 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneousDiscussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK ScubaDirectoryScuba Clubs |
Scuba Forum / General / March 2006Dive site scam
I don't how many of you have seen this at your local dive site, but this may be useful to know. I am sending this to you to warn you of something that has happened to me, as I have become a victim of a very clever scam whilst out diving. This happened to me at a dive site in Seattle, and it could happen to you Here's how the scam works: Two seriously good-looking 21-year-old girls come over to your car as you are packing your gear in the trunk. They both start wiping your windshield with a rag and Windex, with their breasts almost falling out of their skimpy t-shirts. It is impossible not to look. When you thank them and offer them a tip, they say 'No' and instead ask you if you could give them a ride to another dive site. You agree and they get in the back seat. On the way, they start having sex with each other. Then one of them climbs over into the front seat and performs oral sex on you, while the other one steals your wallet. I've had my wallet stolen last Wednesday, Friday, Saturday afternoon, twice on Sunday, and again on Monday. Don't let this happen to you ! > I don't how many of you have seen this at your local dive site, but > this may be useful to know. [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Don't let this happen to you ! You are a fool. You should only carry $5.00 in your wallet. Cheapest blow job you will ever get.  SignatureI have never met a liberal street cop. > You are a fool. > > You should only carry $5.00 in your wallet. Cheapest blow job you will > ever get. The wallet was empty, except for Mossmans phone number and adress, and one of those two dollar nylon units... >>You are a fool. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > The wallet was empty, except for Mossmans phone number and adress, and > one of those two dollar nylon units... Oh well, you will probably get sued. >> You are a fool. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >The wallet was empty, except for Mossmans phone number and adress, and >one of those two dollar nylon units... My unit is made out of flesh and won't fit in my wallet. Signaturedillon Could have been is in the past Could be is in the future There is only the now >>> You are a fool. >>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > My unit is made out of flesh and won't fit in my wallet. I'm still wondering why he walks around with my phone number and address while he's out picking up cheap whores. Does he really believe I'll come over and defend him when he's arrested? > I'm still wondering why he walks around with my phone number and address > while he's out picking up cheap whores. Just following your lead. > Does he really believe I'll come > over and defend him when he's arrested? If I ever get arrested I would call a good lawyer, so why you believe I would call you is the mystery. >> I'm still wondering why he walks around with my phone number and address >> while he's out picking up cheap whores. > > Just following your lead. I don't have your phone number and address in my wallet, or anywhere else for that matter. >> Does he really believe I'll come >> over and defend him when he's arrested? > > If I ever get arrested I would call a good lawyer, so why you believe I > would call you is the mystery. Probably because the good lawyer will turn you down for lack of funds and you'll play on my sense of pity for the pitiful. Fortunately that tactic won't work with me since I'm no longer active to practice in Washington. No, you'll have to get yourself arrested in California if you want to beg for my help. We have plenty of cheap whores down here and right now it's as cold and rainy as Washington so you'll feel completely at home. The hookers will cut you a sharp discount just so they can get off the streets and out of the rain but you only have a narrow window of opportunity before the storm clears and it's bright and sunny again. > I don't have your phone number and address in my wallet, or anywhere else > for that matter. Not only do you have the sense of humor of an empty tuna can, you are dumb as sh.t on a stick. Never been with a hooker, Greg, I would have to defer to your considerable experience in the matter. I also am not marrooned in a loveless marriage of convenience that requires me to leave the country to get laid. The lawyer issue is irrelevant since I am not a criminal, nor am I unfaithful to my SO. But, you do have a point. We all know that the "justice sytem" pettifoggers like you have mutilated is so f.cked up that you can sue just about anyone for just about anything. BTW, I got these from a lawyer friend (who also thinks you are a douchebag); http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_02_26-2006_03_04.shtml#1141082874 http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_02_26-2006_03_04.shtml#1141080752 >> I don't have your phone number and address in my wallet, or anywhere else >> for that matter. > > Not only do you have the sense of humor of an empty tuna can, you are > dumb as sh.t on a stick. Then you must be the stick. Sorry, Stick, but your cheap bar humor fails me. I feel pity, not humor, over your empty tuna can. Did you spend your whole paycheck on booze again? > Never been with a hooker, Greg, I would have to defer to your > considerable experience in the matter. I also am not marrooned in a > loveless marriage of convenience that requires me to leave the country > to get laid. Surely there's got to be one you can afford with all the skanky looking women in your part of the world. I'm not sure why anyone would be required to leave the country to get laid, but you might fare better with the exchange rate in Canada and certainly in Latin America. Don't give up. BTW Stick, I'm not married. Maybe you need better information. > The lawyer issue is irrelevant since I am not a criminal, nor am I > unfaithful to my SO. Funny. Just about all the criminals say that. > BTW Stick, I'm not married. Maybe you need better information. That's a surprise to me. Maybe I need better information too. Make sure I have it before I meet Janna. Lee >> BTW Stick, I'm not married. Maybe you need better information. > > That's a surprise to me. Maybe I need better information too. Make sure > I have it before I meet Janna. Um, yeah, that might need just a little clarification, not too much, just enough so we don't get ourselves hit over the head with a purse or sprayed with mace or something....... Curtis > > BTW Stick, I'm not married. Maybe you need better information. > > That's a surprise to me. Maybe I need better information too. Make sure I > have it before I meet Janna. It's a lawyer thing. You know; Like Clinton didnt have sex with Monica, just blew off on her dress and ran a cigar up her... > It's a lawyer thing. