Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Re: Underwater Digital Camera recommendations

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
bob - 11 Jan 2005 01:28 GMT
I want to purchase an underwater digital camera, and I am looking for
reviews/opinions on what is available and what is a better choice.  I Want
to keep it in the $600 range.  Is it better to go with a dedicated
underwater set-up like the Sealife D310 (good underwater (supposedly), fair
land camera) or go with a better land camera and get a housing for it.

Thanks
Dillon Pyron - 11 Jan 2005 04:12 GMT
>I want to purchase an underwater digital camera, and I am looking for
>reviews/opinions on what is available and what is a better choice.  I Want
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Thanks

My personal opinion is that the D310 is a fair camera.  You'll be
happiest if you buy something with a high MP and a housing.  But a
housing is going to set you back $400 or more.

Signature

dillon

"When the French are against it, you know we can't
be far wrong."  - Adm. Bobbie Ray Inman

Dan Bracuk - 11 Jan 2005 04:31 GMT
Dillon Pyron <dmpyronINVALID@austin.rr.com> pounded away at his
keyboard resulting in:
: But a
:housing is going to set you back $400 or more.

Depends on the housing.  Mine was not nearly that much.  This website
http://www.henrys.com/webapp/wcs/stores/henrys/index.jsp, will show
you some typical prices for Canon, Sony, and Pentax.  They are a lot
less than $400.

Dan Bracuk
If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure.
Steve - 11 Jan 2005 05:54 GMT
>>I want to purchase an underwater digital camera, and I am looking for
>>reviews/opinions on what is available and what is a better choice.  I Want
>>to keep it in the $600 range.  Is it better to go with a dedicated
>>underwater set-up like the Sealife D310 (good underwater (supposedly), fair
>>land camera) or go with a better land camera and get a housing for it.

> My personal opinion is that the D310 is a fair camera.  You'll be
> happiest if you buy something with a high MP and a housing.  But a
> housing is going to set you back $400 or more.

I got the cheaper sealife as a gift and I've been thoroughly unimpressed.

Personally I want full manual capability and decent cameras that offer it aren't at
the low end of the price scale. For those willing to accept the camera's ideas on
exposure there are plenty of (relatively) inexpensive options, and full auto cameras
can take some very good shots, especially if it has (and you know how to use)
exposure compensation. I'd look for that and aperture or shutter priority as the
minimum requirement for control, which probably means entry level is $200 or so. The
abilty to add wide angle capability is a serious plus, but you could also consider
that you're getting a starter set that you'll pass on when you trade up.

Ikelite has a few housings for compact cameras with list prices of about $300. Canon
and Olympus make housings for several of their cameras that retail for about $150 to
$200. That lets you get a decent starter set for not much more than the Sealife. I
have heard, but not confirmed, rumors that the Olympus housings tend to leak after 50
dives or so.

Of course an external strobe is extremely desirable, so that ups the admission
charge. An Ikelite DS-50 with arm and slave or manual controller will run about $500
or so, but is worth it if you're at all serious about things. The strobe can come
along when you upgrade. It should be noted that some of the Ikelite housings block
the onboard strobe, making an external mandatory. Blocking the strobe may seem like a
bad idea, but if it's so close to the lens that the housing's port blocks it you're
going to get alot of backscatter, anyway.

Signature

Steve

The above can be construed as personal opinion in the absence of a reasonable
belief that it was intended as a statement of fact.

If you want a reply to reach me, remove the SPAMTRAP from the address.

Tony Howard - 11 Jan 2005 10:27 GMT
I've had both 35mm (Subal & Aquatica housed Nikon SLR's) and digital
underwater cameras for several years.  The choices are wide and complicated,
so make up a checklist and try before you buy (if possible).

IMHO, the price of the dedicated UW cameras from people like Sea Life and
Sea&Sea is not as competitive as buying a good digital camera and the
appropriate housing.

