Scuba Forum / General / August 2004
Sosua DR Dive Report
|
|
Thread rating:  |
nobody - 09 Aug 2004 23:59 GMT My daughter and I decided to do some diving last week during our vacation in Cabarete, Republica Dominicana. We used Dolphin Dive Center primarily because it was a 30 second walk from our condo on the east end of town. Billed as a PADI Five Star dive shop, the Cabarete facility is really only a satellite office for the dive operation which is down the road in Sosua. Michel, the French expatriate owner, is the hands on operator along with a few other employees. Prices were a little higher than I would have thought ... three tanks for $87 USD. Not as expensive as diving in New Jersey, but more than what I paid not long ago in Key Largo. Michel was very cordial and was especially helpful when yours truly realized that his dive ‘puter was sitting by his home ‘puter 2,000 miles from Cabarete. Michel loaned me a console, which worked well until near the end of the first dive, when it began leaking a bit much. Anyway, at 8:15, we loaded into a taxi for the fifteen minute ride to Sosua.
Dolphin's boats are small, with no amenities except tank holders and on the larger skiff, a PVC dive ‘ladder’. The smaller skiff, not much bigger than a row boat, was accessed by pulling yourself up over the gunwale. Manageable with a pull from the mate, but very good incentive to lose weight. It was by far easier to don and doff gear in the drink, rather than teeter-totter in the skiff. Fortunately the water was very calm on all three dives and we had no problem with that. The dives were planned as drift dives, although there was little if any current. It was more a matter of the skiff being blown off by the breeze and locating us when we surfaced.
Our first dive was at Airport Wall, so named because it’s just about a half mile off the runway of the local airport. It starts about 40' and we maxed at 70'. It was a Tuesday and we were the only boat there. It was my daughter’s first wall dive and she enjoyed it a lot. There were seven divers; three buddy teams and an advanced student working with Michel. We saw a good deal of soft coral and sponges; the ubiquitous colorful reef fishies, and some interesting crabs of various types. The wall is particularly devoid of large fish of any type - perhaps the waters are fished out. No grouper; no sharks; no turtles, etc. Vis. was not bad but not spectacular at 60'-75'. Water was warm at 84 deg. We both dove with shorties and after a 58 minute dive, my daughter was very slightly cold, but not enough to add more rubber. During the dive, I noticed that our number had shrunk by two. Later, I learned that one couple had aborted early in the dive when one of them suffered a nasty sinus squeeze. Anyway, it was a nice, relaxing wall dive and very enjoyable.
After the first dive, we motored back to the dive center to refill the tanks (small boat, no room for extra tanks) and take a SIT-esta. The gal with the sinus squeeze sucked on some O2 to ease her headache, although it may have been as a placebo. Our second dive, now with only five divers + Michel, was at Three Rocks, which are really three large and closely spaced coral reefs very close to shore just east of Sosua. A four minute boat ride got us there and we spent about an hour + in 15'–35', observing the very healthy coral and nice variety of reef critters. We spotted a juvenile spotted Moray which was a bit playful and curious, as well as a few flounder-type bottom dwellers. There were also quite a number of different crustaceans and a few sea slugs to play with. It reminded me of my first instructors adage that in many cases the best dives are shallow dives. The marine life was definitely better on the second dive.
We saved our third dive for two days later, so that we could dive with my daughter’s boyfriend and his brother, who took the Discover Scuba “class”. That consisted of Michel spending about twenty minutes in a four foot pool, showing them the gear and telling them what a great time they would have. Which was true, if not particularly thorough. Anyway, we dove the same site, Three Rocks, and stayed shallow, which was fine for my daughter and I, and safe for the guys. We spent the time taking pictures of the rookies and investigating the micro life. We both agreed that we didn’t feel the need to swim the entire site, and preferred to really examine a smaller area in detail. After 45 minutes, the newbies were given a small shot of air in their BC’s and they drifted to the surface. We stayed for another twenty minutes at 15'-10', and at the end, blissfully drifted up to meet the boat. It just doesn’t get any more relaxing than that.
If you are looking for a real pampering, this isn’t the operation for you (you assemble your own gear and lug it through the water to the boat, and the boats can be tough to get into when the water is rough); however, the base operation is a nice set up and the folks were very friendly. On a scale of one to ten, I’d rate them a 7.5. And considering that we do most of our diving in low vis/damn cold sites, I’d rate the two dive sites the same.
Bart F.
Dan Bracuk - 10 Aug 2004 03:56 GMT nobody <anyone@home.net> pounded away at his keyboard resulting in:
:Dolphin's boats are small, with no amenities except tank holders and on :the larger skiff, a PVC dive ladder. The smaller skiff, not much :bigger than a row boat, was accessed by pulling yourself up over the :gunwale. Manageable with a pull from the mate, but very good incentive :to lose weight. Is that harder or easier than pulling yourself up the side of an inflateable? Also, was there someone on the other side of the boat to provide a counterweight so the boat wouldn't capsize?
