Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / December 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

CO2 through SCUBA 1st Stage Regulator

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Grumman-581 - 01 Dec 2003 19:25 GMT
I'm thinking about using an old SCUBA tank to hold CO2 (liquid) and
mounting it in my Jeep for "onboard air" for filling up tires after
going offroad or running power tools.  When the CO2 goes through the
regulator at a high flow rate, the regulator might frost up somewhat
(at least this sometimes happens with my CO2 regulator on my normal
CO2 tank).  The tank pressures associated with CO2 (approximately 800
psi normally, perhaps 1100 psi after a fill) are considerably less
than the 3000 psi fow which the SCUBA cylinder was originally
certified and since the tank would be carrying liquid CO2, it would
contain a higher capacity of expanded gas than if it was carrying 3000
psi air.  Assuming that I can find a cheap 1st stage, what is the
intermediate pressure coming off the low pressure ports of most 1st
stages?  Any potential problems with having that cold of a gas going
through the 1st stage?  What would be the maximum flow rate that one
could probably expect from such a 1st stage?
rnf2 - 01 Dec 2003 21:32 GMT
> I'm thinking about using an old SCUBA tank to hold CO2 (liquid) and
> mounting it in my Jeep for "onboard air" for filling up tires after
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> through the 1st stage?  What would be the maximum flow rate that one
> could probably expect from such a 1st stage?

Hmm.... I dunno abou carrying LIQUID CO2 in a Alu scuba tank, excessive cold
tends to make Alu brittle. if it was steel tank tho. it should work.

rhys
Alan Street - 01 Dec 2003 21:52 GMT
>> I'm thinking about using an old SCUBA tank to hold CO2 (liquid) and
>> mounting it in my Jeep for "onboard air" for filling up tires after
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>rhys

It's not cold when it's just sitting in the tank. It does chill upon expansion,
so I expect the first stage will very likely freeze up during use.
Crownfield - 02 Dec 2003 02:47 GMT
> >> I'm thinking about using an old SCUBA tank to hold CO2 (liquid) and
> >> mounting it in my Jeep for "onboard air" for filling up tires after
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> It's not cold when it's just sitting in the tank.

surely you jest!
you can not be serious?

> It does chill upon expansion,
> so I expect the first stage will very likely freeze up during use.
DavidM - 02 Dec 2003 03:00 GMT
> > It's not cold when it's just sitting in the tank.
>
> surely you jest!
> you can not be serious?

Does the outside of any liquefies gas tank feel cold to touch?

Cheers
David M
Lee Bell - 02 Dec 2003 10:23 GMT
> > > It's not cold when it's just sitting in the tank.
> >
> > surely you jest!
> > you can not be serious?
>
> Does the outside of any liquefies gas tank feel cold to touch?

Liquid Oxygen and Liquid Nitrogen have been known to be a bit cold to the
touch.
IK - 02 Dec 2003 10:33 GMT
> > > > It's not cold when it's just sitting in the tank.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Liquid Oxygen and Liquid Nitrogen have been known to be a bit cold to the
> touch.

...at atmospheric pressure.
Grumman-581 - 02 Dec 2003 13:35 GMT
> Liquid Oxygen and Liquid Nitrogen have been known
> to be a bit cold to the touch.

Whether a gas is liquid or not is a function of the temperature and the
pressure... Some gases can be readily liquified by just increasing their
pressure a moderate amount... Others require so much of a pressure increase
that from a practical standpoint, we must decrease their temperature also...
CO2 and propane fall into the former category, nitrogen and oxygen fall into
the latter... If I remember correctly, it is a function of their vapor
pressure which is a function of temperature... CO2 readily goes into
solution in water and the colder the water the more CO2 will go into it...
This fact in addition to the carbonic acid that is produced is what gives us
the distinctive flavor and bubbles of carbonated drinks... This is also why
it is so easy to create your own carbonation vessel out of no more than a
2-liter soft drink bottle and a metal schrader valve for a bulkhead
connector in the bottle top... You only need to pressurize the carbonation
vessel to about 30-35 psi and shake vigorously to carbonate the liquid... I
usually pressurize to 65 psi so that I don't have to add carbonation as many
times when I started out with a warmer than optimal liquid... Optimal
temperature is probably around 35-40F... I've also tried oxygenating
drinks... The bubbles are smaller and the drink does not have the same
flavor due to the lack of carbonic acid...
Alan Street - 02 Dec 2003 03:38 GMT
>> >Hmm.... I dunno abou carrying LIQUID CO2 in a Alu scuba tank, excessive cold
>> >tends to make Alu brittle. if it was steel tank tho. it should work.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>surely you jest!
>you can not be serious?

