Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / July 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Time between dive and airline flight

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
- 08 Jul 2004 13:43 GMT
Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.

How much time do I need between my dives and getting back home on my
return flight?

Any comments will be appreciated.

Thanks,

Sy

Signature

Please post and reply to sytech@yahoo.com

rwjg40 - 08 Jul 2004 14:31 GMT
> Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
> I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Any comments will be appreciated.

24 hours.  Aren't you certified?  This is usually a stressed point in
cert classes.

Gordon in Austin
George Cathcart - 08 Jul 2004 16:13 GMT
Um, you might want to check the Dan Web site. It says:

The following guidelines are the consensus of attendees at the 2002
Flying After Diving Workshop. They apply to air dives followed by
flights at cabin altitudes of 2,000 to 8,000 feet (610 to 2,438 meters)
for divers who do not have symptoms of decompression sickness (DCS). The
recommended preflight surface intervals do not guarantee avoidance of
DCS. Longer surface intervals will reduce DCS risk further.

   * For a single no-decompression dive, a minimum preflight surface
     interval of 12 hours is suggested.
   * For multiple dives per day or multiple days of diving, a minimum
     preflight surface interval of 18 hours is suggested.
   * For dives requiring decompression stops, there is little evidence
     on which to base a recommendation and a preflight surface interval
     substantially longer than 18 hours appears prudent.

24 hours is certainly safe, but according to DAN, not necessary.

g

>  
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Gordon in Austin
>  
Jason O'Rourke - 09 Jul 2004 01:03 GMT
>> Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
>> I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>24 hours.  Aren't you certified?  This is usually a stressed point in
>cert classes.

It may be, but it has little bearing with reality.  MHK would show up
to the airport with his hair still wet.  Lots of variables, more than can
result in one or two set answers.

I strive for a late morning flight out so I can still do the morning 2
tanker the day before.  That translates to about 20 hours.  

Signature

Jason O'Rourke www.jor.com

Brian Nadwidny - 09 Jul 2004 02:16 GMT
> > Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
> > I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> 24 hours.  Aren't you certified?  This is usually a stressed point in
> cert classes.

24 hours? You got to be f.cking kidding. More likely you own a hotel in
Miami Beach.

Brian
Edmonton, Alberta
Lee Bell - 09 Jul 2004 03:17 GMT
> > Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
> > I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> 24 hours.  Aren't you certified?  This is usually a stressed point in
> cert classes.

Lighten up.  The guy's taking a refresher course because he wants to refresh
his knowledge and skills.  Asking about the time to fly, specifically to
refresh his memory on the topic, isn't a bad idea.

The answer to the original question is "we don't know."  24 hours us
considered, by most, to be sufficient time, but there are some who believe
there's no risk and some that believe 24 hours isn't long enough.
Personally, I leave a minimum of 24 hours between an aggressive diving
schedule and my flight or at least 12 hours after shallow water, not even
close to deco dives.

Lee
rwjg40 - 09 Jul 2004 18:00 GMT
> > > Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
> > > I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> his knowledge and skills.  Asking about the time to fly, specifically to
> refresh his memory on the topic, isn't a bad idea.

I wasn't aware that I was being "heavy"; I certainly didn't intend to
be. My apologies if I offended anyone.

I'm aware that there is some disagreement on this subject, but in the
classes I took, the "24 hours before flying" was emphasized (rightly or
wrongly) nearly as much as the "don't hold your breath".  It's probably
a good first approximation, anyway.

I am still puzzling over the "hotel in Miami beach" comment, though.
;^)

Gordon in Austin
Brian Nadwidny - 09 Jul 2004 22:29 GMT
> I'm aware that there is some disagreement on this subject, but in the
> classes I took, the "24 hours before flying" was emphasized (rightly or
> wrongly) nearly as much as the "don't hold your breath".  It's probably
> a good first approximation, anyway.

And when I took classes being a "D" diver was emphasized, which probably
was a recommendation as based in fact as any of the recommendations made
since then.

>  I am still puzzling over the "hotel in Miami beach" comment, though.
> ;^)

The 24 hour rule benefits hotel owners because it makes divers stay, and
therefore pay, for another night's accommodations.

Brian
Edmonton, Alberta
Lee Bell - 10 Jul 2004 14:34 GMT
> >  I am still puzzling over the "hotel in Miami beach" comment, though.

> The 24 hour rule benefits hotel owners because it makes divers stay, and
> therefore pay, for another night's accommodations.

. . . and look for something other than diving to do, often with the
assistance, and a commission to, the hotel.

Lee
Divey Dave - 12 Jul 2004 14:21 GMT
> > I'm aware that there is some disagreement on this subject, but in the
> > classes I took, the "24 hours before flying" was emphasized (rightly or
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> The 24 hour rule benefits hotel owners because it makes divers stay, and
> therefore pay, for another night's accommodations.

You just shouldn't have to explain good comedy!

Dave.
Lee Willcox - 17 Jul 2004 20:42 GMT
>>Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
>>I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Gordon in Austin

Gordon, so read this:
http://www.diversalertnetwork.org/medical/faq/faq.asp?faqid=54
gabriele - 18 Jul 2004 12:17 GMT
>>> Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
>>> I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Gordon, so read this:
> http://www.diversalertnetwork.org/medical/faq/faq.asp?faqid=54

Well I'm a professional pilot and a new diver.

I always try to leave at least 24 hours between dive and fly. I fly on a
business jet, so the cabin is lower than on a airliner, even if we fly
higher, but you have to consider the possibility of a loss of
pressurization, you might find yourself at 30000 ft in few minutes.

Gabriele
DrYak - 19 Jul 2004 02:24 GMT
Since the bends could be catastrophic to not only you but others, you
are wise to be very conservative even if you lose some diving.  You
might want to find someone knowledgeable to give you specific advice for
your situation.

gabriele wrote:...