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > ran > a cigar up her... So if I asked any nonlawyer, "do you consider sticking a cigar up a woman to be sex", or "do you consider blowing off on a woman's dress to be sex" the answer would be unanimously yes? You nonlawyers are pretty depraved. Does the gynecologist have sex with his patient when he sticks his speculum inside her? Is the AIDS-infected prisoner having sex with the guard when he spits in his eye? <chop> The only "people" who are stupid enough to try to deflect the truth about Clinton's sexual activity with Monica Lewinski (never mind disgracing the office and nation, lying about it and getting disbarred), are far left nutcases like you, men who think it's OK to screw around on their wives and abuse the office help like you, and lying lawyers like you. But then, what would you know about sex anyway. > The only "people" who are stupid enough to try to deflect the truth about > Clinton's sexual activity with Monica Lewinski (never mind disgracing the > office and nation, lying about it and getting disbarred), are far left > nutcases like you, men who think it's OK to screw around on their wives > and > abuse the office help like you, and lying lawyers like you. In the scheme of things, I think it's far better for one to screw around on one's wife, than to screw the country by invading Iraq on false pretenses. The first is (should have been) a private matter. Most of us prefer to keep our sex lives private, without nosy Republicans trying to figure out what we were doing and where. By lying to the country about Iraq, Bush has sent thousands of kids to their deaths, not to mention the tens of thousands of innocent Iraqi "collateral damage", and run up an incredible deficit for those kids who survive to somehow pay off. Why would any rational human being give a sh.t about a cum-stained dress? > But then, what would you know about sex anyway. In all likelihood, a heck of lot more than you. With your obviously high blood pressure and severe alcoholism, it'd be a wonder if you could get it up at all. <chop the tedious and long ago proven wrong leftist bullshit> > In all likelihood, a heck of lot more than you. With your obviously high > blood pressure and severe alcoholism, it'd be a wonder if you could get it > up at all. As has been pointed out by people who know us both, I am a mere shadow of the alcoholic that you are. But, as usual, dont let the facts attenuate your arrogance and idiocy. My blood pressure is fine. And, I am faithful to my woman. > As has been pointed out by people who know us both, I am a mere shadow of > the alcoholic that you are. Whatever. You're a mere shadow of me in a lot of ways. But I drink for pleasure. You drink out of necessity. Big difference. > And, I am faithful to my woman. (i.e., no one else would have you.) Again, I'm faithful out of pleasure. You're faithful out of necessity. Big difference. > > As has been pointed out by people who know us both, I am a mere shadow of > > the alcoholic that you are. > Whatever. You're a mere shadow of me in a lot of ways. Any day fat boy. Events in New Orleans were not the fault of the current administration in New Orleans, Louisiana, or at the federal level. They were the fault of all the previous administrations and all the people that, knowing better, failed to take action to prevent them. The poor response to the events were partly the fault of the current administrations at all levels and of the people who failed to act to protect their own lives and property. Those that came before had a lot to do with the lack of evacuation and response infrastructure, but those that failed to act promptly and effectively did too. The one thing that falls directly on the current administrations, in my mind, is the failure to notice that the levies had failed. Everyone who bothered to watch national news broadcasts, seem to have known before those in the federal government who were charged with knowing. Lee > Events in New Orleans were not the fault of the current administration in > New Orleans, Louisiana, or at the federal level. They were the fault of all [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > bothered to watch national news broadcasts, seem to have known before those > in the federal government who were charged with knowing. I agree. But, as has been illustrated right here, there are those that are stupid/simple/dishonest enough to place the entire mess on the current administration. We all know who and why. > But, as has been illustrated right here, there are those that are > stupid/simple/dishonest enough to place the entire mess on the current > administration. There's more than a little of this going on by both parties. That seems to be the nature of politics, apparently even when discussed here. Lee > Any day fat boy. Scott, I'm just curious...why does it always end in a physical threat with you ? And yes, your response can be taken as a physical threat so don't pass it off as not. Take a minute...think before you answer...take another minute. >> Any day fat boy. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > it off as not. > Take a minute...think before you answer...take another minute. Not to mention that he called me fat. It's not very nice and makes me want to cry. But then I think about Scott sitting there furiously typing his physical threats and insults and "f.ck punk sh.t c.nt me too me too me too" while his head is spinning in circles and he's reaching for yet another shot of cheap tequila, and a smile creeps onto my lips. As they say, better fat than dumb. I can always diet, but no amount of cheap tequila will ever unrot Scott's sotted brain. Short answer, Scott doesn't really have much else other than two fists and a pot to piss in. He was the schoolyard bully picking on the fat kid back then, and today he's graduated to the usenet bully picking on the fat guy. As you can see, he's basically stayed exactly the same for the past thirty years. Some of us pity him. > > It's a lawyer thing. > > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > inside her? Is the AIDS-infected prisoner having sex with the guard when he > spits in his eye? But remember, Greg. It wasn't about the sex ;-) > € "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message > € news:L4ednQQwCJQrLpTZRVn-iQ@wavecable.com... [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > But remember, Greg. It wasn't about the sex ;-) which shows that you miss Scott's point, it was about the lying and the subsequent twisting of the definition of "sex" to get out of the lying that was done in the first place. . Signature_______________________________________________________________________________ "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3 > which shows that you miss Scott's point, it was about the lying and the > subsequent twisting of the definition of "sex" to get out of the lying > that was done in the first