I hope that I am not offending the gods and experts of this newsgroup.
I am going to mexico on vacation in a week and I would like to snorkel
there.
I wear eyeglasses and my vision is about -2.5-3 dioptries. So I can
see without eyeglasses, but not well enough to appreciate the beauty
of underwater world.
Is there some snorkeling system that is not too expensive and that can
accommodate eyeglasses?
i
There are two options that you might want to consider.
The first is to wear contact lenses. The soft ones don't come out very
easily even if your mask floods. Some people, myself included, find that
the lenses dry out and become uncomfortable when worn inside a mask for a
long time though.
The second option is to get prescription lenses fitted inside a mask. Your
optician should be able to arrange this but it can be expensive. I have a
frame that looks like the front of a pair of glasses but without the legs.
It snaps into the mask very securely. The advantage of this is that the
frame takes ordinary spectacle lenses so you dont need a complete new mask
if your vision changes. Also you can opt to use contact lenses for pool
training.
The disadvantage of this systen is that water and mist can get trapped
between the lenses and the mask glass, which reduces your visibility a bit.
Also, when you take the mask off on the beach or boat, you can't see.
Regards,
Richard
> I hope that I am not offending the gods and experts of this newsgroup.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> i
Ignoramus6098 - 05 Dec 2003 18:46 GMT
> There are two options that you might want to consider.
>
> The first is to wear contact lenses. The soft ones don't come out very
> easily even if your mask floods. Some people, myself included, find that
> the lenses dry out and become uncomfortable when worn inside a mask for a
> long time though.
what is a long time?
> The second option is to get prescription lenses fitted inside a mask. Your
> optician should be able to arrange this but it can be expensive. I have a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> between the lenses and the mask glass, which reduces your visibility a bit.
> Also, when you take the mask off on the beach or boat, you can't see.
Thanks. I was looking around a bit and found this item:
http://www.divers-supply.com/viewItem.asp?ItemID=TUS5094&UnitCde=1&Search=N
I could supposedly insert it into some TUsa mask, whatever it is.
Is this my cheapest option? To buy these lenses and a tusa mask?
Again, I highly doubt that I will snorkel more than 30 hours per
year. Would prefer to get under $100 for the whole package if
possible.
Thanks!
i
Dan Volker - 05 Dec 2003 18:57 GMT
> > There are two options that you might want to consider.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Thanks. I was looking around a bit and found this item:
http://www.divers-supply.com/viewItem.asp?ItemID=TUS5094&UnitCde=1&Search=N
> I could supposedly insert it into some TUsa mask, whatever it is.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> i
I would go with contacts if at all possible..Comfort levels will be high,
the chance for losing them is remote, even with a flooded mask ( and
disposable lens are almost free so who cares :-) )
I have done 3 and 4 hour dives with contacts on and had no issues with
them--other than perfect vision in-water and out.
The peripheral vision issue is huge as well---glasses are fine for the
business world, but they stink for action sports where you need to see out
of the sides of your vision..the peripheral vision issue is not CRITICAL for
diving, but the difference can be appreciated easily.
Dan V
Ignoramus6098 - 05 Dec 2003 19:45 GMT
> I would go with contacts if at all possible..Comfort levels will be high,
> the chance for losing them is remote, even with a flooded mask ( and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Dan V
thank you, maybe I really will go with eyeglasses.
i
Ignoramus6098 - 05 Dec 2003 19:52 GMT
>> I would go with contacts if at all possible..Comfort levels will be high,
>> the chance for losing them is remote, even with a flooded mask ( and
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> i
I am sorry, I meant contact lenses.
i
Jon C - 06 Dec 2003 00:14 GMT
> > thank you, maybe I really will go with eyeglasses.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> i
I think you'll be happy with contacts. It takes a little bit of time to get
completely used to handling them (putting them in, etc), but you'll forget
they're there. Acuvue2 lenses tend to fit extremely well and are
disposable (very very cheap, less than $3 per lens that you wear for 2-4
weeks). Focus Dailies are nice too - 50 cents a pop, never have to worry
about cleaning.
Crownfield - 06 Dec 2003 01:22 GMT
check this link:
http://www.neoptx.com/
I have used them and they work well with any plain mask.
> Thanks!