> Well I'm a professional pilot and a new diver.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Gabriele
Dave L - 19 Jul 2004 22:32 GMT
> Well I'm a professional pilot and a new diver.
>
> I always try to leave at least 24 hours between dive and fly. I fly on a
> business jet, so the cabin is lower than on a airliner, even if we fly
> higher, but you have to consider the possibility of a loss of
> pressurization, you might find yourself at 30000 ft in few minutes.

If you fly a biz jet you might find yerself a lot worse off than
30000ft.....and it could take a few seconds, not minutes.

Dave.
gabriele - 19 Jul 2004 22:54 GMT
>>Well I'm a professional pilot and a new diver.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Dave.

You would really have to lose the cabin door to loose pressurization in
few seconds.
For a window or 2 it will take a moment and then you would already be in
an emergency descent.
It should take 3 minutes for a descent from 45000' down to 10000', so
you should meet the cabin in the thirties.

Gabriele
DrYak - 20 Jul 2004 03:02 GMT
If you don't have a medical problem in the mean time.  I would call DAN
(Divers Alert Network) and ask them what their recommendations are for a
professional pilot who will be at the controls.  As divers, what we do
is poorly documented, but you're getting way out beyond what even
technical divers do.  How many dives do you do?  How deep?  Are you
doing Nitrox?  If not, you ought to seriously look into it.

As a non-medical doctor, I leave it to you to calculate how many
atmospheres light you are at 30,000 feet and guess what this might do to
your cardiovascular system if there is any nitrogen in your blood.  My
rough guess is that it would make your circulatory system pump something
like the head on a beer.

Look at this another way.  With just a short dive, would you want to get
shot to 30,000 feet?  Not even the Navy divers try anything like this.

Do you have pressurized oxygen available?

Is there another pilot to assist you?

>>> Well I'm a professional pilot and a new diver.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Gabriele
Dave L - 20 Jul 2004 14:02 GMT
> If you don't have a medical problem in the mean time.  I would call DAN
> (Divers Alert Network) and ask them what their recommendations are for a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> rough guess is that it would make your circulatory system pump something
> like the head on a beer.

I'd imagine you're pretty close.

> Look at this another way.  With just a short dive, would you want to get
> shot to 30,000 feet?  Not even the Navy divers try anything like this.
>
> Do you have pressurized oxygen available?
>
> Is there another pilot to assist you?

No, (*) and yes.
But I'll be interested in gabrielles answers too.  ;)
Note the (*), O2 is usually delivered at a working pressure between 60-80psi
to the mask, which is *relatively* high considering the outside conditions,
though not by diving standards.

Dave.
Steve - 21 Jul 2004 06:42 GMT
>>Do you have pressurized oxygen available?

>  O2 is usually delivered at a working pressure between 60-80psi
> to the mask, which is *relatively* high considering the outside conditions,
> though not by diving standards.

What is the same as diving, though, is that when the time comes you'll be breathing
that O2 at ambient pressure, and it's the ambient pressure that determines whether or
not you have too much N2. Short of breathing a lot more than 21% O2 for quite some
time beforehand, at an ambient pressure of 30,000 feet ASL, you *will* have too much N2.

Signature

Steve

The above can be construed as personal opinion in the absence of a reasonable
belief that it was intended as a statement of fact.

If you want a reply to reach me, remove the SPAMTRAP from the address.

Dave L - 21 Jul 2004 18:16 GMT
> >>Do you have pressurized oxygen available?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> What is the same as diving, though, is that when the time comes you'll be breathing
> that O2 at ambient pressure,

Yes.

and it's the ambient pressure that determines whether or
> not you have too much N2. Short of breathing a lot more than 21% O2 for quite some
> time beforehand, at an ambient pressure of 30,000 feet ASL, you *will* have too much N2.

Do you mean if you have been breathing normal cabin air pressurized to 8k or
so? I'm not sure I follow ya. If so, I agree, when a rapid decompression
occurs at FL450 then yes, your N2 will load up somewhat rapidly.

Dave.
Steve - 22 Jul 2004 00:21 GMT
>  and it's the ambient pressure that determines whether or
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> so? I'm not sure I follow ya. If so, I agree, when a rapid decompression
> occurs at FL450 then yes, your N2 will load up somewhat rapidly.

What I meant was that at 30k the ambient pressure will be about 40% of sea level. I
expect that you have a better formula than the one I use which is a drop of 3% for
each successive 1000 feet (so 30K is roughly .97^30). Assuming you haven't lost any
significant N2 as a result of reduced cabin pressure yet (or breathing a richer
mixture than 21%) and are at equilibrium with sea level pressure, exposure to 30k
will mean you have 2.5 times the N2 relative to equilibrium at 30k. That's analagous
to an ascent from 50 feet to the surface, after a dive that's long enough for all the
different compartments to be saturated, and I don't think that any of the models
indicate that's a good idea.

BTW, I've been assuming that Gabriele is a variation on Gabrielle, in whichcase it's
"her" plane. I suppose it could also be a variation on Gabriel, though.

Signature

Steve

The above can be construed as personal opinion in the absence of a reasonable
belief that it was intended as a statement of fact.

If you want a reply to reach me, remove the SPAMTRAP from the address.

Dave L - 23 Jul 2004 15:33 GMT
> >  and it's the ambient pressure that determines whether or
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> different compartments to be saturated, and I don't think that any of the models
> indicate that's a good idea.

Agreed, and no I don't have a better formula. Thanks for the explanation.

> BTW, I've been assuming that Gabriele is a variation on Gabrielle, in whichcase it's
> "her" plane. I suppose it could also be a variation on Gabriel, though.

Yeah, I figgered he or she was already pissy enuf at me for me to start
calling him a her. If the mistake was the other way around, I assumed I
could be forgiven!  ;)

Dave.
Dave L - 20 Jul 2004 13:46 GMT
> >>Well I'm a professional pilot and a new diver.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> It should take 3 minutes for a descent from 45000' down to 10000', so
> you should meet the cabin in the thirties.