You have to make your choice based upon several issues:

1.  Functionality of camera, including resolution (I would not recommend
less than 4Mp), manual control of shutter, focus & aperture, lens type,
memory card type, and many other factors.

2. Physical camera size & weight, I.E compact (such as the Sony PC150), or
the mid-sized (Olympus C5050/5060) which offers greater control and
functionality, and the top of the range Digital SLR's such as the Nikon D70.

3. Depth rating required for the housing.  AFAIK all of the manufacturer
badged housings (which are mostly made by a Japanese company called UN) are
rated for 40m and are reasonably inexpensive (?125 to ?175), however if you
need a greater depth rating and functionality then a much more expensive
housing from one of the may specialist manufacturers will be required, such
as Ikelite, Sea&Sea, Subal, Sealux, Nexus etc.   These range in price from
?700 to over ?2000 for the housing alone, let alone the lens ports and
strobe (flash).   These expensive housings offer depth ratings from 60 to
100m and the ability to fit many different lenses (with appropriate lens
ports and gears).

4. Cost.

The least expensive option would be something like a Olympus mU 410 with
housing for ?350, Olympus C5060 or Sony P150 and matching housing (40m)
which can be bought for about ?500 complete (probably cheaper in the US).

The next level option would be  the Olympus C5060 or C8080 with a Ikelite
housing, which then can be used to 60m and is far more rugged and allows for
a cable connected flash rather than slave connection., this would cost about
?800.

Finally, and most expensive are the digital SLR's in dedicated housings.
These offer netter quality and functionality, and the complete removal of
the shutter delay which is the problem with al of the compact digital
cameras.  The least expensive of these cameras and housings would probably
be the Nikon D70 and matching Ikelite housing, at a cost of about ?2000,
including #6807 Ikelite housing, Nikon D-70 camera with Nikkor 18-70mm lens,
#5503.55 port, #5509.28 clamp/sleeve and 67mm Hoya +4 Close-up lens; however
the Subal, Nexus and Sealux housings cost this much (and more) WITHOUT the
camera, lens, lens ports and lens gears.

You pay's your money and makes your choice!
Jerome Meekings - 18 Jan 2005 18:45 GMT
> I have heard, but not confirmed, rumors that the Olympus housings tend to
> leak after 50 dives or so.

Neither of my Olympus housing have leaked and both have done many more
than 50 dives.

And FWIW my current 40M rated housing is happy at 55M

>replace spamblock with my family name to e-mail me
Karl Denninger - 11 Jan 2005 05:08 GMT
>I want to purchase an underwater digital camera, and I am looking for
>reviews/opinions on what is available and what is a better choice.  I Want
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Thanks

Get the Sony 7MP (DSC-P150) and their housing.   The total should be right
in the $600 range if you buy right.

Its a fantastic camera and will work for you on land too.  Takes nice macro
shots underwater, has a movie mode, and is reasonable.

One nice thing about the P150 is that it has very low shutter and start-up
lag, making it entirely reasonable to carry shut off and power it up when
you want to shoot.

--
Signature

Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net    My home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org        Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://www.spamcuda.net        SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
http://genesis3.blogspot.com    Musings Of A Sentient Mind

bob - 12 Jan 2005 15:23 GMT

> Get the Sony 7MP (DSC-P150) and their housing.   The total should be
> right in the $600 range if you buy right.

Are you able to use an external strobe with this set-up?
Karl Denninger - 12 Jan 2005 16:03 GMT
>> Get the Sony 7MP (DSC-P150) and their housing.   The total should be
>> right in the $600 range if you buy right.
>
>Are you able to use an external strobe with this set-up?

Yes, if you optically slave it (that is, the flash fires based on the
on-camera's "flash").  There is no TTL port available with it - or
with any other "compact" point and shoot camera, however.

To get a sync output you need to go to something like an Oly 5050 and Ike
housing which is both significantly larger and more expensive.

