Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / November 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

King George resigned from WKPP?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jim Wyatt - 09 Nov 2003 22:23 GMT
Is it true King George quit WKPP?

Signature

Jim Wyatt
PADI Master Instructor #4612/IANTD Instructor
Florida Keys Reef-Divers, Inc.
www.reef-divers.com

Brian Nadwidny - 10 Nov 2003 00:07 GMT
> Is it true King George quit WKPP?

Apparently he has resigned as Project Director. Sounds like his
involvement in the diving end of it will be scaled back as well.

Brian
Edmonton, Alberta
www.mossmanscubaventures.com
Scott - 10 Nov 2003 02:06 GMT
> Is it true King George quit WKPP?

-----Original Message-----
From: George Irvine [mailto:girvine@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Wkpp@Yahoogroups. Com
Subject: [wkpp] Casey taking over as Project Director

I have asked Casey to take over as Director of the WKPP. He has done a
great job as Project Coordinator, and is the best person for the job of
Director. I will not be involved going forward with running any aspect of
the Project, and as such will vacate my seat on the Board of Directors.
As most of you may be aware, my father asked me some time ago to retire
from the bond business and come into business with him. He has since made me
President of his holding company, and more recently turned over the entire
operation to me while he himself has little involvement in the business
anymore other than teaching me what he knows and responding to my requests
for advice, when I can even get him to come into the office at all. He is 76
now, and both he and my mother have health issues that could have been
disastrous for the companies had something happened to him without this
change having taken place. I was not expecting such a quick transition, and
have assumed a responsibility and competitive challenge beyond anything I
have ever experienced before. I have hundreds of employees depending on me,
and a position in our industry that leaves me nowhere to go but down if I am
not totally on top of my game.

I can no longer take the time to participate in any meaningful way with
the Project, and as such am not at all up to speed on who is who or what is
what, and can not make good decisions from that platform, if indeed I can
even show up to dive. Casey can and will. I would hope that all of you will
give Casey the degree of cooperation that you gave me, and can assure you
all that he is a lot harder and tougher than I am , and would not suggest
putting him to the test. I used to get pissed and yell and scream - he does
neither, he just acts.

The scooter thing is a full blown business for me now, so any help I can
provide there will be forthcoming as always, but the diving related stuff I
will not have time for. Everyone should be on the same page with all of this
now anyway, and you all certainly have a template from the vast experience
of the WKPP from which to operate without asking me about it. On the
scooters, Pina is setting up a list to discuss issues and answers as far as
the mechanics of these devices. For procedural issues, the WKPP has that
down cold.

I will try to keep some diving involvement, if only for the fun of it
when I can, and Pina of course loves the Project and has the time to dive
and be otherwise involved. In reality Casey has been doing all the work
while I have only done a handful of dives with the Project in the last
couple of years, and all of those were with Jarrod or Casey, so I am not
exactly doing anyone any good as far as teaching anyone anything and
certainly will not be missed in that regard.

One good thing about this is that those who hate me in the diving
"community" will not have me to complain about, and certainly without me to
focus on, there is no consensus against the WKPP to drive any threats to the
longevity of the Project.

The WKPP is the pinnacle of diving - please keep it that way for your own
sakes, and for the sake of all whom you would influence by your example.

Subscription/removal requests to WernerChris@msn.com.
chilly - 10 Nov 2003 12:33 GMT
..
It was bound to happen. The guy got bored and found a better opportunity
that makes him happy in the short time.
suds - 10 Nov 2003 13:57 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Irvine [mailto:girvine@bellsouth.net]
> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 2:43 PM
> To: Wkpp@Yahoogroups. Com
> Subject: [wkpp] Casey taking over as Project Director

When did the load mouth rate a secretary?  Obviously, he did not write this
alone.
Jammer Six - 10 Nov 2003 18:35 GMT
> When did the load mouth rate a secretary?  Obviously, he did not write this
> alone.