What's the difference between "a moment" and a few seconds? What is your
'time of useful consciousness' at 45,000ft? Why , if one crewmember leaves
his or her position, is the other required to wear their oxygen mask above
350?
Do you know what 'explosive decompression' means?
Do you think losing the window at 450 wouldn't be considered an explosive
decompression?
Enquiring minds and all.  ;)

Dave.
Lee Bell - 20 Jul 2004 14:08 GMT
>Well I'm a professional pilot and a new diver.

Good combination.  Fly us somewhere.

>I always try to leave at least 24 hours between dive and fly. I fly on a
>business jet, so the cabin is lower than on a airliner, even if we fly
>higher, but you have to consider the possibility of a loss of
>pressurization, you might find yourself at 30000 ft in few minutes.

It wasn't all that long ago that a crew found themselves in a similar
situation . . . well, they didn't exactly find themselves.  The crash
investigators found them (as I recall).  Turns out it was a combination of a
slow leak and a malfunctioning alarm.  They just went to sleep, never to
awaken.

Lee
Saul Good - 20 Jul 2004 15:09 GMT
> >Well I'm a professional pilot and a new diver.
>
> Good combination.  Fly us somewhere.

Heh Heh true enough, but I'm sure his engines burn $$$$ just like they all
do.

> >I always try to leave at least 24 hours between dive and fly. I fly on a
> >business jet, so the cabin is lower than on a airliner, even if we fly
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> slow leak and a malfunctioning alarm.  They just went to sleep, never to
> awaken.

Yea I think they had a famous golf pro on board. Started out in FL and just
flew off course until they crashed somewhere out West. Just shows to go
ya...you never know like you think you know what's going to happen today.
That's why I'm going through my Rescue class. Just to tilt the odds ever so
slightly towards I or those with me on my next dive not getting dead or any
injuries minimized.

> Lee
Dave L - 20 Jul 2004 15:49 GMT
> >Well I'm a professional pilot and a new diver.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> slow leak and a malfunctioning alarm.  They just went to sleep, never to
> awaken.

Yeah, it was Payne Stewarts Lear 35. I was saving that example for a
question later. I have a feeling our friend isn't quite as familiar with the
effects of depressurization, or more importantly, the time of useful
consciousness, as they should be.

Dave.
gabriele - 20 Jul 2004 22:14 GMT
>>>Well I'm a professional pilot and a new diver.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Dave.

Nice to hear that you know me so well to judge what I know and what I
don't, unfortunately I don't recall meeting you.

Useful consciousness at 45000 feet is 4-5 seconds, but this is if you
find yourself instantly at that altitude.

This is not Hollywood!

To put on a Quick donning mask, pumping up to 72.5 PSI takes less than 3
secs.

If you loose 1 or 2 windows,given the cabin volume and the fact that the
bleeds are still pumping air it will take 5 minutes or maybe more for
the cabin to reach 45000 feet.
By that time you will already be at 10000' or less (3 min).

The cabin when flying at 45000' is at an altitude of 6000'.

Even if the door should let go, unless the fuselage breaks in a half
(and then you would not have to worry about oxygen), it will take a
while to loose all pressurization, and a door would not just suddenly
let go without any previous warning, door unsafe light, noise, cabin
altitude climbing. You get a warning at 8700'.

In all the cases I had, simulator of course, the cabin never reached
30000', that i can remember.

24 hours is what is recommended by authorities, like I said that is the
minimum for me and till now I did at least 48.

And yes we are 2 pilots.

Gabriele
Steve - 21 Jul 2004 06:51 GMT
> Useful consciousness at 45000 feet is 4-5 seconds, but this is if you
> find yourself instantly at that altitude.

> To put on a Quick donning mask, pumping up to 72.5 PSI takes less than 3
> secs.

Is that to say that you *always* manage it faster than 3 seconds? Are you sure it
will be just the same with that explosion and all the whooshing going on?

> Even if the door should let go, unless the fuselage breaks in a half
> (and then you would not have to worry about oxygen), it will take a
> while to loose all pressurization,

How long does it take with a 5 by 6' hole in the roof? Will it matter whether the
hole is up front or back aft? Will you have time to lean down and kiss your a.s Aloha?

But like I said in an earlier post, if you have a major loss of pressure the extra N2
probably isn't going to be your biggest concern.

Signature

Steve

The above can be construed as personal opinion in the absence of a reasonable
belief that it was intended as a statement of fact.

If you want a reply to reach me, remove the SPAMTRAP from the address.

Dave L - 21 Jul 2004 18:16 GMT
> > Useful consciousness at 45000 feet is 4-5 seconds, but this is if you
> > find yourself instantly at that altitude.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Is that to say that you *always* manage it faster than 3 seconds? Are you sure it
> will be just the same with that explosion and all the whooshing going on?

g seems to think that it won't whoosh, it'll be a gentle hiss through the
missing window. It  takes "several minutes" according to him, even if two
windows go, or even more amazingly the cabin door.
In his 'plane, the 'bleed pumps' can keep up with the loss.
bwaaaahahawahwah!

> > Even if the door should let go, unless the fuselage breaks in a half
> > (and then you would not have to worry about oxygen), it will take a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> But like I said in an earlier post, if you have a major loss of pressure the extra N2
> probably isn't going to be your biggest concern.

This oughta be interesting.  ;0)

Dave.
Charlie Hammond - 21 Jul 2004 14:03 GMT
..
>To put on a Quick donning mask, pumping up to 72.5 PSI takes less than 3
>secs.

I appologize if I missed this, but what is the significance of "72.5 PSI"?

>24 hours is what is recommended by authorities, like I said that is the
>minimum for me and till now I did at least 48.

The 24 hours -- more recently 18 hours -- recommendations are based on
a MAXIMUM exposure altitide of 8000 ft.  Although it is unlikely, it is
possible that in an emergency situation the pilot of an aircraft will be
exposed to a higher altitude, and thus requrie a longer wait between
diving and flying.

