Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / November 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Scuba Instructor Software

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David Brewster - 04 Nov 2003 17:16 GMT
Just an FYI for those who have downloaded the free scuba instructor software
from www.punksoft.com, there has been some updates to it over the past few
days posted there. There has also been a draft copy of the user's guide in
PDF form posted there as well (about 95% complete).
Greg Mossman - 04 Nov 2003 18:10 GMT
> Just an FYI for those who have downloaded the free scuba instructor software
> from www.spamsoft.com, there has been some updates to it over the past few
> days posted there. There has also been a draft copy of the user's guide in
> PDF form posted there as well (about 95% complete).

Get lost spammer.
Chris Guynn - 04 Nov 2003 19:27 GMT
> > Just an FYI for those who have downloaded the free scuba instructor
> software
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Get lost spammer.

It's hard for me to label this as spam since I can't really find anything he
is trying to sell... The closest thing to a commercial website involved is
the retail traffic pulse (RTP) thing and that doesn't even offer a way to
purchase the system.  As a matter of fact, the RTP site doesn't look like
it's finished even though it was put up in February and the FAQ was last
updated in April (IIRC).
Greg Mossman - 04 Nov 2003 20:07 GMT
> It's hard for me to label this as spam since I can't really find anything he
> is trying to sell... The closest thing to a commercial website involved is
> the retail traffic pulse (RTP) thing and that doesn't even offer a way to
> purchase the system.  As a matter of fact, the RTP site doesn't look like
> it's finished even though it was put up in February and the FAQ was last
> updated in April (IIRC).

I went to the spamsoft.com website and found an area called Products where I
can get "free" software or I can pay for something called Full Product
Database.  Spamster's posts are therefore nothing but teasers for a
commercial product, like DIR demos or trip reports.  Of course it's spam and
not even cleverly concealed.
Alan Street - 04 Nov 2003 21:29 GMT
>> It's hard for me to label this as spam since I can't really find anything
>he
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>commercial product, like DIR demos or trip reports.  Of course it's spam and
>not even cleverly concealed.

As a spam cop, Greg is a firm believer in keeping the camel's nose out of the
tent.
Greg Mossman - 05 Nov 2003 03:18 GMT
> As a spam cop, Greg is a firm believer in keeping the camel's nose out of the
> tent.

You can lead a horse to water, but you don't need to lead a camel to water.
Chris Guynn - 04 Nov 2003 22:00 GMT
> > It's hard for me to label this as spam since I can't really find anything
> he
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> commercial product, like DIR demos or trip reports.  Of course it's spam and
> not even cleverly concealed.

Ooops, I guess I missed that one... Go get 'im Greg...
David Brewster - 04 Nov 2003 22:10 GMT
Isn't spam supposed to be like mass emailing and postings?
I personally have typed out every post ehre - and as for mass emailing - I
just don't.
Jesus Christ man.
Here I am - a professional developer - I make some software for myself - a
buddy tells me that he likes it (he's an instructor too) and says I should
sell it. I say NAHHH - but I decide to go ahead and give it away. NOT only
do I give it away but I decide to open a website incurring the monthly
expense.

Now all I'm getting is greif for it? No wonder no one likes to do favours
for anyone anymore. It sure doesn't pat to be nice does it?

Dave.

> > > It's hard for me to label this as spam since I can't really find
> anything
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Ooops, I guess I missed that one... Go get 'im Greg...
Chris Guynn - 04 Nov 2003 22:33 GMT
> Isn't spam supposed to be like mass emailing and postings?
> I personally have typed out every post ehre - and as for mass emailing - I
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Dave.

Dave,
 You have to understand Greg.  He pretty much thinks that if he didn't post
it, it must be spam. <j/k> ;-)

Seriously, I don't consider it to be spam (even with the full database
costing $5 - $10) even though Greg says it is (and has a very good point
about it leading to a site that sells stuff).  I guess I'm just not as
die-hard of an anti-spammer as he is.

C Guynn
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 00:05 GMT
Hey there.
Well on the drive home from the office, I made a decision.
I took off the Full database product and I took off the purchase option on
the website.
Now I suppose I could have taken the high road and just put the full
database on there for a free download. I probably will once it's more
complete (as well as just package it with the software), but until then,
people can type in their own codes and descriptions and prices. Besides -
I'm sure if I put up a full database that wasnt 100 complete with every t
crossed and I dotted, I'm sure Greg would have lots to say about that right?
haha

I thought it should remain more "pure" to the notion of a hobby type site as
opposed to a hobby site with a desire to at least pay for itself right?
I did put on a donation button there though. If someone likes the software
and wants to buy me a coffee - great. If they want to email me asking for
what's been done on the full database, I'd of course send it, but I'm not
going to promote it any anyway for the time being.

So - perhaps now our friend Greg will agree that I'm not a spammer.

Dave

PS - Thanks for your understanding.

> > Isn't spam supposed to be like mass emailing and postings?
> > I personally have typed out every post ehre - and as for mass emailing - I
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> C Guynn
Greg Mossman - 05 Nov 2003 03:19 GMT
> So - perhaps now our friend Greg will agree that I'm not a spammer.

Too late.
Sven - 05 Nov 2003 05:21 GMT
> > So - perhaps now our friend Greg will agree that I'm not a spammer.
>
> Too late.

This time I agree with you.

-Sven
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 14:15 GMT
For what?

> > So - perhaps now our friend Greg will agree that I'm not a spammer.
>
> Too late.
Greg Mossman - 05 Nov 2003 16:50 GMT
For curing you of

> For what?

your idiotic top posting

> "Greg Mossman" <mossman@qnet.com> wrote in message

And you program these things for a living?  I hope that "work ethic" doesn't
equally apply to your scuba training.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 17:10 GMT
Again, you response lacks substantive content and is hardly worth replying
to - but what the hell.

I do make a living programming actually. I very satisfactory living. I've
had a varied and successful career and am doing exactly what I want to be
doing. Development. The scuba software was made in my spare time for myself.
The applications I make for my career are installed all over the country and
in mission critical environments. If you live in Canada, there's a chance
you would have come in contact (indirectly) with my software.

As for my ethics - my ethics are just fine thank you. More than fine
actually. I have them to thank for getting me this far and yes - my ethics
do extend to training. Although admittingly scuba training is strictly a
hobby. I only got my instructor's rating for fun and to certify some
friends.

