> March is a great month to go - it's high season on the west coast
> (Phuket).
True, so prices reflect that.
> Stay clear of Koh Samui (East coast).
Why?
I agree that the west coast has some more interesting dive sites, but
there is not much wrong with the east coast Koh Tao dive sites.
>replace spamblock with my family name to e-mail me
chilly - 19 Feb 2005 14:18 GMT
> > March is a great month to go - it's high season on the west coast
> > (Phuket).
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I agree that the west coast has some more interesting dive sites, but
> there is not much wrong with the east coast Koh Tao dive sites.
Nothing all that about them either. Not to mention, if a person was going
to dive the Koh Tao sites, why would they stay in Koh Samui to do them?
philip2711 - 19 Feb 2005 22:50 GMT
Didn't intend to put a 'downer' on eastern side - Koh Tao etc. However
the monsoon seasons are more favourable on Phuket side in March - for
example liveaboards operate only November to May to Similan Islands.
Therefore for anyone travelling to the area in March my advice would be
for Phuket. I will not comment on prices - original question didn't ask
if it was cheap or axpensive so it's a matter of personal opinion -
however I will say that following tsunami many operators in Phuket have
reduced prices in order to kick start tourism returning. All my
contacts there indicate that diving is as good as it's been in years -
just need people to go and support the re-birth.
Since the majority of my trip is trekking across northern Thailand, (diving
is a nice add on). Do you think it's foolish to not take ANY equipment? I
would take my mask, fins, and usually my regulator/computer, but I don't
want the weight bothering me for 7 days of hiking.
The dive shops say the can supply ALL the equipment. Generally is there
decent equipment there?
> March is a great month to go - it's high season on the west coast
> (Phuket). Stay clear of Koh Samui (East coast).
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> happy hunting and great diving....
Jerome Meekings - 20 Feb 2005 02:15 GMT
> Since the majority of my trip is trekking across northern Thailand, (diving
> is a nice add on). Do you think it's foolish to not take ANY equipment?
No
> I
> would take my mask, fins, and usually my regulator/computer, but I don't
> want the weight bothering me for 7 days of hiking.
I would take fins and computer.
Fins, because I hate rental full foot fins.
Computer as they are not usually rented there.
But that is me, and I would leave them in Bangkok while I was up north.
> The dive shops say the can supply ALL the equipment. Generally is there
> decent equipment there?
If you usually dive a stab jacket.
Yes, West coast.
OK, East coast.
>replace spamblock with my family name to e-mail me
philip2711 - 20 Feb 2005 11:08 GMT
Clandy,
Think you've answered the question yourself. If trekking is main
purpose of trip with diving an add-on, keep weight low, so mask, fins,
computer "yes" and leave the rest to rental - unless of course you have
possibility to leave the heavy stuff some place between the trekking
and the diving. I'm happy with the equipment I've needed to rent -
(BCD, regulator) but again it's personal experience based on the dive
shops I mentioned.
Froggy - 21 Feb 2005 09:53 GMT
You should be able to rent masks and fins as well, so unless you intend
to snorkel a lot (and there are some nice places in South Thailand) my
advice would be to bring only the computer as it is not always
available for rent, and renting is generally expensive when compared to
the limited inconvenience of carrying one.
Unless you enter Thailand via Bangkok and then travel from the North to
the South via Bangkok again, in which case you may able to leave diving
equipment in Bangkok (left-luggage at the airport, for instance).
Cheers,
Froggy