>
> i
Lee Bell - 06 Dec 2003 13:20 GMT
> check this link:
> http://www.neoptx.com/
> I have used them and they work well with any plain mask.
These look good for somebody like me, who's getting progressively more far
sighted as they age, but $35 seems a bit high if disposable contacts are a
viable option.
Lee
Crownfield - 06 Dec 2003 18:46 GMT
> > check this link:
> > http://www.neoptx.com/
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> sighted as they age, but $35 seems a bit high if disposable contacts are a
> viable option.
agreed.
I bought two different pairs and made bifocals.
> Lee
Richard - 06 Dec 2003 19:34 GMT
> > There are two options that you might want to consider.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> what is a long time?
Anything over about half an hour. I mainly dive in cold water. I don't
know if that has any impact on the lenses. If they do dry out they have a
tendency to fold in half and get stuck under my top eye lid. This is
painful and unfixable in the water so I don't like to use contact lenses if
I can't surface and get back to shore quickly.
However, as many have said, contact lenses are more convenient when they
behave themselves and I prefer them for pool training. This makes the type
of mask with removable lenses ideal for me.
Enjoy Mexico and spare a thought for those of us shivering on the snow bound
beaches of Northern Europe!
Best Wishes,
Richard
>I hope that I am not offending the gods and experts of this newsgroup.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>i
Some dive shops stock prescription lenses with your diopter. The
complete new mask and lenses should be $90 or so and they would be
able to set you up immediately.
"Ignoramus6098"
> I hope that I am not offending the gods and experts of this newsgroup.
The gods of rec.scuba are very hard to offend.
> I am going to mexico on vacation in a week and I would like to snorkel
> there.
Good idea. The gods approve.
> I wear eyeglasses and my vision is about -2.5-3 dioptries. So I can
> see without eyeglasses, but not well enough to appreciate the beauty
> of underwater world. Is there some snorkeling system that is not too
> expensive and that can accommodate eyeglasses?
It depends on what you consider "not too expensive." A few years ago, I
bought my father a TUSA Liberator mask. The mask itself was about $50,
reasonable for a quality mask. The Tusa mask has two lenses and then make
them in various diopters for near sighted people (can see near, not see
far). Unfortunately, they do not make them, or didn't at the time, for far
sighted people. I had to have them custom made, and that cost a bit more
than the mask. In my personal opinion, this is a good option for anybody
that will use the mask at least occasionally.
$50 for a mask may sound like a lot to you, but, all things considered, it
isn't. For any snorkeler or diver, mask fit is one of the most important
aspects of your equipment. Sure, for us divers, there are life support
items that have to work, or else, but if the mask does not fit, or is of
such poor quality that you can't keep it from fogging up every minute or so,
you're not going to enjoy that dive, no matter how much you spend on
everything else. You can have fun with really junk fins and a cheap snorkel
works pretty much like an expensive one, but a bad mask simply can not be
tolerated.
Having said that, get some help from a shop that has a wide variety of mask
styles. They'll be able to help you find something that will take your
perscription, that will fit and not leak and, with a little luck, won't
break the bank in the process.
Lee
de Valois - 05 Dec 2003 21:38 GMT
Lee Bell left this mess on Fri, 05 Dec 2003 21:21:26 GMT for The Way to clean
up:
>"Ignoramus6098"
>
>> I hope that I am not offending the gods and experts of this newsgroup.
>
>The gods of rec.scuba are very hard to offend.
I take offense at that.
Tao te Carl
"It takes a village to have an idiot." - Carl (c) 2003
(Kudos to Cap'n Jim Wyatt for this link) BEFORE you ask a dumb-a.s question
here...http://www.speakeasy.org/~neilco/bart.gif
Alan Street - 05 Dec 2003 22:59 GMT
>Lee Bell left this mess on Fri, 05 Dec 2003 21:21:26 GMT for The Way to clean
>up:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>I take offense at that.
Which is why you haven't attained deity status yet :-)
Prescription masks can be had for anywhere from $75 to way-too-much. It
might be worth checking to see if standard diopter masks are available for
rent for a few extra bucks. SCUBA shops often have the whole range from -1
to -8 right on the shelves.

Signature
Briggs Christie
Oahu Dive Center
Kailua, Hawaii
1-866-933-DIVE
www.oahudivecenter.com
> I hope that I am not offending the gods and experts of this newsgroup.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> i