> For curing you of
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> And you program these things for a living?  I hope that "work ethic" doesn't
> equally apply to your scuba training.
Greg Mossman - 05 Nov 2003 18:02 GMT
> Again, you response lacks substantive content and is hardly worth replying
> to - but what the hell.

The most substantive content of my post points out that you have no concept
of netiquette, demonstrated by your continual top-posting.  It doesn't make
any more sense for a computer mechanic not to understand netiquette than for
an auto mechanic not to understand "right of way".
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 18:40 GMT
My top posting?
Man - I simply hit reply to group within Outlook express here and type away
at my message. If my postings appear to not be in the threaded fashion that
you are used to - get new software - my postings are coming up fine for me.

> > Again, you response lacks substantive content and is hardly worth replying
> > to - but what the hell.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> any more sense for a computer mechanic not to understand netiquette than for
> an auto mechanic not to understand "right of way".
chilly - 05 Nov 2003 18:52 GMT
> My top posting?
> Man - I simply hit reply to group within Outlook express here and type away
> at my message. If my postings appear to not be in the threaded fashion that
> you are used to - get new software - my postings are coming up fine for me.

Incoming!!!!!!
Chris Guynn - 05 Nov 2003 19:38 GMT
> My top posting?
> Man - I simply hit reply to group within Outlook express here and type away
> at my message. If my postings appear to not be in the threaded fashion that
> you are used to - get new software - my postings are coming up fine for me.

top posting refers to putting your response above the original posters text.
Notice how what you wrote is actually above what I wrote in this post.  That
is called bottom posting.  Top posting is frowned upon even though it is
exactly what OE does by default.  Top posting has absolutely nothing to do
with the "thread pattern."
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 20:03 GMT
> top posting refers to putting your response above the original posters text.
> Notice how what you wrote is actually above what I wrote in this post.  That
> is called bottom posting.  Top posting is frowned upon even though it is
> exactly what OE does by default.  Top posting has absolutely nothing to do
> with the "thread pattern."

Thanks Christ -I figured that out a few minutes ago when Chilly sent me a
link
(helpful young lad like yourself haha)

Thanks for taking the time to point it out to me.
Greg Mossman - 06 Nov 2003 01:34 GMT
> Thanks Christ -I figured that out a few minutes ago when Chilly sent me a
> link

You can just call me Greg if you like.

> (helpful young lad like yourself haha)

As others have pointed out, you are very much like Jack Farmer.  Like you,
he claims to work with computers for a living, yet doesn't seem to know sh.t
about them.  And your giggle is the same.  Do you have a picture you can
show us?
David Brewster - 06 Nov 2003 14:02 GMT
> As others have pointed out, you are very much like Jack Farmer.  Like you,
> he claims to work with computers for a living, yet doesn't seem to know sh.t
> about them.  And your giggle is the same.  Do you have a picture you can
> show us?

Sure.
You can either look up my MSN profile under my email address here, or you
can find a set of pictures spliced together at

www.punksoft.com/Desktop.jpg

(I understand this is the protocol for pictures - giving a web link)
Or you can find my pic on another website for a company I helped put
together several years back :
www.superpet.com/profile.html
Some of the job titles I held there were :
- IT manager
- Graphics Design
- Corporate trainer
- Litigation?Legal Liaison
- Member of the National Board of Directors for PIJAC Canada
- Chair Human Recourses and Human Rights committee (that was my last
position)

No I'm enjoying a nice stressfree life doing developing during the week and
diving on the weekends. ;-)
Chris Guynn - 06 Nov 2003 14:32 GMT
> > As others have pointed out, you are very much like Jack Farmer.  Like you,
> > he claims to work with computers for a living, yet doesn't seem to know
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> www.punksoft.com/Desktop.jpg

2 questions:

1.) Who's the lady?
2.) Is her name and number prominently displayed on your dive gear
somewhere?

:-)

> (I understand this is the protocol for pictures - giving a web link)
> Or you can find my pic on another website for a company I helped put
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> No I'm enjoying a nice stressfree life doing developing during the week and
> diving on the weekends. ;-)
David Brewster - 06 Nov 2003 14:50 GMT
> > > about them.  And your giggle is the same.  Do you have a picture you can
> > > show us?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> 1.) Who's the lady?

That's my Ex. We're best friends still. In fact - she keeps asking me to
hook her up with a scuba diver (she loves divers) but all my dive friends
are married. Interested?
JOKE!
Yeah right. ;-p
That's Angie. She's not my ex - just goshin' ya.
We're planning to get married at some point mid to late next year.

> 2.) Is her name and number prominently displayed on your dive gear
> somewhere?

Yes - does that mean you want to go diving with me now?
;-pPpPpP

Actually she's not into diving (although she may try it this summer). She's
a fitness trainer (you gatta see her abs!) - I'm trying to find a way to
combine our two client bases haha.
Limey Dave - 06 Nov 2003 15:09 GMT
> > 1.) Who's the lady?
>
> That's my Ex. We're best friends still. In fact - she keeps asking me to
> hook her up with a scuba diver (she loves divers)

Maybe she doesn't mean scuba divers?

Dave.
David Brewster - 06 Nov 2003 15:25 GMT
> > > 1.) Who's the lady?
> >
> > That's my Ex. We're best friends still. In fact - she keeps asking me to
> > hook her up with a scuba diver (she loves divers)
>
> Maybe she doesn't mean scuba divers?

HAHA
That's hysterical - I can't believe a pervert like myself didn't catch that
one while I typed it.
I must be slipping.
;-)
Chris Guynn - 06 Nov 2003 16:10 GMT
> > > > about them.  And your giggle is the same.  Do you have a picture you
> can
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> hook her up with a scuba diver (she loves divers) but all my dive friends
> are married. Interested?

I would be, but I suffer from the same malady as your dive friends... :-)

> JOKE!
> Yeah right. ;-p
> That's Angie. She's not my ex - just goshin' ya.
> We're planning to get married at some point mid to late next year.

my condolences...

> > 2.) Is her name and number prominently displayed on your dive gear
> > somewhere?
>
> Yes - does that mean you want to go diving with me now?
> ;-pPpPpP

With you, without you, whatever.  I just want to go diving again.
Hopefully, it will happen pretty soon.

> Actually she's not into diving (although she may try it this summer). She's
> a fitness trainer (you gatta see her abs!)

Of all the things I thought of that I might have wanted to see... I don't
think her abs made the list. <eg>

>  - I'm trying to find a way to
> combine our two client bases haha.

