Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Where to do dolphin dives?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Clint - 24 Jan 2005 16:24 GMT
     I went down to Grand Bahamas a few years ago and did the dolphin dive
with Unexso.  The dive masters got two dolphins to do silly tricks with the
divers underwater like kissing you when you remove your regulator.  It was
fun.  Now that my partner is certified, she wants to do the dolphin dive
too.  Does anybody know if there are other places besides Grand Bahamas to
do dolphin dives?

     Clint

     Free Spirit Gallery
     http://www.FreeSpiritGallery.ca
     Exquisite Eskimo Inuit Art & Northwest Indian Art
Dan Bracuk - 24 Jan 2005 22:38 GMT
"Clint" <pepmax@videotron.ca> pounded away at his keyboard resulting
in:
:  Does anybody know if there are other places besides Grand Bahamas to
:do dolphin dives?

Anthony's Key in Roatan.

Dan Bracuk
If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure.
Greg Mossman - 25 Jan 2005 00:24 GMT
>      I went down to Grand Bahamas a few years ago and did the dolphin dive
> with Unexso.  The dive masters got two dolphins to do silly tricks with
> the divers underwater like kissing you when you remove your regulator.  It
> was fun.  Now that my partner is certified, she wants to do the dolphin
> dive too.  Does anybody know if there are other places besides Grand
> Bahamas to do dolphin dives?

Palau.
Reef Fish - 25 Jan 2005 19:42 GMT
> >      I went down to Grand Bahamas a few years ago and did the dolphin dive
> > with Unexso.  The dive masters got two dolphins to do silly tricks with
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Palau.

Belize, Roatan, Cancun, Cozumel, ... and plenty of locations
to pet and dive with the trained/captive dolphins.

You can also go to the sand flats of North Bahamas and wait
for possibly days to dive with the WILD dolphins that come
and play with swimmers/divers until they are bored with them
(in 5 minutes or less).

But the BEST dolphin dives are everywhere in the oceans.
You listen to their whistles and clicking talk and watch
them in their natural habitat, without being molested by
the clueless gawkers.

-- Bob.
nyg - 25 Jan 2005 21:40 GMT
> > >      I went down to Grand Bahamas a few years ago and did the
> dolphin dive
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> -- Bob.

but after the experience is over the clueless gawkers aren't as
clueless anymore. they have come into contact with (and presumably
appreciated) the animals. there in lies the merit of the so-called
"slavery" and "repugnant activity" -- each time someone does it, they
learn that dolphins are amazing creatures. touching and seeing a sea
creature up close is not the same as looking at pictures or a tv. they
will then do more to preserve the species etc. they may go home and
tell their friends how great dolphins are. they may spend money on
conservation efforts. i used to think of seaworld etc in bad terms. but
then i realized that one creature being subjected to life in a pool may
educate enough otherwise ignorant people to make a difference for the
species as a whole (assuming of course that the animals are properly
cared for of course... unlike the free willy orca).
-AF
Greg Mossman - 25 Jan 2005 22:10 GMT
> but after the experience is over the clueless gawkers aren't as
> clueless anymore. they have come into contact with (and presumably
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> species as a whole (assuming of course that the animals are properly
> cared for of course... unlike the free willy orca).

Sort of how hunters gain respect for the magnificent beasts they slaughter
in order to obtain another trophy for their den.  What a lovely concept.

I bet you'd agree with making some black people slaves in order to gain
sympathy for the "plight of the negro".
Jer - 26 Jan 2005 05:57 GMT
>>>>     I went down to Grand Bahamas a few years ago and did the
>>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> cared for of course... unlike the free willy orca).
> -AF

