>A couple of my 'ol buddies and I have discussed the idea of doing a shark
> dive in California.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Thanks!
Go for it.
Shark dives are fun and interesting, and somewhat less dangerous than
driving on the freeway.
Educate yourself on different types of sharkdives, and their possible
ecological impact, first.
jbeck - 07 Mar 2006 03:11 GMT
>>A couple of my 'ol buddies and I have discussed the idea of doing a shark
>> dive in California.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Educate yourself on different types of sharkdives, and their possible
> ecological impact, first.
Looking for something guided...was hoping to get some recommendations on
some quality dive operations...or at least a recommended, no BS resource.
Popeye - 07 Mar 2006 09:50 GMT
>>>A couple of my 'ol buddies and I have discussed the idea of doing a shark
>>> dive in California.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Looking for something guided
Unguided shark dives are called...diving.
In North Carolina, we have to Bogart our way through dozens of Sand Tigers
to get into a wreck.
>...was hoping to get some recommendations on some quality dive
>operations...or at least a recommended, no BS resource.
I should have elaborated but I'm at work.
Some folks have an arguable point that shark feeding dives have a negative
behavioral impact on the sharks.
The various methods of baiting and/or feeding the sharks are probably the
primary focus point.
This has led to shark dives being banned in many places.
I myself disagree, at least to any amount of consequence.
I don't know if this applies to baiting a GWS with, er... you, in a cage.
jbeck - 08 Mar 2006 20:26 GMT
>>>>A couple of my 'ol buddies and I have discussed the idea of doing a
>>>>shark
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> I don't know if this applies to baiting a GWS with, er... you, in a cage.
Thanks Popeye.
Have never dove the east coast, and some of this crowd is now in California.
Thus why we are leaning towards California. I think seeing GWS would be
very interesting.
>A couple of my 'ol buddies and I have discussed the idea of doing a shark
> dive in California.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Thanks!
Sharks are boring and overated. Take your ol' buds up to the PNW and get
your a.ses over to the Seattle aquarium. They got an octopus there that eats
sharks. Great fun for the whole crew!
jbeck - 07 Mar 2006 03:18 GMT
>>A couple of my 'ol buddies and I have discussed the idea of doing a shark
>> dive in California.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> your a.ses over to the Seattle aquarium. They got an octopus there that
> eats sharks. Great fun for the whole crew!
I am sure that aquarim is great, but I will have to pass on it this year.
In my several hundred open water dives, I have *never* seen a shark. It's
one of those things, no matter what others may think, that I must do.
<speaking for myself, not the rest of my idiot friends>
Matthias Voss - 07 Mar 2006 08:50 GMT
> In my several hundred open water dives, I have *never* seen a shark.
That is not reciprocal.
Matthias
chilly - 07 Mar 2006 09:23 GMT
> > In my several hundred open water dives, I have *never* seen a shark.
>
> That is not reciprocal.
:^)
I also wonder where you've been diving jbeck. I've seen lots of them,
certainly not on every dive or even every area I go to, but I've seen my
share here and there in the world.
So I'm just wondering, do you usually only do local dives/freshwater dives?
jbeck - 08 Mar 2006 20:33 GMT
>> > In my several hundred open water dives, I have *never* seen a shark.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> So I'm just wondering, do you usually only do local dives/freshwater
> dives?
A few of my dives have been fresh water, but by far most have been
throughout the Caribean and Sea of Cortez. Also have a few cavern dives
(nope, no sharks there). Nikonos Cameras used to sponsor shoot outs, and I
participated in a few of those...a few years ago <sigh>. So far, top dive
location for me personally: Cayman Brac. Most overrated: Cozumel. Just
my humble opinions. Is that enough feel for my background?
chilly - 09 Mar 2006 04:40 GMT
> > So I'm just wondering, do you usually only do local dives/freshwater
> > dives?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> location for me personally: Cayman Brac. Most overrated: Cozumel. Just
> my humble opinions. Is that enough feel for my background?
Bummer for ya. You've been robbed.
Joe English - 07 Mar 2006 13:38 GMT
>> In my several hundred open water dives, I have *never* seen a shark.
>
> That is not reciprocal.
>
> Matthias
or dive with a lawyer
Cam - 08 Mar 2006 20:53 GMT
> > In my several hundred open water dives, I have *never* seen a shark.
>
> That is not reciprocal.
>
> Matthias
I fish for largemouth bass and the best advice I've got for someone who
wants to catch a smallmouth is to cast away from shore from the same
spots you've been casting towards shore. In the same way you're not
likely to see many sharks when you're facing a reef but as Matthias
points out, they can see you.
Cam
Lee Bell - 07 Mar 2006 10:48 GMT
> In my several hundred open water dives, I have *never* seen a shark. It's
> one of those things, no matter what others may think, that I must do.
> <speaking for myself, not the rest of my idiot friends>
Sounds like your problem is observation skills. Where are you diving?
Want to see sharks, go spearfishing.
Lee
>A couple of my 'ol buddies and I have discussed the idea of doing a shark
> dive in California.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Suggestions? Comments? Insights?
Southern California shark dives, other than the white shark charters to
Guadalupe mentioned following your first post, are occasionally done by a
handful of local operators with the intent of finding blue sharks in open
ocean. Often a mako will show up as well. The "divers" sit in a cage,
usually just with snorkels not scuba gear, and the boat chums until the
sharks come in. Therefore, your buddies don't even have to be certified
divers to enjoy the thrill of waiting endlessly for the sharks to arrive all
the while being coated in an oily, smelly fish scum.
On the charter I was on (the Aquatica), divers with a minimum of 50 dives
(their rule) could opt out of the cage and instead hang on a weighted line
at about 20 feet. This was a much better experience. When you get 4-6
blues circling you, it's impossible to keep your eyes on all of them at the
same time. They give you a "shark billy", basically a filled section of PVC
pipe, that you are supposed to use to push the sharks away from you if they
come too close. I never used mine, idiotically pushing my face up against
one as it swam by, and touching another on the tail. But I supposedly
benefit from professional courtesy and don't recommend you try this at home.
jbeck - 08 Mar 2006 20:57 GMT
>>A couple of my 'ol buddies and I have discussed the idea of doing a shark
>> dive in California.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> divers to enjoy the thrill of waiting endlessly for the sharks to arrive
> all the while being coated in an oily, smelly fish scum.
Fish scum hair...I wonder how luring that would be for a nice mermaid?
> On the charter I was on (the Aquatica), divers with a minimum of 50 dives
> (their rule) could opt out of the cage and instead hang on a weighted line
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> supposedly benefit from professional courtesy and don't recommend you try
> this at home.
This is the link that I googled: http://www.diveaquatica.com/
Several posters seem to think highly of that operation:
http://www.scubaboard.com/archive/index.php/t-79297.html
I think the information on Aquatica is right in line with what I was looking
for. This is the direction that our group will probably pursue.
I really do thank you for your time in sharing this information.
Joe