Good luck...
David Brewster - 06 Nov 2003 16:25 GMT
> > That's my Ex. We're best friends still. In fact - she keeps asking me to
> > hook her up with a scuba diver (she loves divers) but all my dive friends
> > are married. Interested?
>
> I would be, but I suffer from the same malady as your dive friends... :-)

I'm so sorry to hear that. ;-)

> > That's Angie. She's not my ex - just goshin' ya.
> > We're planning to get married at some point mid to late next year.
>
> my condolences...

Now why do people keep telling me that? ;-)

> > Actually she's not into diving (although she may try it this summer).
> She's
> > a fitness trainer (you gatta see her abs!)
>
> Of all the things I thought of that I might have wanted to see... I don't
> think her abs made the list. <eg>

haha ;-)
Man - you have no idea. I'm a lucky lucky man I tell you
;-)
rnf2 - 06 Nov 2003 19:35 GMT
> Actually she's not into diving (although she may try it this summer). She's
> a fitness trainer (you gatta see her abs!) - I'm trying to find a way to
> combine our two client bases haha.

Tell your students they're overweight and need to lose 10Kg before you'll
teach them, then introduce em to her... and hope she doesn't ditch you for
one of them.

rhys
Greg Mossman - 06 Nov 2003 20:19 GMT
>  (you gatta see her abs!)

Got any pictures?
David Brewster - 06 Nov 2003 20:21 GMT
Alas - you know - I don't think I do.
:-(
I guess I'm going to have to get some "fitness" pics of her done up (Gawd I
love those type of pics).
Now that I've got that in my head - I'm gonna have to take some shots of her
workin' out. :-)

> >  (you gatta see her abs!)
>
> Got any pictures?
Greg Mossman - 06 Nov 2003 21:09 GMT
> Now that I've got that in my head - I'm gonna have to take some shots of her
> workin' out. :-)

And then post them, please.  Like I quoted before: go ahead, make my day.

(Unless the past 10 years have turned her into something resembling my
grandmother - in that case, keep her to yourself)
David Brewster - 06 Nov 2003 21:33 GMT
> > Now that I've got that in my head - I'm gonna have to take some shots of
> her
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> (Unless the past 10 years have turned her into something resembling my
> grandmother - in that case, keep her to yourself)

Those pics are only a few months old.
Limey Dave - 08 Nov 2003 22:58 GMT
"David Brewster" <punky@interlog.com> wrote in message
news:bodn4c$p08$1@news.eusc.inter.net...

>  (you gatta see her abs!)

6 minute abs?

Dave.
chilly - 06 Nov 2003 14:54 GMT
> You can either look up my MSN profile under my email address here, or you
> can find a set of pictures spliced together at
>
> www.punksoft.com/Desktop.jpg

So this guy walks into a bar with a duck stuck on his head.  The bartender
says, "Wow, that's quite a growth you've got attached to ya"  And the duck
says "Yeah, started out as a pimple on my a.s"
chilly - 06 Nov 2003 15:08 GMT
> Or you can find my pic on another website for a company I helped put
> together several years back :
> www.superpet.com/profile.html

Really?!  Which one is you?

http://www.superpet.com/shoppingcart%20database/shopreptile.html

(wg)
David Brewster - 06 Nov 2003 15:23 GMT
> > Or you can find my pic on another website for a company I helped put
> > together several years back :
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> (wg)

The young looking guy on the far left - that pic was like 10 years ago - I'm
not with that company anymore (although I still have tight personal ties)
but my picture can still be found on the odd store wall here and there. ;-)
chilly - 06 Nov 2003 15:44 GMT
> > Really?!  Which one is you?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> not with that company anymore (although I still have tight personal ties)
> but my picture can still be found on the odd store wall here and there. ;-)

LOL, you didn't click on the link I left did you?
David Brewster - 06 Nov 2003 15:52 GMT
> > > http://www.superpet.com/shoppingcart%20database/shopreptile.html
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> LOL, you didn't click on the link I left did you?

Hardy har har ;-)

You know - I did a search on you....

www.slarson.isgay.com
chilly - 06 Nov 2003 16:06 GMT
> > > > http://www.superpet.com/shoppingcart%20database/shopreptile.html
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> www.slarson.isgay.com

Man, you really need to do some searches on google.
chilly - 06 Nov 2003 16:11 GMT
> > You know - I did a search on you....
> >
> > www.slarson.isgay.com
>
> Man, you really need to do some searches on google.

By the way, start with the thread titled:  Dan Bracuk, Wine sucking
cheesehead
David Brewster - 06 Nov 2003 16:13 GMT
> > You know - I did a search on you....
> >
> > www.slarson.isgay.com
>
> Man, you really need to do some searches on google.

And you need to stop manning those glory holes.

;-)
chilly - 06 Nov 2003 16:24 GMT
> > > You know - I did a search on you....
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> And you need to stop manning those glory holes.

"Honey, with one of these, I can get all of those I want."
chilly - 06 Nov 2003 16:25 GMT
> > > You know - I did a search on you....
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> And you need to stop manning those glory holes.

I was going to say that you should try thinking outside of the box, but then
I realized . . ..ahahahahahah
Brian Nadwidny - 04 Nov 2003 22:50 GMT
David Brewster wrote:

> Now all I'm getting is greif for it? No wonder no one likes to do favours
> for anyone anymore. It sure doesn't pat to be nice does it?

Welcome to rec.scuba.

Brian
Edmonton, Alberta
David Brewster - 04 Nov 2003 22:04 GMT
That's only because I spent ages typing in all of the products from the PADI
catalogue. If you want to toiss me $5 for my time - great otherwise you
don't need my full database.
Type in all the products and courses yourself - makes no difference to me or
the software.
Now at some point in the future (we're talking like a year) I may start
selling the software - but until then - it's free.

> > It's hard for me to label this as spam since I can't really find anything
> he
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> commercial product, like DIR demos or trip reports.  Of course it's spam and
> not even cleverly concealed.
Chris Guynn - 04 Nov 2003 22:28 GMT
> That's only because I spent ages typing in all of the products from the PADI
> catalogue. If you want to toiss me $5 for my time - great otherwise you
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Now at some point in the future (we're talking like a year) I may start
> selling the software - but until then - it's free.

Didn't you spend ages putting together the database?  Isn't that pretty much
the same thing?  Just thought I'd ask...

C Guynn

<snip>
Greg Mossman - 05 Nov 2003 03:20 GMT
> Now at some point in the future (we're talking like a year) I may start
> selling the software - but until then - it's free.

