 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneousDiscussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK ScubaDirectoryScuba Clubs |
Scuba Forum / General / February 2005serious work in the dive industry
Hola Scubadivers, this message is for all DM assistant instruc. Instructors and so on, from every diveorganization like PADI, NAUI; IDD CMAS, BARRACUDA, ACUC, PDIC, etc and everbody who really wants to become one. I see that there are a lot people who want to work as a divemaster etc, but is looking for the right employer and v.v. I'm working on a service to get everybody what they want. Therefore I want to ask everybody to send me an e-mail so I can ask you some questions. Employee (to be) or employer, both are welcome. Also reactions from DM and up about their best or worst employer(s) I saw some pretty good examples from St. Thomas. This is not a commercial nor a commercial company. I am an Instructor in Mexico trying to set up a new business in getting the right people to the right employers, Will you help me? Write an email to me and let me ask you no more than 10 questions. If you answer I will keep you posted on my progress. I believe there is a solution! Born2dive...forced2work > This is not a commercial nor a commercial company. Bullshit. Get this sh.t out of here, newbie.  Signature"I know we're going to die. There's three of us who are going to do something about it." -Tom Burnett, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001 > ? This is not a commercial nor a commercial company. > > Bullshit. > > Get this sh.t out of here, newbie. But wait, Jammer, Graham Gowland thinks it belongs here. Doesn't that mean anything? > But wait, Jammer, Graham Gowland thinks it belongs here. > > Doesn't that mean anything? Why , thank you Chilly, I see you realise my true importance! ;-) (Mind you, doesn't mean I think he should have re-posted the same request) > > ? This is not a commercial nor a commercial company. > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Doesn't that mean anything? No. IIRC Graham's not a divine, royalty, or even a member of the Court. Graham, can you write a limmerick? Dennis > No. IIRC Graham's not a divine, royalty, or even a member of the Court. > Graham, can you write a limerick? > > Dennis There was a young lady called Chilly Whose knickers were lacy and frilly She pulled on a suit And jumped off a Chinook And said 'It's the first time I've bin in'.. There once was a Dutchman called Seb Who had an idea while in bed He thought if I'm able To ask on this Server Then cash by the buckets I'll make.. erm - I guess the answer's 'No' then! And who said I'm not Divine?! > > No. IIRC Graham's not a divine, royalty, or even a member of the Court. > > Graham, can you write a limerick? [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > And who said I'm not Divine?! You need to do some serious googling to find out what a limerick should be written. I don't know what you are doing in this post, but it's not limericking. > You need to do some serious googling to find out (how) what a limerick > should be > written. I don't know what you are doing in this post, but it's not > limericking. Well, let's see your attempt - here are the rules of a Limerick! The Elements Of Limericks There are five lines. Note: Lines 3 and 4 are often printed on the same physical line. Rhyming scheme (a a b b a): Lines 1, 2, and 5 rhyme Lines 3 and 4 rhyme. Number of syllables: Some of the examples in textbooks vary, but the number of syllables usually follow this pattern: Line 1 8 syllables. Line 2 8 syllables. Line 3 5 syllables. Line 4 5 syllables. Line 5 8 syllables. Rhythm: Lines 1, 2, and 5 contain 3 accented syllables. Lines 3 and 4 contain 2 accented syllables. Meter: There is no required metrical scheme, but each line usually has a masculine ending that is that each phrase is always stressed, or emphasized, on the last syllable. Humor: Limericks thrive on the lack of harmonious agreement between parts. They contain a broad humor that most students over 8 to 10 years old appreciate. Junior High age students seem to really appreciate the limerick form. Younger students, preschool to eight, really enjoy the rhythm and rhyme of the limerick. > > You need to do some serious googling to find out (how) what a limerick > > should be [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Lines 1, 2, and 5 rhyme > Lines 3 and 4 rhyme. Uh ya. And none of your submittals do that. (snip) > Uh ya. And none of your submittals do that. Well, as I said, let's see your effort - or are you all month and no action??? ;-) > > Uh ya. And none of your submittals do that. > > Well, as I said, let's see your effort - or are you all month and no > action??? ;-) All