>And yes we are 2 pilots.

Then it is YOUR resposibility to check the appropriate regulations.
For example, I know that the FAA _requires_ pilots to wear oxygen
masks above a certain altitude -- even in a pressurized aircraft.
Are there regs relating to PILOTING after diving? Airline or FAA?

Signature

     Charlie Hammond -- Hewlett-Packard Company -- Ft Lauderdale  FL  USA
         (hammond@not@peek.ssr.hp.com -- remove "@not" when replying)
     All opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily my employer's.

Dave L - 21 Jul 2004 18:16 GMT
> ..
> >To put on a Quick donning mask, pumping up to 72.5 PSI takes less than 3
> >secs.
>
> I appologize if I missed this, but what is the significance of "72.5 PSI"?

None really. Somebody asked if it was high or low pressure coming to the
mask. The working pressure on most masks in bizjets is somewhere between
60-80psi, iirc. Steve was correct though, it will basically be fed at
ambient pressure regardless.

> >24 hours is what is recommended by authorities, like I said that is the
> >minimum for me and till now I did at least 48.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> exposed to a higher altitude, and thus requrie a longer wait between
> diving and flying.

I'm too lazy, so I was wondering if anyone knows off the top of their heads
what standard pressure is at 45,000ft, converted to 'atmosphere's'? I
remember that 29.92" is approximately 14.7psi, but that's about it. I'm
wondering how decompression in an aircraft compares *in reality* with a
diving decompression incident.

> >And yes we are 2 pilots.
>
> Then it is YOUR resposibility to check the appropriate regulations.
> For example, I know that the FAA _requires_ pilots to wear oxygen
> masks above a certain altitude -- even in a pressurized aircraft.
> Are there regs relating to PILOTING after diving? Airline or FAA?

I'm not aware that the FAA hsa ever addressed the issue of flight
crewmwmbers and diving, but the wearing of O2 mask regs *certainly* don't
take that into consideration. Unless the regs have changed since I last flew
(which is entirely possible) when our bud flies at 450 he or his other
crewmember is required to wear a mask at all times, ie, obove 410. Between
350 and 410, one is only required to be actually *wearing* their mask if the
other crewmember leaves his station.

Dave.
Charlie Hammond - 21 Jul 2004 19:20 GMT
>I'm too lazy, so I was wondering if anyone knows off the top of their heads
>what standard pressure is at 45,000ft...

There's is a kinda neat chart at http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/25_462.html

From that:

       Sea Level - 14.696 psi
       10,00 ft -- 10.1
       20,00 ft -- 6.78
       30,00 ft -- 4.37
       40,00 ft -- 2.73
       45,00 ft -- 2.14

2.14:14.696 works out to be 1:6.87.
This is equivalent to the ratio of the surface to about 176 fsw.
If you're saturated with N2 at surface pressure, then, oxygen or no,
you can expect to get bent at 45,000 ft if you don't get to a higher
pressure (lower pressure altitude) quickly.  (Among other problems.)

Using a ratio of 1:3, about 25,000 feet is as high as you'd like to
go if you want to avoid bends.   And if you have MORE N2 that surface
saturation, you'd better stay lower.

Another point of reference -- Mt Everest is just a bit under 30,000 ft;
it is possible to climb Mt Everest without suplimental oxygen.
I would expect that a pilot at around 30,000 feet could continue
to function at ambient (outside) air pressure for a reasonable
period of time.  So the FAA seems reasonably in line on this.

..
>crewmember is required to wear a mask at all times, ie, obove 410. Between
>350 and 410, one is only required to be actually *wearing* their mask if the
>other crewmember leaves his station.

Signature

     Charlie Hammond -- Hewlett-Packard Company -- Ft Lauderdale  FL  USA
         (hammond@not@peek.ssr.hp.com -- remove "@not" when replying)
     All opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily my employer's.

chilly - 21 Jul 2004 20:13 GMT
> In article <QxxLc.119660$OB3.7246@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
(snip)> If you're saturated with N2 at surface pressure, then, oxygen or no,
> you can expect to get bent at 45,000 ft if you don't get to a higher
> pressure (lower pressure altitude) quickly.  (Among other problems.)

Ah, there we go, back on track.  Phew.
Steve - 22 Jul 2004 03:55 GMT
> There's is a kinda neat chart at http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/25_462.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> 2.14:14.696 works out to be 1:6.87

A simple rule of thumb I've used is that the pressure drops a bit over 3% with each
additional 1000 feet of altitude. It's not 3% of sea level pressure each time, but 3%
of the current pressure, ie, pressure at 10,000 is about 97% of pressure at 9000. If
you remember that it's actually closer to 3.5% it works quite well to altitudes at
which you can out your feet on the ground. Not perfect, but something you might
actually remember off the top of your head.

> Another point of reference -- Mt Everest is just a bit under 30,000 ft;
> it is possible to climb Mt Everest without suplimental oxygen.
> I would expect that a pilot at around 30,000 feet could continue
> to function at ambient (outside) air pressure for a reasonable
> period of time.

If that pilot had just spent a couple of weeks at 20k feet becoming acclimated you'd
have a good point. A climber that flew into base camp from even 10k feet wouldn't
have a prayer of functioning at 30k the following morning. A pilot that's acclimated
to an altitude that's close to sea level can expect a very short period of uesful
consciousness when suddenly exposed to ambient pressure at 30k.

Signature

Steve

The above can be construed as personal opinion in the absence of a reasonable
belief that it was intended as a statement of fact.

If you want a reply to reach me, remove the SPAMTRAP from the address.

Dave L - 23 Jul 2004 15:33 GMT
> >I'm too lazy, so I was wondering if anyone knows off the top of their heads
> >what standard pressure is at 45,000ft...
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> you can expect to get bent at 45,000 ft if you don't get to a higher
> pressure (lower pressure altitude) quickly.  (Among other problems.)