> Now at some point in the future (we're talking like a year) I may start
> selling the software - but until then - it's free.

> Now at some point in the future (we're talking like a year) I may start
> selling the software - but until then - it's free.

> Now at some point in the future (we're talking like a year) I may start
> selling the software - but until then - it's free.

> Now at some point in the future (we're talking like a year) I may start
> selling the software - but until then - it's free.

> Now at some point in the future (we're talking like a year) I may start
> selling the software - but until then - it's free.

I rest my case.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 14:24 GMT
What case?
That you stutter?
The type of close minded person that you are?
That you have nothing better to contribute than repitition and negativity?
That you have this deep need to control everything and everyone around you?
That perhaps not everything revolves around you?
That rarely do you have anything original or even interesting to say?
That the opinions you express are perhaps some of the most jaded and
un-enlighted ones around?
That  you're the type of person that thinks everything should be handed to
you?
That the world and everyone in it owes you for you gracing us with your
presence?
That perhaps the ilk of your character has prevented you from enjoying the
bennefits of a fruitful and rewarding career?
I suppose I could go on and on and on... but I think I've got your type
pegged Greg.
But hey - I suppose the world needs people like you to make everyone else
look good right?

;-)

PS:
At some point I may start charging for it in the future. Who knows. But for
now - it's free, and that's what counts.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with that, and while everyone is entited
to their opinion - I would have to question the business/work ethics of
those that do, if not their intellegence.

> > Now at some point in the future (we're talking like a year) I may start
> > selling the software - but until then - it's free.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> I rest my case.
Greg Mossman - 05 Nov 2003 16:49 GMT
> PS:
> At some point I may start charging for it in the future. Who knows. But for
> now - it's free, and that's what counts.

It's free because no one would ever pay for it.  But it's still spam because
it's used in the same way many marketers pass out free samples - to draw in
customers for the rest of the (for profit) merchandise.

> There is absolutely nothing wrong with that, and while everyone is entited
> to their opinion - I would have to question the business/work ethics of
> those that do, if not their intellegence.

Microsoft gives Windows away for free too.  What's wrong with that?

By the way, only a dip sh.t would spell intelligence incorrectly when
insulting another's.  It hardly makes your point.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 17:19 GMT
You're right - it is free because I wouldn't expect anyone to pay for it
yet. It took me about a week of programming a few hours a day to put it
together. I don't consider it for mass-commercial quality yet. I need to put
in some more features and add some spit and polish to it before it's at that
stage. And even then - I'll probably keep it free for a long time yet
anyhow.

There is no other merchandise to draw people to. Are you able to come to
terms with that yet? Go to my site - there is no mention on anything to buy.
It's free software with free support to anyone who wants it. If they don't
want it, no worries, but if someone downloads it, uses it, and says they
like it - great - that's all I'm asking for. I'm not luring anyone to my
site for anything other than recognition for providing free software to
other instructors.

Microsoft gives Windows away for free? Ahhhhh... no. What do you think
you're talking about? What planet are you on?

As for picking out my spelling/typo - that's pretty petty don't you think?
If you had done something similar (maybe you have but I certainly have not
had the presence of mind to check, let alone care - this is hardly the venue
for such formalities) you wouldn't find me so desperate to point it out.

> > PS:
> > At some point I may start charging for it in the future. Who knows. But
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> By the way, only a dip sh.t would spell intelligence incorrectly when
> insulting another's.  It hardly makes your point.
Dan Bracuk, CTHD - 06 Nov 2003 01:48 GMT
Forget the bells and whistles - fix the basics.

"David Brewster" <punky@interlog.com> pounded away at his keyboard
resulting in:
: I don't consider it for mass-commercial quality yet. I need to put
:in some more features and add some spit and polish to it before it's at that
:stage.
Dan Bracuk
If at first you don't succeed, you run the risk of failure.
The Best of rec.scuba http://www.pathcom.com/~bracuk/RecScuba/
David Brewster - 06 Nov 2003 14:07 GMT
> Forget the bells and whistles - fix the basics.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> :stage.
> Dan Bracuk

I'd love to, but I can't find anything wrong with what's in there right now.
A few bugs have been found that were fixed (screen calculations and that
sort of thing) but nothing lately.
Dan Bracuk, CTHD - 07 Nov 2003 05:56 GMT
"David Brewster" <punky@interlog.com> pounded away at his keyboard
resulting in:
:I'd love to, but I can't find anything wrong with what's in there right now.

Do you still make users come up with their own primary keys?

Dan Bracuk
If at first you don't succeed, you run the risk of failure.
The Best of rec.scuba http://www.pathcom.com/~bracuk/RecScuba/
David Brewster - 07 Nov 2003 14:59 GMT
> "David Brewster" <punky@interlog.com> pounded away at his keyboard
> resulting in:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Dan Bracuk

Primary Key is such a harsh word don't you think?
;-)

I do give people to ability to assign their own unique codes to customers,
instructors, components, and course ciriculums. Although course ciriculums
and the components that make up a course are already filled out (at least in
part at this point) in the database - but people have the flexibility to
change/add/delete codes as they see fit.

I do understand your issue with it, I'm not ducking that, it's just that
from my experience (developing large database/inventory systems) from all
the software that I have out there, making an application "Fisher-Price"
like is not always ideal. Giving people the ability to see/create meaningful
short codes for things that would require long descriptions (that may
require truncating in reports and subscreens) goesd a long way to
maintaining a clean database. It's hard to explain fully but just having the
ability to create your codes and making database items appear in order (due
to sorting) due to the self-assigned codes goes a long way to eliminating
duplicate database entries... garbage in garbage out we like to say.

While I don't pretend to be Mr. Super Diver here, (it's obvious from some of
the postings there are some incredibly advanced divers here), my experience
in diving is enough to make me a good instructor and that's about it (which
I think is pretty cool). But my experience in technological issues (and
programming) would be pretty hard to surpase by the average Joe. (I can see
the flames coming now). Sometimes you have to use your best judgements and
not give users everything they want, all in the interest of maintaining
integrity within the application itself. It's a constant battle to avoid
"feature-itis" believe me. Without posting my resume here, I'd developed
some pretty incredible products in the past... everything from DTV card
programming software, to software that reconcilies credit/debit transactions
between a POS system and a bank's system, to software that ties into
security panels to count traffic, to video recognition to determine if
products are located on the bottom of shopping carts, to large scale
inventory maintenance packages. etc. etc. etc. So with that, people will
jsut have to understand that when I decide that a specific change to the
software is not appropriate, it's not due to laziness or lack of ability,
but rather based on past experiences that tell me it would be unwise to do
so.

