> Has there ever been a thread here so one sided?
>
> Will no one go to this poor bastard's aid? (Where's Mike Kane when we
> really need him?)
>
> Lee? Yer champion of the underdog, go help him out.
I killfiled him almost instantly, but had to let him out so I could pound
him proper.
Does that count?
mike gray - 21 May 2004 03:56 GMT
>> Has there ever been a thread here so one sided?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Does that count?
No. That's too easy.
> Has there ever been a thread here so one sided?
>
> Will no one go to this poor bastard's aid? (Where's Mike Kane when we
> really need him?)
>
> Lee? Yer champion of the underdog, go help him out.
OK, I'll take the underdog's side.
SNUBA really does have several advantages that have been overlooked in these
threads:
1. It allows those too lazy or too stupid to learn how to dive the right
way, to interact with the undersea realm more fully.
2. It prevents users from trashing the environment below about 20 feet,
keeping them in a portion of the water column where few of us spend much
time.
3. It has the potential for adding chlorine to the gene pool, removing those
least able to survive on their own and most likely to become a burden on the
rest of us.
4. It makes bodies easier and safer to find. They are marked with a large
floating device. It provides a means to reel them in from the surface
without actually having to go down and get their remains . . . provided you
do it soon enough after an accident.
5. If you don't do it soon after an accident, it provides an alternative
means of keeping the water's clean. Sharks and other marine creatures are
used to finding food at the end of lines. In time, sharks may begin to
associate hookahs and lines with food instead of hooks and lines, a hidden
advantage to those who fish, but not for sharks.
6. No matter what they do, the system does not lead to sharks associating
divers or snorkelers with food. Those using SNUBA are clearly neither.
How's that?
Lee
mike gray - 21 May 2004 14:24 GMT
>> Has there ever been a thread here so one sided?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Lee
If Chris had said that, we'd all love him!
TonyP - 21 May 2004 15:20 GMT
>>Has there ever been a thread here so one sided?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> How's that?
Priceless!
Dillon Pyron - 21 May 2004 16:40 GMT
>> Has there ever been a thread here so one sided?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>1. It allows those too lazy or too stupid to learn how to dive the right
>way, to interact with the undersea realm more fully.
Then where do those "helmet" "dives" fit into the picture? They don't
even have to swim. (I'm not talking about professional divers, I'm
talking about those tourist things).
>2. It prevents users from trashing the environment below about 20 feet,
>keeping them in a portion of the water column where few of us spend much
>time.
>3. It has the potential for adding chlorine to the gene pool, removing those
>least able to survive on their own and most likely to become a burden on the
>rest of us.
Unfortunately, they have most likely propagated, eliminating the
Darwim Effect.
>4. It makes bodies easier and safer to find. They are marked with a large
>floating device. It provides a means to reel them in from the surface
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>6. No matter what they do, the system does not lead to sharks associating
>divers or snorkelers with food. Those using SNUBA are clearly neither.
The neat thing about SNUBA is that someone else can use up "your" air.
>How's that?
>
>Lee

Signature
dillon
When I was a kid, I thought the angel's name was Hark
and the horse's name was Bob.