Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Come again?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Randy Buckner - 06 Jul 2005 17:07 GMT
Unless I have totally forgotten the concept of Boyle's Law, does this make
any sense?

"Two days after a dive, a 31-year-old- male walked into a Louisiana hospital
ER agitated, with delusions, paranoia, and complex visual hallucinations ...
While scuba diving, the patient had made a breath-holding ascent from 45
feet to 15 feet ... "

That dude must have some pretty pliable lungs.

Buck
Dennis (Icarus) - 06 Jul 2005 18:05 GMT
> Unless I have totally forgotten the concept of Boyle's Law, does this make
> any sense?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> That dude must have some pretty pliable lungs.

45 feet is 2.36 ATA, or  33.276 PSI.
15 feet is 1.45, or 20.445 PSI

http://www.scubamed.com/feature.htm
Lung overpressure injury can occur from as little as 4 feet of depth
because of the Boyle's law relationship: P V = K, which states the the
product of absolute pressure and volume is a constant. As pressure falls on
ascent, the lung volume expands.
This diagram shows the percent change in lung volume for 10 foot changes in
depth from 100 feet to the surface. Note that there is a 32.7% change in
volume when ascending from 10 feet to the surface, while the change in
volume when going from 100 to 90 feet is only 2%.

So, inhale compressed air at 4 feet, hold it, and then ascend to the
surface, and you risk a barotrauma injury.

If they held their breath from 45 to 15 feet, I'd say its highly likely they
suffered lung injury.

> Buck

Dennis
chilly - 06 Jul 2005 18:37 GMT
> If they held their breath from 45 to 15 feet, I'd say its highly likely they
> suffered lung injury.

Sure, but would it take 2 days to notice it?
Dillon Pyron - 06 Jul 2005 19:36 GMT
>> If they held their breath from 45 to 15 feet, I'd say its highly likely
>they
>> suffered lung injury.
>
>Sure, but would it take 2 days to notice it?

If I'd been dead for two days, I'd certainly feel at least a little
paranoid about the whole thing.

I doubt that a) he really did that stupid stunt and 2) mushrooms can
cause those sorts of symptoms.  More likely the brown acid.

Signature

dillon
Linux, it's not just an OS, it's a way
of life.

And a damn fine one, at that.

chilly - 06 Jul 2005 19:54 GMT
> >> If they held their breath from 45 to 15 feet, I'd say its highly likely
> >they
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I doubt that a) he really did that stupid stunt and 2) mushrooms can
> cause those sorts of symptoms.  More likely the brown acid.

Well, they did say he was having delusions.
Lee Bell - 06 Jul 2005 19:36 GMT
> If they held their breath from 45 to 15 feet, I'd say its highly likely
> they
> suffered lung injury.

Kind of depends on how full the lungs were at the beginning of the ascent,
doesn't it?  An OOA diver usually discovers the problem after he's exhaled.
At that point, he has little gas in his lungs and should have no significant
problems as a result of holding his breath from 45 feett, all the way to the
surface.  Personally, I'm more likely to damage my ears than my lungs.  I
sometimes have problems with reverse blockage.

Lee
Charlie Hammond - 06 Jul 2005 20:46 GMT
>> If they held their breath from 45 to 15 feet, I'd say its highly likely
>> they suffered lung injury.
>
>Kind of depends on how full the lungs were at the beginning of the ascent,
>doesn't it?  ...

No, it doesn't!

If you don't believe it you're welcome to try it <grin>, but I assure you
that no body can empty their lungs enough to survive a breath holding ascent
from 45 to 15 feet.

Signature

     Charlie Hammond -- Hewlett-Packard Company -- Ft Lauderdale  FL  USA
         (hammond@not@peek.ssr.hp.com -- remove "@not" when replying)
     All opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily my employer's.

Matthias Voss - 07 Jul 2005 08:50 GMT
>>>If they held their breath from 45 to 15 feet, I'd say its highly likely
>>>they suffered lung injury.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> that no body can empty their lungs enough to survive a breath holding ascent
> from 45 to 15 feet.

A little math:
Breath out to residual capacity typical 1,5l. Ascend to depth of a 1/1,6
of pressure, give a lung volume of 2,43 l.
Nothing to worry about, and leaves enough margin for not exhaling fully.
Matthias
Froggy - 08 Jul 2005 15:46 GMT
hammond@not wrote:

> >> If they held their breath from 45 to 15 feet, I'd say its highly likely
> >> they suffered lung injury.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> that no body can empty their lungs enough to survive a breath holding ascent
> from 45 to 15 feet.

Really?

I can do it:

Fill lungs on surface.

Hold breath.

Dive to 45 feet.

Continue to hold breath.

Ascend to 15 feet.

My guess is that I'd still be alive.

Then back to surface.

Cheers,

Froggy
Lee Bell - 08 Jul 2005 18:26 GMT
>>>It kind of depends on how full the lungs were at the beginning of the
>>>ascent,
>>>doesn't it?  ...

>> No, it doesn't!

Yes, it does.

>> If you don't believe it you're welcome to try it <grin>, but I assure you
>> that no body can empty their lungs enough to survive a breath holding
>> ascent
>> from 45 to 15 feet.

No problem.  You an assure anybody of anything you like, but you're still
wrong.  Froggy's example below makes it pretty clear that it is not only
possible, but easy.

> Really?
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Then back to surface.
Dennis (Icarus) - 08 Jul 2005 18:33 GMT
> >>>It kind of depends on how full the lungs were at the beginning of the
> >>>ascent,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> wrong.  Froggy's example below makes it pretty clear that it is not only
> possible, but easy.

How about filling your lungs at 45 from your scuba gas supply, then hold
your breath & ascend to 15 feet.

Dennis

> > Really?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> >
> > Then back to surface.
Chris Guynn - 08 Jul 2005 18:43 GMT
> > >>>It kind of depends on how full the lungs were at the beginning of the
> > >>>ascent,
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Dennis

Filling your lungs at 45 wasn't exactly the issue under question... the
issue was whether or not you could "empty" your lungs enough to make the
45'-15' breath holding ascent without damage.
Rob Brooks - 13 Jul 2005 03:12 GMT
of course you would be alive....freediving? Why are you all having this
conversation? What I think you may have wanted him to do is : Hold breath to
45ft.....take in air from regulator at 45ft...then hold that breath and
surface....make sure you hold that entire breath at FULL lung
capacity.......note: I'm not responsible for anyone's death or
sick-ness....unquote.....:)
What will happen?- Per your lungs are 100% maxed....when you rise your
LUNGS will expand per the pressure ON YOUR LUNGS (at 45ft) will be no
more....this means you will end up with Lung Over Expansion..............***
SEE Dictionary ***

>>>>It kind of depends on how full the lungs were at the beginning of the
>>>>ascent,
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>>
>> Then back to surface.
James Connell - 07 Jul 2005 08:58 GMT
> Unless I have totally forgotten the concept of Boyle's Law, does this make
> any sense?

Yeah, it's the diving equivalent to  - if a chicken and a half lays an
egg and a half in a day and a half how long will it take ....
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.