I think I understand the point your making, and I'd actually agree with
it *if* the captive animals had been collected for rehablitation and
eventual return to their natural home.  But they don't do that.  The
majority of animals used in these 'kiss me' programs (including Sea
World's) are collected for permanent residency and used for commercial
profit.  There is nothing natural about living in a glass box.   When
humans do this to humans it's a crime, when they do it to others it's a
major stockholder event.  IMO, there's something intrinsically wrong
about the latter, and I wouldn't pay for parking at Sea World, let alone
the entrance fee.  OTOH, there are venues dedicated to the rehad and
return of their animal charges, and supporting those is well
recommended.  These venues are easy to spot, their business focus is on
the animals, not the attendees.  If someone wants to be the primary
focus of a business, hire an escort whore and stop expecting someone
else to do it.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Reef Fish - 28 Jan 2005 18:40 GMT
> >>>>     I went down to Grand Bahamas a few years ago and did the
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> World's) are collected for permanent residency and used for commercial
> profit.  There is nothing natural about living in a glass box.

THAT's the crux of the issue as to why we shouldn't patronize the
slavery trade in dolphin-kissing, and it more animated counterpart
in Cozumel that the cruise-pods raved about.

http://csiwhalesalive.org/csicapfl.html

Wild dolphins and whales are known not to survive well in captivity.
I know the webpage above OVER-simplifies the situation and the
cited "statistics" are no more credible than many of the "smoking
fatality" statistics we've seen.

Here's an article that talks more specifrically about dolphins:

http://www.dolphinawareness.org/facts/main.html

Not a pretty picture, eh?

To balance the above, here's an article that presents the
counter-arguments about some of the "statistics" cited.

As I had said in this thread earlier, it's far more enjoyable,
especially since we ARE scuba-divers already, is to enjoy your
dolphin encounter in THEIR natural habitat, on THEIR own terms,
in the same manner you would enjoy diving with sharks in
Cocos Island, Palau, and the French Polynesia, rather than
petting a shark or three in a tank.

-- Bob.
Greg Mossman - 28 Jan 2005 19:01 GMT
> As I had said in this thread earlier, it's far more enjoyable,
> especially since we ARE scuba-divers already, is to enjoy your
> dolphin encounter in THEIR natural habitat, on THEIR own terms,
> in the same manner you would enjoy diving with sharks in
> Cocos Island, Palau, and the French Polynesia, rather than
> petting a shark or three in a tank.

Maybe it's far more enjoyable when it happens in a natural setting, but it's
far more likely to be able to enjoy snorkeling or diving with dolphins in an
artificial setting.  I've only had the experience of seeing a dolphin
underwater once (a pod of six in Cozumel) and they were gone again in the
blink of an eye.  It was exciting to be sure, but my dolphin snorkel in
Palau was far more enjoyable since I was able to caress the beast and poke
it in the eye.  When there's a natural dolphin encounter to match the shark
encounters found in Coco, Palau, or Tahiti, please let me know about it.

Regarding Palau, the dolphin experience there told us that they had planned
at some indefinite future date to organize dolphin experiences outside the
enclosed areas, in open water.  That would be a nice compromise.  The
setback was that the dolphins, unfamiliar with the area, were too nervous
outside the enclosed areas and would flee back 'home'.
Reef Fish - 28 Jan 2005 19:33 GMT
> > As I had said in this thread earlier, it's far more enjoyable,
> > especially since we ARE scuba-divers already, is to enjoy your
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> far more likely to be able to enjoy snorkeling or diving with dolphins in an
> artificial setting.  I've only had the experience of seeing a dolphin

> underwater once (a pod of six in Cozumel) and they were gone again in the
> blink of an eye.  It was exciting to be sure, but my dolphin snorkel in
> Palau was far more enjoyable since I was able to caress the beast and poke
> it in the eye.  When there's a natural dolphin encounter to match the shark
> encounters found in Coco, Palau, or Tahiti, please let me know about it.

Greg, what you are saying is that it's far more enjoyable for YOU
to caress and fondle a whore (the human specie;  not the dolphin
counterpart for this analogy) who works in a whore house than meeting
any female in a "natural" human encounter which most of us prefer.

I know, it takes much more patience to wait for the really enjoyable
encounter that way, and not the "wham, bam, thank you mam you pay
your bucks to 'enjoy'".  :-)

> Regarding Palau, the dolphin experience there told us that they had planned
> at some indefinite future date to organize dolphin experiences outside the
> enclosed areas, in open water.