Later.
Greg Mossman - 08 Nov 2003 05:26 GMT
> Without posting my resume here, I'd developed
> some pretty incredible products in the past... video recognition to
determine if
> products are located on the bottom of shopping carts

My, my.  How would the world have survived without that?
Chris Guynn - 05 Nov 2003 19:49 GMT
<Snip>

> Microsoft gives Windows away for free too.  What's wrong with that?

Really?  Where can I get a copy?

<snip>
chilly - 05 Nov 2003 17:13 GMT
(snip)> PS:
> At some point I may start charging for it in the future. Who knows. But for
> now - it's free, and that's what counts.

MHK gives out free demonstrations.  And he says that's what counts.

> There is absolutely nothing wrong with that, and while everyone is entited
> to their opinion - I would have to question the business/work ethics of
> those that do, if not their intellegence.

No problem with free samples.  I like to taste a new product at the grocery
store from time to time.  But never fool myself into believing that they are
giving me the free samples for anything other than to promote the product
that they want me to "buy".  Whether that be the same day or in the future.

> > > Now at some point in the future (we're talking like a year) I may start
> > > selling the software - but until then - it's free.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> >
> > I rest my case.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 17:26 GMT
Thanks Chilly.
I suppose Greg (is that his name?)'s definition of spammers would include
anyone who ever gives anything away for free or for demonstration at ever
point in the life cycle of a product.
Makes me think how he can function all day long.
Has he never taken a car for a test drive?
Never received samples in the mail?
Never had a sample at Costco?
Never downloaded Shareware? (Bet he's never paid for it if he has).
In any event - the software on my site (www.punksoft.com) - I suppose he'll
blast me for putting the webaddress there is full functioned with no
restrictions at all. It's no even trial-ware or share-ware. It's completely
100% free. If someone likes it and they want to donate money - great - I'll
let them buy me a coffee and a bagel for their thanks - but that said - the
product remains absolutely free and evolves weekly for people who have a
need for it.

Dave

> (snip)> PS:
> > At some point I may start charging for it in the future. Who knows. But
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> > >
> > > I rest my case.
chilly - 05 Nov 2003 17:37 GMT
> Thanks Chilly.
> I suppose Greg (is that his name?)'s definition of spammers would include
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Never had a sample at Costco?
> Never downloaded Shareware?

Good, so you are clear on the concept.  We're half way there.

> (Bet he's never paid for it if he has).
> In any event - the software on my site (www.punksoft.com) - I suppose he'll
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> product remains absolutely free and evolves weekly for people who have a
> need for it.

That sounds like MHK's gig too.  It's all altruistic.  Good for you.

> Dave
>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> > > >
> > > > I rest my case.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 17:47 GMT
At the risk of showing my ignorance (and giving Greg an opening)....
What is
MHK?

Damn.
Too late.
My ignorance is shown.

Just noticed Chilly you are in Canada... Where abouts?

> > Thanks Chilly.
> > I suppose Greg (is that his name?)'s definition of spammers would include
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
> > > > >
> > > > > I rest my case.
chilly - 05 Nov 2003 17:54 GMT
> At the risk of showing my ignorance

As long as you spell it right . . .

> (and giving Greg an opening)....
> What is
> MHK?

See, that's why you should lurk awhile first.  Get a feel for the group.

> Damn.
> Too late.
> My ignorance is shown.

:^)

> Just noticed Chilly you are in Canada... Where abouts?

Western Canada and you?

> > > Thanks Chilly.
> > > I suppose Greg (is that his name?)'s definition of spammers would
[quoted text clipped - 82 lines]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I rest my case.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 17:58 GMT
Toronto.
Shaw used to be here but I know they've concentrated out West.
Prairies or BC?
I've actually spent more time than I can already afford lurking around
rec.scuba - but hell - I keep getting drawn into these discussions ;-)

> > At the risk of showing my ignorance
>
[quoted text clipped - 106 lines]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I rest my case.
chilly - 05 Nov 2003 18:04 GMT
> Toronto.
> Shaw used to be here but I know they've concentrated out West.
> Prairies or BC?

Prairies.

> I've actually spent more time than I can already afford lurking around
> rec.scuba - but hell - I keep getting drawn into these discussions ;-)

The getting drawn in, I understand.  But you should have lurked some more
before coming on here with your spam.
Then at least you'd have known what you were getting yourself into.

> > > At the risk of showing my ignorance
> >
[quoted text clipped - 120 lines]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I rest my case.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 18:20 GMT
I'd agree with you if it weren't for the fact that I'm not a spammer.

> > Toronto.
> > Shaw used to be here but I know they've concentrated out West.
[quoted text clipped - 143 lines]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I rest my case.
chilly - 05 Nov 2003 18:32 GMT
> I'd agree with you if it weren't for the fact that I'm not a spammer.

Are to and a lousy top poster to boot.

(g)

> > > Toronto.
> > > Shaw used to be here but I know they've concentrated out West.
[quoted text clipped - 152 lines]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I rest my case.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 18:45 GMT
I just mentioned to Greg about top posting.
I don't have a clue why my posts are coming up different for you guys.
I'm using Outlook Express and my posts are coming up threaded with everyone
elses. (I just hit Reply Group)
I admit that I am guessing at what you mean by top-posting.
Pehaps Outlook Express posts to newsgroups slightly differently than your
software?
Perhaps your software is reading the groups slightly different than Outlook
Express?
Thatever the case may be, my appologies but it's nothing intentional on my
part, but I don't see any difference between your posts and mine.

> > I'd agree with you if it weren't for the fact that I'm not a spammer.
>
[quoted text clipped - 164 lines]
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I rest my case.
chilly - 05 Nov 2003 18:52 GMT
> I just mentioned to Greg about top posting.
> I don't have a clue why my posts are coming up different for you guys.
> I'm using Outlook Express and my posts are coming up threaded with everyone
> elses. (I just hit Reply Group)
> I admit that I am guessing at what you mean by top-posting.

I suggest that you do a search on Usenet etiquette.

> Pehaps Outlook Express posts to newsgroups slightly differently than your
> software?

Outlook Express is what I use (don't tell anyone) and it is my
responsibility to place my typed text in the right place based on Usenet
standard rules of etiquette.