I'm not sure if you're joking, since I thought you had a scientific
background and would know this.

At room temperature (25C), CO2 condenses to a liquid at 50 bar. Here's
a phase diagram that helps explain it:

http://www.chemicalogic.com/download/co2_phase_diagram.pdf

A tank of CO2 sitting around will either contain a liquid or a gas
depending on the pressure, but it will not be cold (until you open the
valve, that is. At that point, if it is in a liquid phase, it will give
up a large amount of latent heat and get seriously cold, usually
forming dry ice).

Alan
Grumman-581 - 02 Dec 2003 13:50 GMT
> Hmm.... I dunno abou carrying LIQUID CO2 in a Alu scuba tank, excessive cold
> tends to make Alu brittle. if it was steel tank tho. it should work.

Irregardless of whether it really is cold or not, aluminum would be
perfectly acceptable since commercial soft drink fountains often use
aluminum for their CO2 tanks... Luxfer makes them also...
Rich Lockyer - 02 Dec 2003 01:47 GMT
Common IP would be around 130 psi +/- 10.
You could dial that down... argon regs generally run around 80psi or
so.

Even that is more than you'd really need for your tires, and getting
the tank filled with CO2 while fitted with a K-valve MAY be
problematic (not to mention a hazard).

See if you can fit a regular kegerator CO2 valve and then you can use
a kegerator regulator as well...  or check here.

http://www.morebeer.com/index.html?page=detail.php3&pid=D1052

$129 for a 20-pound tank.
$55 for a reg.

 --- Rich
 http://richlockyer.tripod.com/
Lee Bell - 02 Dec 2003 02:43 GMT
> I'm thinking about using an old SCUBA tank to hold CO2 (liquid) and
> mounting it in my Jeep for "onboard air" for filling up tires after
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> intermediate pressure coming off the low pressure ports of most 1st
> stages?

Between 130 and 150 psi depending on brand and how it was adjusted when last
serviced.

> Any potential problems with having that cold of a gas going
> through the 1st stage?

How cold do you expect the gas to be?  Expanding gas cools.  That's true of
air just like it is true of CO2.  Since the expansion is somewhat greater
from liquid to gas, I would assume that it would be a bit colder, but can't
really tell how cold.  On the other hand, I would assume that a gas that is
not cold enough to damage the rubber in your tires, would not be cold enough
to damage the parts in your regulator.  Frost buildup on the outside of the
regulator would not seem to be critical to its operation, but you might get
better information from somebody that actually uses the things in cold
climates.

>  What would be the maximum flow rate that one could probably expect from
such a 1st stage?

It would be approximately the same as the flow you would get out of a low
pressure port now.  It is certainly adequate for filling tires.

Lee
Rich Lockyer - 03 Dec 2003 02:32 GMT
>to damage the parts in your regulator.  Frost buildup on the outside of the
>regulator would not seem to be critical to its operation, but you might get
>better information from somebody that actually uses the things in cold
>climates.

I'd put an OPV on the reg to save the hose (and maybe a hand) in case
the reg freeflows.

 --- Rich
 http://richlockyer.tripod.com/
Lee Bell - 02 Dec 2003 02:55 GMT
> I'm thinking about using an old SCUBA tank to hold CO2 (liquid) and
> mounting it in my Jeep for "onboard air" for filling up tires after
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> through the 1st stage?  What would be the maximum flow rate that one
> could probably expect from such a 1st stage?

One more thing I should have mentioned.  Mark this tank very, very clearly.
Picking it up and using it for breathing gas is likely to be a mistake you
only get to make once.