NEVER had that experience in Palau, and would not have wanted even if
they paid me.  ALL the shark experience in Palau I had were in the
SHARKS' natural habitat, be it in Blue Corner, or Peliliu, or any
of the liveaboard dive sites in which there are always SHARKS in
their own habitat and environment.

-- Bob.
Greg Mossman - 28 Jan 2005 19:39 GMT
> Greg, what you are saying is that it's far more enjoyable for YOU
> to caress and fondle a whore (the human specie;  not the dolphin
> counterpart for this analogy) who works in a whore house than meeting
> any female in a "natural" human encounter which most of us prefer.

Hardly.  I can get females in natural settings (like bars) to possibly stick
around a little with creative conversation and offers of free alcohol.
Dolphins, however, are immune to such ploys and immediately leave the scene.
If all my female encounters were like my dolphin encounters, I'd most
definitely prefer hookers.

> NEVER had that experience in Palau, and would not have wanted even if
> they paid me.  ALL the shark experience in Palau I had were in the
> SHARKS' natural habitat, be it in Blue Corner, or Peliliu, or any
> of the liveaboard dive sites in which there are always SHARKS in
> their own habitat and environment.

I wasn't paid for it but I also didn't pay for it.  However, I didn't see
any other dolphins in Palau when I was there.  And while I did see plenty of
SHARKS, none of the SHARKS let me caress them.
Reef Fish - 28 Jan 2005 19:57 GMT
> > Greg, what you are saying is that it's far more enjoyable for YOU
> > to caress and fondle a whore (the human specie;  not the dolphin
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Hardly.  I can get females in natural settings (like bars) to possibly stick
> around a little with creative conversation and offers of free alcohol.

Just like you brag about the IQ score of yours when you have absolutely
and positively NO verifying IQ score or test of any kind you could
show.

Yeah, that's how you can fool those in a bar, perhaps, but not HERE.

> > NEVER had that experience in Palau, and would not have wanted even if
> > they paid me.  ALL the shark experience in Palau I had were in the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I wasn't paid for it but I also didn't pay for it.  However, I didn't see
> any other dolphins in Palau when I was there.

But I was talking about SHARKS, and only sharks, in Palau.

The kind that live and swim in the ocean, and not the two-legged
ones with hangs around bars looking for cheap prostitutes for a
lay, like you Greg.  ;^)

> And while I did see plenty of SHARKS,

and you didn't "ENJOY them", like some Prez was talking about smoking
weeds.  :-)

> none of the SHARKS let me caress them.
I wouldn't either, if I were a shark!!

-- Bob.
Greg Mossman - 28 Jan 2005 20:15 GMT
> But I was talking about SHARKS, and only sharks, in Palau.

But the thread is about dolphins and we were talking about dolphins, in
Palau and otherwise.

> and you didn't "ENJOY them", like some Prez was talking about smoking
> weeds.  :-)

I don't enjoy sharks unless I can touch them.  I petted a cute nurse shark
in Burma a few weeks ago.  That was enjoyable.

> I wouldn't either, if I were a shark!!

I don't want to caress you, Bob, shark or not.
Dan Bracuk - 28 Jan 2005 23:04 GMT
"Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> pounded away at his
keyboard resulting in:
:Greg, what you are saying is that it's far more enjoyable for YOU
:to caress and fondle a whore (the human specie;  not the dolphin
:counterpart for this analogy) who works in a whore house than meeting
:any female in a "natural" human encounter which most of us prefer.

Nothing wrong with paying a few bucks to guarantee a good result.

Dan Bracuk
If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure.
Reef Fish - 29 Jan 2005 00:42 GMT
> "Reef Fish" <Large_Nassau_Grouper@Yahoo.com> pounded away at his
> keyboard resulting in:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Dan Bracuk

Did Patty know about your guarantee experience?  :-)

First of all, I don't think those cat houses Greg patronized
(Mustang Ranch?) guarantee him anything other than any craps he
catches is FREE.

