looks like it encapsulates about everything I would eventually
end up doing/studying anyway so what I'm really asking is: is this a matter
of what you get is what you pay for and is it a respectable program?  Should
I look else where?  I'm not worried about pacing myself as I'm well
accustomed to intense studying/training and doing just fine.  My wife is
even better than I am at digesting.

So just understand, this isn't about braggin rights and a certification
saying I'm advanced.  This is about a quest to learn and this happens to ba
what looks like an interesting program that packs in everything I would
otherwise be persuing, anyway.  On this understanding I base the original
question of this thread.

Thanks,
Shawn
Ray - 22 Jun 2006 06:11 GMT
> I want to make myself clear.  I'm not saying I want to become and advanced
> diver after just a few classes, however intense.  I'm much more interested
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Thanks,
> Shawn

LA County Parks and Recreation developed one of the first diving
programs in the US.  It is a very good program for learning. It teaches
the equivalent of advanced, rescue and a few specialties from the "big
guys". If they offer you a chance to buy a Naui card for anything, you
may have to cough up some more money...if you are in to cards. If you
ever plan on going the "Pro" route, go ahead and buy the cards otherwise
just pay attention to what is being discussed.

Go ... dive ... learn ... have fun.

Just my $.02
Signature


Ray Contreras
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Webmonkey for:
http://www.ossystems.com
http://www.bobs-garage.com
http://www.clanwolverine.org
http://www.rayzplace.com

Star - 22 Jun 2006 06:34 GMT
> > I've been looking at the LA scuba Advanced Diver Program
> > http://www.lascuba.com/adp.html
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> Thanks,
> Shawn

Shawn, your next steps need to be to just go DIVING. Find a few more
experienced divers to hang with, join a club and attend their fun dives
which are usually led by experienced divers - whatever you have to do,
but go DIVING.  To make the most of your next classes, whatever you
choose them to be, you need the UW time.  And that equals diving.

What sites, no matter how seemingly pitiful they may be, are close
enough to your home that you can make use of them several times each
week?  The biggest favor you could do yourself and your wife right now
is to get 50-100 piddly little shallow dives under your belts.

Give yourself little jobs to do on each dive.  Choose a skill and work
on that skill.  For example, learn the perfect frog kick technique and
use only the frog kick for as much of a dive as you can.  On another
dive after you learn the site really well, proctice your compass skills
by placing a rock to mark the bottom and swimming a perfect square back
to the rock.  Do "show me" drills with your wife (no not THAT kind of
drill, geez you guys!) Practice swimming perfectly horizontal.
Practice not using your arms by crossing them in front of you or
holding hands with yourself across your lower back.  You get the
picture.

Then when you come back for AOW, it will be a piece of cake and you'll
be ready to learn SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much more!

Enjoy diving; its about as good as anything gets.

*
It is a good thing, therefore, to make short excursions now and then
to the bottom of the sea among dulse and coral, or up among the clouds
on mountaintops,
or in balloons, or even to creep like worms into dark holes and caverns
underground,
not only to learn something of what is going on in those out-of-the-way
places,
but to see better what the sun sees on our return to the common
everyday beauty.

~ John Muir 1911
Lee Bell - 22 Jun 2006 12:57 GMT
>> What is y'all's opinion on this program?  My wife and I just got
>> certified last weekend NAUI open water and we're looking for the next
>> steps (in training).
>
> I want to make myself clear.  I'm not saying I want to become and advanced
> diver after just a few classes, however intense.

You're not saying it, but you do want it.  We all wanted it.  Nothing to be
ashamed of there.  Knowing that it doesn't happen that way is a big step in
the right direction.

Grumman gave you the best advice so far.  Get out there and do some diving.
Your open water course should have provided you with the basics you need to
dive and advance your skills safely.  Many of us, maybe even most of us,
think that it's a good idea to get some experience with your equipment and
take the time to get really comfortable doing relatively easy dives before
pursuing further training.  Take some time to enjoy the sport and get really
good at what you already know and then decide what, if anything, you want to
do next.

Once you're ready to advance to the next level, whenever you honestly
determine you are ready, I suggest Advanced, Rescue and  Nitrox courses.
The advanced course should help you understand how to assess the risk of new
types of diving and prepare you to deal with them.  The Rescue course should
help you learn how to assist others when you need to, but more importantly,
should help you learn how to avoid needed help yourself.  Nitrox is a bit
different.  I generally recommend a nitrox course when you begin to have to
end dives because you're out of no decompression time rather than because
you are out of gas.  That's not an issue for most new divers, but as your
consumption rate decreases and the depth and number of repetitive dives you
do increases, nitrox use will become more advantageous.  Just to clear up a
common misconception, while nitrox is commonly used as a decompression gas
after deep dives, it is not used for the deep portion of the dive.  It's a
way or reducing the amount of nitrogen in your system, all else being equal,
allowing you to stay at the same depth longer, not a way to get to greater
depths.

I know nothing substantive about the LA Scuba ADP programme.  Perhaps
someone that knows about that particular program will speak up.  Some, but
not all courses of that type are more hype than substance.  It can be
important to know which is which.

> So just understand, this isn't about braggin rights and a certification
> saying I'm advanced.

Don't scoff at being able to say you are advanced.  Just be careful to be
sure you are honest with yourself about just how advanced you are.  Getting
in over your head can alter your entire outlook on diving or leave you dead
or permanently injured.

These days, an advanced card, and progressiviely more advanced cards, are
tickets to some interesting diving.  It lets you board the boats to advanced
sites.  By itself, however, it does not necessarily mean you're safe diving
those sites.

Lee
Greg Mossman - 22 Jun 2006 18:13 GMT
> I know nothing substantive about the LA Scuba ADP programme.  Perhaps
> someone that knows about that particular program will speak up.  Some, but
> not all courses of that type are more hype than substance.  It can be
> important to know which is which.

It's definitely more substance than hype.  But it's probably too "advanced"
for a beginner, given that it's at least the equivalent of NAUI Rescue and
NAUI Master, classes that hardly anyone suggest be taken immediately after
open water certification.  I second the suggestion to get plenty more dives
in.

> These days, an advanced card, and progressiviely more advanced cards, are
> tickets to some interesting diving.  It lets you board the boats to
> advanced sites.  By itself, however, it does not necessarily mean you're
> safe diving those sites.

And what boats are these, pray tell?  I had heard that the only boats that
cared about an "Advanced" certification were a few in Florida for the
wrecks, but I had no problem showing a basic open water card to Silent World
to dive the Spiegel Grove.
Lee Bell - 23 Jun 2006 03:23 GMT
> And what boats are these, pray tell?  I had heard that the only boats that
> cared about an "Advanced" certification were a few in Florida for the
> wrecks, but I had no problem showing a basic open water card to Silent
> World to dive the Spiegel Grove.

I've run into a few of them in the Bahamas as well as in various parts of
south Florida.

Silent World doesn't count.  They knew who every one of us was before we
arrived, at least Ric did.  Is the Grove an advanced dive?