Thatnks, that is exactly what I was trying to get at. I only remembered
approximate numbers up to about 20,000 and that it levels off quite a bit
the higher you go.

> Using a ratio of 1:3, about 25,000 feet is as high as you'd like to
> go if you want to avoid bends.   And if you have MORE N2 that surface
> saturation, you'd better stay lower.
>
> Another point of reference -- Mt Everest is just a bit under 30,000 ft;
> it is possible to climb Mt Everest without suplimental oxygen.

Not for the average person. The climbers who climb even close to those
altitudes without suplemental O2 spend weeks aclimatising. They climb up,
then descend again just for that sole purpose.

> I would expect that a pilot at around 30,000 feet could continue
> to function at ambient (outside) air pressure for a reasonable
> period of time.  So the FAA seems reasonably in line on this.

Again, I don't recall the numbers for time of useful consciousness at
different altitudes, but I suspect that going from 6 or 8k to 30 in a matter
of seconds is actually quite debilitating, should you not get the mask on
fairly quickly. Certainly, at the higher alt's, (high 30's and lower 40's)
it is in the few second range.
> ..
> >crewmember is required to wear a mask at all times, ie, obove 410. Between
> >350 and 410, one is only required to be actually *wearing* their mask if the
> >other crewmember leaves his station.

Dave.
Steve - 22 Jul 2004 03:53 GMT
> None really. Somebody asked if it was high or low pressure coming to the
> mask. The working pressure on most masks in bizjets is somewhere between
> 60-80psi, iirc. Steve was correct though, it will basically be fed at
> ambient pressure regardless.

I'm just making an assumption here, but isn't it a demand valve? That makes it
essentially similar to a SCUBA regulator, except that the intermediate pressure is
apparently only about half as much. One might wonder why that presure was pointed out
in the first place, since all you really need is 14.8 at a suitably high flow rate.

> I'm too lazy, so I was wondering if anyone knows off the top of their heads
> what standard pressure is at 45,000ft, converted to 'atmosphere's'?

Charlie's chart may be 100% accurate, but above 10k it increases in increments of 5k,
leaving you to interpolate if you want values for other altitudes. As long as you're
gonna do math anyway, a fairly accurate approximation is .965 raised to the power of
the altitude in 1000's of feet. 10K = .965^10 = .700 ATA, vs the .687 from the
chart(indirectly, since ATA isn't one of the listings). In scientific mode the
calculator that comes with Windows will be happy to do the math for you.

Signature

Steve

The above can be construed as personal opinion in the absence of a reasonable
belief that it was intended as a statement of fact.

If you want a reply to reach me, remove the SPAMTRAP from the address.

Charlie Hammond - 22 Jul 2004 14:15 GMT
>I'm just making an assumption here, but isn't it a demand valve? ...

I believe that constant flow devices are used.
In some cases nasal canulas are used.
(I've probably miss-spelled "canula"; my spell-checkrer is not helpful.)

Signature

     Charlie Hammond -- Hewlett-Packard Company -- Ft Lauderdale  FL  USA
         (hammond@not@peek.ssr.hp.com -- remove "@not" when replying)
     All opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily my employer's.

Dave L - 23 Jul 2004 15:33 GMT
> > None really. Somebody asked if it was high or low pressure coming to the
> > mask. The working pressure on most masks in bizjets is somewhere between
> > 60-80psi, iirc. Steve was correct though, it will basically be fed at
> > ambient pressure regardless.
>
> I'm just making an assumption here, but isn't it a demand valve?

In the a/c I used to fly I believe the crew mask was demand and the pax
masks were constant flow..

That makes it
> essentially similar to a SCUBA regulator, except that the intermediate pressure is
> apparently only about half as much. One might wonder why that presure was pointed out
> in the first place, since all you really need is 14.8 at a suitably high flow rate.

Well, somebody asked if high the supply was high pressure, and I fell into
the trap of providing the intermediate pressure, which you quickly and
correctly noted was irrelevant.

> > I'm too lazy, so I was wondering if anyone knows off the top of their heads
> > what standard pressure is at 45,000ft, converted to 'atmosphere's'?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> chart(indirectly, since ATA isn't one of the listings). In scientific mode the
> calculator that comes with Windows will be happy to do the math for you.

Yeah, that's what I was asking. I wondered how the changes equated to the
units we are familiar with for diving.

Dave.
Dave L - 21 Jul 2004 18:16 GMT
> >>>Well I'm a professional pilot and a new diver.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >>situation . . . well, they didn't exactly find themselves.  The crash
> >>investigators found them (as I recall).  Turns out it was a combination of
a
> >>slow leak and a malfunctioning alarm.  They just went to sleep, never to
> >>awaken.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Nice to hear that you know me so well to judge what I know and what I
> don't, unfortunately I don't recall meeting you.

You didn't have to. I was judging by your post, not that it was very
specific.

> Useful consciousness at 45000 feet is 4-5 seconds, but this is if you
> find yourself instantly at that altitude.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> To put on a Quick donning mask, pumping up to 72.5 PSI takes less than 3
> secs.

I've done it many times. It takes about 3 seconds when you're sitting there
thinking, "I'm going to put my mask on now".

> If you loose 1 or 2 windows,given the cabin volume and the fact that the
> bleeds are still pumping air it will take 5 minutes or maybe more for
> the cabin to reach 45000 feet.

I guess a lot of variables are involved, most considerably being the cabin
volume and the size of the window.....but in general terms, I disagree. I
think losing a window in a small bizjet at 450 would take a few seconds, not
a few minutes to almost completely depressurize.

> By that time you will already be at 10000' or less (3 min).
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> (and then you would not have to worry about oxygen), it will take a
> while to loose all pressurization,

I disagree. I think you'd be busy wondering wtf just happened while spilling
yer hot coffee on yer nuts, panicking over all the alarms that just went off
and trying to grab yer mask before you blacked out. But that's just my
opinion.
I'm glad to hear that in your world when your cabin door disappears you have
several minutes to do your emegency descent, read the checklist and serve
the pax another scotch and water while ur at it.