Dan Bracuk If at first you don't succeed, you run the risk of failure. The Best of rec.scuba http://www.pathcom.com/~bracuk/RecScuba/
Nobody - 10 Aug 2004 04:28 GMT > nobody <anyone@home.net> pounded away at his keyboard resulting in: > :Dolphin's boats are small, with no amenities except tank holders and on [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Is that harder or easier than pulling yourself up the side of an > inflateable? Dunno! Never dove off of an inflatable. However, the Gunwales are higher on the wood boat, and certainly harder material ... one could easily crush ones unmentionables if not careful when swinging over the top of the gunwale. That might not happen on a softer inflatable.
Also, was there someone on the other side of the boat to
> provide a counterweight so the boat wouldn't capsize? > > Dan Bracuk Yes, there was the mate, who operated the boat to pick us up when we surfaced. He balanced the boat when the DM exited the water, and they both helped balance and pull gear out of the drink when we'all exited. My BC and my daughter's, both of which have integrated pockets o' lead, were the toughest.
I forgot to mention this - the mate had a nice scar on his leg ... from a boat prop! Lucky to still have his leg, I suppose. When we left the beach for the third dive, in the smaller wooden skiff, the mate had trouble starting the motor (a pull cord starter.) Another fellow who works for Michel was on the beach, and after the mate was having no luck, that fellow dove into the water and started swimming towards us, to help our mate. Just as the swimmer neared the stern of the boat, the motor coughed to life, and Keeerist!, that guy was no more than a meter from the prop! He wanted to turn and swim away, but sat still (smartly), or his legs would have been chum. But as they say, close only counts with hand grenades ...
Bart F.
Jer - 10 Aug 2004 05:51 GMT > Yes, there was the mate, who operated the boat to pick us up when we > surfaced. He balanced the boat when the DM exited the water, and they > both helped balance and pull gear out of the drink when we'all exited. > My BC and my daughter's, both of which have integrated pockets o' lead, > were the toughest. Whenever I dive with my integrated weight BC, I always toss the weight pockets in the boat first, the BC/tank combo is a lot easier afterward.
> I forgot to mention this - the mate had a nice scar on his leg ... from > a boat prop! Lucky to still have his leg, I suppose. When we left the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > or his legs would have been chum. But as they say, close only counts > with hand grenades ... Yikes!
> Bart F.
 Signature jer email reply - I am not a 'ten' "All that we do is touched with ocean, yet we remain on the shore of what we know." -- Richard Wilbur
nobody - 10 Aug 2004 11:12 GMT > Whenever I dive with my integrated weight BC, I always toss the weight > pockets in the boat first, the BC/tank combo is a lot easier afterward. Yes, my daughter did this, but I can't. My BC is a Dive-Rite, and the pockets don't desengage. Theoretically, I could unzip the tops and pull the weights out, one by one, but that's a bit too much work. 'Twas only 16 lbs. But the back pad is foam, and it sops up water, so the thing does get heavy when leaving the water. Otherwise, I like it.
Bart F.
DrYak - 11 Aug 2004 02:01 GMT I'll get off topic, but a BC without ditchable weights sounds like cement overshoes in Lake Michigan to me...
>> Whenever I dive with my integrated weight BC, I always toss the weight >> pockets in the boat first, the BC/tank combo is a lot easier afterward. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Bart F. nobody - 11 Aug 2004 12:35 GMT They are ditchable, but the pockets are not removeable. There is a flap that is held by velcro, which when pulled down, opens the bottom and the weights tumble to Davy Jone's locker. I've tried it once to get the feel for the system and it works instantly and is very intuitive. One pulls - they fall. But the pockets are held to the BC in a semi-permanent manner that doesn't allow removing them for handing up to a boat from the water.
My daughter's BC has weight holders that fit into a sleeve. You remove the weight pockets sideways. Quick, but less intuitive, and you lose part of the BC with the weights! Hmnnnn ....
Bart F.
> I'll get off topic, but a BC without ditchable weights sounds like > cement overshoes in Lake Michigan to me... [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >> >> Bart F. Jer - 11 Aug 2004 15:57 GMT > They are ditchable, but the pockets are not removeable. There is a flap > that is held by velcro, which when pulled down, opens the bottom and the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > the weight pockets sideways. Quick, but less intuitive, and you lose > part of the BC with the weights! Hmnnnn .... My ditchable BCD uses this style of weight pockets, and extras are available for a modest cost. I grabbed an additional pair early on and they reside permanently in the spares compartment of my gear bag - which is the bottom under everything else. :)
 Signature jer email reply - I am not a 'ten' "All that we do is touched with ocean, yet we remain on the shore of what we know." -- Richard Wilbur
jim frei - 11 Aug 2004 20:11 GMT > My daughter's BC has weight holders that fit into a sleeve. You remove > the weight pockets sideways. Quick, but less intuitive, and you lose > part of the BC with the weights! Hmnnnn .... and replacement weight pockets will cost you about $30 for the pair. after about 3 years of heavy use, the velcro wears out and will no longer hold the weight pockets securely...i've dropped two pockets (recovered one) after making sure the velcro was grabbing - or so I thought. now i've rigged mine with wire ties that can be cut quickly if needed.
 Signature jim frei http://stormwatergroup.com
|
|
|