Your ignorance is showing again...

Contempt prior to investigation.

The hallmark of the fool.

Signature

"We're going to rush the hijackers."
    -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001

Jack Farmer - 10 Nov 2003 11:18 GMT
> Is it true King George quit WKPP?

Yep.
bullshark - 10 Nov 2003 13:05 GMT
>Is it true King George quit WKPP?

George who, and why should we care about a radio station?

safe diving,

bullshark
suds - 10 Nov 2003 13:59 GMT
> >Is it true King George quit WKPP?
>
> George who, and why should we care about a radio station?
>
> safe diving,

It wasn't a *real* radio station, just on tv.   And I always had a *huge*
crush on Bailey.  (But she got a real fat butt by the end.)  What ever
happened to her.  LOL

suds
DavidM - 10 Nov 2003 14:12 GMT
> It wasn't a *real* radio station, just on tv.   And I always had a *huge*
> crush on Bailey.  (But she got a real fat butt by the end.)  What ever
> happened to her.  LOL

Not much...

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0810453/

Cheers
David M
suds - 10 Nov 2003 14:21 GMT
> Not much...
>
> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0810453/

Here is a little more detail.  Just turn off the speakers first.

suds
DavidM - 11 Nov 2003 01:22 GMT
> > Not much...
> >
> > http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0810453/
>
> Here is a little more detail.  Just turn off the speakers first.

huh?  Does it make noise? Sorry about that if it does - I've not got
speakers on this machine.

Cheers
David M
Salty - 11 Nov 2003 05:52 GMT
> > On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 22:23:23 GMT, Jim Wyatt <Jim@nospam-reef-divers.com>
>  wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> crush on Bailey.  (But she got a real fat butt by the end.)  What ever
> happened to her.  LOL

I dunno but her butt was still ok when it was fat. Not fat actually...
just a little plump.
Alan Street - 10 Nov 2003 15:04 GMT
>>Is it true King George quit WKPP?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>bullshark

Mr. Crownfield, I believe we have a LOTD contender.
Michael Ross - 10 Nov 2003 15:33 GMT
>>Is it true King George quit WKPP?
>
>George who, and why should we care about a radio station?

Radio station?

I thought it was a motorcycle club...

Mike
http://www.corestore.org

'The avalanche has already started
It is too late for the pebbles to vote'
Toto - 10 Nov 2003 16:25 GMT
> >>Is it true King George quit WKPP?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> 'The avalanche has already started
> It is too late for the pebbles to vote'

JC's sake get it right.
He the one that sends out those pesky people in white sarongs and black jack
boots, selling Halcyon dive gear at the airport and dive sites.
You know the one's they dance around chanting.

Your going to die stroke
Your going to die stroke
Your going to die
Your going to die
I don't know why
I don't know why
So, please, my dive gear buy
So, please my dive gear buy
I'm not allowed choice
I'm not allowed choice
We have one voice
We have one voice
We are not allowed to think
We are not allowed to think
Please buy our gear or I'll be forced to drink
Please buy our gear or I'll be forced to drink
Not the kool-aid
Not the kool-aid
Oh my, I need first-aid
Oh my, I need first aid
I'm the one who's going to die.
Am I really the stroke that's going to die.
I don't know why.
I don't know why.

Toto
Jammer Six - 10 Nov 2003 18:37 GMT
> Your going to die stroke
> Your going to die stroke
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> I don't know why.
> I don't know why.

You're repeating yourself, bitch.

Time to pick one of your masters, and ask for a beating.

Signature

"Let's roll!"
    -Todd Beamer, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001

Toto - 10 Nov 2003 18:44 GMT
> ? Your going to die stroke
> ? Your going to die stroke
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Time to pick one of your masters, and ask for a beating.