Secondly, Greg then bragged about:

Greg>  I can get females in natural settings (like bars) t­o possibly
Greg>  stick around a little with creative conversation and offers
Greg>  of fre­e alcohol.

I cited Greg cuz he always obfuscates about what he says and even
when I caught him with a "smoking gun" by citing exactly what he
was trying to deny, he still went for rounds denying it.

So, here ...

Greg considers a bar as his natural setting while other folks
might a cozy bed or a cozy sofa near a fireplace with nuts <the
edible kind) roasting in an open fire ...

and Greg has to dig deep into his repertroire of fabrications or
"tall tales" with which we are so familiar, to convince this
stranger in the night, to "possibly stick around a little  ...

and FINALLY Greg would pull out his ...   <drum roll in suspense!!>
"offers of free alcohol"  to trick his female stranger companion
into being drugged into a stupor ...

and Greg would now get "far more enjoyment" molesting this drunken
slut than what poor ordinary folks like some of us would never
experience.

Did I get THAT right?  <BG>

-- Bob.
chilly - 28 Jan 2005 19:34 GMT
> > As I had said in this thread earlier, it's far more enjoyable,
> > especially since we ARE scuba-divers already, is to enjoy your
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> it in the eye.  When there's a natural dolphin encounter to match the shark
> encounters found in Coco, Palau, or Tahiti, please let me know about it.

Just had two such experiences in Roatan.

One of them even came in so close, I thought he was going to poke me in the
eye.  I've got the picture to prove it.

I'll scan it and send it to you.

(snip)
Jer - 29 Jan 2005 17:11 GMT
>>As I had said in this thread earlier, it's far more enjoyable,
>>especially since we ARE scuba-divers already, is to enjoy your
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> it in the eye.  When there's a natural dolphin encounter to match the shark
> encounters found in Coco, Palau, or Tahiti, please let me know about it.

So, your statement here is it's morally acceptable when *you* get
enjoyment from the encounter, even knowing your affectations were likely
forced upon another sentient being in an artificial venue - including
the poking of the animal's eye?  Given that last part, I'll gladly help
you into shark-infested waters just after the chumming starts.  Remember
Greg, they all belong to the same union - f.ck with one and they'll f.ck
you back.

> Regarding Palau, the dolphin experience there told us that they had planned
> at some indefinite future date to organize dolphin experiences outside the
> enclosed areas, in open water.  That would be a nice compromise.  The
> setback was that the dolphins, unfamiliar with the area, were too nervous
> outside the enclosed areas and would flee back 'home'.

OTOH, had they been left alone in the first place, it's likely they
would've chosen a more appropriate home if that choice hadn't been
stolen from them earlier.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Greg Mossman - 29 Jan 2005 18:26 GMT
> So, your statement here is it's morally acceptable when *you* get
> enjoyment from the encounter, even knowing your affectations were likely
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Greg, they all belong to the same union - f.ck with one and they'll f.ck
> you back.

Morality is purely subjective.  Therefore, yes, anything is morally
acceptable to me when *I* get enjoyment from the encounter.

I've been in shark-infested waters after the chumming starts and I'm still
alive today, only missing three fingers.  The sharks were obviously scared
of me after they heard what I did to the dolphin, their most feared enemy.
Word gets around ya know.

> OTOH, had they been left alone in the first place, it's likely they
> would've chosen a more appropriate home if that choice hadn't been
> stolen from them earlier.

They were all rescued.  Had they been left alone in the first place, they
would likely be dead.  If you feel that's a more appropriate "home" for them
then apparently that's your moral choice.

Me, I'd rather save something and use it to make money.  I hope to save a
diver one day with judicious use of my octopus.  That diver will then be
mine to exhibit around the world.  I'll keep him or her on a leash.  Would
that satisfy you?
Jer - 30 Jan 2005 03:19 GMT
>>So, your statement here is it's morally acceptable when *you* get
>>enjoyment from the encounter, even knowing your affectations were likely
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Morality is purely subjective.  Therefore, yes, anything is morally
> acceptable to me when *I* get enjoyment from the encounter.

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised, but I am.