Lee
Greg Mossman - 23 Jun 2006 08:17 GMT
>> And what boats are these, pray tell?  I had heard that the only boats
>> that cared about an "Advanced" certification were a few in Florida for
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Silent World doesn't count.  They knew who every one of us was before we
> arrived, at least Ric did.  Is the Grove an advanced dive?

Given that "Advanced" now means deeper than 60', and I hit 140' with an
obligatory 8 min of deco diving on mixed gas in a strong current with lousy
viz, I'd say so.  I'm not sure how I would have handled the dive without
such extensive background knowledge of "boat diving", "fish ID specialty",
and "peak buoyancy" as demonstrated by my trusty Advanced Open Water card
(in actuality my advanced card lists more advanced-sounding specialties, but
it didn't have to).
Lee Bell - 23 Jun 2006 13:07 GMT
> Is the Grove an advanced dive?

> Given that "Advanced" now means deeper than 60', and I hit 140' with an
> obligatory 8 min of deco diving on mixed gas in a strong current with
> lousy viz, I'd say so.

Works for me.  I once won a PADI deep diving video someplace.  I was quite
surprised to note that anything over 60 feet seemed to require that
particular specialty.  Prior to that, I sort of thought deep referred to
something a bit below 60 feet, but what do I know.

I've given up on predicting what dive operators and/or agencies rate as
advanced.  Depending on who you talk to, the walls of Cayman are advanced,
but the walls of Cozumel are suitable for entry level training.  Anything
with an overhead is clearly advanced, more if the agency offers a specialty
involving overheads, unless it's classed as a swimthrough, in which case,
it's not advanced, even though it comes out over a 100 feet deep on a Coz
wall.  Shallow reefs, that sometimes have no current and sometimes have
lots, are each dives, but a  drift along a Boynton reef, where the boat
comes to you at the end of the dive, is advanced, or not, depending on the
operator.

Hell, I'm still having trouble with the idea that diving with a gas other
than air is no longer technical.

> I'm not sure how I would have handled the dive without such extensive
> background knowledge of "boat diving", "fish ID
> specialty", and "peak buoyancy" as demonstrated by my trusty Advanced Open
> Water card (in actuality my advanced card lists
> more advanced-sounding specialties, but it didn't have to).

If we did not know you were a highly skilled, knowledgeable and experienced
diver, as demonstrated by reading your on line political posts, you would
not have been invited.  Actually, we know you're more qualified than most of
us.  There's no way we'd let a lawyer on the boat otherwise.  Nightspark and
I are, of course, also more qualified than most.  There's no way anyone
would let cops or T men on the boat otherwise either.  Us Strokes are the
elite of recreational divers and only associate with those who are similarly
secure in their knowledge and skills, even when such confidence is not
warranted.  In addition to having low consumption, low being defined as
whatever our consumption is, and perfect buoyancy control, that being
defined as being able to get back to the surface at the end of the dive, and
an infinite patience with those less perfect, except DMs that make bad
coffee, we're handsome very, very handsome.

Silent World may have been happy with whatever card you showed them, but
they were quite nervous with my 1969 NAUI card that shows my certification
level as "SCUBA."  They didn't calm down until I relented and showed the SSI
Master Diver card which, incidentally, does not say a word about the
underlying specialties which even I've forgotten by now.  They never did see
a nitrox card, but they didn't fill my tanks any of the times I used them.
The first and last times, I only did two dives.  The time before last, they
were out of O2 or something like that and I got a fill from Capt. Slate's,
right next to the Silent World boat.  Slate, by the way, banks nitrox, 30% I
think, but don't hold me to it.

So far, nobody has mentioned the fact that, of all the cards I have, exactly
none of them has my picture on it.  The NAUI card is paper, dating back to
times before digital photography and cheap printers let everybody put a
picture on everything.  My SSI advanced card has no picture, nor does the
Master Diver Card I got a year or so later.  I didn't get cards for the
qualifying courses, which is why I can't remember what they were.

Oh yes, I have one of the most highly sought after, but seldom achieved,
certifications in the industry.  I am a certified Internet Diver.  I have
the certificate and everything, signed by el Stroko Guapo himself.  Let's
see the DIR guys trump that.

Lee
Greg Mossman - 23 Jun 2006 17:44 GMT
> In addition to having low consumption, low being defined as whatever our
> consumption is, and perfect buoyancy control, that being defined as being
> able to get back to the surface at the end of the dive, and an infinite
> patience with those less perfect, except DMs that make bad coffee, we're
> handsome very, very handsome.

I would have settled for bad coffee on Silent World, but the DM was so lousy
he couldn't even handle the drinking water obligations of the boat.

> Silent World may have been happy with whatever card you showed them, but
> they were quite nervous with my 1969 NAUI card that shows my certification
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Capt. Slate's, right next to the Silent World boat.  Slate, by the way,
> banks nitrox, 30% I think, but don't hold me to it.

I must have a new and improved SSI Master Diver card, since it (and my SSI
Advanced Open Water, which I lost in Cozumel) lists the specialties.  Nitrox
is one of them, so it works for that too.  Unfortunately I've now misplaced
that card, so I'm down to a single card that mentions nitrox, my SSI
Specialty Diver card.  When I lost Janna's Specialty Diver (nitrox) card,
and boy was she pissed, we got two replacement cards from SSI that are
full-fledged Nitrox cards and they're very pretty.

Capt. Slate's certainly had a nicer set up down by the dock.  But I'm going
to hold off diving Key Largo again until I can find a dive op that can take
me to a decent reef.  Mike says that decent reefs do exist out there, but
you probably have to charter the entire boat to get them to take you out.
Maybe for DWG III?  Otherwise, I'll head further south and give Jim Wyatt's
successor, whats-her-name, a try.

> So far, nobody has mentioned the fact that, of all the cards I have,
> exactly none of them has my picture on it.  The NAUI card is paper, dating
> back to times before digital photography and cheap printers let everybody
> put a picture on everything.  My SSI advanced card has no picture, nor
> does the Master Diver Card I got a year or so later.  I didn't get cards
> for the qualifying courses, which is why I can't remember what they were.

That's what you get when you're certified before photography was invented.
For Janna's replacements, we simply e-mailed SSI a .jpg.  If you really want
a picture card, they'll only charge you $25 or so and then you can be
special like the rest of us.

> Oh yes, I have one of the most highly sought after, but seldom achieved,
> certifications in the industry.  I am a certified Internet Diver.  I have
> the certificate and everything, signed by el Stroko Guapo himself.  Let's
> see the DIR guys trump that.

JJ is supposed to be at the Scuba Show this weekend in Long Beach.  I'll ask
him about the upcoming I-DIR class and whether or not I can help write the
waivers in exchange for a freebie.
Popeye - 23 Jun 2006 19:53 GMT
>> In addition to having low consumption, low being defined as whatever our
>> consumption is, and perfect buoyancy control, that being defined as being
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I would have settled for bad coffee on Silent World, but the DM was so
> lousy he couldn't even handle the drinking water obligations of the boat.

 Do Ric and his unusually hot wife Janet still own it, or can we start
making cracks about Captain PADI now? <weg>

 They've been so good to us over the years, I swore to myself I'd wait.