I think it's your turn, if your up to it.
I don't need you crapping out on me, last guy had a bad ticker.
Oh ya, you just can't get it up.
Got your wet noodle ready?
Wait a minute don't you want to put your hair up in a pony tail?
Don't break a nail.

Toto

ps try not to hit like a girl this time.
Chris Guynn - 10 Nov 2003 20:17 GMT
> > ? Your going to die stroke
> > ? Your going to die stroke
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> ps try not to hit like a girl this time.

Better watch out Toto... He might kick you in the a.s and then nail his foot
in place there... :-)
Jammer Six - 10 Nov 2003 20:19 GMT
> I think it's your turn, if your up to it.
> I don't need you crapping out on me, last guy had a bad ticker.
> Oh ya, you just can't get it up.
> Got your wet noodle ready?
> Wait a minute don't you want to put your hair up in a pony tail?
> Don't break a nail.

We said "Masters", bitch, not "God".

Pay attention.

Signature

"We're going to rush the hijackers."
    -Jeremy Glick, aboard United Airlines flight 93, September 11, 2001

Salty - 11 Nov 2003 05:56 GMT
> ? Your going to die stroke
> ? Your going to die stroke
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> ? I don't know why.
> ? I don't know why.


> You're repeating yourself, bitch.
> Time to pick one of your masters, and ask for a beating.

You ain't shittin'. A severe beating about the head would be good I think.
Toto - 11 Nov 2003 06:44 GMT
> > ? Your going to die stroke
> > ? Your going to die stroke
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> You ain't shittin'. A severe beating about the head would be good I think.

I hear you took acceptation to being called a c.nt.
How about an old dried up crusty c.nt that should keep her legs as well as
her mouth shut.
Because it smells like low tide at a raw sewage discharge pipe.
I guess that clears up a few things.
Stop e-mailing people, they don't want to hear from you.
Now piss off.

Toto
MacReady - 10 Nov 2003 19:55 GMT
>>Is it true King George quit WKPP?
>
>George who, and why should we care about a radio station?

You were supposed to give us a coke alert.

You owe me a keyboard.
BllFs6 - 21 Nov 2003 15:37 GMT
Hmmm

I always wondered a couple things about the Sheck death....and though its been
awhile..... I read many a detailed account of Shecks deeper record setting deep
dives (vs horizontal cave penetrations)....

First, if you read his accounts of these dives its obvious his allotment of
"spare air" to deal with problems was darn short....in other words that little
extra in the tank wasnt gonna last very long time wise at say 600 feet on open
circuit scuba...

which reminds me of something Ive never liked about the 1/3rds rule of cave
diving as popularly stated....some extra air at a shallow depth and you can
probably deal with minor "emergencies"...not so at "deep depths"....Ive always
thought that the rule should be more explicity stated:

1/3 of y, where y = total air - x, where x equals the amount of air required to
last z minutes at max depth and z minutes is some decent length of time to deal
with a reasonable emergency...say 15 minutes...YOMV...

Anywho.....looking at his air consumption plans.....I wondered why he didnt
even do something as simple as  a constant mass addition rebreather.....even a
REALLY crappy one dumping a ton of gas into the system probably woulda given
him 10 times more time at depth (not that he woulda wanted to use it unless
hereally  needed to....but it beats RUNNING outa gas......)

Now, if you look at his goals for the final dive.....and then look at how he
did it, it still doesnt make sense....and lets ingore the fact that he was
solo...thats a whole other can of worms....

He had 2 basic goals.....perhaps.....reach the bottom and/or set a new depth
record...now you can question the wisdom of this/these goals but again there is
something I never "liked".....

He pretty much carried all the gas he need for the deep part of descent/ascent
ON him....he had stages tied to the line for the deco up part of the ascent

Now remember, this is a big open cenote with a line just going straight to the
bottom....

If it had been me.... (yeah right), in addition to a buttload of gas ON MY
PERSON.....I woulda had another buttload or 2 of gas/tanks/regs attached to the
main descent line or perhaps another adjacent line just a few horizontal feet
away.....hell....have a tank staged every 50 vertical feet or so....