month and no action? Typo or clever play on words? :^) In any event, my limericks are well documented. > All month and no action? Typo or clever play on words? :^) > > In any event, my limericks are well documented. Oh, intended, I assure you! Not having had the chance to enjoy any of you works, could you post one here for our edification? > > All month and no action? Typo or clever play on words? :^) > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Not having had the chance to enjoy any of you works, could you post one here > for our edification? No. > No. Oh, pretty please! You're not scared we'll be nasty, are you? > > No. > > Oh, pretty please! You're not scared we'll be nasty, are you? LOL, not hardly. >> Oh, pretty please! You're not scared we'll be nasty, are you? > > LOL, not hardly. I guess that'll be thanks to that Viking Blood - Blond hair, short legs, great ***'s, lots of courage...... And an inability to rhyme! :-) > >> Oh, pretty please! You're not scared we'll be nasty, are you? > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > :-) But I can whistle your tune. >> I guess that'll be thanks to that Viking Blood - Blond hair, short legs, >> great ***'s, lots of courage...... [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > But I can whistle your tune. Hm, would that be 'I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get on your nerves, get on your nerves, I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get get on you nerves...I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get on your nerves, get on your nerves, I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get get on you nerves...I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get on your nerves, get on your nerves, I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get get on you nerves...I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get on your nerves, get on your nerves, I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get get on you nerves...I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get on your nerves, get on your nerves, I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get get on you nerves...I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get on your nerves, get on your nerves, I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get get on you nerves...I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get on your nerves, get on your nerves, I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get get on you nerves...'? > >> I guess that'll be thanks to that Viking Blood - Blond hair, short legs, > >> great ***'s, lots of courage...... [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Hm, would that be 'I know a tune that'll get on you nerves, get on your (snip OCD stuff) Well, maybe I should have said I can whistler your tune. Or maybe this one: Green finch and linnet bird, Nightingale, blackbird, How is it you sing? > Green finch and linnet bird, > Nightingale, blackbird, > How is it you sing? I never had you down as a Sonheim fan, my little Lark! > > Green finch and linnet bird, > > Nightingale, blackbird, > > How is it you sing? > > I never had you down as a Sonheim fan, my little Lark! That's only because I made a wrong assumption. >> I never had you down as a Sonheim fan, my little Lark! > > That's only because I made a wrong assumption. And what one was that? That I'm really a hairdresser?? > > >> I guess that'll be thanks to that Viking Blood - Blond hair, short > legs, [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Nightingale, blackbird, > How is it you sing? Oops, never mind. Wrong guess. > > No. > > Oh, pretty please! You're not scared we'll be nasty, are you? search google. Dennis > > All month and no action? Typo or clever play on words? :^) > > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Not having had the chance to enjoy any of you works, could you post one here > for our edification? An inability to use Google is almost as bad as an inability to limerick. > An inability to use Google is almost as bad as an inability to limerick. Google I can do, but these pesky lawyers cover their tracks well - you'd think if they posted a poem, they'd actually include the word 'poem' somewhere in the post! ;-) Now limerick... hmm, yes there was a contest, but did out trusty Chilly contribute? > > An inability to use Google is almost as bad as an inability to limerick. > > Google I can do, but these pesky lawyers cover their tracks well - you'd > think if they posted a poem, they'd actually include the word 'poem' > somewhere in the post! ;-) Now limerick... hmm, yes there was a contest, but > did out trusty Chilly contribute? What makes you think limericks are poetry? And to which contest do