>> Silent World may have been happy with whatever card you showed them, but
>> they were quite nervous with my 1969 NAUI card that shows my
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> ask him about the upcoming I-DIR class and whether or not I can help write
> the waivers in exchange for a freebie.
Greg Mossman - 23 Jun 2006 23:44 GMT
>  Do Ric and his unusually hot wife Janet still own it, or can we start
> making cracks about Captain PADI now? <weg>
>
>  They've been so good to us over the years, I swore to myself I'd wait.

I believe it's under new ownership.  New management, at least.  The boat was
just a bare boat, with a small Igloo of drinking water their only amenity.
They got us all there and back safely, with no "issues", but we were
definitely rushed on the second dive.

On the other hand, they now offer LP steel tank rentals in various sizes and
nitrox fills with advanced notice, something I would have gladly taken
advantage of to save us a FLL-Boynton roundtrip to return Splashdown's tanks
before we flew out.  All Ric had were Al80s when I reserved our seats on the
boat.
Grumman-581 - 24 Jun 2006 00:51 GMT
> All Ric had were Al80s when I reserved our seats on the
> boat.

So, you just take more of them with you... 2 on the back, one under
each arm, and a couple on a deco line should do you... <evil-grin>
Lee Bell - 24 Jun 2006 02:50 GMT
> I believe it's under new ownership.  New management, at least.  The boat
> was just a bare boat, with a small Igloo of drinking water their only
> amenity. They got us all there and back safely, with no "issues", but we
> were definitely rushed on the second dive.

Notice how it didn't work out quite the way they planned?  I don't know
about you, but I was in no hurry to return to the surface to make up for the
fact that they were late getting back from the morning trip.

Lee
Greg Mossman - 24 Jun 2006 05:25 GMT
>> I believe it's under new ownership.  New management, at least.  The boat
>> was just a bare boat, with a small Igloo of drinking water their only
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> about you, but I was in no hurry to return to the surface to make up for
> the fact that they were late getting back from the morning trip.

We stayed nice and shallow at 90' on the second dive, sucking 36%.  I came
up with 1400 psi of wasted nitrox.
Lee Bell - 24 Jun 2006 02:48 GMT
>  Do Ric and his unusually hot wife Janet still own it, or can we start
> making cracks about Captain PADI now? <weg>

I don't know if the sale is complete, but they weren't there when we
visited.  The new owner seems to speak DIR, which is quite a change from Ric
and Janet.

I don't recall Captain PADI mentioning PADI at all, but it may have been
because I was not listening.  As I recall, he was quite pleasant and pretty
laid back, very different from the pre dive briefing we got on our earlier
visit.

Lee
Popeye - 24 Jun 2006 13:19 GMT
>>  Do Ric and his unusually hot wife Janet still own it, or can we start
>> making cracks about Captain PADI now? <weg>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> pretty laid back, very different from the pre dive briefing we got on our
> earlier visit.

 I am -positive- you'll remember him firmly stating in the pre-dive that if
you stayed in the water over an hour, or went into deco, or came back on the
boat with less than 500 psi in your tank, or if you returned without your
buddy, that it was, and I quote, a "P.A.D.I. -RULE-" that you must forfeit
your second dive.

 He said it on both our trips, and I had images of you and Curtis tying him
off behind the boat and dragging him back.

 If it wasn't for Ric and Janet, I would have had an extended field day
with his a.s, captain or no.

 As it was, he seemed to understand we weren't tourists, and left us alone.

 He was sure glad we were there when that guy stroked.

Signature

                                  Popeye
        "If one does as God does enough times, one
        will become as God is."  -Dr. Hannibal Lector.

                   www.finalprotectivefire.com

Lee Bell - 24 Jun 2006 15:23 GMT
>  I am -positive- you'll remember him firmly stating in the pre-dive that
> if you stayed in the water over an hour, or went into deco, or came back
> on the boat with less than 500 psi in your tank, or if you returned
> without your buddy, that it was, and I quote, a "P.A.D.I. -RULE-" that you
> must forfeit your second dive.

You are quite correct.  I remember him well.  He was quite a bit different
this time around.

>  He said it on both our trips, and I had images of you and Curtis tying
> him off behind the boat and dragging him back.

I found it quite amusing to listen to his canned speach, including the time
and deco stuff with Curtis sitting in front of a set ot twins full of trimix
and me sitting there with a deco bottle clearly marked with a mod of 70.  I
don't think Curtis or I really considered tying him or dragging him back
behind the boat, but I don't think either of us considered abiding by his
rules either.  We made a point of not rubbing his nose in what we were going
to do with or without his permission and he made a point of not noticing
that we didn't comply with his PADI Rules.

I don't know if you noticed, but when he asked for questions, the only one,
which came from me, was "Who is this PADI guy you keep talking about?"  His
response kind of set the mood for me.  He kind of shrugged and responded,
"I'm required to say it."  I can respect that, particularly when he didn't
try to enforce any of the PADI rules when we so clearly violated them.

>  If it wasn't for Ric and Janet, I would have had an extended field day
> with his a.s, captain or no.

We could have had a good time at his expense, but, in my opinion, he didn't
do anything that really warranted it.  He has a job to do and he has to at
least pay lip service to how he is told to do it.  Frankly, as much as I
like Ric and Janet, Ric's a bit of a Captain PADI too.  Since he's the boss,
however, he has the option of ignoring PADI rules when he feels comfortable
with the divers abilities and sense of self responsibility.  None of us
would even consider trying to hold Ric responsible for our diving mistakes
and he knew it.  Janet, of course, is Janet.  She's one of the nicest people
I've met in the dive industry and, PADI or not, can expect nothing but
compliments and courtesy from me.  God help anyone who treats her
differently while one of us is there.

>  As it was, he seemed to understand we weren't tourists, and left us
> alone.

>  He was sure glad we were there when that guy stroked.

You're damned right about that.  He had good reason.  If it weren't for you,
we'd probably still be trying to get the victim out of the water.  Well,
maybe not.  Curtis was behind you and he could have done it too.  Nobody
else on the boat could have gotten him out of the water as quickly and
effectively.

I think he was even more happy to have a group of experienced divers
duplicate his advice regarding first aid during the trip back to shore.  He,
and the agency, were at risk for anything the victim and those that
accompanied him had to say . . . except there were more of us than there
were of them and we made the fact that we agreed with him and not them
abundantly clear, both during the trip and in the forms we completed
relative to the incident.

It was nice of Ric to offer us a free afternoon trip, but I wish I had
declined.  I would much rather have spent the time with you and others than
diving on a poor, mostly dead reef so shallow I'd have had to dig a hole to
get to 20 feet and a somewhat better, but still very shallow reef.

At any rate, I think he did better for Dive with Greg II, but like I said, I
didn't pay a lot of attention.  Someone else will have to confirm.

Lee
chilly - 25 Jun 2006 13:15 GMT
> >>  Do Ric and his unusually hot wife Janet still own it, or can we start
> >> making cracks about Captain PADI now? <weg>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> buddy, that it was, and I quote, a "P.A.D.I. -RULE-" that you must forfeit
> your second dive.