Maybe it wouldnta helped in this situation.....but beside the cost of doing
this it sure wouldnta hurt anything.....

take care

Blll
Dan Volker - 22 Nov 2003 02:23 GMT
> Hmmm
>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> Blll

Look at the date of Sheck's death.
Any rebreathers on the market then were death traps.....The real issue,
which you raise, is that this was too deep for open circuit---it was a
foolish dive. This form of absolute stupidity was what this a.shole bowden
was all about.  Too bad someone could not have exposed him for the dangerous
moron that he was, prior to Sheck's death.

Dan V
Karl Denninger - 23 Nov 2003 04:31 GMT
>Look at the date of Sheck's death.
>Any rebreathers on the market then were death traps.....The real issue,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Dan V

That's a hell of a judgment to place on someone who is choosing to test the
limits of human endurance.

Do you place the same judgment on Sheck himself?  If not, why not?  Did he
lack free will prior to getting in the water?  Can you show me where someone
put a gun to his head and forced him to make that dive?

Or is the bottom line that you detest pressing the limits of human ability,
and if you can't make it illegal, well by God, you'll drag those who make
such attempts through the mud in an attempt to browbeat them into complience
with your worldview?

Signature

Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net    Tired of spam at your company?  LOOK HERE!
http://childrens-justice.org    Working for family and children's rights
http://diversunion.org        LOG IN AND GET YOUR TANK STICKERS TODAY!

Dan Volker - 23 Nov 2003 14:01 GMT
> >Look at the date of Sheck's death.
> >Any rebreathers on the market then were death traps.....The real issue,
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> such attempts through the mud in an attempt to browbeat them into complience
> with your worldview?

Karl,
This is where my Tequila analogy plays well.  What is the "limit" of human
ability to consume mass quantities of Tequila? Can you chug 3 bottles, or
can you chug 5 bottles,  prior to passing out and potentially dieing of
alcohol poisoning?  What is this human endurance limit?
If the human endurance limit has nothing to do with issues important to
mankind, then its probably not even as smart as proving you can chug 4
bottles of Tequila ( there are at least alot of "drunks"  that would feel
this is relevant to mankind--their version of mankind).

Society sets the limits of human performance that are "meaningful to
society".
People can choose the limits that are important to themselves,
individually.
Karl, you are free to choose whether the human endurance limit you want to
test ( and be "famous" for ) is drinking, nose picking, farting louder than
any other human, strapping yourself to a canon ball and being shot farther
than any other person, or maybe just being acknowledged to be the most
obnoxious person anyone has ever met.
Maybe you would like to be famous for having taken the longest sh.t.
If society does not see a value to the new limit or boundary you have set,
then your death defying feat will have jeopardized your life without having
any chance of "allowing" you to be famous---because society would not care.
On the other hand, there may be family members that would suffer terribly if
you died in this quest to push boundaries---and this would be an even
greater shame if the boundary you were pushing could not, in any way,  ever
be recognized as being helpful to mankind----OK, maybe "some" people would
worship you if you died taking the longest sh.t any person ever took....But
would it be worth it Karl---the suffering this could bring in to the people
that care about you....the point being here, the suffering which occurred in
the hearts of the people who cared deeply about Sheck, after a meaningless
death....meaningless to society. If an astronaut dies, society thinks its a
tragedy, but it was part of an attempt to allow humans to expand out into
space---so in a death, an astronaut could become a hero...... If Karl dies
trying to fart louder than any man ever before him, the societal value of
this will NOT make Karl a hero---it will make a sad story about a man who
was dangerously mis-directed. And of course, it will be a sad story about a
man who did not smell very good .....