you refer? There's been a few over the years. Back to the archives with you! > What makes you think limericks are poetry? And to which contest do you > refer? There's been a few over the years. > > Back to the archives with you! Anyway - should she be sitting on her Laurels??? A new Limerick to match the challenge, I say! ;-) > > What makes you think limericks are poetry? And to which contest do you > > refer? There's been a few over the years. > > > > Back to the archives with you! > > Anyway - should she be sitting on her Laurels??? Why not? A new Limerick to match the > challenge, I say! ;-) As a newbie, you have no say ;-) > ? > What makes you think limericks are poetry? And to which contest do you > ? > refer? There's been a few over the years. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Why not? An attacker (interlopers included) or one who would Assume The Throne had better have the Facts straight, and had better know The History. A degree or two of magnitude below finding the proper specs for G5/8 BSP. > Anyway - should she be sitting on her Laurels??? A new Limerick to match the > challenge, I say! ;-) No one cares what newbies say. Kneel, knave. Signature"We're going to rush the hijackers." -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001 > ? Anyway - should she be sitting on her Laurels??? A new Limerick to match the > ? challenge, I say! ;-) > > No one cares what newbies say. > > Kneel, knave. You forgot the Lord and Master bit... > > No one cares what newbies say. > > > > Kneel, knave. > > You forgot the Lord and Master bit... Wouldn't want to steal your sh.t... At least not when you could catch me. Signature"We're going to rush the hijackers." -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001 > Not having had the chance to enjoy any of you works, could you post one here > for our edification? Silence, newbie. Signature"We're going to rush the hijackers." -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001 > ? Not having had the chance to enjoy any of you works, could you post one here > ? for our edification? > > Silence, newbie. Oh, be magnanimous and give him the link. > > ? Not having had the chance to enjoy any of you works, could you post one > here [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Oh, be magnanimous and give him the link. Nah. I'll just explain it to him. A lively rec.scuban named chilly Thought the game really quite silly Yet by saving the king From a jellyfish sting Knightdom was bestowed willy-nilly Time passed and contest forgotten A rec.scuban lass was besotten Our brave Becca did ode About chilly's small node Seems some had ideas they oughten > A lively rec.scuban named chilly > Thought the game really quite silly > Yet by saving the king > From a jellyfish sting > Knightdom was bestowed willy-nilly > Time passed and contest forgotten > A rec.scuban lass was besotten > Our brave Becca did ode > About chilly's small node > Seems some had ideas they oughten Ah, and what ideas! ;-) > ? Not having had the chance to enjoy any of you works, could you post one here > ? for our edification? > > Silence, newbie. Ah what the hell. I'm a bit rusty but: There once was a king name of Jammer Who brooked not one rec.scuban stammer He asked but a ditty For the keys to his city Yet what woe reigned down on a spammer! >>Uh ya. And none of your submittals do that. >> > Well, as I said, let's see your effort - or are you all month and no > action??? ;-) Don't question this wisdom from chilly. To do so would just be plain silly. 'Cause your a's and your b's just are not the bees' knees, and your meter goes all willy nilly. > >>Uh ya. And none of your submittals do that. > > Well, as I said, let's see your effort - or are you all month and no > > action??? ;-) > Don't question this wisdom from chilly. > To do so would just be plain silly. > 'Cause your a's and your b's > just are not the bees' knees, > and your meter goes all willy nilly. Sir Clifford to the rescue. > Humor: > ... They > contain a broad humor that most students over 8 to 10 years old appreciate. > Junior High age students seem to really appreciate the limerick form. > Younger students, preschool to eight, really enjoy the rhythm and rhyme of > the limerick. And here we find out why they are so popular with a portion regulars here - Junior high school mentalities. > > Humor: > > ... They [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > And here we find out why they are so popular with a portion regulars > here - Junior high school mentalities. As contrasted by your input. >>>Humor: >>>... They [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > As contrasted by your input. strike a nerve?? when there is a valid diving issue I May join in - unlike the constant spew of crap that comes from a few. > strike a nerve?? Niggah, please. > when there is a valid diving issue I May join in - > unlike the constant spew of crap that comes from a few. Go ahead and post the last few "valid diving issues" you responded, or originated a post to. Let's be reasonable and ask for only ten. >>strike a nerve?? > > Niggah, please. that's what i thought. >>when there is a valid diving issue I May join in - >>unlike the constant spew of crap that comes from a few. