Which dive tables are better to use, the U.S. Navy table, or PADI table?
The USN tables seem more liberal on the front end (60 ft. for 60 min. vs.
60 ft for 50 min. for PADI), but seem more conservative than PADI for
surface intervals and RNT.
Charlie Hammond - 27 Sep 2004 20:13 GMT
>Which dive tables are better to use, the U.S. Navy table, or PADI table?
..
Depends on what you are using it for.
For a combat diver under the control of a diving officer with an on-site
decompression chamber available, us the Navy table. (There is a LOT in
the way the Navy table are used that is not apparent from the tables
themselves!)
For a recreational diver, use the PADI/DSAT table.

Signature
Charlie Hammond -- Hewlett-Packard Company -- Ft Lauderdale FL USA
(hammond@not@peek.ssr.hp.com -- remove "@not" when replying)
All opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily my employer's.
Grumman-581 - 28 Sep 2004 02:14 GMT
> Which dive tables are better to use, the U.S. Navy table, or PADI table?
The Navy tables, of course...
(although I might be *slightly* biased)...
mike gray - 28 Sep 2004 02:50 GMT
> Which dive tables are better to use, the U.S. Navy table, or PADI table?
> The USN tables seem more liberal on the front end (60 ft. for 60 min. vs.
> 60 ft for 50 min. for PADI), but seem more conservative than PADI for
> surface intervals and RNT.
My Navy tables give 60 ft. for 55 min, 75 min, 110 min, 150 min, 180
min, and 210 min.
But no 60 for 60.
Al Wells - 28 Sep 2004 22:12 GMT
> My Navy tables give 60 ft. for 55 min, 75 min, 110 min, 150 min, 180
> min, and 210 min.
>
> But no 60 for 60.
What Navy? Mine is the well known 60 for 60. There is a Navy "doppler"
table that is 60 for 50.
mike gray - 28 Sep 2004 23:02 GMT
>> My Navy tables give 60 ft. for 55 min, 75 min, 110 min, 150 min, 180
>> min, and 210 min.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> What Navy? Mine is the well known 60 for 60. There is a Navy "doppler"
> table that is 60 for 50.
US Navy.
Navy Department, Bureau of Ships, Diving Manual 1943, page 170,
Decompression Table No. 1
Scott - 28 Sep 2004 23:24 GMT
> >> My Navy tables give 60 ft. for 55 min, 75 min, 110 min, 150 min, 180
> >> min, and 210 min.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Navy Department, Bureau of Ships, Diving Manual 1943, page 170,
> Decompression Table No. 1
I know you still think Christ is a Corpral, but;
Thats back when a 60 foot dive was no deco, ever.
http://www.supsalv.org/pdf/DIVEMAN.exe
This starts a 46 meg download
mike gray - 29 Sep 2004 16:50 GMT
>> >> My Navy tables give 60 ft. for 55 min, 75 min, 110 min, 150 min, 180
>> >> min, and 210 min.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> This starts a 46 meg download
46 megs is more than I can absorb.
Martin Christensen - 28 Sep 2004 21:47 GMT
> Which dive tables are better to use, the U.S. Navy table, or PADI table?
> The USN tables seem more liberal on the front end (60 ft. for 60 min. vs.
> 60 ft for 50 min. for PADI), but seem more conservative than PADI for
> surface intervals and RNT.
In Denmark, the only table which are allowed for commercial divers are the
Navy table.
Martin
To Arms!! - 29 Sep 2004 04:40 GMT
> Which dive tables are better to use, the U.S. Navy table, or PADI
> table?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> for
> surface intervals and RNT.
I've got a set of PADI Navy tables on a credit card sized card. 60'
for 60 minute tables. This is what I was trained on.
We were trained to add a safety factor into the tables - go to the
next greater depth on the table (a 55' dive would be 70' on the
table). I never did use the wheel. It looked like a PADI money making
gimmick. I now dive with two computers, but still carry the Navy
tables.