Sheck dying on a 1000 foot deep open circuit attempt could not have ever
helped any future penetration into cave, piping, or society critical
mission. It makes no more sense than dying while trying to show that the
limits of human endurance for deep air could be--say, 600 feet deep in a 4
mph current over a reef---this would have zero meaning, because it would
always be stupid to dive this deep on air, and there would always be better
ways to dive this deep if a reason existed to dive this deep.

Dan V
Lee Bell - 23 Nov 2003 15:26 GMT
Somebody change the subject of this thread.  It's long since moved away from
George, as it should have.

The king is gone.  Let him rest in peace.

Lee
Dan Volker - 23 Nov 2003 16:44 GMT
> Somebody change the subject of this thread.  It's long since moved away from
> George, as it should have.
>
> The king is gone.  Let him rest in peace.
>
> Lee

Karl may need his self image boosted a bit, so that he won't be so easily
threatened.
Someone may want to help him with this.....?

I'd rather talk about what is  "DIR"  for recreational divers--here on
rec.scuba....

1.) Your mission ( DIR objective) is to have as much fun as possible on each
dive.
2.) In order to achieve this, there are a number of related goals it is wise
to strive for as well:
a. ) On whatever fun dive you are "planning", make sure you really "plan"
the dive.
b.) Make sure your gear is "appropriate" for the dive, and that you won't be
"pushing the limits of human endurance" in order to survive the dive you are
planning,  with your present equipment.
c.) Talk to other divers before going out on the boat, and try to find
someone who shares your interest in the type of fun dive you want to do, and
who shares your ideas on the "safe" way the dive should be planned and
executed........ ( sorry about that executed word, I was still thinking
about Bowden).
d.) Before you dive with a new buddy, discuss your methods of underwater
communicating, what will cause a dive abort, when the dive should be turned,
and how you would handle most common problems this particular dive could
offer up to you.
e.) If you get paired with someone you don't know, and their tank is
dragging below their butt--almost ready to fall out of the band, and their
octopus is stuffed deep into a pocket where they might need 2 minutes to get
it out--or if it is just flailing around with no way to predict its
immediate location during a dive-----or they are configured and pre-inflated
like a puffer fish---then I suggest you inform the dive boat captain that
this is NOT a person you will be willing to buddy with. If you are paying
money to dive on this boat, you don't deserve an "albatross around your
neck". And if you resemble this person I just re-created, consider watching
more TV, and considering diving as "too much work to be fun for you"  ;-)
Or...... if you resemble this person, and your name is Karl, don't worry,
the tank is fine, your buddy won't be counting on you for the octopus
anyway--so don't sweat it.....and you probably need a lot more weight---I'd
bet the boat captain ( if you're Karl, you could be the boat captain...)
will let you borrow the anchor--just tie it around yourself a few times with
granny knots :-)   I'm just kidding here---I'd rather see Karl live a long
life full of watching TV,  and in contributing to rec.boats where his sly
wit can be best enjoyed :-)  Karl, I've heard you are really missed there !

Dan V
Lee Bell - 23 Nov 2003 22:07 GMT
> I'd rather talk about what is  "DIR"  for recreational divers--here on
> rec.scuba....

You're not an employee of GUE.  You're not authorized to talk about what is
and is not DIR . . . at least you won't be once the trademark is granted.
You'll have to talk about something else.

> 1.) Your mission is to have as much fun as possible on each
> dive.

Edited to remove trademark.

> 2.) In order to achieve this, there are a number of related goals it is wise
> to strive for as well:
> a. ) On whatever fun dive you are "planning", make sure you really "plan"
> the dive.

Not necessary for most "fun" dives.  Computers handle the situation nicely.

> b.) Make sure your gear is "appropriate" for the dive, and that you won't be
> "pushing the limits of human endurance" in order to survive the dive you are
> planning,  with your present equipment.

Every time you dive, you're beyond the limits of human capacity.  That's why
we need equipment in the first place.  It is a good idea to have equipment
suitable for the dive.  It's even better if the individual knows enough to
determine what is appropriate for his dive rather than depending on somebody
else to tell him/her.