place. . Right, and Bush never lies, especially not about anything as important as a cum-stained dress. He's just constantly "misinformed" or "inaccurate" whenever he gets caught in a lie, especially about little things like war and disaster that kill thousands of people. "After visiting three nations in South Asia, Bush was returning home to a stack of political problems — from bad approval ratings and embarrassing Hurricane Katrina videos to lingering questions about a domestic surveillance program and the takeover of some American port operations by an Arab company. He departed the country in much the same way he arrived — after dark aboard Air Force One, with its lights off and window shades drawn." At least Clinton never had to hide in shame. He travels around the world on million-dollar speaking tours, heartily welcomed wherever he goes. Bush on the other hand will likely retire in exile at the Kennebunkport complex where his mother can bless him everyday and tell him what a good boy he really is, no matter what the evil liberal media report. >At least Clinton never had to hide in shame.... I'm no fan of Bush, but I heard on NPR (no less) this morning that the last time Clinton went to Pakistan he got off of Air Force One (I think in India, I missed it if they said where) and flew into Pakistan on a small unmarked executive jet. Granted, it didn't have the lights turned off but that's kind of a distinction without a difference. Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA ghekhuis@earthlink.net Floats like a bee, stings like a butterfly >>At least Clinton never had to hide in shame.... > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > unmarked executive jet. Granted, it didn't have the lights turned off but > that's kind of a distinction without a difference. Maybe. Clinton's visit was only five months since Musharraf's coup, and during a time when India and Pakistan were actively fighting. "A few hours before President Clinton's visit, Indian troops shelled several villages in Pakistani-adminstered Kashmir, killing three civilians, local officials said. The Indian army denied it had opened fire on the area. Meanwhile, the authorities in Indian-administered Kashmir said they captured one man and killed five others who were involved in the recent massacre of 36 Sikhs in a village near Srinagar. . . . At least two people were killed and six injured when a bomb exploded in the Pakistani city of Karachi on Saturday, police said. " http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/690160.stm >>>At least Clinton never had to hide in shame.... >> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/690160.stm The notion that Bush is shamed every place he goes contrasted with Clinton being beloved everywhere he went is slightly revisionistic. Perhaps Clinton was much more careful of his "image" than GWB, but the contrast largely ends there. The relationship between Clinton and GWB's father, George Herbert Walker Bush, is somewhat telling. If Bill Clinton was at all the champion of rights that he is often portrayed, you have to think that at some point he'd ask GHWB to reign in his son, even a little. We aren't just talking about two fathers talking about a son, these are two past presidents (who both claim to be super patriots) and a current president, who happens to be the son of one. Neither one has expressed anything more than mild displeasure (if even that) at some of the actions undertaken by GWB. I think it is more a matter of popularity; I don't think either one feels any sense of "shame." Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA ghekhuis@earthlink.net Stings like a butterfly, floats like a bee >>>>At least Clinton never had to hide in shame.... >>> [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > Galen Hekhuis NpD, JFR, GWA ghekhuis@earthlink.net > Stings like a butterfly, floats like a bee If they don't like him - he must be doing plenty right >If they don't like him - he must be doing plenty right You mean there's hope for me? JF >>If they don't like him - he must be doing plenty right > > You mean there's hope for me? > > JF John - there is hope for anyone - but you may have to lose the golf clubs > > which shows that you miss Scott's point, it was about the lying and the > > subsequent twisting of the definition of "sex" to get out of the lying [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > whenever he gets caught in a lie, especially about little things like war > and disaster that kill thousands of people. Hilarious. Never mind the numerous inquests and commissions you lefties have demanded that have only proven you wrong, time and time again. We wont go into the whorehouse that you all have created in the UN. > Hilarious. > > Never mind the numerous inquests and commissions you lefties have demanded > that have only proven you wrong, time and time again. Hilarious. When the fox runs the inquest to discover who killed the hens, it's a real surprise to find that the hens committed suicide. "Tillman, 27, died on April 22, 2004, when he was struck by gunfire during a firefight along a canyon road near the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. The Army said at the time that the barrage of bullets came from enemy fire. A report by the Army later found that troops with Tillman knew at the time that friendly fire had killed the football star. Officers destroyed critical evidence and concealed the truth from Tillman's brother, also an Army Ranger, who was nearby, the report found. "More than three weeks after a memorial service in San Jose, Calif., the Army announced on May 29, 2004, that friendly fire rather than an enemy encounter caused Tillman's death. However, even at the time of the memorial, top Army officials were aware that the investigation showed the death had been caused by an act of 'gross negligence,' the report said." "The Army said Saturday it will launch a criminal investigation into the April 2004 death of Pat Tillman, the former professional football player who was shot to death by fellow soldiers in Afghanistan in what previous Army reviews had concluded was an accidental shooting. Col. Joseph Curtin, an Army spokesman, said the Defense Department office of inspector general had reviewed the matter at the Army's request and concluded that a criminal probe was warranted." > We wont go into the whorehouse that you all have created in the UN. "Cunningham pleaded guilty to accepting bribes from defense contractors and others in exchange for steering government contracts their way. They included a Rolls-Royce, a yacht, homes, travel, meals, Persian rugs valued at $40,000 each and various antique furnishings. Among Cunningham's acquisitions was a 7,628-square-foot mansion in Rancho Santa Fe, one of America's wealthiest communities. Cunningham was ordered to forfeit his share of proceeds from the sale of the home, bought with the help of bribes from defense