> I've been in shark-infested waters after the chumming starts and I'm still
> alive today, only missing three fingers.  The sharks were obviously scared
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> would likely be dead.  If you feel that's a more appropriate "home" for them
> then apparently that's your moral choice.

Allowing nature to provide the choices we all deserve doesn't
necessarily guarantee success.

> Me, I'd rather save something and use it to make money.  I hope to save a
> diver one day with judicious use of my octopus.  That diver will then be
> mine to exhibit around the world.  I'll keep him or her on a leash.  Would
> that satisfy you?

You're welcome to save anything you produce, saving what wasn't yours in
the first place for your personal greed isn't what I consider
appropriate behaviour and ought not be allowed by one's own conscience,
assuming one possesses such.  As far as the leash encounter thing is
concerned, I don't have a problem with it so long as there's agreement
from both ends of the leash.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Reef Fish - 30 Jan 2005 04:01 GMT
> > I've been in shark-infested waters after the chumming starts and I'm still
> > alive today, only missing three fingers.

Greg lost his three fingers from welshing a bet with other lawyers.
:-)
The only thing he lost in the chumming waters was what was left of his
brains.

> Allowing nature to provide the choices we all deserve doesn't
> necessarily guarantee success.
>
> > Me, I'd rather save something and use it to make money.

Greg is saving TONS of money by WELSHING and imagining that he won the
bets he lost.   <LOL>

> You're welcome to save anything you produce, saving what wasn't yours in
> the first place for your personal greed

That's what Greg has plenty -- personal greed!
> jer
> email reply - I am not a 'ten'

-- Bob.
Greg Mossman - 30 Jan 2005 17:48 GMT
> The only thing he lost in the chumming waters was what was left of his
> brains.

Then obviously you'd have nothing to lose by taking my IQ test challenge.
Correct?

> That's what Greg has plenty -- personal greed!

$19,000 and counting.  Does that make me greedy?
Reef Fish - 30 Jan 2005 18:22 GMT
> > The only thing he lost in the chumming waters was what was left of his
> > brains.
>
> Then obviously you'd have nothing to lose by taking my IQ test challenge.
> Correct?

Wrong!  I have PLENTY to lose by you CHEATING.

Just like you're doing now, trying CHEAT by weaseling out of your
original bet because you can't produce any verifiable, valid IQ
test score evidence!

> > That's what Greg has plenty -- personal greed!
>
> $19,000 and counting.  Does that make me greedy?

Very much so!  Proven in http://tinyurl.com/5cdjk

Game is over, Greg.  Henceworth, your welching acts will be
answered by the same link (hot off the press this morning <G>):

http://tinyurl.com/5cdjk
" How Greg LOST his IQ bet : Greg's CONFESSION "

-- Bob.
Jer - 25 Jan 2005 01:11 GMT
>       I went down to Grand Bahamas a few years ago and did the dolphin dive
> with Unexso.  The dive masters got two dolphins to do silly tricks with the
> divers underwater like kissing you when you remove your regulator.  It was
> fun.  Now that my partner is certified, she wants to do the dolphin dive
> too.  Does anybody know if there are other places besides Grand Bahamas to
> do dolphin dives?

There are a number of places that offer this stupid venue of slavery.
Why anyone would spend perfectly good money to watch an animal act like
Pavlov's puppy instead of how they supposed to act is beyond my
comprehension.  I've also heard a rumour that someone's actually
planning to use a white tiger for entertainment in a Las Vegas
nightclub.  With any luck, somebody's gonna get bit.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Dillon Pyron - 25 Jan 2005 14:34 GMT
>>       I went down to Grand Bahamas a few years ago and did the dolphin dive
>> with Unexso.  The dive masters got two dolphins to do silly tricks with the
>> divers underwater like kissing you when you remove your regulator.  It was
>> fun.  Now that my partner is certified, she wants to do the dolphin dive
>> too.  Does anybody know if there are other places besides Grand Bahamas to
>> do dolphin dives?

We had a blast diving with a wild pod off Belize.  They stayed with us
until the air gave out.  Still my favorite dive.