Lee
Dazed and Confuzed - 02 Dec 2003 04:05 GMT
> > I'm thinking about using an old SCUBA tank to hold CO2 (liquid) and
> > mounting it in my Jeep for "onboard air" for filling up tires after
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Lee

Better to buy a co2 tank and a cheap regulator. No potentially deadly mistakes
then. Probably cheaper too. You can rent co2 or argon tanks here for about 18
bucks a year. Just exchange them when you run 'em dry.

--

An amateur built the ark ....professionals built the Titanic.
Grumman-581 - 02 Dec 2003 05:23 GMT
> Better to buy a co2 tank and a cheap regulator. No potentially deadly mistakes
> then. Probably cheaper too. You can rent co2 or argon tanks here for about 18
> bucks a year. Just exchange them when you run 'em dry.

Oh, I already own a 20# CO2 tank and regulator, but I was recently bidding
on some old SCUBA tanks on eBay and made the mistake of bidding on multiple
tanks at the time time... Hey, it was my first attempt at eBay and as luck
would have it, no one else bidded on these tanks... I've got a few steel and
aluminum tanks headed my way and I figured that I would get some use out of
them... Some of them are out of hydro and using them for CO2 would still be
safe even if they were some of the 6351-T6 alloy (of which a few out of the
millions that were manufactured) that ruptured... I've been renting a large
O2 tank for welding and I'll transfer some of the O2 into a couple of them
for use while flying at night and return the large O2 tank so that I no
longer will be having to rent it at $9 per month... So far, I've won the bid
on 3 of the tanks and my luck will probably have me winning the bid on a few
more before it is all over... Oh well, I'll just chalk it up as a "learning
experience" and since I can still use the tanks for other stuff, it's not
that big of a deal... As "learning experiences" go, it was a rather cheap
one (i.e. no compound fractures or missing body parts involved this time)...
Although I would have to buy a regular CO2 valve to get a gas supplier to
fill the tank and they would probably expect a recent hydro, I figure that I
can rig up a fill whip with some adapters and transfer the liquid CO2 from
my actual CO2 tank to the SCUBA tanks that I'll be using for CO2... Of
course, I'll mark these tanks so that I won't make a mistake and use them
for air tanks... On my other CO2 tank, I've already made it so that it can
fill tires, run air tools, and make my own carbonated beverages...

So, what can I expect for the flow rate from a 1st stage?
Scott - 02 Dec 2003 05:43 GMT
> So, what can I expect for the flow rate from a 1st stage?

Far more than needed to inflate a flat tire.

Now, what are you really up to?
Grumman-581 - 02 Dec 2003 07:42 GMT
> Far more than needed to inflate a flat tire.

Inflating tires can withstand a slower flow rate than seating tires after
you've popped them off their bead... Sometimes that happens if you deflate
them too much before going offroad... There is also the issue of wanting the
regulator to be able to handle an impact wrench...

> Now, what are you really up to?

Just what I originally posted... Onboard air for my Jeep... The one that I
originally configured for it has kind of gotten dedicated to carbonation of
drinks... Here's a link to someone else who has done it:
http://www.stu-offroad.com/co2/co2-1.htm
Scott - 02 Dec 2003 15:58 GMT
> > Far more than needed to inflate a flat tire.
>
> Inflating tires can withstand a slower flow rate than seating tires after
> you've popped them off their bead... Sometimes that happens if you deflate
> them too much before going offroad... There is also the issue of wanting the
> regulator to be able to handle an impact wrench...

Use ether to re-seat the bead.
Grumman-581 - 02 Dec 2003 16:53 GMT
> Use ether to re-seat the bead.

With or without a supplemental spark? <grin>
Scott - 03 Dec 2003 01:31 GMT
> > Use ether to re-seat the bead.
>
> With or without a supplemental spark? <grin>

Sparingly, with a wooden match thrown at it.
Dazed and Confuzed - 03 Dec 2003 01:00 GMT
> > > Far more than needed to inflate a flat tire.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Use ether to re-seat the bead.

It can be spectacular when you do that.....especially when you over-apply the
ether.

But it does work well.