contractors, which sold in December for $2.6 million. The exact amount has not been determined, but is likely to be hundreds of thousands of dollars." > > Hilarious. > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Hilarious. When the fox runs the inquest to discover who killed the hens, > it's a real surprise to find that the hens committed suicide. We all knew that was coming. A piece of sh.t like you can only use a situation like Tillmans to further his cowardice. >> Hilarious. When the fox runs the inquest to discover who killed the >> hens, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > A piece of sh.t like you can only use a situation like Tillmans to further > his cowardice. Just one more example of all the lies spewing from this administration, from the bottom all the way to the top. That you support covering up the real facts behind Tillman's death, just as you support covering up the real facts behind why we went to war in Iraq, shows that you're a merely a sheep, ready to bleat your support for whatever mantra the GOP and Ann Coulter would have you sing. Baaaaa. >>>Hilarious. When the fox runs the inquest to discover who killed the >>>hens, [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Baaaaa. I'm sure Bush fired the fatal shots > I'm sure Bush fired the fatal shots Bingo. As if this cocksucker gives a sh.t about Tillman or any other person keeping him free. >> I'm sure Bush fired the fatal shots > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > keeping > him free. And enough of this "keeping me free" nonsense. It's our nuclear arsenal that keeps us free, and all the soldiers based here at home that can repel invading armies and navies. Tillman got killed trying to keep Afghanistan a U.S. puppet. The American kids getting killed in Iraq are trying to make Iraq a U.S. puppet. Too bad Jim Henson's already dead. He was a much better puppeteer than Bush and he never got anyone killed - he would have made a great president. > And enough of this "keeping me free" nonsense. Right. And you would know all about it due to your service to your nation. >> And enough of this "keeping me free" nonsense. > > Right. > > And you would know all about it due to your service to your nation. You certainly can't claim I was brainwashed by a military training system based on destroying individuality. >> And you would know all about it due to your service to your nation. > > You certainly can't claim I was brainwashed by a military training system > based on destroying individuality. So, brainwashing by a liberal education system is better? Nah..... > >> And you would know all about it due to your service to your nation. > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Nah..... He wouldnt know the difference. >>> And you would know all about it due to your service to your nation. >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Nah..... You think Freshman Comp run by a nerdy grad student T.A. can brainwash as well as boot camp and drill sergeants and uniforms and crew cuts? Maybe the military ought to try a kinder, more gentle approach. > > So, brainwashing by a liberal education system is better? > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > well as boot camp and drill sergeants and uniforms and crew cuts? Maybe the > military ought to try a kinder, more gentle approach. The military is protecting peace and freedom, not trying to get laid. > > > So, brainwashing by a liberal education system is better? > > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > The military is protecting peace and freedom, not trying to get laid. What about liberty call? ;-) Dennis >> > So, brainwashing by a liberal education system is better? >> > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > The military is protecting peace and freedom, not trying to get laid. Certainly no one would accuse anyone in the military of ever trying to get laid while on R&R, shore leave, or whatever qualifies as off time. But college students are busy learning the skills that will enable them to run America, while the military is ever training, playing war games, or whatever it is that they do when they're not on shore leave. > You think Freshman Comp run by a nerdy grad student T.A. can brainwash as > well as boot camp and drill sergeants and uniforms and crew cuts? Maybe > the military ought to try a kinder, more gentle approach. Actually, I see the brainwashing starting in grade school, and to hear some of the stuff my high schoolers spout, well...... But, they usually figure out that dad's right after all when they enter the real world. Curtis >> You think Freshman Comp run by a nerdy grad student T.A. can brainwash as >> well as boot camp and drill sergeants and uniforms and crew cuts? Maybe [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > some of the stuff my high schoolers spout, well...... But, they usually > figure out that dad's right after all when they enter the real world. You mean the "real" world where guys dive miles into caves and break bricks with their hands? No wonder the poor kids are mixed up. They can't tell the video games from the reality, Mr. Mario Bro Magilla. > You mean the "real" world where guys dive miles into caves and break > bricks with their hands? No wonder the poor kids are mixed up. They > can't tell the video games from the reality, Mr. Mario Bro Magilla. CTMRH I'm looking forward to diving with you again sometime. <evil grin> Curtis >> You mean the "real" world where guys dive miles into caves and break >> bricks with their hands? No wonder the poor kids are mixed up. They [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Curtis Yeah, right. Like I'd ever dive with an arm-stealing gorilla like you. > >> You mean the "real" world where guys dive miles into caves and break > >> bricks with their hands? No wonder the poor kids are mixed up. They [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Yeah, right. Like I'd ever dive with an arm-stealing gorilla like you. Again :-) > ? ""Magilla"" <cavey_curtis@$$ yahoo.com> wrote in message > ? news:Qh5Pf.515767$qk4.474609@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Again :-) Speaking of which, what's your excuse for missing Dive With Greg 2.1? >> ? Yeah, right. Like I'd ever dive with an arm-stealing gorilla like you. >> ? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Speaking of which, what's your excuse for missing Dive With Greg 2.1? Um, Dive with Alan, version 1.0? :^) Curtis > Yeah, right. Like I'd ever dive with an arm-stealing gorilla like you. Gotta be better than breaking a senile, arrogant old fart out of the nursing home and getting in the hot tub with him. :-P Magilla wrote >> Yeah, right. Like I'd ever dive with an arm-stealing gorilla like you. > > Gotta be better than breaking a senile, arrogant old fart out of the > nursing home and getting in the hot tub with him. :-P Ewwwwwww ! >> Gotta be better than breaking a senile, arrogant old fart out of the >> nursing home and getting in the hot tub with him. :-P > > Ewwwwwww ! Somehow, I figured you'd appreciate that one....... :-) Curtis > >> And enough of this "keeping me free" nonsense. > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > You certainly can't claim I was brainwashed by a military training system > based on destroying individuality. No one but you knows what f.cked up your brain, and you would lie about it anyway. That your brain is f.cked up is not in question. >>>And enough of this "keeping me free" nonsense. >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > You certainly can't claim I was brainwashed by a military training system > based on destroying individuality. you would need a brain to be washed - you lost that many years ago >>> I'm sure Bush fired the fatal shots >> Bingo. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > that keeps us free, and all the soldiers based here at home that can repel > invading armies and navies. sure worked in the trade centers... > Tillman got killed trying to keep Afghanistan a > U.S. puppet. The American kids getting killed in Iraq are trying to make > Iraq a U.S. puppet. Too bad Jim Henson's already dead. He was a much > better puppeteer than Bush and he never got anyone killed - he would have > made a great president. typical liberal. some Hollywood type should be president. >> And enough of this "keeping me free" nonsense. It's our nuclear arsenal >> that keeps us free, and all the soldiers based here at home that can >> repel invading armies and navies. > > sure worked in the trade centers... Sure it did. All of the WTC victims died free. > typical liberal. > > some Hollywood type should be president. Like Ronald Reagan? Uh . . . >>>I'm sure Bush fired the fatal shots >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > better puppeteer than Bush and he never got anyone killed - he would have > made a great president. very typical >>> Hilarious. When the fox runs the inquest to discover who killed the >>> hens, [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > to bleat your support for whatever mantra the GOP and Ann Coulter would have > you sing. Baaaaa. I did not have sex with that woman... >> Just one more example of all the lies spewing from this administration, >> from the bottom all the way to the top. That you support covering up the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Baaaaa. I did not have sex with that woman... Baaaaa Biiiiig Deal. Baaaaa. Weapons of mass destruction. Baaaaa. Al-Qaeda linked to Saddam. Baaaaa. We can ignore North Korea and Iran, since only Saddam, financed by Al-Qaeda, is in imminent danger of getting nuclear weapons. Baaaaa. Breach, what breach? Baaaaa. Abramoff? I don't know no Abramoff. Those pictures are lies, and we won't release the other pictures. Baaaaa. Pictures? Those Abu Graibh photos are lies (and we won't release the other pictures). Baaaaa. Torture? Not us, but it's legal if we just happen to do it anyway. Baaaaa. Secret prisons? Not us, but it's legal is we just happen to do it anyway. Baaaaa. Secret wiretaps? Well, maybe us, but it's legal anyway, and who ratted on us anyway? But Clinton got a bl.wj.b and that's all that really counts. >>>Just one more example of all the lies spewing from this administration, >>>from the bottom all the way to the top. That you support covering up the [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > But Clinton got a bl.wj.b and that's all that really counts. why was it okay when Kerry used those answers? (abaout his war record) >> > Hilarious. >> > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >A piece of sh.t like you can only use a situation like Tillmans to further >his cowardice. It remains that 'friendly fire' killings seem to have become a specialty for the American military. As for Tillman the Army was less than forthcoming concerning the circumstances of his death. John They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety Benjamin Franklin > At least Clinton never had to hide in shame. He travels around the world on > million-dollar speaking tours, heartily welcomed wherever he goes. Bush on > the other hand will likely retire in exile at the Kennebunkport complex > where his mother can bless him everyday and tell him what a good boy he > really is, no matter what the evil liberal media report. Bill Clinton helped Dubai on ports deal By Stephanie Kirchgaessner in Washington Published: March 1 2006 23:50 | Last updated: March 1 2006 23:50 Bill Clinton, former US president, advised top officials from Dubai two weeks ago on how to address growing US concerns over the acquisition of five US container terminals by DP World. It came even as his wife, Senator Hillary Clinton, was leading efforts to derail the deal. http://news.ft.com/cms/s/60414c4c-a95e-11da-a64b-0000779e2340.html Yeah, earning big bucks too. But working for whom? Signature_______________________________________________________________________________ "A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences." - Proverbs 22:3 > Bill Clinton helped Dubai on ports deal > By Stephanie Kirchgaessner in Washington [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > But working for whom? <cough> Who'd a thunk? The Clintons? Involved in lies, hypocrisy and unbridled greed at the expense of the taxpayers of America? No way. Bush must have set them up, the dumb bastard. > > > So if I asked any nonlawyer, "do you consider sticking a cigar up a woman > > to [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > subsequent twisting of the definition of "sex" to get out of the lying > that was done in the first place. . I don't miss Scott's point at all (in fact, I think I see it more clearly than allows himself to see it). For all the posturing about perjury and "disgracing the office" it's obvious in retrospect that, for people like Scott, it was first and foremost about sex. > I don't miss Scott's point at all (in fact, I think I see it more > clearly than allows himself to see it). Of course you do. You are so much smarter than a mere mortal like myself could ever hope to be, that you know me better than I know myself. In fact, you are so smart, you can fool yourself into putting words into my mouth. > For all the posturing about > perjury and "disgracing the office" it's obvious in retrospect that, > for people like Scott, it was first and foremost about sex. If that were true, then my complaint would be that he did it with a fat, ugly tramp. Certainly a President, even a POS like Clinton, could have done better than Monica. Let's take JFK for an example. > If that were true, then my complaint would be that he did it with a fat, > ugly tramp. Hillary is not *that* fat... Oh, you're talking about Monica... Uhhh... Never mind... > Certainly a President, even a POS like Clinton, could have done better than > Monica. > > Let's take JFK for an example. Yep, JFK was getting World Class Nookie... Billy Boy's choice in women is embarassing... > > If that were true, then my complaint would be that he did it with a fat, > > ugly tramp. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Yep, JFK was getting World Class Nookie... Billy Boy's choice in women is > embarassing... Well, every president has his way of "bonding with the common man." Johnson did it with barbecues, Bush does it (badly) with folksy talkin'. Clinton did it by bonking something for everyone :-) > > If that were true, then my complaint would be that he did it with a fat, > > ugly tramp. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Yep, JFK was getting World Class Nookie... Billy Boy's choice in women is > embarassing... Look at the hag he married. > Look at the hag he married. Well, I *did* say "women", not "woman"... That does imply that he is guilty of poor taste on multiple accounts... Frankly though, I don't hate him for boinking the hired help... Hillary is the only one who has a right to indignation over it... Now, I'm somewhat embarassed from the standpoint that as the leader of the ONLY FUCKIN' SUPERPOWER on the planet, he couldn't choose better... I hate the f.cker for many other things, but boinking the hired help is not one of them... > > Look at the hag he married. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > choose better... I hate the f.cker for many other things, but boinking the > hired help is not one of them... Just another example of the slime that he is and represents. > > Look at the hag he married. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > choose better... I hate the f.cker for many other things, but boinking the > hired help is not one of them... Bear in mind that he foud a 500 year old mummy attractive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mummy_Juanita Former US President Bill Clinton, while observing Juanita on display at the National Geographic museum, said: "You know, if I were a single man, I might ask that mummy out. That's a good-looking mummy!" Dennis > Bear in mind that he foud a 500 year old mummy attractive. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mummy_Juanita > Former US President Bill Clinton, while observing Juanita on display at the > National Geographic museum, said: "You know, if I were a single man, I might > ask that mummy out. That's a good-looking mummy!" He thinks Hillary is attractive, so what could you expect. >> I don't miss Scott's point at all (in fact, I think I see it more >> clearly than allows himself to see it). [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > You are so much smarter than a mere mortal like myself could ever hope to > be, that you know me better than I know myself. let me guess: greg is a democrat? > Let's take JFK for an example. > let me guess: greg is a democrat? You're only guessing? 8^) I, and perhaps a few others like me, are the only real surprises I'm aware of in this forum. I'm about as conservative as anyone I know, and a registered Democrat. Lee > > let me guess: greg is a democrat? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > of in this forum. I'm about as conservative as anyone I know, and a > registered Democrat. Actually, it is no suprise. As much as the far left nutcases like to make the word "democrat" synonimous with "barking moonbat", a bunch of us know that isnt the case. Too bad they arent smart enough to create and run their own party. > ? "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message > ? news:L4ednQQwCJQrLpTZRVn-iQ@wavecable.com... [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > ? > > ? > Like Clinton didnt have sex with Monica, just blew off on her dress and > ? > ran > ? > a cigar up her... > ? > ? So if I asked any nonlawyer, "do you consider sticking a cigar up a woman to > ? be sex", or "do you consider blowing off on a woman's dress to be sex" the > ? answer would be unanimously yes? You nonlawyers are pretty depraved. > ? > ? Does the gynecologist have sex with his patient when he sticks his speculum > ? inside her? Is the AIDS-infected prisoner having sex with the guard when he > ? spits in his eye? > ? > ? > > But remember, Greg. It wasn't about the sex ;-) It wasn't - two perjury, one obstruction of justice, and one abuse of power were in the articles of impeachment. http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/09/articles.docs/ Dennis > It wasn't - two perjury, one obstruction of justice, and one abuse of power > were in the articles of impeachment. > http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/09/articles.docs/ Funny how "they" always manage to ignore the facts. The definition of psychosis. Sad part is they arent smart enough (in their freakishly rabid need to feel more intelligent) to realize what dupes they are, and that as "they" play us off against each other we all lose. With fruitcakes like Cindy Sheehan at the helm, "they" arent smart enough to deduce why Hillary will lose like no one has lost before. Hillary will lose bigger than Kerry, and they will call foul. Again. The collective intelligence of a soaked leather jacket. > The definition of psychosis. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > us > off against each other we all lose. Now the fox is calling the hens psychotic and rabid? Have you ever heard of the psychological term "projection"? You should look it up. > With fruitcakes like Cindy Sheehan at the helm, "they" arent smart enough > to > deduce why Hillary will lose like no one has lost before. Haven't heard from Cindy in a while. Hillary's still around though. > Hillary will lose bigger than Kerry, and they will call foul. She's still lagging behind McCain in the polls, but closing the margin. Bush still has almost two more years to continue to f.ck things up to ensure her win in 2008, not to mention the fallout from the Abramoff and Libby prosecutions that promise to take down many once-prominent Republican thugs. > > With fruitcakes like Cindy Sheehan at the helm, "they" arent smart enough > > to > > deduce why Hillary will lose like no one has lost before. > > Haven't heard from Cindy in a while. Hillary's still around though. She was here a couple of days ago: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/education/20060304-9999-7m4peace.html > ? > ? > With fruitcakes like Cindy Sheehan at the helm, "they" arent smart [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/education/20060304-9999-7m4peace.html That's my corporate-funded alma mater, for you. An entire 100 people for a rally on a California college campus and they call that a "sizable anti-war rally"? UCSD is definitely no Berkeley. I remember how things changed after the Price Center was built. All protests now had to be within certain "free speech zones". The cool pub in the woods was moved to the plastic Round Table Pizza. Cops starting raiding late-night events at the counter-culture Che