--
Signature

Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net    My home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org        Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://www.spamcuda.net        SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
http://genesis3.blogspot.com    Musings Of A Sentient Mind

Richard Faulkner - 12 Jan 2005 20:25 GMT
>Yes, if you optically slave it (that is, the flash fires based on the
>on-camera's "flash").

What do you need to do this? I have a Sea & Sea TTL Strobe - could this
be made to work on a point & shoot like a Canon ixus, (IXY SD500).

Signature

Richard Faulkner

Karl Denninger - 12 Jan 2005 21:00 GMT
>>Yes, if you optically slave it (that is, the flash fires based on the
>>on-camera's "flash").
>
>What do you need to do this? I have a Sea & Sea TTL Strobe - could this
>be made to work on a point & shoot like a Canon ixus, (IXY SD500).

Just a strobe that knows how to optically slave.  Most do, but not all,
because even if you TTL fire one of them, you almost never are able to slave
the second off the first (except optically.)

--
Signature

Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net    My home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org        Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://www.spamcuda.net        SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
http://genesis3.blogspot.com    Musings Of A Sentient Mind

Steve - 13 Jan 2005 06:56 GMT
>> Yes, if you optically slave it (that is, the flash fires based on the
>> on-camera's "flash").
>
> What do you need to do this? I have a Sea & Sea TTL Strobe - could this
> be made to work on a point & shoot like a Canon ixus, (IXY SD500).

If the Sea & Sea strobe has a built-in slave sensor it will fire when the flash on
the camera fires. Since the ixus is digital, though, it probably has a pre-flash,
which means the flash will fire when the camera is checking focus and exposure, and
not when the camera is actually taking the picture, unless the strobe is designed for
digital cameras. For a digital camera that has pre-flash you need a slave sensor that
is designed to ignore the pre-flash and fire on the main flash. Ikelite offers two
slaves that will do that, for about $150 each. Look here, and scroll down a bit:
http://www.ikelite.com/web_pages/sync_cords.html

The  TTL slave sensor uses the camera's flash duration to control the external flash,
and the manual controller offers you 10 power settings and can be triggered with a
sync cord (when the camera and housing are compatible with it) or its built-in slave.
The catch is that they only work with Ikelite's new digital strobes, which will set
you back at least $300. You can get a package with the smaller strobe, sensor and a
strobe arm for about $500 and change.

Be aware that the slave sensor may not give you the full power of an external strobe.
If the flash duration of the on-camera strobe is too short the external strobe may
not reach maximum output before being quenched. For some cameras Ikelite will suggest
the manual controller for that reason.

Signature

Steve

The above can be construed as personal opinion in the absence of a reasonable
belief that it was intended as a statement of fact.

If you want a reply to reach me, remove the SPAMTRAP from the address.

Tony Howard - 13 Jan 2005 09:04 GMT
If you are going to use an external flash on a digital camera using it as a
slave unit, it must have three additional functions:

1.  It must have a slave sensor that can trigger the flash from an external
flash.  For reliable operation you may need a fibre-optic cable kit to
ensure that it will still trigger even when not pointed directly at the
cameras built-in flash unit.

2.  It must be compatible with the pre-flash given out by many digital
cameras, otherwise it will 'flash' when the internal camera does it's
pre-flash, not when the main exposure flash is triggered.

3.  You will need a variable flash power setting so you can manually set the
external flash to suit the distance between you and the subject, aperture
and ISO (ASA) setting.  In addition this can also be useful when balancing
flash against ambient light, as when photographing a close-up whist not
losing detail in the background.

Many UW flashes have these functions.  I use the Sea&Sea YS90TTLdx  Duo, the
YS120dx also has these functions.  Ikelite, Subtronic, Epoque and Inon also
of these functions on some of their models.

The Inon are getting very good reviews over here in the UK.
A.K.A. - MORK - 14 Jan 2005 20:21 GMT
>Get the Sony 7MP (DSC-P150) and their housing.   The total should be right
>in the $600 range if you buy right.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>--

that is the unit I just bought, (AFTER our cameras dumped on us on our cruise)

I have not got the chance to use in underwater yet,, but it is a great camera
on the land.  the marine pack comes with a great housing that lets you use ALL
functions/buttons.  as well as a removable red lens filter, and flash defuser.