> 24 hours is what is recommended by authorities, like I said that is the
> minimum for me and till now I did at least 48.

Prolly the smartest thing you've said.

Dave.
Charlie Hammond - 21 Jul 2004 18:54 GMT
>> To put on a Quick donning mask, pumping up to 72.5 PSI takes less than 3
>> secs.
>
>I've done it many times. It takes about 3 seconds when you're sitting there
>thinking, "I'm going to put my mask on now".

Two problems:

(1) It takes LONGER than 3 seconds when your not sitting there
ready to put on the mask asap -- and you won't be, becuase your
flying the airplane.

(2) 3 seconds is too long.  In an emergence you need to aviate *NOW*.

Signature

     Charlie Hammond -- Hewlett-Packard Company -- Ft Lauderdale  FL  USA
         (hammond@not@peek.ssr.hp.com -- remove "@not" when replying)
     All opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily my employer's.

Dave L - 23 Jul 2004 15:33 GMT
> >> To put on a Quick donning mask, pumping up to 72.5 PSI takes less than 3
> >> secs.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> ready to put on the mask asap -- and you won't be, becuase your
> flying the airplane.

Absolutely, that was the point I was trying to make.

> (2) 3 seconds is too long.  In an emergence you need to aviate *NOW*.

Actually that is good advice for a student pilot. Aviate, navigate,
communicate. Problem is, when ur at 450 and you depressurize, you have about
4-5 seconds before you black out.....so putting the mask on becomes job #1.
Period.

Dave.
Charlie Hammond - 26 Jul 2004 14:58 GMT
>         ... Problem is, when ur at 450 and you depressurize, you have about
>4-5 seconds before you black out.....so putting the mask on becomes job #1.
>Period.

Not if you already HAVE it on -- as required.

Signature

     Charlie Hammond -- Hewlett-Packard Company -- Ft Lauderdale  FL  USA
         (hammond@not@peek.ssr.hp.com -- remove "@not" when replying)
     All opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily my employer's.

Dave L - 26 Jul 2004 20:01 GMT
> >         ... Problem is, when ur at 450 and you depressurize, you have about
> >4-5 seconds before you black out.....so putting the mask on becomes job #1.
> >Period.
>
> Not if you already HAVE it on -- as required.

One of the crewmembers is required to be wearing the mask. That is in
gabriels world. When I flew, *always* at 410 or below,  it was not required
at all. THEN it becomes job #1.

Dave.
Dave L - 21 Jul 2004 18:16 GMT
> > Yeah, it was Payne Stewarts Lear 35. I was saving that example for a
> > question later. I have a feeling our friend isn't quite as familiar with the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Nice to hear that you know me so well to judge what I know and what I
> don't, unfortunately I don't recall meeting you.

If you'd met me, you'd remember!
Are you done pissing and whining now?

> And yes we are 2 pilots.

Thank God!

Dave.
DrYak - 22 Jul 2004 01:28 GMT
Gabreile,

I'm glad that you like diving enough to want to do it so much.

The flying after diving is clearly not a settled issue. There are lots
of unknowns.  If you check Divers Alert Network or talk to a dive
physician they will tell you this.  The 24 hours is based on gradual
decompression, not sudden.  There's a difference between opening a beer
or soda quickly and slowly.  You're the quick version.  Getting oxygen
in a mask in 2-3 seconds is great, but will it get the pressure in your
lungs back to sea level?

Well, at 30,000 feet that too could be fatal.  It's not only the oxygen,
it's the pressure.  I can get bent (and fatally going from 200 feet to
10 feet under the surface) without anything like the pressure changes
you're talking about.

If you want to take your own chances (as we all do when we dive) that is
one thing.  I go diving and fly after 24+ hours, but if something goes
wrong I am the only hurt because I'm not the pilot.

The FAA says as a pilot you can't have a drink within 24 hours of
flying.  Do they have any rules about diving and flying?

To paraphrase something about flying, my goal is not to be the best
diver.  I want to be the oldest diver.

Very seriously.  We've all made some suggestions.  You need to find some
real expert opinions in dive and flight medicine.  Calling DAN (you
don't need to be a member) is a good, professional start.  If you have
to pay for some of the advice, it could turn out to be money well spent.
 Call the Air Force Academy and see if they don't have someone there
who knows something about this who will talk to you.  Or call the Naval
Academy.
gabriele - 22 Jul 2004 09:56 GMT
> Gabreile,
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> knows something about this who will talk to you.  Or call the Naval
> Academy.

This discussion split in 2 threads:

Flying after diving:
Spoke with DAN, they say that for few repetitive recreational dives,
like you might do in one week in the Caribean, after 24-36 hours you are
back to normal, from here the depressurization problem does not have to
do with diving.

Aeronautical authorities reccomend 24 hours, one says if dive do not
require a stop then 4 hours, if deco stop then 24.

Flight operations:
Yes I agree that it will take more than 3 secs to don the mask, with the
nise, air rush, fog, and the "what the .... was that" it will probably
take between 5 and 10 secs.

Yes you have to aviate, but you have to put your mask on, somene
suggesting otherwise?
The aeroplane would be on autopilot and should remain on it, emergency
descent is done on autopilot, one type of long range biz jet have a
single switch to perform the descent automatically, others will have it
soon too.

Never said that the bleeds are going to keep up but that they will still
pump air, not doing much probably I agree.

Spoke with the manufacturer, says for loss of the door cabin takes 30
secs to depressurize, less that what I expected but still enoght to have
your mask on and be in descent.

Masks deliver at ambient or slightly over depending on pilot selection:
-Normal diluted on demand.
-100% oxy on demand
-100% oxy continuos flow.