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Let's be reasonable and ask for only ten. I'm not going to spend the time. Unlike some, who apparently have no life outside sitting on their a.s in front of the computer, I have other things to do. > I'm not going to spend the time. Unlike some, who apparently have no > life outside sitting on their a.s in front of the computer, I have other > things to do. As evidenced by this post. >>I'm not going to spend the time. Unlike some, who apparently have no >>life outside sitting on their a.s in front of the computer, I have other >>things to do. > > As evidenced by this post. you can keep trying to spin it all you want - fact is your posts are pure crap and that goes for the Large majority of the "regulars" here. > you can keep trying to spin it all you want - fact is your posts are > pure crap and that goes for the Large majority of the "regulars" here. Here spin this: f.ck YOU Your contribution here is no better than what you bitch about, dickhead. You don't like it f.cking leave, whatever you do just shut the f.ck up. > Here spin this: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > You don't like it f.cking leave, whatever you do just shut the f.ck up. Scott, I'm not sure I follow you. Signature"We're going to rush the hijackers." -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001 > ? Here spin this: > ? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Scott, I'm not sure I follow you. S' okay, I was addressing the children. > Here spin this: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > You don't like it f.cking leave, whatever you do just shut the f.ck up. typical - trying to act like a grown up by cursing the "special needs" kids I work with at school try the same thing. they think that the shock value will give them power and control - scott, they are 5 -> 10 years old and mentally challenged, you act just like em! > typical - trying to act like a grown up by cursing the "special needs" > kids I work with at school try the same thing. they think that the shock > value will give them power and control - scott, they are 5 -> 10 years > old and mentally challenged, you act just like em! Did I stutter, punk? >>typical - trying to act like a grown up by cursing the "special needs" >>kids I work with at school try the same thing. they think that the shock >>value will give them power and control - scott, they are 5 -> 10 years >>old and mentally challenged, you act just like em! > > Did I stutter, punk? maybe,but even if you didn't stutter, what you goin to do if i don't do what you wish? I tell you - NOTHING, you're just a poor impotent fool pounding on his keyboard. got that? fool, impotent, useless, trying to act grown up but not sure how, and so trying to act important on usenet by cussing and threatening. I almost pity you. Hey. James. Is this more of the SCUBA content you are always bitching about? Dumb a.shole. You had numerous opportunities to do anything but run your suck here, and you did nothing but sling threats. BTW, *everyone* who remembers you around here remembers you as a spooky f.cker, not because you are physically scary, but because you are a nutcase. We are still waiting for you to make a scuba related post. > Hey. > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > BTW, *everyone* who remembers you around here remembers you as a spooky > f.cker, not because you are physically scary, but because you are a nutcase. I know of nobody on this group (except you) who I've ever met. well, maybe jammer, I don't know, if so he's Very forgetable in person - Hell he's forgetable in every case! the only ones who Seem to have that opinion also are the same ones who would be regarded the same by any shrink - you for instance are a True Nutcase. or don't you read those tim McVea is a hero, waco is new the alamo, far right paranoid crank mags of yours any more? and everyone Should remember you as the dyed in the wool DIR wannbe suckbutt. you were that, right? and when did that change? oh yeah, after they dissed you and told you you didn't know sh.t? > We are still waiting for you to make a scuba related post. turd in Your pocket too? just like jammer? DIR suckbutt? Are you using foul language