I'd be in a pickle then, if I wasn't to come back without my buddy, since
I'd probably be doing a dive of over an hour and my buddy would have been
back on the boat long before and without me.  Guess I might have a shot at
the second dive but my buddy would have to do without.  Um, that is assuming
I went into the water with a buddy in the first place.

>   He said it on both our trips, and I had images of you and Curtis tying him
> off behind the boat and dragging him back.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>   He was sure glad we were there when that guy stroked.
Lee Bell - 24 Jun 2006 02:44 GMT
> Capt. Slate's certainly had a nicer set up down by the dock.  But I'm
> going to hold off diving Key Largo again until I can find a dive op that
> can take me to a decent reef.  Mike says that decent reefs do exist out
> there, but you probably have to charter the entire boat to get them to
> take you out. Maybe for DWG III?  Otherwise, I'll head further south and
> give Jim Wyatt's successor, whats-her-name, a try.

Rachel Chaimson, rachel@wreckreationcharters.com

> JJ is supposed to be at the Scuba Show this weekend in Long Beach.  I'll
> ask him about the upcoming I-DIR class and whether or not I can help write
> the waivers in exchange for a freebie.

When he stops laughing, let us know what he said.  JJ's not real well known
for his generosity outside of the WKPP team.

Lee
Grumman-581 - 23 Jun 2006 18:17 GMT
> Silent World doesn't count.  They knew who every one of us was before we
> arrived, at least Ric did.  Is the Grove an advanced dive?

Not in my opinion... Even at the sand, it's not that deep and there is
hard bottom to prevent you from going any further without a shovel...
The hardest part is the drive down to Key Largo... Even if you don't
take US-1 the entire way... <grin>
Dillon Pyron - 25 Jun 2006 02:37 GMT
>> And what boats are these, pray tell?  I had heard that the only boats that
>> cared about an "Advanced" certification were a few in Florida for the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>I've run into a few of them in the Bahamas as well as in various parts of
>south Florida.

On their adventure Fridays, Dive Makai will only take out advanced
divers.  When we went out with them, it was two deep dives and a
shallow (60 feet deep) cavern penetration.

>Silent World doesn't count.  They knew who every one of us was before we
>arrived, at least Ric did.  Is the Grove an advanced dive?
>
>Lee
>
Signature

dillon

JAFO

Greg Mossman - 25 Jun 2006 23:55 GMT
> On their adventure Fridays, Dive Makai will only take out advanced
> divers.  When we went out with them, it was two deep dives and a
> shallow (60 feet deep) cavern penetration.

I know that many Maui dive ops require a minimum number of dives (24 or 25)
and recent dive experience in order to dive the back wall, but they don't
require any particular sort of certification.

I'll have to try Dive Makai next time we're on the island.  Jack's was a bit
too commercial for my taste.  The new owner of Dive Makai got a biology
undergraduate degree from the same school where I got my biology degree
around the same time, and went to law school at the crosstown rival of my
law school, so we seem to have a few things in common.
SpringDiver - 22 Jun 2006 12:39 GMT
>I've been looking at the LA scuba Advanced Diver Program
>http://www.lascuba.com/adp.html
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>Thanks,
>Shawn

Sounds like fun Shawn. Wow 14 dives for $450. Looks like you and your
wife could meet other folks with different diving interests too. Have
fun. That's what counts. Also, probably some good reinforcement for
your initial training.
Dillon Pyron - 25 Jun 2006 02:26 GMT
>I've been looking at the LA scuba Advanced Diver Program
>http://www.lascuba.com/adp.html
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>Thanks,
>Shawn

Shawn, you're at the point at which experience counts more than the
additional training.  Get some dives under your belt, enjoy it a
little.  Then go back and do what has a rep as a good course.

I always tell my OW students to go dive within their training and then
come back for AOW.  In truth, it'll save money for those who suddenly
realize that diving isn't the hobby they thought it might be.

Ten weekends is a tremendous committment of time.  You could do 20
dives on your own and develop a lot more confidence in your ability.
Signature

dillon

JAFO

Shawn B. - 28 Jun 2006 06:30 GMT
> I've been looking at the LA scuba Advanced Diver Program
> http://www.lascuba.com/adp.html
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> last weekend NAUI open water and we're looking for the next steps (in
> training).

Thanks for all your feedback, everyone.  We've decided to enroll to the
program and use the 14 dives as another chance to be with an instructor.  My
wife feels more comfortable that way and since its her first time diving, I
happen to agree.  This particular program is next to impossible to find good
information about or examples of other people who've attended but the
instructors seem okay.  We'll see how it goes.

Thanks,
Shawn
Grumman-581 - 28 Jun 2006 08:14 GMT
> Thanks for all your feedback, everyone.  We've decided to enroll to the
> program and use the 14 dives as another chance to be with an instructor.  My
> wife feels more comfortable that way and since its her first time diving, I
> happen to agree.

Damn, she's got you trained pretty good... How long your been married?
Shawn B. - 29 Jun 2006 02:25 GMT
> Damn, she's got you trained pretty good... How long your been married?

I learned, back when we were engaged, that the secret to a happy
relationship/marriage is to keep the woman happy.  She ain't happy, I
certainly won't be happy.

We are going on our 4th year soon.

Thanks,
Shawn
Star - 29 Jun 2006 03:11 GMT
> > Damn, she's got you trained pretty good... How long your been married?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Thanks,
> Shawn

My husband would have told you the same thing and we're approaching 29.

He loves me enough to tag along on a dive today although he is on a
medical leave from diving for the next several weeks.  He even made
food and was nice to my friends, when he wasn't whining about not being
able to dive.

*
Grumman-581 - 29 Jun 2006 05:13 GMT
> We are going on our 4th year soon.

So, only 3 years and she's got you trained that well... Damn, her
mother would be proud of her...
GWB - 29 Jun 2006 06:36 GMT
>> Thanks for all your feedback, everyone.  We've decided to enroll to the
>> program and use the 14 dives as another chance to be with an instructor.  My
>> wife feels more comfortable that way and since its her first time diving, I
>> happen to agree.
>
>Damn, she's got you trained pretty good... How long your been married?

Ooooooo.......How long you been divorced?  <BG>
SpringDiver - 28 Jun 2006 08:39 GMT
>> I've been looking at the LA scuba Advanced Diver Program
>> http://www.lascuba.com/adp.html
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>Thanks,
>Shawn

Good for you Shawn. Now have fun.

Wayne
Greg Mossman - 28 Jun 2006 19:36 GMT
> Thanks for all your feedback, everyone.

Which you decided to ignore.

> We've decided to enroll to the program and use the 14 dives as another
> chance to be with an instructor.  My wife feels more comfortable that way
> and since its her first time diving, I happen to agree.  This particular
> program is next to impossible to find good information about or examples
> of other people who've attended but the instructors seem okay.  We'll see
> how it goes.

Great.  Another 18-dive Master Diver.

I'm surprised that they even accept people fresh out of open water.  So much
for my expectation of higher standards.
Grumman-581 - 28 Jun 2006 23:16 GMT
> Great.  Another 18-dive Master Diver.
>
> I'm surprised that they even accept people fresh out of open water.  So much
> for my expectation of higher standards.

