> Impacted good or bad?
> Secondly and more importantly, am especially looking for family fun
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I am just not sure which city has the most family-orientated
> assistance.
Probably Whistler.
> Impacted good or bad?
Like a festering wisdom tooth.
> Secondly and more importantly, am especially looking for family fun
> activites, as well as tours and
> museums.
That was the problem. The Grand Wailea's website boasts: "The Grand Wailea
Resort Hotel & Spa is the perfect destination for a fabulous Hawaii
vacation. This Hawaii resort is known for fun family getaways, honeymoons
and having Hawaii's finest conference facilities." Unfortunately, it's hard
to please the honeymooner and the fun family in the same spot. Plus, it
seemed like the top salesmen didn't appreciate the price of the pool bar
drinks, so they would bring in cases of beer from the store across the
street. That may be de rigeur for the Holiday Inn in Waco, but it's not too
classy for a $500 a night luxury hotel. It was like trying to have a
romantic honeymoon at a frat party.
> Maybe visiting a specific historical landmark?
> I am just not sure which city has the most family-orientated
> assistance.
People don't go to Whistler, Phoenix, or Maui for historical landmarks.
Whistler is for skiing. Maui is for beaches and watersports. Phoenix is
for golfing. Why not send them on a cruise instead?
That said, Maui is probably the best overall, especially for those that
don't ski or golf. All sorts of island tours available, a whaling museum in
Lahaina, a volcano, hiking, waterfalls, and miles and miles of beaches.
Helicopter rides, kayaking, scuba diving and snorkeling, bicycling,
basically anything you can do at the other places and much more (except for
snow skiing).
Ben - 13 Jan 2006 02:30 GMT
So would you recommend me buying an all-access-pass, where we pay a bit
more, but the drinks are unlimited (go with the hotel tab)?
Greg Mossman - 13 Jan 2006 07:55 GMT
> So would you recommend me buying an all-access-pass, where we pay a bit
> more, but the drinks are unlimited (go with the hotel tab)?
Heck yeah. I totally belive in all-you-can-drink wristbands to supplement
romantic honeymoon hotels.
Apparently the Grand Wailea, if they offer 'all-access-pass' drink passes,
is quite the party central. All the power to them, but they really need to
lose the honeymoon appeals. I've learned my lesson, but there's no reason
others have to make the same mistake.
Ben - 13 Jan 2006 18:09 GMT
I read that there is another, hotel that holds less people, but is
still "connected to" the Grand Wailea. That is for honeymoons and
such. Also, there are private-adult pools, where no kids are allowed,
so noise and such are reduced for a more relaxing and romantic feel.
Dillon Pyron - 13 Jan 2006 19:37 GMT
>> So would you recommend me buying an all-access-pass, where we pay a bit
>> more, but the drinks are unlimited (go with the hotel tab)?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>lose the honeymoon appeals. I've learned my lesson, but there's no reason
>others have to make the same mistake.
Thanks for the info. I've had a couple of honeymoon requests for
there, now I have something solid to tell them. Too cheap to stay
there, myself.

Signature
dillon
666 permissions of the beast