to get attention? > turd in Your pocket too? just like jammer? The only tured in Our pocket is you, little man. > DIR suckbutt? Probly just learned it from one of his "special needs" kids. Dennis > Are you using foul language to get attention? > > > turd in Your pocket too? just like jammer? > > The only tured in Our pocket is you, little man. > The only tured in Our pocket is you, little man. back to more preteen age witisisms and attempted insults, you are truely pathetic. > back to more preteen age witisisms and attempted insults, you are truely > pathetic. Dive content? Signature"We're going to rush the hijackers." -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001 > > typical - trying to act like a grown up by cursing the "special needs" > > kids I work with at school try the same thing. they think that the shock > > value will give them power and control - scott, they are 5 -> 10 years > > old and mentally challenged, you act just like em! > > Did I stutter, punk? Must have. He thought you were cursing the "special needs" kids. Dennis Dennis (Icarus) wrote: >>>typical - trying to act like a grown up by cursing the "special needs" >>>kids I work with at school try the same thing. they think that the shock [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Dennis perhaps a punctuation got left out, eh? the missing punctuation mark is obvious to anyone reading the whole 'sentence'. what is amazing to me is how once one of you twits gets pointed out as the juvenial chest thumpers that are found more in middle school than in real life adults - the same collection of twits can only point out grammer/punctuation/spelling errors or cuss to make themselves feel better. y'all a real bunch of winners. > Dennis (Icarus) wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > perhaps a punctuation got left out, eh? the missing punctuation mark is Perhaps. :-) > obvious to anyone reading the whole 'sentence'. what is amazing to me is Soo...these kids you work with....are they your tutors? > how once one of you twits gets pointed out as the juvenial chest > thumpers that are found more in middle school than in real life adults - > the same collection of twits can only point out > grammer/punctuation/spelling errors or cuss to make themselves feel better. I wasn't pointing out grammar/punctuation//spelling. Just interpreting what you wrote. If you meant something different, try to be a bit clearer, 'k? Maybe those "speciak needs" kids could help? > y'all a real bunch of winners. Yes, we are. :-) Dennis > grammer/punctuation/spelling errors or cuss to make themselves feel better. Kinda like you callingt everyone who is sick of your bullshit childish? > y'all a real bunch of winners. And here you are, like a moth to a flame. > Dennis (Icarus) wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > how once one of you twits gets pointed out as the juvenial chest > thumpers that are found more in middle school than in real life adults - It occurs to me that the life-stage directly following the "name calling / cussing" stage is the stage where one tries to seem "better" than their antagonists by pointing out how childish they (the antagonists) are. It's just an observation. >>perhaps a punctuation got left out, eh? the missing punctuation mark is >>obvious to anyone reading the whole 'sentence'. what is amazing to me is [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > antagonists by pointing out how childish they (the antagonists) are. It's > just an observation. ;-) > perhaps a punctuation got left out, eh? the missing punctuation mark is > obvious to anyone reading the whole 'sentence'. what is amazing to me is [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > grammer/punctuation/spelling errors or cuss to make themselves feel better. > y'all a real bunch of winners. Diving content? Signature"We're going to rush the hijackers." -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001 > > Here spin this: > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > typical - trying to act like a grown up by cursing the "special needs" > kids I work with at school that explains a lot. your work environment has been rubbing off on you. > typical - trying to act like a grown up by cursing the "special needs" > kids I work with at school try the same thing. they think that the shock > value will give them power and control - scott, they are 5 -> 10 years > old and mentally challenged, you act just like em! jimmy, I don't see any diving content here. Signature"We're going to rush the hijackers." -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001 > jimmy, I don't see any diving content here. It's like watching a surgeon use a Kabar. > you can keep trying to spin it all