Well, anyone with more experience probably wouldn't be stupid enough
to pay that kind of money to be 'master' <snicker> diver...
Shawn B. - 29 Jun 2006 02:33 GMT
>> Thanks for all your feedback, everyone.
>
> Which you decided to ignore.

I didn't happen to ignore it, I just wanted to see various opinions on the
program, not whether they felt whether I should enroll into a program or
not.  In any case, doing more dives before more training is sound, but quite
a bit of thought and planning and contemplating (whether to do it or not)
went into this.  In the end, we agreed not to but then she decided she
wanted to for various reasons and we talked more and figured that its what
we want to do.  I won't regret the decision (unless the instruction is 3rd
class).

>> We've decided to enroll to the program and use the 14 dives as another
>> chance to be with an instructor.  My wife feels more comfortable that way
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Great.  Another 18-dive Master Diver.

We aren't looking to be a "Master Diver" as you put it, you make it sound so
synical and like we're trying to be something we're not.  Actually, many of
the classes: the U/W navigation, night, and underwater naturalist are
actually of particular interest to us.  So are the others, the fact they do
lake diving, too.  Perhaps means nothing to you, but they are putting into
one setting most of the other things we want to do and what better way to do
it than to just "do it" and then take it from there.  I don't think we can
even dare to consider ourselves "Master Divers" just because we did a few
dives and got a NAUI card.  But we will be better divers, have learned a
lot, and won't have to take the classes later when our master degrees
homework for the next 2-3 years burdens us.

> I'm surprised that they even accept people fresh out of open water.  So
> much for my expectation of higher standards.

In all the places we looked, having an OW cert card was all that was needed.
Most wanted PADI but when I showed NAUI they make a deal out of it like its
some sort of higher power or something.  In any case, I don't think many
instruction schools have these "higher" standards you dream of.  At least
we're honest enough with ourselves to understand that we aren't master
divers, just learning more about the thing we like to do.  Quite frankly, I
don't see what the problem is with that.

Thanks,
Shawn
Star - 29 Jun 2006 03:14 GMT
> >> Thanks for all your feedback, everyone.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> Thanks,
> Shawn

There isn't a problem with learning.  Always learn; after 1000+ dives,
I learn something new on every dive.  And lotsa people here have more
dives than that.

Once you have this series of classes completed (or even DURING this
time!)  you need to go diving.  Just the 2 of you; no instructor.  Go
to a site you know and just swim to the places you already know.

Oh, and NAUI *is* a higher power as compared to PADI (ducking).

Oh, and did you mention where in the country you are located, if you
don't mind saying?
Shawn B. - 29 Jun 2006 06:07 GMT
> Oh, and NAUI *is* a higher power as compared to PADI (ducking).

I don't know if that is a joke or not but places I enquire about seems to
treat it such.  I don't understand.  It's just training.  What's the
diference?

> Oh, and did you mention where in the country you are located, if you
> don't mind saying?

I'm in So. California, near Laguna Beach.

Thanks,
Shawn
Star - 29 Jun 2006 06:40 GMT
> > Oh, and NAUI *is* a higher power as compared to PADI (ducking).
>
> I don't know if that is a joke or not but places I enquire about seems to
> treat it such.  I don't understand.  It's just training.  What's the
> diference?

The instructor makes all the difference.  At the OW level, there is not
much difference in standards, but depending on the instructor, it CAN
be a big difference.  PADI for example permits the training of kids as
young as 10.  NAUI and YMCA won't train kids til they are 12; I won't
train them til they are 15-16.

YMCA had the first, and still the most stringent list of skills. After
teaching this OW course, which requires a great deal of time in the
pool just learning how to be in the water with your gear, i find my
students are well prepared for OW and doing some diving.  The NAUI
program was taken almost directly from the YMCA, but has been watered
down a bit.  NAUI, however, gives me academic freedom to expect a bit
more from my students, so I can teach these skills with NAUI as well.

The instructor plays a huge role in teaching a skill as a skill and not
a one-time performance.  Mask clearing, for example.  I've had students
in a nitrox, AOW, and god forbid in tech classes who had done a mask
removal and replacement exactly once, with assistance.  That's not a
skill.  Something becomes a skill when you can perform it with skill
repeatedly.  It's your instructors job to see that you can do so.

NAUI has, as a final criteria for issuing a c-card, a question to the
instructor:  Would you be willing to let a loved one dive with this
student?

I've answered no to that question more than once.  Sometimes the
student hangs around and works harder; sometimes not. Training is
purchased; certification is earned.

> > Oh, and did you mention where in the country you are located, if you
> > don't mind saying?
>
> I'm in So. California, near Laguna Beach.

Ah - I'm a bit farther north, Puget Sound, or I'd dive with you two.

Good luck.

*

> Thanks,
> Shawn
Shawn B. - 29 Jun 2006 07:17 GMT
> The instructor plays a huge role in teaching a skill as a skill and not
> a one-time performance.  Mask clearing, for example.  I've had students
> in a nitrox, AOW, and god forbid in tech classes who had done a mask
> removal and replacement exactly once, with assistance.  That's not a
> skill.  Something becomes a skill when you can perform it with skill
> repeatedly.  It's your instructors job to see that you can do so.

That's a joke.  We had to do mask clearing and full removable more times
than I can count... in the pool, in the ocean, whenever and wherever the
instructor deemed fit.  All kinds of regulator excercises and at times, in
the pool and in the water.  Then, when 20 classes were in the area doing a
dive and everyone kicks you in your face, we had no problems getting our
masks back but watching other classes down there, they didn't even know what
to do once the mask came off.  Or a regulator gets knocked out of one of the
other classes students mouth, the didn't know what to do.  That happens to
one in our class, its hardly a setback.  He even screwed with our gear
underwater and made sure we were calm enough and collected enough to set
things straight.  Lots of buddy breathing and some rescue and navigation.
Even when most of the people were performing, if one person didn't get
things right, the whole classes couldn't do the dive.

> NAUI has, as a final criteria for issuing a c-card, a question to the
> instructor:  Would you be willing to let a loved one dive with this
> student?

My wife does really well.  I'm especially alert of her well-being but we
make a good diving team.  There were other couples in there, also.  The
instructor paid close attention to how couples interact and buddy each
other.  If my attention slipped for even a moment (or hers) he would be
quick to set it straight.  Perhaps he has to answer the same question?

Our instructors don't take jack crap from anyone; you either learn or you
don't and if you don't perform up to their standards (they have NAUI and
PADI instructor numbers that are in the low 4 digits) then you simply don't
pass.  They were also particular about surf entry... entering the Laguna
surf isn't the same as the book teaches.  We watched class after class do it
by the book and many classes (including their instructor) never made it into
the water or had to be rescued.  Then, our class (or others trained by the
same people) had no problems whatsoever.

The value of good instruction is priceless, but I still don't know how to
screen for a good instructor.

Thanks,
Shawn
Lee Bell - 29 Jun 2006 13:06 GMT
> That's a joke.

If it is, it's not a funny one.  From your comments, you had a good course
and a good instructor.  The harassment, or confidence drills, as they tend
to be called these days, are an add on that many of us who have been diving
for a long time had to go through.  They've become quite uncommon these
days.  Most of us that made it through them, think they were a very good
idea.