I am a sony dealer, and can sell them,  but found "BEST BUY" will meet my
price, and  had the cameras in stock,  and found the marine pack on ebay for
about $10.00 cheaper then I could sell it to myself for.
so with shipping it was a wash.
Adam Helberg - 15 Jan 2005 21:15 GMT
> >Get the Sony 7MP (DSC-P150) and their housing.   The total should be right
>>in the $600 range if you buy right.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> about $10.00 cheaper then I could sell it to myself for.
> so with shipping it was a wash.

How does Sony compare with Canon for underwater use?

Adam
Rudy Benner - 15 Jan 2005 21:33 GMT
>> >Get the Sony 7MP (DSC-P150) and their housing.   The total should be
>> >right
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Adam

The Canon A85 has an underwater mode which does a number of things,
including emulation of the UR Pro filter. The UW housing gives access to all
the pushbuttons. It has a flash diffuser and a hood for the LCD.

Adobe Photoshop CS does a nice job of colour correcting in case the UR Pro
filter doesn't quite get it right.

Hope to baptise it in April at CocoView. I am considering a strobe. Any
recommendations?

Rudy
chilly - 15 Jan 2005 23:21 GMT
> Hope to baptise it in April at CocoView.

When in April, to you plan to be at CocoView?
Rudy Benner - 15 Jan 2005 23:32 GMT
>> Hope to baptise it in April at CocoView.
>
> When in April, to you plan to be at CocoView?

We are aiming to arrive on April 23, which is a full moon. Are you coming?
chilly - 15 Jan 2005 23:43 GMT
> >> Hope to baptise it in April at CocoView.
> >
> > When in April, to you plan to be at CocoView?
>
> We are aiming to arrive on April 23, which is a full moon. Are you coming?

Not to CocoView.  However, if I do return to Roatan in April, that is my
planned date of arrival.

Right now, it is just a pipe dream.
Rudy Benner - 15 Jan 2005 23:56 GMT
>> >> Hope to baptise it in April at CocoView.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Right now, it is just a pipe dream.

Its not nailed down yet, but correspondence has been exchanged and that date
is available.
JOF - 16 Jan 2005 22:52 GMT
Jeez chilly, if Rudy's gonna moon, ya don't wanna be in range.

JF (from sunny Mexico)

> > >> Hope to baptise it in April at CocoView.
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Right now, it is just a pipe dream.
chilly - 17 Jan 2005 00:09 GMT
> Jeez chilly, if Rudy's gonna moon, ya don't wanna be in range.
>
> JF (from sunny Mexico)

Good point, John.  How the heck have you been?  You've been conspicuous in
your absence.

> > > >> Hope to baptise it in April at CocoView.
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >
> > Right now, it is just a pipe dream.
Greg Mossman - 17 Jan 2005 00:15 GMT
>> Jeez chilly, if Rudy's gonna moon, ya don't wanna be in range.
>>
>> JF (from sunny Mexico)
>
> Good point, John.  How the heck have you been?  You've been conspicuous in
> your absence.

He's in Mexico now.  Maybe he only posts on vacation, like Reef Fish.
Rudy Benner - 17 Jan 2005 00:35 GMT
>> Jeez chilly, if Rudy's gonna moon, ya don't wanna be in range.
>>
>> JF (from sunny Mexico)
>
> Good point, John.  How the heck have you been?  You've been conspicuous in
> your absence.

There he is, in sunny Mexico, and he has nothing better to do that check
rec.scuba. Obviously, he has no life and no friends.
chilly - 17 Jan 2005 06:29 GMT
> >> Jeez chilly, if Rudy's gonna moon, ya don't wanna be in range.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> There he is, in sunny Mexico, and he has nothing better to do that check
> rec.scuba. Obviously, he has no life and no friends.