you want - fact is your posts are > pure crap and that goes for the Large majority of the "regulars" here. [snicker] Most of the regulars are diving in equipment he built, stroke. Kneel. Signature"We're going to rush the hijackers." -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001 > >>I'm not going to spend the time. Unlike some, who apparently have no > >>life outside sitting on their a.s in front of the computer, I have other [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > you can keep trying to spin it all you want - fact is your posts are > pure crap and that goes for the Large majority of the "regulars" here. I for one have received mounds of useful, helpful, and informative elucidation from Scott (as well as many of the others you seek to chastise). Strangely enough, I've not yet had the good fortune to read anything of any use, value or even interest from you. Just my editorial 2 cents of course; please continue with your regularly scheduled rants... Oh, and just to keep the NG police off my a.s, here's my diving contribution to this post... I'm going to the Cheeca Lodge and Spa in Islamorada next week for a few days of divin', drinken' and fucken' (not necessarily in that order). So, what I need to know is, would it be more appropriate to combine a fine merlot with a succulent cohiba after the reef dives or should I wait for the wreck dives and build up some anticipation? Curious minds and such... -- Randy F. Milak ~I might still be a virgin if not for what rec.scuba did to my mind!~ Oh, and just to keep the NG police off my a.s, here's my diving contribution to > this post... I'm going to the Cheeca Lodge and Spa in Islamorada next week > for a [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > dives and > build up some anticipation? I'd wait until after the wreck, but why the Merlot? Wouldn't a nice cold white go down even better? ;-) > > "Randy F. Milak" <rfmilak@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > So, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > I'd wait until after the wreck, Interesting. > but why the Merlot? Surely you jest? > Wouldn't a nice cold white go down even better? ;-) <shutter> What an iteration of mixed messages. The words "cold white" is why this poor sole is going to Florida in the first place ... the words "go down" would be the 2nd and 3rd reasons. -- Randy F. Milak ~A bartender is just a pharmacist with a limited inventory!~ >> > "Randy F. Milak" <rfmilak@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> > So, [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > -- Either way, I wish you well - I'm off to Budapest myself this weekend, so no diving, and not much warmth! Some nice Tokaj though... Can you poor colonials get a proper Cohiba these days? After all, mustn't trade with the nasty Casto! > Can you poor colonials get a proper Cohiba these days? After all, > mustn't trade with the nasty Casto! Yeah, but we get them from Nicaragua and the DR. Castro hasn't put out a decent smoke in 20 years. > Yeah, but we get them from Nicaragua and the DR. Castro hasn't put > out a decent smoke in 20 years. I hope they're still rolled on the thighs of young virgins? > > Yeah, but we get them from Nicaragua and the DR. Castro hasn't put > > out a decent smoke in 20 years. > I hope they're still rolled on the thighs of young virgins? They are when I'm done with them. >>Yeah, but we get them from Nicaragua and the DR. Castro hasn't put >>out a decent smoke in 20 years. > > I hope they're still rolled on the thighs of young virgins? Dipped, not rolled. Matt-007-hias > Either way, I wish you well - I'm off to Budapest myself this weekend, so no > diving, and not much warmth! Some nice Tokaj though... If you want to go cavediving, there is a famous cave in Hungary where you need a full wetsuit to protect you against the hot water.. 40° centigrade or so. > Can you poor colonials get a proper Cohiba these days? After all, mustn't > trade with the nasty Casto! I bet you get good ones there. Have a nice time there Matthias > I for one have received mounds of useful, helpful, and informative elucidation > from Scott (as well as many of the others you seek to chastise). Strangely enough, > I've not yet had the good fortune to read anything of any use, value or even > interest from you. Just my editorial 2 cents of course; please continue with your > regularly scheduled rants... Couple fries short of a happy meal, that one... > Oh, and just to keep the NG police off my a.s, here's my diving contribution to > this post... I'm going to the Cheeca Lodge and Spa in Islamorada next week for a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Curious minds and such... I think a good local rum or a nice Patron would do much better as an accompaniment than rotten grape juice. Liquor is quicker. > "Randy F. Milak" <rfmilak@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > So, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I think a good local rum or a nice Patron would do much better as an > accompaniment than rotten grape juice. Hmmm, rum you say. I like it. Maybe with a little OJ and coconut. > Liquor is quicker. My wife wouldn't like the "quicker" part, but the rest of it she'd prolly go for. -- Randy F. Milak ~Women who seek to be equal to men lack ambition!