> Perhaps your software is reading the groups slightly different than Outlook
> Express?

Obviously not.

> Thatever the case may be, my appologies but it's nothing intentional on my
> part, but I don't see any difference between your posts and mine.

You didn't notice that my posts to you were below yours?  In other words,
you spoke and I responded afterwards?  Just like in a normal convo outside
the the 'net?

> > > I'd agree with you if it weren't for the fact that I'm not a spammer.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> around
> > > > > rec.scuba - but hell - I keep getting drawn into these discussions

> ;-)
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 164 lines]
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I rest my case.
Greg Mossman - 05 Nov 2003 19:06 GMT
> You didn't notice that my posts to you were below yours?  In other words,
> you spoke and I responded afterwards?  Just like in a normal convo outside
> the the 'net?

The guy's an idjit spammer.  How do you expect him to notice subtleties like
that?  See if you can teach him how to snip in Lesson Two.

[snip]
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 19:09 GMT
Sticks and stones my friend.
Did it ever cross your mind, that if I am doing something wrong here,
perhaps if you just told me what you'd like me to do so as not to offend you
so much with the "top posting" you claim I am doing - that perhaps I would
appreciate your guidance and govern myself accordingly with future posts?
I think perhaps you are more hell-bent on acting the way you do rather than
being a good and helpful person.

> > You didn't notice that my posts to you were below yours?  In other words,
> > you spoke and I responded afterwards?  Just like in a normal convo outside
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> [snip]
chilly - 05 Nov 2003 19:14 GMT
> Sticks and stones my friend.
> Did it ever cross your mind, that if I am doing something wrong here,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I think perhaps you are more hell-bent on acting the way you do rather than
> being a good and helpful person.

http://www.html-faq.com/etiquette/
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 19:45 GMT
> > Sticks and stones my friend.
> > Did it ever cross your mind, that if I am doing something wrong here,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> http://www.html-faq.com/etiquette/

THANKS!
chilly - 05 Nov 2003 19:55 GMT
> > http://www.html-faq.com/etiquette/
>
> THANKS!

You may be a spammer but you a quick learner.  :^)

You are welcome.
Limey Dave - 05 Nov 2003 19:51 GMT
> Sticks and stones my friend.
> Did it ever cross your mind, that if I am doing something wrong here,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I think perhaps you are more hell-bent on acting the way you do rather than
> being a good and helpful person.

Of course he is, he's a lawyer!
Jeesh!

Dave.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 20:06 GMT
> > Sticks and stones my friend.
> > I think perhaps you are more hell-bent on acting the way you do rather
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Of course he is, he's a lawyer!
> Jeesh!

Get out? Really?
Man - many of my friends (certainly all that I sail with anyhow) are lawyers
(and politicians). I should have spotted that haha.
chilly - 05 Nov 2003 20:09 GMT
(snip)> haha.

Hmm . . . very Jack Farmer like . . .
Chris Guynn - 05 Nov 2003 20:22 GMT
> (snip)> haha.
>
> Hmm . . . very Jack Farmer like . . .

hmmm... if his parts are very Jack Farmer like and very HK like, does that
make him JFK?
Chris Guynn - 05 Nov 2003 20:37 GMT
> > (snip)> haha.
> >
> > Hmm . . . very Jack Farmer like . . .
>
> hmmm... if his parts are very Jack Farmer like and very HK like, does that
> make him JFK?

make that hmmm... if his posts are very Jack Farmer like and very MHK like,
does that make him JFK?
rnf2 - 06 Nov 2003 01:05 GMT
"Chris Guynn" <chrisguynn@sbcglobal.N.O.S.P.A.M.net> wrote > > > (snip)>
haha.

> > > Hmm . . . very Jack Farmer like . . .
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> make that hmmm... if his posts are very Jack Farmer like and very MHK like,
> does that make him JFK?

If it did, he would have been shot by the CIA by now.

rhys
Sven - 06 Nov 2003 01:37 GMT
> Sticks and stones my friend.
> Did it ever cross your mind, that if I am doing something wrong here,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I think perhaps you are more hell-bent on acting the way you do rather than
> being a good and helpful person.

I think it is a bot.

-Sven
Limey Dave - 05 Nov 2003 19:49 GMT
> I just mentioned to Greg about top posting.
> I don't have a clue why my posts are coming up different for you guys.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Thatever the case may be, my appologies but it's nothing intentional on my
> part, but I don't see any difference between your posts and mine.

After you hit "reply" move the cursor to just below the comment you want to
respond to.
You being a software injuneer though, you oughta know this.
Now see the difference?

Dave.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 20:09 GMT
> After you hit "reply" move the cursor to just below the comment you want to
> respond to.
> You being a software injuneer though, you oughta know this.
> Now see the difference?
>
> Dave.

Thanks - a few people took a moment out to correct me.
Your time is appreciated.

Although I beg to ask the question, what does being a developer have to do
with knowing what "top posting" was? If you never go into newsgroups how
would you?
Just because I write software does not mean that I must know everything
about everything electronic. No more so than just because someone who is a
lawyer and who has taken latin must therefore know all the scientific names
of the animal and plant species that they may come in contact with.

See my point?

Haveing said all that, I offer my thanks to those that took the time to
correct my misunderstandings.
Limey Dave - 05 Nov 2003 20:21 GMT
> > After you hit "reply" move the cursor to just below the comment you want
> to
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Although I beg to ask the question, what does being a developer have to do
> with knowing what "top posting" was?

I'd posted that reply before I saw you didn't understand the meaning of top
post. Still, most gateways into Usenet will show some sort of "how to's,"
which common sense dictates, should be read before posting and will also
offer you a link to the Usenet faq before you even subscribe to any froups.

If you never go into newsgroups how
> would you?

See above.

> Just because I write software does not mean that I must know everything
> about everything electronic. No more so than just because someone who is a
> lawyer and who has taken latin must therefore know all the scientific names
> of the animal and plant species that they may come in contact with.

No, but they'd learn at least a few words before trying to hold a
conversation in the language.

Dave.
Chris Guynn - 05 Nov 2003 20:36 GMT
<snip>

> I'd posted that reply before I saw you didn't understand the meaning of top
> post. Still, most gateways into Usenet will show some sort of "how to's,"
> which common sense dictates, should be read before posting and will also
> offer you a link to the Usenet faq before you even subscribe to any froups.

Are you one of those people who read the instructions before you start to
put together that new toy you just got?  :-)

I am.