Your comments also suggest you've seen, as we all have, those who's agency
did not adequately promote good training and whose instructors did not
provide it.  Different people have different opinions on the agencies.  Mine
is that PADI, at he corporate level, is the worst of the bunch.  They're far
more interested in volume and revenues than in safety and quality training.
All of the agencies now offer somewhat watered down training in order to
compete with the leader in watered down training, PADI.

> Lots of buddy breathing . . .

Buddy breathing or gas sharing?  There's a difference to many of us.  Buddy
breathing, as I use the term, means shaing a single second stage, passing it
back and forth between more than one diver.  Gas sharing usually means
handing someone your alternate.  If your course included buddy breathing,
which I think all courses should, then you really did get good trainning and
really should thank your instructor both personally and by recommending
him/her.

> My wife does really well.  I'm especially alert of her well-being but we
> make a good diving team.  There were other couples in there, also.  The
> instructor paid close attention to how couples interact and buddy each
> other.  If my attention slipped for even a moment (or hers) he would be
> quick to set it straight.  Perhaps he has to answer the same question?

Be careful in your diving relationship.  It's quite easy for us macho types,
may not include you, but it certainly does include me, to look after the
little woman in all things.  It's a nice sentiment, but it's not beneficial
where safety issues are involved.  Woman, as Star will certainly confirm,
have the same need to be self reliant as men, perhaps more since they often
have to dive with men.

> Our instructors don't take jack crap from anyone; you either learn or you
> don't and if you don't perform up to their standards (they have NAUI and
> PADI instructor numbers that are in the low 4 digits) then you simply
> don't pass.

That's the biggest difference in agencies and instructors.  PADI is set up
to ensure that everyone passes.  Other agencies tend to be the same, but not
to the same degree.  Some instructors make up for that by ensuring their
students are competent before they get a card, others don't.

>  They were also particular about surf entry... entering the Laguna surf
> isn't the same as the book teaches.  We watched class after class do it by
> the book and many classes (including their instructor) never made it into
> the water or had to be rescued.  Then, our class (or others trained by the
> same people) had no problems whatsoever.

Scary, isn't it?  Those people that had to be rescued probably have cards
today.  Like Star said, would you want  your spouse diving with one of them?

> The value of good instruction is priceless, but I still don't know how to
> screen for a good instructor.

Sure you do.  You described one in your post.  Look for another just like
him/her . . . or go back and get more training from the same one.

Lee
Star - 29 Jun 2006 16:28 GMT
> > That's a joke.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> days.  Most of us that made it through them, think they were a very good
> idea.

Other than turning off a student's air UW, which is no longer permitted
in OW training for insurance reasons, YMCA has not eliminated
"confidence drills."  I understand the shutoff thing:

Attorney to instructor:  Please tell us what you did right before your
client drowned?

Instructor"  First I shut off his air.....

> Your comments also suggest you've seen, as we all have, those who's agency
> did not adequately promote good training and whose instructors did not
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> All of the agencies now offer somewhat watered down training in order to
> compete with the leader in watered down training, PADI.

One can interpret volumes about society today by people's choices in OW
training.  They will happily choose the weekend course for $99 over the
more involved and expensive course offering several pool sessions and
5-6 OW dives with the promise of more "fun" dives with the instructor
and club/shop.  Yet this same person will seek the most reputable
tennis instructor no matter what the cost.  And which sport is it,
again, that can kill you?  Hello!!

> > Lots of buddy breathing . . .
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> really should thank your instructor both personally and by recommending
> him/her.

It's a skill-builder that should NEVER have to be actuallly used IRL,
but its a really important confidence builder.  I teach it as such.

> > My wife does really well.  I'm especially alert of her well-being but we
> > make a good diving team.  There were other couples in there, also.  The
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> have the same need to be self reliant as men, perhaps more since they often
> have to dive with men.

I was in the more interesting situation of having dove for years and at
the DM level when my husband decided to be certified.  From the
beginning he knew I was self-reliant, which sometimes worked the other
way for a while as he figured he didn't need to use his buddy skills
when he dove with me.  We worked it out though, and were able to remain
happily marrried :-)
In training couples or family pairs, I usually start them out with a
buddy other than their spouse or SO.  They can learn on their own, and
then get back together on a more "equal" basis.  Most are amenible to
this approach once it's explained.  In fact, they usually like it. and
they have a good understanding of self-reliancy in a buddy
relationship.

> > Our instructors don't take jack crap from anyone; you either learn or you
> > don't and if you don't perform up to their standards (they have NAUI and
> > PADI instructor numbers that are in the low 4 digits) then you simply
> > don't pass.

I would hope that their attitude is not simply a military approach, but
one of working with a student until the appropriate level of mastery
and competence is reached.  Sometimes, a student just needs some time
and practice until he feels comfortable with a skill; hence the
advantage of many pool sessions rather than a weekend course.

> That's the biggest difference in agencies and instructors.  PADI is set up
> to ensure that everyone passes.  Other agencies tend to be the same, but not
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Sure you do.  You described one in your post.  Look for another just like
> him/her . . . or go back and get more training from the same one.

Shawn, you've already established in yourself an important attitude in
becoming a good diver: demanding competency of yourself and those
around you.   Complacency is a killer, as I'm sure you have figured
out.  Realize that in time as you dive more and more (so go DIVING!)
you'll temper your vocalization of that attitude and learn to ask your
instructors and mentors the right questions and will learn how to ask
the right questionos from the right people. In other words, don't
become a PITA to those trying to help you by thinking you know more
than they do.  It's not a big deal here, but it is IRL. Here, you can
pretty much say anything and the worst you'll get is a keyboard-lshing
:-)

How is your wife doing with her training?  What are her goals in
diving? Expect that you will have some individual interests and respect
those.  When she's ready, send her off diving with people other than
you. And you go diving with others as well.  Diving isn't like marriage
vows with respect to faithfulness; diving with others will truly make
you both better divers and better dive partners for one another.

Enjoy your course, let us know how it goes, and did I mention that you
need to GO DIVING??

*
Lee Bell - 29 Jun 2006 18:49 GMT
> Other than turning off a student's air UW, which is no longer permitted
> in OW training for insurance reasons, YMCA has not eliminated
> "confidence drills."  I understand the shutoff thing:

> Attorney to instructor:  Please tell us what you did right before your
> client drowned?

> Instructor"  First I shut off his air.....

Attorneys and I don't often agree on what is right and wrong.  Just look at
all the disagreements Greg and I have had over the years which, by the way,
don't mean we like one another any more or less than would otherwise be the
case.

Personally, I found having my air shut off to be one of the more useful
elements of the confidence drills I was put through.  While it's not very
likely that my air would be shut off during a normal dive, it did teach me
to turn it on without a lot of stress, the one or two times (a decade) that
I've jumped in without turning it on in the first place.

> It's a skill-builder that should NEVER have to be actuallly used IRL,
> but its a really important confidence builder.  I teach it as such.

We already knew you are a good instructor.  Your fame preceeds your recent
postings.  No, I won't tell who told on you.