Cafe, which had to stop holding events after the U started billing them for "security". But it's nice that Sheehan still has some place to go, surrounded by kids that could have been her kid had his life not been tragically wasted by Bush's Iraq debacle. Maybe Hillary can give her some low-level PR position after she gets elected to the White House, possibly conducting tours of the grand building once the Democrats re-open its doors to the public and renounce the Bush era of shame. > > ? > > ? > With fruitcakes like Cindy Sheehan at the helm, "they" arent smart [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > grand building once the Democrats re-open its doors to the public and > renounce the Bush era of shame. "We hereby renounce the Bush era of shame and invite the next Clinton era of shame. All who are intereted can come and watch the debauchery." - Hillary Clinton >>>? >>>? > With fruitcakes like Cindy Sheehan at the helm, "they" arent smart [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > shame. All who are intereted can come and watch the debauchery." - Hillary > Clinton I do (have a good time, that is - cause I am a lesbian) > > The definition of psychosis. > > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Haven't heard from Cindy in a while. Hillary's still around though. Cindy started to attack Hillary. I would not be surprised if Cindy got a call "Be quiet, Cindy, or well...just three words - Fort Marcy Park. Got it?" :-) <snip> Dennis >>The definition of psychosis. >> [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > her win in 2008, not to mention the fallout from the Abramoff and Libby > prosecutions that promise to take down many once-prominent Republican thugs. yeah - we heard this in the last election too about closing that gap! Hiliary has a bigger gap! > yeah - we heard this in the last election too about closing that gap! > Hiliary has a bigger gap! Only Bill is supposed to know that. Have you been poking around where you shouldn't, Joe English? >>yeah - we heard this in the last election too about closing that gap! >>Hiliary has a bigger gap! > > Only Bill is supposed to know that. Have you been poking around where you > shouldn't, Joe English? typical again, what does that have do with anything? > > The definition of psychosis. > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Have you ever heard of the psychological term "projection"? You should look > it up. I dont have to look it up, you provide a sterling example of it every time you run your foul mouth. > > With fruitcakes like Cindy Sheehan at the helm, "they" arent smart enough > > to [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > her win in 2008, not to mention the fallout from the Abramoff and Libby > prosecutions that promise to take down many once-prominent Republican thugs. Yeh, sure. You havent been right about anything yet, and the reasons for that are obvious, which is why you cant see them. > I dont have to look it up, you provide a sterling example of it every time > you run your foul mouth. And now you're telling me I have a foul mouth, Mr. "Pussy f.ck sh.t c.nt". Another perfect example. > Yeh, sure. > > You havent been right about anything yet, and the reasons for that are > obvious, which is why you cant see them. I've been right about Bush turning into an abject failure. About the Iraq war turning into a civil war (one which Negroponte promises will destablize the entire region). About the myriad instances of corruption among Republican party favorites. I did underestimate Bush's ability to rig an presidential election, I'll admit that. Fox News's latest poll shows that only 39% of Americans approve of the job George W. Bush is doing for us, 54% disapprove. That 39% is composed of religious wackos who still believe the world is flat, we all evolved directly from Adam and Eve, 9/11 was caused by God's revenge against tolerance of homosexual lifestyles, and George W. Bush receives divine inspiration. > > I dont have to look it up, you provide a sterling example of it every time > > you run your foul mouth. > > And now you're telling me I have a foul mouth, Mr. "Pussy f.ck sh.t c.nt". > Another perfect example. Exactly. Your words, not mine. Punk. > > Yeh, sure. > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > the entire region). About the myriad instances of corruption among > Republican party favorites. It's not parties, Einstein, it's the entire system. Another fact you are blissfully unable to grasp. > I did underestimate Bush's ability to rig an presidential election, I'll > admit that. Thats the tip of the iceberg of your missunderstandings. Actually, I know better. You understand very clearly, you just choose to lie. > Fox News's latest poll shows that only 39% of Americans approve of the job > George W. Bush is doing for us, 54% disapprove. What happened here? All of a sudden you consider Fox news to be a reliable source worthy of quoting? You are such an abvious whore it should be embarrassing, but we all understand why you arent. > That 39% is composed of > religious wackos who still believe the world is flat, we all evolved > directly from Adam and Eve, 9/11 was caused by God's revenge against > tolerance of homosexual lifestyles, and George W. Bush receives divine > inspiration. Funny, the only person putting forth such tripe is you. And even at that, if what you post from Fox news is true, it was more than enough to kick your candied a.s, and that of your fruit-loop political "party". Even the Democrats are starting to shun the far left nutcases like you. Now, what was that projection thing you were bleating about? >> And now you're telling me I have a foul mouth, Mr. "Pussy f.ck sh.t >> c.nt". [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Your words, not mine. Like I said, perfect example. They are exactly your words, hence the quotes. Do you really need the Google cites? For instance, here's a clever one from 1/24/05, over a year ago: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.scuba/browse_frm/thread/95140eee2b888a8c/2203 ff4dade011c8?lnk=st&q=(cunt+OR+shit+OR+pussy+OR+fuck)+author%3Apugetsounddiver%4 0gmail.com&rnum=3&hl=en#2203ff4dade011c8 In that intelligent, well-thought-out reply, we have pugetsounddiver@gmail.com saying: "f.ck you. Make a f.cking statement or commitment, if your pussy a.s can, or dont. Or, better yet, just shut the f.ck up. That way no one wilol give a f.ck whether you do or dont show (oh, my bad, no one gives a f.ck anyway). No one really gives a f.ck where you will be when, because no one really gives a f.ck if you are or arent. You painted your image here. Go or dont, just dont f.ck with another mans family and time, ya f.cking punk." That's about your most impressive endeavor yet. Seven f.cks, two fuckings, one pussy, and one a.s. And it continues: "Kiss my a.s, or jump bad an come on up here. Either way, just shut the f.ck up. If you're going to show, show. If