~ > Hmmm, rum you say. I like it. Maybe with a little OJ and coconut. Always worked for Jimmy Buffet. > > Liquor is quicker. > My wife wouldn't like the "quicker" part, but the rest of it she'd prolly go for. Only quick on the buzz, my man. And remember; If God hadnt meant man to eat pussy, He wouldnt have shaped it like a taco. <rimshot> > strike a nerve?? when there is a valid diving issue I May join in - > unlike the constant spew of crap that comes from a few. Yeah. Like this one. Idiots. Jesus... Signature"We're going to rush the hijackers." -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001 > Idiots. Jesus... yes, jammer, jesus loves you too - even though you're an idiot. I however don't, Go troll elsewhere you insufferable sheepdip. > yes, jammer, jesus loves you too - even though you're an idiot. > I however don't, Go troll elsewhere you insufferable sheepdip. You're the only one here who would consider this as participation in a diving thread, jimmy. [snicker] Signature"We're going to rush the hijackers." -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001 > > yes, jammer, jesus loves you too - even though you're an idiot. > > I however don't, Go troll elsewhere you insufferable sheepdip. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > [snicker] James, Jammer is right. This is a group consisting of Dysfunctional Morons who dysfuntions as a gang. Some members of the gang have even dived in this millenium -- like that idiot Bob Crownfield. How do you expect them to talk about SCUBA??? For a brief intro to members of the Dysfunctional Gang, see http://tinyurl.com/4xmjw Jammer is actually NOT a member of this gang, because Jammer is far smarter than any of them. Jammer has been around rec.scuba longer than any of the current crop of the Dysfunctional Gang. Unlike Lee Bell who brags about sticking his head into his own a.s (he called it his "blocked senders list") and then pops up and spews his crap every opportunity he has riding the tail-wind of the other Morons, Jammer never does that. He probably had me on his killfile -- which is FINE and DANDY -- that's what an INTELLIGENT reader should do, if he doesn't like my style or DIVING threads. But there are really DUMB a.ses like Lee Bell, and some of the newcomer Dysfunctional Ostriches, who says I am on their killfile, but they couldn't resist coming out to WORSHIP ME every chance they have. Watch who pop up after this post. :-))) chilly, Alan Street, Dennis, Scott ... damn! They are already in this thread. But Bob Crownfield slipped, and so did a few of the OTHER members in the Dysfunctional Gang. Make sure you know them: http://tinyurl.com/4xmjw I'll leave them holding their breath until *I* am good and ready to post another Editorial about this rec.scuba group and its Dysfunctional Mental Midgets. Adios, -- Bob. > ? strike a nerve?? when there is a valid diving issue I May join in - > ? unlike the constant spew of crap that comes from a few. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Idiots. Jesus... James, Don't be silly! Haven't you worked out yet that Jammer like using short, succinct phrases. Anything more complicated would overload his poor brain, and make his neck turn even redder! ;-) > > ? strike a nerve?? when there is a valid diving issue I May join in - > > ? unlike the constant spew of crap that comes from a few. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Anything more complicated would overload his poor brain, and make his neck > turn even redder! ;-) Now, why don't you go and find out what James is known for. >>>No. IIRC Graham's not a divine, royalty, or even a member of the Court. >>>Graham, can you write a limerick? [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > written. I don't know what you are doing in this post, but it's not > limericking. Twas Chilly the limerick reviewer Graham's trys to rhyme just didn't move her Said Chilly to Graham "They're not worth a damn" 'Cause his limericks sucked worse than a Hoover. > Twas Chilly the > limerick reviewer [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > 'Cause his limericks sucked > worse than a Hoover. YRH, I give you Sir Andrew of Patrol, Lord of the Taser, Keeper of the Royal Handcuffs. > Twas Chilly the > limerick reviewer [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > 'Cause his limericks sucked > worse than a Hoover. LOL :^) Now that's one of the better ones we've seen here. > No. IIRC Graham's not a divine, royalty, or even a member of the Court. > Graham, can you write a limmerick? Apparently not. > But wait, Jammer, Graham Gowland thinks it belongs here. > > Doesn't that mean anything? Nope. Never heard of him. He must be in my killfile. Signature"We're going to rush the hijackers." -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001 > > ? But wait, Jammer, Graham Gowland thinks it belongs here. > > ? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > In article <XbcOd.3499$OI2.2404@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net>, Graham Gowland > > <gowlandREMOVE@bigfoot.com> wrote: > ? I don't want a diving job - but I don't mind someone asking the > question! > No one cares, newbie. > Survive a year, and we may allow you to carry tanks. > Until then, remain silent. There once was a fellow called Jammer Who worked hard at being a spanner He jumped at the sound, of our Chillies frown But ended up in many kill-files > There once was a fellow called Jammer > Who worked hard at being a spanner > He jumped at the sound, of our Chillies frown > But ended up in many kill-files Sorry, but that one sucked. Do better and you may earn His favor. >> There once was a fellow called Jammer >> Who worked hard at being a spanner [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Do better and you may earn His favor. Sucked? We have a new definition for the term: UNDER-f.cking-STATEMENT --- Rich http://richlockyer.tripod.com/ > There once was a fellow called Jammer > Who worked hard at being a spanner > He jumped at the sound, of our Chillies frown > But ended up in many kill-files To complete the rhyme, the last verse would have to be "but could not raise high his banner " or similar. Btw, I try in vain imagining Jammer transfroming into a spanner. Try it again with nailgun, pls. Matthias > > > ? But wait, Jammer, Graham Gowland thinks it belongs here. > > > ? [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > He jumped at the sound, of our Chillies frown > But ended up in many kill-files Try again. Limmericks, well-written ones, are pleasing to his eyes. It is one path to Knighthood and the Royal Court. Although since his ascension to the divine...... Dennis SPAM ALERT > Hola Scubadivers, > > this message is for all DM assistant instruc. Instructors and so on, > from every diveorganization like PADI, NAUI; IDD CMAS, BARRACUDA, ACUC, > > PDIC, etc and everbody who really wants to become one. What! No GUE? I'm outraged... OH sorry you said divers... :) > I see that there are a lot people who want to work as a divemaster etc, Really? Where exactly do you see these people and how long have you been having these visions? > but is looking for the right employer and v.v. What's a v.v.? > I'm working on a service to get everybody what they want. Coffee... Hot, Black and Now? You're the best! > Therefore I want to ask everybody to send me an e-mail so I can ask you > some questions. Why not ask here? > Employee (to be) or employer, both are welcome. Also > reactions from DM and up about their best or worst employer(s) I saw > some pretty good examples from St. Thomas. Tell us about it... > This is not a commercial nor a commercial company. I think jammers got you pegged friend... > I am an Instructor You mean an honest to goodness real scuba diving Instructor? Wholly cow...you're unique like everyone else. > in Mexico Yup, the high employment standards capital of the world... > trying to set up a new business But I thought you said this wasn't a commercial company? Oh, oh, it must be a NON-profit organization like DAN or something? > in getting the right people to the right employers, There's a name for those type of folks but I'm not sure they're not-for-profit folks... they're called... lemme think now... uh... right at the tip of my tongue... they're called uh... > Will you help me? Yes...read these. They will help you greatly for the future. http://tinyurl.com/5ywhm http://tinyurl.com/55ktz http://tinyurl.com/3z9kr > Write an email to me and let me ask you no more than > 10 questions. If you answer I will keep you posted on my progress. Post your 10 questions...suck it up buttercup, whaddaya got to lose? > I believe there is a solution! Yup, a real peripheral visionist. Hey, how come you and the "© © © Good News!..." guy, seem to have all the answers? -- Randy F. Milak ~May your life be long and useful like a roll of toilet paper!~ |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.