> I was in the more interesting situation of having dove for years and at
> the DM level when my husband decided to be certified.  From the
> beginning he knew I was self-reliant, which sometimes worked the other
> way for a while as he figured he didn't need to use his buddy skills
> when he dove with me.  We worked it out though, and were able to remain
> happily marrried :-)

Our situation was just the opposite.  I have been diving for almost 30 years
when I met my wife.  She got certified the year we got married.  I don't
want to suggest that I'm overly protective, because I really try not to be.
Nevertheless, there was a faint shadow above her when she did her checkout
dives . . . me.  She got paired with the turkey that bolted for the surface
in the swimming pool sessions.  You may be very sure he was not going to do
that at 30 feet or more with my wife in tow.  To his credit, or perhaps
hers, he had no significant problems during the checkout dive.

> In training couples or family pairs, I usually start them out with a
> buddy other than their spouse or SO.  They can learn on their own, and
> then get back together on a more "equal" basis.  Most are amenible to
> this approach once it's explained.  In fact, they usually like it. and
> they have a good understanding of self-reliancy in a buddy
> relationship.

I paid for my wife to learn to now ski, despite the fact that I was once a
competitive water skiier.  I paid for my wife to learn how to snow ski,
despite the fact that I was once an advanced snow skiier and have a NASTAR
bronze medal to prove it.  I paid for my wife to learn how to dive, despite
the fact that I had been diving for 30 years when she learned.

I learned a long time ago that a close relationship with a student can
change the instructors expectations and patience.  It's almost always better
to let a good, independent, professional instructor handle the task.

I taught my wife to drive a stick shift car (we weren't married at the time)
only because she had just bought one and needed to drive it to work the next
day.  I got lucky, succeeding without shouting, being shouted at, or being
shot.

Lee
Star - 29 Jun 2006 21:31 GMT
> > Other than turning off a student's air UW, which is no longer permitted
> > in OW training for insurance reasons, YMCA has not eliminated
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> to turn it on without a lot of stress, the one or two times (a decade) that
> I've jumped in without turning it on in the first place.

Agreed.  But it's the law, for me, at this point.  In OW anyways.  AOW,
Master diver, leadership training - its fair game and I do it.

When jumping in and then learning air is off, just pretend you're
practicing a shutdown.  Works for me :-)

> > It's a skill-builder that should NEVER have to be actuallly used IRL,
> > but its a really important confidence builder.  I teach it as such.
>
> We already knew you are a good instructor.  Your fame preceeds your recent
> postings.  No, I won't tell who told on you.

Be that way, then :-P

> Our situation was just the opposite.  I have been diving for almost 30 years
> when I met my wife.  She got certified the year we got married.  I don't
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> that at 30 feet or more with my wife in tow.  To his credit, or perhaps
> hers, he had no significant problems during the checkout dive.

You were just being a good buddy.  No interference there.

> > In training couples or family pairs, I usually start them out with a
> > buddy other than their spouse or SO.  They can learn on their own, and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> bronze medal to prove it.  I paid for my wife to learn how to dive, despite
> the fact that I had been diving for 30 years when she learned.

Someone else trained my husband, other than DM.

> I taught my wife to drive a stick shift car (we weren't married at the time)
> only because she had just bought one and needed to drive it to work the next
> day.  I got lucky, succeeding without shouting, being shouted at, or being
> shot.

We hung wallpaper together and did not need to call a laywer :-)

*
Lee Bell - 30 Jun 2006 00:26 GMT
> Agreed.  But it's the law, for me, at this point.  In OW anyways.  AOW,
> Master diver, leadership training - its fair game and I do it.

Understood.

> When jumping in and then learning air is off, just pretend you're
> practicing a shutdown.  Works for me :-)

Us single tank divers don't do many shut downs.  8^)

>> We already knew you are a good instructor.  Your fame preceeds your
>> recent
>> postings.  No, I won't tell who told on you.

> Be that way, then :-P

OK, I will be.  8^)

> You were just being a good buddy.  No interference there.

I suppose, but I'm not sure her instructor would agree.  Back then, I was
still diving with a hard rubber plate and single hose regulator.  No
buoyancy device and no octopus alternate.  The wouldn't let me on the boat.
No problem, I took my own boat.  Until you've tried, you have no idea how
hard it can be to unhook and retrieve an anchor and drive the boat at the
same time.  I had a plan.  It failed.  The seas were a bit choppy.  I fed
the fish three times before I gave up, put my gear back on and went down and
retreived my anchor by hand.  It had slipped into a hole in the hard pan
bottom and would never have come out if I had not gone to get it.

>> I taught my wife to drive a stick shift car (we weren't married at the
>> time)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> being
>> shot.

> We hung wallpaper together and did not need to call a laywer :-)

Send it to Ripley's.  That's definite "believe it or not" territory.

Lee
JRE - 30 Jun 2006 01:26 GMT
<snip>
>>Buddy breathing or gas sharing?  There's a difference to many of us.  Buddy
>>breathing, as I use the term, means shaing a single second stage, passing it
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> It's a skill-builder that should NEVER have to be actuallly used IRL,
> but its a really important confidence builder.  I teach it as such.

<snip>

This is not a basic OW question (which was probably the context of your
response).

But suppose you had a catastrophic deco reg failure. Would you want to
be able to buddy breathe with someone having the same deco mix?  This is
not an academic question.  This happened to someone else when I dove
last.  Few deco regs I've seen have octos.  (Certainly mine does not.)
Oh, by the way, it's simply amazing how many bubbles happen at the
surface when a first stage HP O-ring lets go.  Looked like the sea was
boiling...

Now, lost deco gas planning should cover this eventuality from a safety
standpoint, but I'm talking about convenience and safety margin here,
not survival or razor-thin DCS avoidance.

I think I would want to share gas in this case, assuming adequate
supply, in either direction.

John Eells
Lee Bell - 30 Jun 2006 02:23 GMT
> This is not a basic OW question (which was probably the context of your
> response).

> But suppose you had a catastrophic deco reg failure. Would you want to be
> able to buddy breathe with someone having the same deco mix?  This is not
> an academic question.  This happened to someone else when I dove last.
> Few deco regs I've seen have octos.  (Certainly mine does not.) Oh, by the
> way, it's simply amazing how many bubbles happen at the surface when a
> first stage HP O-ring lets go.  Looked like the sea was boiling...

> Now, lost deco gas planning should cover this eventuality from a safety
> standpoint, but I'm talking about convenience and safety margin here, not
> survival or razor-thin DCS avoidance.

I was under the impression that the right way to do things is for each diver
to have sufficient gas for his needs and for his buddy's needs.  If I'm
correct, the ability to buddy breathe is inherent in the process.  I
seriously doubt that there is a diver competent to do this kind of deco
diving, that is not also competent to buddy breathe, even those that have
never had occasion to do it, even in practice.  As Scott commented, it's not
rocket surgery, or was that brain science?  I forget.

I'm glad you mentioned this, though.  I've been having trouble telling the
folks in the UK, where deco is much more common than it is here, why they
should teach buddy breathing and you just provided a good reason.

Lee
Star - 30 Jun 2006 04:38 GMT
> <snip>
> >>Buddy breathing or gas sharing?  There's a difference to many of us.  Buddy
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> John Eells

John, you are correct in that we were discussing this as a recreational
diving skill.