you're not, shut the f.ck up. People, other than you, might actually give a sh.t and try to adjust their lives to accomodate you. GAWD you're a miserable, self centered cocksucker. If I win the lottery tomorrow, I pray that I never end up a soulless c.nt like you." Two more f.cks, another a.s, a cocksucker, a sh.t, and a c.nt. And this wasn't even about an insult to your beloved George W. Bush and his corrupt Republican party. This was where you jumped in during a conversation I was having with Grumman to finalize my plans to visit him. If your response isn't clearly the foul deranged words of an utter lunatic, I'm not sure what else they could be considered. > Punk. Yep, almost forgot. One punk too. >> instances of corruption among >> Republican party favorites. > > It's not parties, Einstein, it's the entire system. Sure it is. The fact that 95% of the corrupt politicians happen to be Republican is sheer coincidence. >> Fox News's latest poll shows that only 39% of Americans approve of the >> job [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > All of a sudden you consider Fox news to be a reliable source worthy of > quoting? CBS shows only 38% approval, but I figured you'd call that one liberal biased. > You are such an abvious whore it should be embarrassing, but we all > understand why you arent. Aren't a whore or aren't embarrassed? Your English is terrible. Are you sure you're really an American? > Funny, the only person putting forth such tripe is you. Our President believes in "intelligent design", don't you? > And even at that, if what you post from Fox news is true, it was more than > enough to kick your candied a.s, and that of your fruit-loop political > "party". A little fear-mongering around election time and the numbers crept up a bit. Bush even admitted that it was likely Bin Laden's threats around that time that gave him the edge. If America back then knew how really incompetent this administration has been concerning national security, the results would have been far different. > Even the Democrats are starting to shun the far left nutcases like you. They keep asking me for more money. Doesn't seem like shunning. > Now, what was that projection thing you were bleating about? See above. You forget so soon. <snip back and forth between liberal lawyer and crazed biker> > > Now, what was that projection thing you were bleating about? > > See above. You forget so soon. Damn, he's easier to spin up than Feesh, and twice as loony. How many plays do you get for a quarter, Greg? > ? "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> wrote in message > ? news:g5qdnUV4QOJH35bZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@wavecable.com... [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Damn, he's easier to spin up than Feesh, and twice as loony. How many > plays do you get for a quarter, Greg? All you want, as long as you have the quarter. > >> And now you're telling me I have a foul mouth, Mr. "Pussy f.ck sh.t > >> c.nt". [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Like I said, perfect example. They are exactly your words, hence the > quotes. Do you really need the Google cites? Nope. I know what I said and why. I do enjoy wasting your time though. You live and work in a world where you dont and cant have the guts to say what you mean. I dont. > Yep, almost forgot. One punk too. Make it fifteen, you punk. > > It's not parties, Einstein, it's the entire system. > > Sure it is. The fact that 95% of the corrupt politicians happen to be > Republican is sheer coincidence. Pure psychosis, or just another blatent lie. No one, even you, can be stupid enough to believe that sh.t. > CBS shows only 38% approval, but I figured you'd call that one liberal > biased. I didnt cite or quote, you did. That projection thing you keep projecting. > > You are such an abvious whore it should be embarrassing, but we all > > understand why you arent. > > Aren't a whore or aren't embarrassed? Your English is terrible. Are you > sure you're really an American? No one else has any problem understanding simple english, only a lawyer would. > > Funny, the only person putting forth such tripe is you. > > Our President believes in "intelligent design", don't you? Wait, I thought he was an idiot. Now he is "our" president? What was that about english? > > And even at that, if what you post from Fox news is true, it was more than > > enough to kick your candied a.s, and that of your fruit-loop political > > "party". > > A little fear-mongering around election time and the numbers crept up a bit. Well, you know, for the previous 8 years the President was busy kicking the can into the next administration. > Bush even admitted that it was likely Bin Laden's threats around that time > that gave him the edge. Whatever it takes to keep Kerry out of office is a win. > If America back then knew how really incompetent > this administration has been concerning national security, the results would > have been far different. As contrasted by the previous administration. How many terrorist attacks under Clinton rule, how many under Bush? > > Even the Democrats are starting to shun the far left nutcases like you. > > They keep asking me for more money. Doesn't seem like shunning. It's called "milking a sucker". Look it up. > > Now, what was that projection thing you were bleating about? > > See above. You forget so soon. Good thing for you I am not a lawyer, you'd be cleaning my bathroom. > You live and work in a world where you dont and cant have the guts to say > what you mean. > > I dont. Apes in the wild are allowed to beat their chests all they want. In modern, civilized society, most human beings show a modicum of restraint. The rest are in jail. I realize that you live on the outer limits of society, where men still eat with their hands and wipe their a.ses with corn cobs (hopefully in that order), but to the rest of us, your existence is like watching Deliverance on cable. Simply an amusing curiousity, but something you want to keep at arm's length in case it bites. > Make it fifteen, you punk. I lose count. > No one else has any problem understanding simple english, only a lawyer > would. Oh, "simple" English. Fine, I'll try to understand it. It can't be too much harder than understanding a toddler. Maybe we could draw pictures. > Wait, I thought he was an idiot. > > Now he is "our" president? > > What was that about english? Here's a lesson for you: Our president is an idiot. Subject=Our President (our is an possessive, qualifying president so you don't think we're talking about the Mongolian President); Verb=is; Object=an idiot ("an" is an article connoting the possibility that there is more than one idiot). That's not so hard, is it? > Well, you know, for the previous 8 years the President was busy kicking > the > can into the next administration. Sure, leaving Bush with |
Enable EMail Alerts
Start New Thread
Reply to this Message