> c.) Talk to other divers before going out on the boat, and try to find
> someone who shares your interest in the type of fun dive you want to do, and
> who shares your ideas on the "safe" way the dive should be planned and
> executed........ ( sorry about that executed word, I was still thinking
> about Bowden).

No problem.  Done that.  Mike and I fit nicely and, so far, I figure we're
pretty safe.  Of course those that abide by more stringent buddy protocols
might not agree, but it's not their dive to plan.

> d.) Before you dive with a new buddy, discuss your methods of underwater
> communicating, what will cause a dive abort, when the dive should be turned,
> and how you would handle most common problems this particular dive could
> offer up to you.

Mike aborts when Mike thinks he should.  I abort when I think I should.
Under certain circumstances, Mikes decision will affect mine more than under
other circumstances.

> e.) If you get paired with someone you don't know, and their tank is
> dragging below their butt--almost ready to fall out of the band, and their
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> like a puffer fish---then I suggest you inform the dive boat captain that
> this is NOT a person you will be willing to buddy with.

Too late.  Once you're in the water, you're his buddy.  Personally, I would
not enjoy this dive.  I'm sure that I'd spend the entire time wondering when
my new buddy was going to do something stupid enough to be potentially
fatal.  The upside is that somebody that dives this way is very unlikely to
have low consumption.  I won't be stuck with them for long.

Lee
Scott McFadden - 24 Nov 2003 01:03 GMT
> "Lee Bell" <leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote in message

> > The king is gone.  Let him rest in peace.

Oh my!

What happened, did Lyle really "nail" himself this time?

<snip>

> c.) Talk to other divers before going out on the boat, and try to find
> someone who shares your interest in the type of fun dive you want to do, and
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> money to dive on this boat, you don't deserve an "albatross around your
> neck".

The Hell with all that crap.

Either I bring a buddy with me or, I'm solo.

Real simple.

> I'm just kidding here---I'd rather see Karl live a long
> life full of watching TV,  and in contributing to rec.boats where his sly
> wit can be best enjoyed :-)  Karl, I've heard you are really missed there !

Good grief!

Dan, "wreck".boats is muddied, turbulent and troubled enough as it is.
--
SJM
Dan Volker - 24 Nov 2003 01:21 GMT
> > I'm just kidding here---I'd rather see Karl live a long
> > life full of watching TV,  and in contributing to rec.boats where his sly
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> --
> SJM

Scott,
Would you rather have Karl being "missed" here on rec.scuba , or on
rec.boats ?   :-)

Dan V
Scott McFadden - 24 Nov 2003 16:14 GMT
> > > I'm just kidding here---I'd rather see Karl live a long
> > > life full of watching TV,  and in contributing to rec.boats where his
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Would you rather have Karl being "missed" here on rec.scuba , or on
> rec.boats ?   :-)

Tough call :-)

Karl seems to have a bug for Jablonski as well.

It was about some second hand Halcyon gear he picked or something (I
forget) and, as usual, he got all worked up beyond belief.

So, you are in fine "company".

BTW, welcome back.
--
SJM
Dan Volker - 24 Nov 2003 19:02 GMT
> > > > I'm just kidding here---I'd rather see Karl live a long
> > > > life full of watching TV,  and in contributing to rec.boats where his
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> --
> SJM

Thanks. Its good to be back.
Dan V
Lee Bell - 24 Nov 2003 08:50 GMT
> > > The king is gone.  Let him rest in peace.
>
> Oh my!
>
> What happened, did Lyle really "nail" himself this time?

Who cares?

George spent a lot of time and effort being the south end of a north bound
horse.  He's given that up in favor of actually working for a living, even
if he does start with a significant advantage.  It's time to be over him and
get on with life . . . and let him get on with his.

Lee
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.