So, depressurization at high altitude should be survivable, of course
Murphy is always around the corner but this is what we got and we have
to do our best with it.

Unfortunately I'll be away for one week without access to the newsgroup
(no diving don't worry) so I will not be able to follow up on the
thread, but I'll sure check in  at a later date.

All the best to everybody.

Gabriele (variation of Gabriel)
Dave L - 23 Jul 2004 15:33 GMT
> Aeronautical authorities reccomend 24 hours, one says if dive do not
> require a stop then 4 hours, if deco stop then 24.

Do you have a reference for that? I'm not attacking you, I am interested to
know.

> Flight operations:
> Yes I agree that it will take more than 3 secs to don the mask, with the
> nise, air rush, fog, and the "what the .... was that" it will probably
> take between 5 and 10 secs.

Better.

> Yes you have to aviate, but you have to put your mask on, somene
> suggesting otherwise?
> The aeroplane would be on autopilot and should remain on it, emergency
> descent is done on autopilot, one type of long range biz jet have a
> single switch to perform the descent automatically, others will have it
> soon too.

What are you flying? Are you type rated?  (No offense, just curious).

> Never said that the bleeds are going to keep up but that they will still
> pump air, not doing much probably I agree.

Not what you insinuated.

> Spoke with the manufacturer, says for loss of the door cabin takes 30
> secs to depressurize, less that what I expected but still enoght to have
> your mask on and be in descent.

I'm guessing you are in a rather large cabin a/c.

> Masks deliver at ambient or slightly over depending on pilot selection:
> -Normal diluted on demand.
> -100% oxy on demand
> -100% oxy continuos flow.

Depending on a/c.

> So, depressurization at high altitude should be survivable, of course
> Murphy is always around the corner but this is what we got and we have
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> All the best to everybody.

Same to you, don't be so sensitive when you get back.

Dave.
gabriele - 24 Jul 2004 14:11 GMT
Well I'm back earlier than planned, boss changed his mind.

>>Aeronautical authorities reccomend 24 hours, one says if dive do not
>>require a stop then 4 hours, if deco stop then 24.
>
> Do you have a reference for that? I'm not attacking you, I am interested to
> know.

Could not find anything exept raccomandations, I remebered Canada said
something, checked the A.I.P, sais that if dive do not require deco stop
pilot should not fly before 4 hours, if deco stop required then 24 h.

>>Flight operations:
>>Yes I agree that it will take more than 3 secs to don the mask, with the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> What are you flying? Are you type rated?  (No offense, just curious).

A Global Express, yes type rated.

>>Never said that the bleeds are going to keep up but that they will still
>>pump air, not doing much probably I agree.
>
> Not what you insinuated.

Well probaly didn't express myself well

>>Spoke with the manufacturer, says for loss of the door cabin takes 30
>>secs to depressurize, less that what I expected but still enoght to have
>>your mask on and be in descent.
>
> I'm guessing you are in a rather large cabin a/c.

Yes quite largest cabin for Business Jets, next step up would Boeing or
Airbus

>>Masks deliver at ambient or slightly over depending on pilot selection:
>>-Normal diluted on demand.
>>-100% oxy on demand
>>-100% oxy continuos flow.
>
> Depending on a/c.

I can talk only about the aircraft I know.

>>So, depressurization at high altitude should be survivable, of course
>>Murphy is always around the corner but this is what we got and we have
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Same to you, don't be so sensitive when you get back.

I came here to give my opinion and hear other's. I felt you were judging
my knoledge and saying I was doing something dangerous.

> Dave.

Gabriele
Dave L - 26 Jul 2004 19:51 GMT
> Well I'm back earlier than planned, boss changed his mind.
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> something, checked the A.I.P, sais that if dive do not require deco stop
> pilot should not fly before 4 hours, if deco stop required then 24 h.

Transport Canada told you that? I'd be amazed.
You fly out of canada?

> >>Flight operations:
> >>Yes I agree that it will take more than 3 secs to don the mask, with the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> A Global Express, yes type rated.

Nice. you should know more about your a/c. though.

> >>Never said that the bleeds are going to keep up but that they will still
> >>pump air, not doing much probably I agree.
> >
> > Not what you insinuated.
>
> Well probaly didn't express myself well

you said,
> If you loose 1 or 2 windows,given the cabin volume and the fact that the
> bleeds are still pumping air it will take 5 minutes or maybe more for
> the cabin to reach 45000 feet.

I don't think it was an error in expressing yourself. I think what you said
was absolutely incorrect.

> >>Spoke with the manufacturer, says for loss of the door cabin takes 30
> >>secs to depressurize, less that what I expected but still enoght to have
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Yes quite largest cabin for Business Jets, next step up would Boeing or
> Airbus

Even on a GE, I'd still have guessed that explosive decompression due to
loss of cabin door would take significantly less than 30 seconds. Still, if
you say the manufacturer said so......

> >>All the best to everybody.
> >
> > Same to you, don't be so sensitive when you get back.
>
> I came here to give my opinion and hear other's. I felt you were judging
> my knoledge and saying I was doing something dangerous.

I was judging your knowledge by the content of your posts.

Dave.
gabriele - 26 Jul 2004 20:51 GMT
> Transport Canada told you that? I'd be amazed.
> You fly out of canada?

They didn't tell me, is in the A.I P.

>>A Global Express, yes type rated.
>>
>>Well probaly didn't express myself well
>  
> I don't think it was an error in expressing yourself. I think what you said
> was absolutely incorrect.

 > Even on a GE, I'd still have guessed that explosive decompression due to
> loss of cabin door would take significantly less than 30 seconds. Still, if
> you say the manufacturer said so......

> I was judging your knowledge by the content of your posts.
>
> Dave.

Whatever.

Take care.

Gabriele
Dave L - 23 Jul 2004 15:33 GMT
> Gabreile,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> 10 feet under the surface) without anything like the pressure changes
> you're talking about.