C Guynn
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 20:38 GMT
> Are you one of those people who read the instructions before you start to
> put together that new toy you just got?  :-)
>
> I am.

Yup.
I also masterbated before I knew what the hell it was good for.
;-)
Chris Guynn - 05 Nov 2003 20:45 GMT
> > Are you one of those people who read the instructions before you start to
> > put together that new toy you just got?  :-)
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I also masterbated before I knew what the hell it was good for.
> ;-)

TMI
Limey Dave - 05 Nov 2003 22:39 GMT
> <snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> I am.

I'm one of those people that throws away the destructions without ever
looking at them. If I can't figger out how to put it together it ain't gonna
last long.

Dave.
rnf2 - 06 Nov 2003 01:08 GMT
> > Are you one of those people who read the instructions before you start to
> > put together that new toy you just got?  :-)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Dave.

Mine tend to break before I've even managed to finish reading the
instructions.

Having a cat jump on the workbench and knock fragile plastics onto a
concrete floor can be annoying

rhys
Limey Dave - 05 Nov 2003 18:00 GMT
> At the risk of showing my ignorance (and giving Greg an opening)....
> What is
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Just noticed Chilly you are in Canada... Where abouts?

C'mon rookie. That's whereaboots?

Dave.
Greg Mossman - 05 Nov 2003 17:59 GMT
> Has he never taken a car for a test drive?

Are you suggesting that Nissan, Chevrolet, and Geo now advertise on
rec.scuba?

> Never received samples in the mail?

On rec.scuba?

> Never had a sample at Costco?

Actually, no.  Those free samples are responsible for a large share of
food-borne illnesses mainly from little brats who picks their butts and then
touch all the samples before you shove them in your hungry mouth.

> Never downloaded Shareware? (Bet he's never paid for it if he has).

You'd lose that bet.  But I've certainly never downloaded any shareware
advertised on rec.scuba because I don't patronize spammers.

> In any event - the software on my site (www.punksoft.com) - I suppose he'll
> blast me for putting the webaddress there is full functioned with no
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> product remains absolutely free and evolves weekly for people who have a
> need for it.

So weekly you will bombard us with your spam?

The difference, dipshit, is that we are bombarded with advertising, offers
of "free" samples and the like, almost everywhere we go.  rec.scuba, for the
most part, is a commercial-free haven and we like it that way.  No
advertising, period.  Get it?
chilly - 05 Nov 2003 18:04 GMT
> > Never had a sample at Costco?
>
> Actually, no.  Those free samples are responsible for a large share of
> food-borne illnesses mainly from little brats who picks their butts and then
> touch all the samples before you shove them in your hungry mouth.

DAMN!  Now you've spoiled it for me.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 18:39 GMT
You know...there is a world outside of rec.scuba.
When I was talking about samples and shareware and the like - I was
referring to life in general - a life outside of rec.scuba

Good point on the costco thing - I'll give you that. It has been a while
since I walked through a costco and sampled anything, but I would still not
forsake the opportunity to sample something that I was truly interested
in... can't live life in a cotton ball you know.

It's not spam - there's no commercial enterprise at the website. It's just
free software for scuba instructors. No catch, no lures and no bait and
switch.
I understand and share your venom towards commercial advertising, but
perhaps you should pick up a dictionary. Commercial advertising would have
to advertise something with the intend of a commerce based exchange in mind.
No such exchange is being promoted. It's pretty one sided actually. Download
the software and pay... zippo... ziltch... nadda... nutta...

Now if you're worried about the group being cluttered up with spam
messages - I can sympathize with you, but stop for a sec and ponder how many
postings your attack on something which is so obviously not commercial
enterprise has created. Actually - you may make a good negotiator in life. I
see you deftly ignore the points you can't argue on and fabricate or
preverse the points that you may have a slight chance of arguing against.
Bringing in your own unique sense of reality does lend itself to some
entertaining point of view. So I will give you this that, you have provided
me with a fair amount of entertainment.

Some people never cease to amaze me.

Oh and as for spamming every week - if I were a spammer - I wouldn't be
having this conversation with you - I'd be spamming to my heart's content.
Am I going to continue leaving the odd message here about the software?
Yes - when there are changes or important updates - yes. You see you're not
the only one here and there have been a few who have downloaded it and have
liked it. I'm more concerned with keeping them informed and offering the
software to anyone else who has a need for it rather than to worry about the
opinions to those like you who frankly, other than to provide an
entertaining diversion, don't matter to me. If you don't want to know about
it, don't read about it, and certainly don't post about it.

> > Has he never taken a car for a test drive?
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> most part, is a commercial-free haven and we like it that way.  No
> advertising, period.  Get it?
Chris Guynn - 05 Nov 2003 19:47 GMT
> You know...there is a world outside of rec.scuba.
> When I was talking about samples and shareware and the like - I was
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> postings your attack on something which is so obviously not commercial
> enterprise has created.

That was surprisingly MHK like...

> Actually - you may make a good negotiator in life. I
> see you deftly ignore the points you can't argue on and fabricate or
> preverse the points that you may have a slight chance of arguing against.
> Bringing in your own unique sense of reality does lend itself to some
> entertaining point of view. So I will give you this that, you have provided
> me with a fair amount of entertainment.

By the way, Greg is a lawyer... isn't that pretty much what they're taught
to do?

> Some people never cease to amaze me.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> entertaining diversion, don't matter to me. If you don't want to know about
> it, don't read about it, and certainly don't post about it.

<snip>

Did anyone else notice the similarities between this post and MHK's style?
chilly - 05 Nov 2003 19:55 GMT
> Did anyone else notice the similarities between this post and MHK's style?

LOL, well, heck, I mighta mentioned that an hour ago or so.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 20:13 GMT
> By the way, Greg is a lawyer... isn't that pretty much what they're taught
> to do?

Really? My closest friends are all lawyers, I sail with them every Tuesday,
I've never found them to be jerks. ;-pPpPpP
Gee Greg must have a pretty busy successful practive to have all this time
to flame me here. I wonder which client he is billing for all this "net
research" time. ;-)
Before he flames me back - I do have SOME free time today - although
admingly not as much as I need to keep up here

> Did anyone else notice the similarities between this post and MHK's style?

Who is MHK?
Chris Guynn - 05 Nov 2003 20:20 GMT
> > By the way, Greg is a lawyer... isn't that pretty much what they're taught
> > to do?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Who is MHK?