--

An amateur built the ark ....professionals built the Titanic.
Alan Street - 02 Dec 2003 16:21 GMT
>> So, what can I expect for the flow rate from a 1st stage?
>
>Far more than needed to inflate a flat tire.
>
>Now, what are you really up to?

CO2 can be a little more volumetrically efficient than air. For example, a
typical "T" tank of nitrogen (56" x 9") holds about 304 ft3 at 2650 psi, while
the same size tank of liquid CO2 (at 400 psi) holds about 437 ft3.
Grumman-581 - 02 Dec 2003 16:59 GMT
> CO2 can be a little more volumetrically efficient than air. For example, a
> typical "T" tank of nitrogen (56" x 9") holds about 304 ft3 at 2650 psi, while
> the same size tank of liquid CO2 (at 400 psi) holds about 437 ft3.

From what I understand, you get about 3 times the 'air' supply for running
air tools and such from CO2 vs a similarly sized SCUBA tank... Plus, it's
easier to transfer most of the CO2 from one tank to another with CO2... With
air, you can only transfer half of it from one tank to another... With CO2,
you should be able to transfer all of it except for around 800 psi of gas
(assuming that you invert the doner tank)...
Dazed and Confuzed - 03 Dec 2003 01:05 GMT
> > CO2 can be a little more volumetrically efficient than air. For example, a
> > typical "T" tank of nitrogen (56" x 9") holds about 304 ft3 at 2650 psi,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> you should be able to transfer all of it except for around 800 psi of gas
> (assuming that you invert the doner tank)...

nope, only half.

--

An amateur built the ark ....professionals built the Titanic.
Alan Street - 03 Dec 2003 00:13 GMT
>> > CO2 can be a little more volumetrically efficient than air. For example, a
>> > typical "T" tank of nitrogen (56" x 9") holds about 304 ft3 at 2650 psi,
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>nope, only half.

No, almost all. You're thinking about gas transfer, where the pressure will
equalize between the two cylinders. Above ~50 bar (see my previous post), CO2
is a liquid at room temperature. As long as the liquid can flow between the two
tanks, it will be possible to almost completely fill one tank and empty the
other.
mike gray, CID - 03 Dec 2003 01:47 GMT
> No, almost all. You're thinking about gas transfer, where the pressure will
> equalize between the two cylinders. Above ~50 bar (see my previous post), CO2
> is a liquid at room temperature. As long as the liquid can flow between the two
> tanks, it will be possible to almost completely fill one tank and empty the
> other.

So I can use CO2 in one of my doubles, thus using the CO2 in one tank to
force the last cf out of the other, and get rid of my Spare-Air????
Alan Street - 03 Dec 2003 02:30 GMT
In article
<%gbzb.142788$Ec1.5763743@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, mike
gray, CID <mikegrayCID@worldnut.nut> wrote:

> > No, almost all. You're thinking about gas transfer, where the pressure will
> > equalize between the two cylinders. Above ~50 bar (see my previous post),
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> So I can use CO2 in one of my doubles, thus using the CO2 in one tank to
> force the last cf out of the other, and get rid of my Spare-Air????

Sure. Just make sure you're upside down and backwards when you make the
valve switch <g>.
Grumman-581 - 03 Dec 2003 20:45 GMT
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 01:47:39 GMT, "mike gray, CID"
<mikegrayCID@worldnut.nut> wrote ...

>So I can use CO2 in one of my doubles, thus using the CO2 in one tank to
>force the last cf out of the other, and get rid of my Spare-Air????

If you were doing something that required filling up large lift bags,
taking a CO2 bottle with you instead of relying on air tanks would be
more efficient... The key issue would be ensuring that the take was
upright durng the filling process, thus it could really suck if you
attempted to use it for dry suit or BC inflation...
rnf2 - 02 Dec 2003 21:34 GMT
> Hey, it was my first attempt at eBay and as luck
> would have it, no one else bidded on these tanks... I've got a few steel and
> aluminum tanks headed my way and I figured that I would get some use out of
> them...

You could send me a tank :)

I spent all my insurance on new gear, but still lack a tank and reg.