As for losing a deco gas, I *always* have enough backgas for a (very
long) deco and a backup schedule as well. (Recall that you plan to
carry enough of ALL gases for both you and your partner.) If I were to
share a deco gas, it would be on the backup backgas deco schedule, each
diver having the deco gas (taking care that to observe the MOD so as
not to share too hot of a gas) for 3-5 minutes then handing it back.
Even a skilled buddy-breathe could, depending on other conditions and
which stop you were at, seriously mess up BOTH divers as the jostling
and effort will most certainly interfere with a clean deco.  Another
possible plan would be to hand off the deco bottle to the OOG diver,
let that diver use it until done while remaining on your backgas, then
go to a backup deco schedule. OR, the OOG diver can complete his deco,
hand you back the bottle, then surface and send a clean safety diver
down with a fresh bottle for you.

As in recreational diving, buddy-breathing as in
take-3-breaths-and-pass-and-exhale would probably be my last choice
with a lost deco gas.

*
Carl Nisarel - 30 Jun 2006 19:50 GMT
Luann Lee "PornStar" <lclee1@gmail.com> rista:

> John, you are correct in that we were discussing this as a
> recreational diving skill.

Yet the r.s. regular fuckwits demand a professional skill level
from anyone posting.
Some Random Dude - 30 Jun 2006 03:36 GMT
>> > That's a joke.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Instructor"  First I shut off his air.....

Rops, my instructor for the buddy breaths made sure everone on the
class knew how to share air with a single reg, not just share gas. and
during the swim around after skills practice when we got some bottom
time in after learnign he'd buzz around the pairs and do harrassment
stuff like swim past and pull the mask off, or grab a foot and rip off
the fin. I even had him turn my air off, so it does happen, had to
share air while my buddy turned it back on.
Shawn B. - 30 Jun 2006 07:12 GMT
> Be careful in your diving relationship.  It's quite easy for us macho
> types, may not include you, but it certainly does include me, to look
> after the little woman in all things.  It's a nice sentiment, but it's not
> beneficial where safety issues are involved.  Woman, as Star will
> certainly confirm, have the same need to be self reliant as men, perhaps
> more since they often have to dive with men.

Yeah, I understand.  Actually, in the beginning we were paired with other
buddies but as comfort sunk in they paired us with our spouse.  Also, there
was plenty of pool excercises making sure we were ready for the ocean before
the fact.  Tons of buddy breathing and octo breathing.  I actually got an
octo from a buddy where it took in more water than air.  Hated it at first,
but then I saw it as a personal oppurtunity figure out what to do if that
were 60 feet under???  I stuck my tongue in the whole and it worked.  My
instructor said that's exactly what I should have done and... went and got
another octo that worked properly afterwords.  After that experience (and my
terrible cough from breathing water)...

... the rest of the class thereafter "instinctively" check their regulators
by breathing a breath (under water once in the water) and testing their octo
the same way, before decending into the ocean/pool.  Our instructure didn't
have to give us a lesson in that one but, in addition to the very strict
assemble/dissemble gear drill, er, excercises we did, and checking
everything that can be checked, this became just another one of the things
to do.  Sure, we were trained to do it before jumping in the water, but how
do you know if it will take in water excessively until your in the water and
try it?

Anyway, basic stuff.  But all instructors were so extremely safety and
proficiency conscious that, aggrevating at first, now its just the way I
learned and I won't want to visit any instructor that doesn't care at least
as much.

Most of the females required so much attention that its insane.  The
instructors were very patient and after a while, the females (my wife
included) exceeded the proficiency of the males and even, sort of, set
examples for the men to catch up with.  The instructors were thoroughly
impressed that, with a very very very slow start, in the end, they did
absolutely spectacular.  I say thought somewhat jokingly, there's nothing
wrong with men/women in general, just just how the class turned out.

We all learned, we all got our fair share of attention, we all had our
struggles, and we all were taught strictly to survey and learn about local
conditions, laws, surf entry, emergency phones/procedures/locations... etc.
before doing a dive.  We all were taught how to plan a dive with our buddy
and plan for emergencies, what to do, how to change plans if something goes
wrong, etc.  We also learned to go to the various Laguna Coves and watch
other classes occasionally to get an idea about how other classes are
trained.  What we observed was pretty scary.

The most important programming we recieved is that we are responsible for
our own gear/safety and that no one else is.  Pretty obvious, huh?  His
favorite line was "there's no homocide in SCUBA, only suicide.".  That about
hits it home for me.  I approach every dive the same way.  I'm responsible
for my own safety.  My wife for hers, and we can never take buddy check for
granted.

Thanks,
Shawn
Star - 30 Jun 2006 15:29 GMT
<SNIP>

> Most of the females required so much attention that its insane.

*SIts firmly on hands steam pouring from ears.....*

>The
> instructors were very patient

Were any of them women?

> and after a while, the females (my wife
> included)

She's already kicking your backside UW with her trim, streamlining and
SAC, if not other things as well. Get used to it.

exceeded the proficiency of the males and even, sort of, set
> examples for the men to catch up with.

.... and will continue to do so, should they so choose.  

*
Grumman-581 - 30 Jun 2006 17:43 GMT
> She's already kicking your backside UW with her trim, streamlining and
> SAC, if not other things as well. Get used to it.

Grace was relating a story about some individuals who appeared to be
targeting Asians -- following them home and robbing them... In
response, I pointed out an article on the Houston Chronicle's website
today concerning a case where a young woman's SUV was run off the road
and she was raped, stabbed, and left for dead...
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/4014662.html

Grace's response was, "Yeah, men are just animals"..

My response to her was, "Yeah, but if civilization had been left to
women, we would still be arguing about the color of the first bear
skin run in the first fuckin' cave"...

Her response, "Pink, of course"...

My response, "Yeah, right, now you're gonna have us go all the fuckin'
way up to the Artic just to kill a fuckin' polar bear"...

Summary:  We're two entirely different species that somehow manage to
interbreed...
Chris Guynn - 30 Jun 2006 19:17 GMT
<snip>

> Summary:  We're two entirely different species that somehow manage to
> interbreed...

It's only because the process is so much fun.  :-)
Rick Simms - 10 Jul 2006 14:31 GMT
>> She's already kicking your backside UW with her trim, streamlining and
>> SAC, if not other things as well. Get used to it.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>Summary:  We're two entirely different species that somehow manage to
>interbreed...

The old title, "Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus" is not true.

"Men are from Earth, Women are from Earth, Get used to it" is much
more applicable.

Rick Simms
********************  
Nature abhors a vacuum, but not as much as a cat does.

Nelson Crawford
Chris Guynn - 30 Jun 2006 19:16 GMT
<snip>

> She's already kicking your backside UW with her trim, streamlining and
> SAC, if not other things as well. Get used to it.

Isn't it more difficult to be more streamlined when you have... ummm...
funbags?

;-)
Grumman-581 - 30 Jun 2006 21:22 GMT
> Isn't it more difficult to be more streamlined when you have... ummm...
> funbags?

For some women moreso than others, of course... <dirty-old-man-grin>