I don't know why anyone would check out rec.scuba while they are on holidays
. . .other than to brag or make sure one of your bestfriends was still
alive.
JOF - 17 Jan 2005 14:23 GMT
I've been keeping an eye on y'all but had nothing worth contributing. I
started reading this thread because it was about digital photography
and I happen to have a new Canon digital. I just wish I'd bought the
housing so I could get some pics of the caves I'm diving later this
week.

JF
JOF - 17 Jan 2005 14:15 GMT
All I hear each day around the pool is talk of politics and/or
football. I have no use for football since I grew up, and I figgered if
I had to listen to political discourse I might as well hear it from
experts. Hence the visit to rec.scuba. Besides, TV sucks here and one
can only read so many hours a day.

JF
chilly - 17 Jan 2005 14:34 GMT
> All I hear each day around the pool is talk of politics and/or
> football. I have no use for football since I grew up, and I figgered if
> I had to listen to political discourse I might as well hear it from
> experts. Hence the visit to rec.scuba. Besides, TV sucks here and one
> can only read so many hours a day.

I hear there is a problem with Northers down there just now?  It is a tad
chilly and the seas up a bit?
JOF - 18 Jan 2005 15:24 GMT
Sorry if my replies seem disjointed. I'm using Google out of necessity
and having sorted out it's foibles yet.

The wind has been onshore for the first two weeks of the year but
turned around to come out of the south for a couple of days which made
for flat seas. On Monday it started blowing out of the north but it
hasn't been a problem. Still warm by the pool. Admittedly a tad chilly
(no pun intended) in the shade in the morning but fine once the day
gets going. The breeze is a bonus on the beach cuz without it hooter
patrol is very warm.

The seas here in Cancun have been bumpy most days and I was told that
the port was closed down in the Puerto Aventuras area for a couple of
weeks. The boats here in Cancun have been out most days but I've seen
all the dive sites here before so it just doesn't seem worth the
trouble to fight the waves to clamber back aboard a dive boat. I'll
just settle for a bit of cenote diving instead. The weather's always
nice in the caves.

JF
Dillon Pyron - 18 Jan 2005 23:19 GMT
>> >Get the Sony 7MP (DSC-P150) and their housing.   The total should be right
>>>in the $600 range if you buy right.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
>How does Sony compare with Canon for underwater use?

My wife was pretty pleased with her DSC-P7.  It's an older model and
has the long lockup problem, but she's learned to adapt.  Our next
step will be a strobe for it, assuming the ENT gives her the green
light to dive again.

>Adam

Signature

dillon

"When the French are against it, you know we can't
be far wrong."  - Adm. Bobbie Ray Inman

Greg Mossman - 19 Jan 2005 03:16 GMT
> My wife was pretty pleased with her DSC-P7.  It's an older model and
> has the long lockup problem, but she's learned to adapt.  Our next
> step will be a strobe for it, assuming the ENT gives her the green
> light to dive again.

What's wrong with your wife's EN or T?
Dillon Pyron - 19 Jan 2005 17:54 GMT
>> My wife was pretty pleased with her DSC-P7.  It's an older model and
>> has the long lockup problem, but she's learned to adapt.  Our next
>> step will be a strobe for it, assuming the ENT gives her the green
>> light to dive again.
>
>What's wrong with your wife's EN or T?

Blown eardrum.  And the doc says her eustacheon tubes are "small and
convoluted".  Which means equalization is a royal bitch.

She may have surgery to repair the hole or replace the drum.

Signature

dillon

"When the French are against it, you know we can't
be far wrong."  - Adm. Bobbie Ray Inman

AlJ - 11 Jan 2005 17:10 GMT
I picked up a 4MP Nikon Coolpix 4300 on Ebay for $180.  Should be good
land camera.

I ordered the Fantasea case for it from B&H Photo in NY for $144.
I don't need the camera but this seemed to be the cheapest way.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.