>There are a number of places that offer this stupid venue of slavery.
>Why anyone would spend perfectly good money to watch an animal act like
>Pavlov's puppy instead of how they supposed to act is beyond my
>comprehension.  I've also heard a rumour that someone's actually
>planning to use a white tiger for entertainment in a Las Vegas
>nightclub.  With any luck, somebody's gonna get bit.

Never happen.  Only a crazy gay Kraut would do something like that.

Signature

dillon

"When the French are against it, you know we can't
be far wrong."  - Adm. Bobbie Ray Inman

usenet69@hotmail.com - 26 Jan 2005 21:34 GMT
Try Guam. I hear they have great dolphin dives. The best part is that
you don't even need a passport! It is a tropical island owned by the
united states.

---------------------------------
pass your urine test
www.urine-pimp.com
Grumman-581 - 26 Jan 2005 21:38 GMT
> Try Guam. I hear they have great dolphin dives. The best part is that
> you don't even need a passport! It is a tropical island owned by the
> united states.

Or go to Texas... In the intracoastal waterway near Freeport (south of
Houston), I saw dolphins nearly everytime I launched my boat on the Brazos
River...

As far as the dives being able to be classified as "great", I would have to
reserve judgement... I tend to prefer water that is clear enough that I can
actually see my gauges...
Jer - 27 Jan 2005 02:55 GMT
>>Try Guam. I hear they have great dolphin dives. The best part is that
>>you don't even need a passport! It is a tropical island owned by the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> reserve judgement... I tend to prefer water that is clear enough that I can
> actually see my gauges...

So would the dolphins...

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Grumman-581 - 27 Jan 2005 04:09 GMT
> So would the dolphins...

Why would the dolphins want to be able to see my gauges?

Seriously though, the intracoastal waterway is open to the Gulf very close
to where I usually see them, so if they wanted clear water, they could
easily find it... I have to guess that there is something around there that
attracts the smaller fish that they eat... The fresh water dumped in the
Gulf by the Brazos is rather muddy, so you would have to go out 7-25 miles
before hitting blue water... Apparently the shrimp are attracted to boundary
of the fresh and salt water since you see a lot of shrimp boats out there...
With the shrimp come larger fish and somewhere in this food chain, I suspect
that the dolphins find their meals... Why some of them end up in the
intracoastal waterway, I don't know... I'll usually see at least 3 or 4 each
time I go through there...
Jer - 29 Jan 2005 17:11 GMT
>>So would the dolphins...
>
> Why would the dolphins want to be able to see my gauges?

I was thinking it might be helpful if they could accurately report where
the body could be found.  :)

> Seriously though, the intracoastal waterway is open to the Gulf very close
> to where I usually see them, so if they wanted clear water, they could
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> intracoastal waterway, I don't know... I'll usually see at least 3 or 4 each
> time I go through there...

Yeah, I've seen them too, and I figured they were chasing something
really important to them, else why tolerate the unatural situation?
Maybe their food stocks elsewhere are scant and they're doing the only
thing they can, or as you say, they simply taking advantage of a
situation when the opportunity presents itself.  I suppose if they limit
their exposure to what usually ends up in most rivers, they'll live long
enough to reproduce.

Signature

jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Bill Blazer - 28 Jan 2005 10:42 GMT
>>       I went down to Grand Bahamas a few years ago and did the dolphin
>> dive with Unexso.  The dive masters got two dolphins to do silly tricks
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> to use a white tiger for entertainment in a Las Vegas nightclub.  With any
> luck, somebody's gonna get bit.

Say Hey !!

I can't answer that question. But I know someone on social culture thai that
knows where the elephants lie down.

5555 Yee-Haw !!
FreeFloat - 28 Jan 2005 17:56 GMT
>  Say Hey !!
>
> I can't answer that question. But I know someone on social culture thai that
> knows where the elephants lie down.
>
> 5555 Yee-Haw !!

pickle, get lost.  No one asked about f.cking elephants.  And if you have
nothing worthwhile to contribute, get the hell off the thread.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.