I've had to spend the money I was saving for the reg on my 4WD, the head
gaskets blown, so I've now gotta take off the head and install a new gasket,
and I'll change the timing while I'm at it. It's not much use having all the
gear to dive and not having the transport to get to the dive site, I figure
it's better to have the transport to get to a gear rental shop and the
site... :)

rhys
Lee Bell - 02 Dec 2003 21:55 GMT
> I've had to spend the money I was saving for the reg on my 4WD, the head
> gaskets blown, so I've now gotta take off the head and install a new gasket,
> and I'll change the timing while I'm at it. It's not much use having all the
> gear to dive and not having the transport to get to the dive site, I figure
> it's better to have the transport to get to a gear rental shop and the
> site... :)

That's a very expensive head gasket.
Grumman-581 - 02 Dec 2003 05:02 GMT
> One more thing I should have mentioned.  Mark this tank very, very clearly.
> Picking it up and using it for breathing gas is likely to be a mistake you
> only get to make once.

Especially if you were inverted and started to breathe off of that tank and
ended up breathing liquid CO2... <grin>
Steve - 02 Dec 2003 06:50 GMT
> One more thing I should have mentioned.  Mark this tank very, very clearly.
> Picking it up and using it for breathing gas is likely to be a mistake you
> only get to make once.

Since he presumably won't be putting a second stage on this particular first, he
could potentially rethread the ports. That would make it much more difficult to screw
up badly, since it would require some significant effort to do so.
Signature

Steve

The above can be construed as personal opinion in the absence of a reasonable
belief that it was intended as a statement of fact.

If you want a reply to reach me, remove the SPAMTRAP from the address.

Grumman-581 - 02 Dec 2003 13:43 GMT
> Since he presumably won't be putting a second stage on this particular first, he
> could potentially rethread the ports.

That might not be that bad of an idea since for this useage, having ports
that were threaded in 1/4" NPT would be best since that is the most common
thread used for the air tool quick connects... Not having the capability to
do this though, I would just use the standard ports and have a small hose
that converted from a LP port to a 1/4" NPT thread...
Dazed and Confuzed - 03 Dec 2003 00:54 GMT
> > Since he presumably won't be putting a second stage on this particular
> first, he
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> do this though, I would just use the standard ports and have a small hose
> that converted from a LP port to a 1/4" NPT thread...

buy a tap.

--

An amateur built the ark ....professionals built the Titanic.
Steve - 02 Dec 2003 22:12 GMT
Why not just use air? It's cheaper than CO2 and its not as much a pain in
the a.s.  Besides...using CO2 on power tools will only mess up the tool
> I'm thinking about using an old SCUBA tank to hold CO2 (liquid) and
> mounting it in my Jeep for "onboard air" for filling up tires after
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> through the 1st stage?  What would be the maximum flow rate that one
> could probably expect from such a 1st stage?
Lee Bell - 02 Dec 2003 23:16 GMT
> Why not just use air? It's cheaper than CO2 and its not as much a pain in
> the a.s.  Besides...using CO2 on power tools will only mess up the tool.

He needs portability and can carry more liquid CO2 than air in the same
sized bottle.

Hoe does CO2 mess up power tools?

Lee

> > I'm thinking about using an old SCUBA tank to hold CO2 (liquid) and
> > mounting it in my Jeep for "onboard air" for filling up tires after
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > through the 1st stage?  What would be the maximum flow rate that one
> > could probably expect from such a 1st stage?
Grumman-581 - 02 Dec 2003 23:24 GMT
> Why not just use air? It's cheaper than CO2 and its not as much a pain in
> the a.s.  Besides...using CO2 on power tools will only mess up the tool

I guess it depends upon where you get your CO2... I get a 20# tank filled up
locally for around $8... About the same price as a refill on a SCUBA tank,
but you get about 3 times as much 'air' out of it to run your tools... There
is also the issue of being able to use my one current hydro CO2 tank to get
the gas from the supplier and then being able to transfer most of it to the
other tanks that might not have a current hydro... Although I could do that
with air, I would only be able to transfer half of the original tank to the
new tank... Since I would be transferring liquid, I could transfer most of
it to the new tank... There are a lot of people who use CO2 for the air
tools and I have not heard any reports of them messing up the tools... You
have to add a little oil to the tool periodically, but you need to do that
with air also...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.