Exactly.

> If you want to take your own chances (as we all do when we dive) that is
> one thing.  I go diving and fly after 24+ hours, but if something goes
> wrong I am the only hurt because I'm not the pilot.

uh-huh!

> The FAA says as a pilot you can't have a drink within 24 hours of
> flying.  Do they have any rules about diving and flying?

I don't recall any. I will look when I get the time.

> To paraphrase something about flying, my goal is not to be the best
> diver.  I want to be the oldest diver.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> who knows something about this who will talk to you.  Or call the Naval
> Academy.

All well said.

Dave.
Dave L - 20 Jul 2004 15:51 GMT
> It wasn't all that long ago that a crew found themselves in a similar
> situation . . . well, they didn't exactly find themselves.  The crash
> investigators found them (as I recall).  Turns out it was a combination of a
> slow leak and a malfunctioning alarm.  They just went to sleep, never to
> awaken.

When you think about it, they were lucky........that's the way to go!  ;0)

Dave.
nobody - 20 Jul 2004 16:34 GMT
You are referring to a flight carrying a professional golfer (if I
remember correctly) which was on auto-pilot. Flight controllers couldn't
contact the pilot and the plane eventually ran out of fuel. The
supposition was that there was a very slow decompression of the cabin
and that they fell asleep.

Bart F.

>>Well I'm a professional pilot and a new diver.
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Lee
nospam@all.please.net - 08 Jul 2004 14:33 GMT
> Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
> I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.
>
> How much time do I need between my dives and getting back home on my
> return flight?

http://www.diversalertnetwork.org/medical/faq/faq.asp?faqid=54
Adam Helberg - 08 Jul 2004 15:58 GMT
> > Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
> > I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.diversalertnetwork.org/medical/faq/faq.asp?faqid=54

Best answer.
SFM - 08 Jul 2004 14:53 GMT
There has been several updates and if you are not sure you should be going
to your local dive shop and take a scuba refresher course.

Scott

Signature

------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott F. Migaldi, K9PO
MI-150972
PP-ASEL-IA

Are you a PADI Instructor or DM? Then join the PADI
Instructor Yahoo Group at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PADI-Instructors/join
-----------------------------------
Catch the wave!
www.hamwave.com

**"A long time ago being crazy meant something, nowadays everyone is
crazy" -- Charles Manson**

>
> Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Sy
Brian Nadwidny - 08 Jul 2004 17:48 GMT
> Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
> I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Any comments will be appreciated.

Well you need to have time to get to the airport, check in, stuff like
that.

That about covers it unless you want to have time to get something to
eat as well.

Brian
Edmonton, Alberta
Scott - 08 Jul 2004 22:17 GMT
> > Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
> > I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> That about covers it unless you want to have time to get something to
> eat as well.

Lets not omit the lounge.
Edward Watson - 08 Jul 2004 23:05 GMT
The message <10ere4e47kudv40@corp.supernews.com>
from "Scott" <pugetsounddiver@gmail.com> contains these words:

> > that.
> >
> > That about covers it unless you want to have time to get something to
> > eat as well.

> Lets not omit the lounge.

Nah, it's simpler just to fly Logan Air/British Airways, that way
there's not a hope you're going to take-off within a couple of hours of
schedule anyhow - at least not to Sumburgh, saves any worrying about
intervals
Brian Nadwidny - 09 Jul 2004 02:14 GMT
> Nah, it's simpler just to fly Logan Air/British Airways, that way
> there's not a hope you're going to take-off within a couple of hours of
> schedule anyhow - at least not to Sumburgh, saves any worrying about
> intervals

Gotta love Logan Air/BA. I can't imagine too many other airlines that
would make me fly from Kirkwall to Sumburgh so that I can connect to my
flight from Sumburgh to Kirkwall.

What's even funnier is that I spent 3 hours in Kirkwall waiting for
Sumburgh to clear up so I could fly from Kirkwall to Sumburgh and then
to Kirkwall.

Brian
Edmonton, Alberta
www.mossmanscuba.com
Alan Street - 09 Jul 2004 00:30 GMT
> > > Just to refresh my memory, I will be taking some "refresher dives" when
> > > I'm in Miami Beach next month.  I'll probably do it one afternoon.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Lets not omit the lounge.

Definately, although you have to fly internationally to get the one
with free booze :-)
Brian Nadwidny - 09 Jul 2004 02:09 GMT
> Lets not omit the lounge.

Absolutely. I can't believe I forgot to allow for that. Making time for
the lounge is of utmost importance.

Brian
Edmonton, Alberta
Scott - 09 Jul 2004 02:54 GMT
> > Lets not omit the lounge.
>
> Absolutely. I can't believe I forgot to allow for that. Making time for
> the lounge is of utmost importance.

Task saturation, clear as a Bell jar. To Us, its a no mention prerogative.

I knew you were there Bra, just had to give you that Brotherly elbow to the
ribs.

Speaking of which;

Get off your lumps and come visit.

You need to come here.

Let me show you around, and let Us Bless You with that unspoken commodity.

Have I burned you yet?
Brian Nadwidny - 09 Jul 2004 03:51 GMT
> Speaking of which;
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Let me show you around, and let Us Bless You with that unspoken commodity.

Gotta be next year. Nothing on my schedule for the Wet Coast until late
next spring. I was hoping to make a sidetrip when I went to Nanaimo last
month but I had no extra time.

If I come can we shoot guns?

> Have I burned you yet?

Nope.

Brian
Edmonton, Alberta
Scott - 09 Jul 2004 05:40 GMT
> > Speaking of which;
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> next spring. I was hoping to make a sidetrip when I went to Nanaimo last
> month but I had no extra time.

Brother; if you have the time, I have the crime.

I already spoke to the Old Man about you, in particular and exclusive, and
we'll hook you up.

> If I come can we shoot guns?

Absolutely.

We will wear you out just loading mags.

But, your ears wont ring.

=;-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.