That's mostly irrelevant.  The word on the street is that he isn't coming
back so you might be lucky enough to not have to deal with his spamming (at
least, that's probably how Greg looks at it).
Chris Guynn - 05 Nov 2003 20:44 GMT
> > > By the way, Greg is a lawyer... isn't that pretty much what they're
> taught
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> back so you might be lucky enough to not have to deal with his spamming (at
> least, that's probably how Greg looks at it).

By the way, if you really want to know about MHK, go to groups.google.com on
the internet and search through rec.scuba for MHK.  You'll find everything
you want to know there.
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 21:05 GMT
> By the way, if you really want to know about MHK, go to groups.google.com on
> the internet and search through rec.scuba for MHK.  You'll find everything
> you want to know there.

Are you kidding me? There were like 29,100 hits with that search.
Oh wait.
Michael H Kane right....
Hmmm.....
Well hard to tell what's true and what's not but it all seems ligit.

Balls galore when it comes to diving cold water with no hood (A man after a
Canadian's Heart)
Thought I saw something about him living in New York, but found an
California address instead.
If it's the California guy - TONS of dive experience
Something about offering up $10k for some lawsuit somewhere (ok - that might
get you throught court room doors)...
Read something about him being a successfull accountant
Gives lectures.
Seems very well respected in the dive community.

I admit some confusion - either I've got the wrong guy or I am missing
something. I was expecting to find someone that every hated and booted outta
here, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
Chris Guynn - 05 Nov 2003 22:12 GMT
> > By the way, if you really want to know about MHK, go to groups.google.com
> on
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Gives lectures.
> Seems very well respected in the dive community.

That sounds about right... I never really paid him enough attention to be
able to say.  He had a tendency to "advertise" his dive training here.  Some
people didn't appreciate it.  Many people didn't care.  IIRC, he said that
he really didn't get much business from it, which made me wonder why he
insisted on doing it.  Oh well...

> I admit some confusion - either I've got the wrong guy or I am missing
> something. I was expecting to find someone that every hated and booted outta
> here, but that doesn't seem to be the case.

There are few people here that are truly hated.  Probably the closest I've
heard of is Black, but that seemed to be by a specific group of individuals
and was definitely before my time (here).  Scuba Bobby got some real nasty
treatment here too and there was a good deal of animosity towards someone
named Angel.  Other than that, everyone here is pretty much just pricks to
everyone else, but we get along fairly well anyway (especially when we meet
in person... or so I've been told).
David Brewster - 05 Nov 2003 22:18 GMT
> named Angel.  Other than that, everyone here is pretty much just pricks to
> everyone else, but we get along fairly well anyway (especially when we meet
> in person... or so I've been told).

Meeting people from here in person... hell.. I'd rather suck on rusty nails.
I enjoy some banter just as much as the next guy - but that almost seems
like suicide to me haha.
Chris Guynn - 05 Nov 2003 22:24 GMT
> > named Angel.  Other than that, everyone here is pretty much just pricks to
> > everyone else, but we get along fairly well anyway (especially when we
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I enjoy some banter just as much as the next guy - but that almost seems
> like suicide to me haha.

Actually, there was a recent trip to Florida that a good many of the people
here got together for.  It was just last month IIRC.  Dive with Greg became
the unofficial title of it.  From what I understand they all had a great
time (unfortunately, I couldn't make it).  I've can't say that I've ever
heard of a bad meeting between rec.scubans, but I hear all the time about
meetings where both parties had a great time (and generally ended up at
least partially inebriated).  :-)

C Guynn
Limey Dave - 05 Nov 2003 22:41 GMT
> > named Angel.  Other than that, everyone here is pretty much just pricks to
> > everyone else, but we get along fairly well anyway (especially when we
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I enjoy some banter just as much as the next guy - but that almost seems
> like suicide to me haha.

For you, at this point, it almost certainly would be.

Dave.
Greg Mossman - 05 Nov 2003 20:54 GMT
> > Actually - you may make a good negotiator in life. I
> > see you deftly ignore the points you can't argue on and fabricate or
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> By the way, Greg is a lawyer... isn't that pretty much what they're taught
> to do?

What, provide entertainment?
Chris Guynn - 05 Nov 2003 22:07 GMT
> > > Actually - you may make a good negotiator in life. I
> > > see you deftly ignore the points you can't argue on and fabricate or
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> What, provide entertainment?

precisely...
rnf2 - 06 Nov 2003 01:16 GMT
> > > > Actually - you may make a good negotiator in life. I
> > > > see you deftly ignore the points you can't argue on and fabricate or
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> precisely...

Expensive entertainment if he charges like most lawyers.

But this seems to be becoing spam for Gregs law business... can we gang up
on Greg the Legal Business Spammer?

rhys
Greg Mossman - 05 Nov 2003 19:54 GMT
> You know...there is a world outside of rec.scuba.
> When I was talking about samples and shareware and the like - I was
> referring to life in general - a life outside of rec.scuba

Very good.  Now put it together.  It's OK to advertise your product in
general - outside of rec.scuba.

> Good point on the costco thing - I'll give you that. It has been a while
> since I walked through a costco and sampled anything, but I would still not
> forsake the opportunity to sample something that I was truly interested
> in... can't live life in a cotton ball you know.

Good for you.  I'm simply not interested in sampling something that gives me
a high risk of contracting a food-borne illness.  Unless I'm drunk.  I eat
all sorts of weird sh.t when I'm drunk.  But I'm not usually drunk when I'm
shopping at Costco.  Maybe that's what I'm missing.  All the other shoppers
are drunk and that's why they don't notice when their bratty butt-pickin'
kids touch all the free food samples.

> It's not spam - there's no commercial enterprise at the website. It's just
> free software for scuba instructors. No catch, no lures and no bait and
> switch.

1) The home page solicits donations:  "The software is free, but any and all
donations are appreciated and will go towards maintaining the website,
ensuring everyone gets free support, and will pave the way for future
upgrades and feature additions."

2) The home page provides a link to PADI's commercial website along with a
suggestion to visit it, and you just so happen to be a PADI instructor.

3) The home page boasts that you have created another product "which you are
invited to check out as well."

4) You have since changed the Products page to eliminate the commercial
product, obviously in response to my complaints.  I appreciate that I am
able to pull your strings all the way from here, but you haven't gone far
enough yet for my taste.  See #1-3, above, and #5, below.

5) The Services page advertises your services as a dive instructor and
computer programmer, neither of which is fr