Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / General / April 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Chamber Challeneg Update

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ken Kurtis - 07 Apr 2004 22:41 GMT
And . . . they're off!!!!!!

Chamber Day/Eve is exactly four weeks from today (May 5) and the Catalina
Chamber Challenge is already off to a good start, with a total of $6850 as of
today. (In case you're wondering, last year at this timed we were at $7500.)
However, we've got a long way to go, especially if we'd like to exceed last
year's total of $18,825. But it's doable, especially if you pitch in to help.

As you hopefully know, a hyperbaric chamber is the only way to treat diving
pressure injuries and our Catalina Hyperbaric Chamber stands as a needed
emergency lifeline for SoCal divers on a 24/7/366 (don't forget that this is a
Leap Year) basis. Unfortunately, the Chamber is not self-sustaining and relies
partially on a grant from Los Angeles County (which covers about one-thrird of
the yearly expenses) and must raise the rest of their own. That's where Chamber
Day, and specifically the Chamber Challenge, come in.

The monies raised here represent unrestricted funds for running the Chamber and
keeping it up-to-date with the latest technology. Your contributions will have
a direct impact not only on diver safety, but also in gaining a better
understanding of what happens to us when we go underwater and - more
importantly - how we can be better treated when something goes wrong.

We suggest a $100 donation but we're always happy to take more. Many stores are
giving $500 (Sport Chalet has made a $1000 donation) and many clubs are dipping
into their treasuries to donate as well. But whatever you can afford is
appreciated.

We'd like to take a moment to single out Kendall Raine and Sport Chalet for
each donating $1000. And we'd also like to mention Karl Huggins, Reef Seekers
Dive Co., Jim Krasne, Scuba Schools of America (Montclair), Scuba Haus, & Mom's
the Word for each kicking in $500.

The complete list of names is posted below and we encourage you to add your
name (and contribution) to the number of caring divers in SoCal who are willing
to give a bit back to make sure that we all have the Chamber as a safety net.
Call us at 310/652-4990 or do it through the secure server on our website.

So . . . WHO'S NEXT???????

Ken Kurtis
Chairman, Chamber Day/Eve 2004
www.chamberday.org
----------------------------------------------------------
CHAMBER CHALLENGE 2004
(Updated as of April 7, 2004 @ 2:30PM)

TOTAL TO DATE: $6850

GOLD SPONSORS ($1000 & UP)
Kendall Raine
Sport Chalet

SILVER SPONSORS ($500-999)
Karl Huggins
Reef Seekers Dive Co.
Jim Krasne
Scuba Schools of America (Montclair)
Scuba Haus
Mom’s the Word

BRONZE SPONSORS ($100-499)
Tony Hanna
Diver.net
Frank O’Donnell
Joe Takahashi
Douglas Dive Club
Scott Cox
Gary Romanik
Hollywoodivers
Sarasue Essenpries
Burbank Dive Club
Jeanne B. Sleeper
Marylou Quinn & JP Pylkannen
Dr. Robert Davidson
Ocean Adventures

OTHERS
Dr. Hal Frankl
Scott - 07 Apr 2004 22:47 GMT
Can you tell us, please, how the chamber has been used, and how many divers
have been treated in it?
Greg Mossman - 07 Apr 2004 23:33 GMT
> Can you tell us, please, how the chamber has been used, and how many divers
> have been treated in it?

"The Catalina Hyperbaric Chamber is only used for diving accidents. Most
other medical hyperbaric chambers in this country are used for other
hyperbaric therapies and treatments such as wound healing, burns, carbon
monoxide poisoning, and other clinical applications. These clinical
treatments are the bread and butter for most chambers since diving accidents
are sporadic and, luckily, not that common."

http://wrigley.usc.edu/hyperbaric/fundinfo.htm

"Right off I should tell you that dive accidents are not legion here (or
anywhere else, for that matter). Last year 20 divers arrived at the Catalina
chamber and of those, 10 were treated. On the average the chamber sees 25 to
35 divers a year and treats about half of them."

http://www.skin-diver.com/departments/environment/diverscando.asp?theID=179
Scott - 07 Apr 2004 23:43 GMT
> > Can you tell us, please, how the chamber has been used, and how many
> divers
> > have been treated in it?

2 things;

1) I wasn't talking to you. I want the sales pitch from Ken.

2) Your credibility here, with me, is suspect at best.
Greg Mossman - 08 Apr 2004 01:32 GMT
> 1) I wasn't talking to you. I want the sales pitch from Ken.

You posted here, you were talking to me.

> 2) Your credibility here, with me, is suspect at best.

I wasn't talking to you.  Others may really care about the answer and
overlook your cheap trolling.

But I agree that the constant updates become annoying.  Once a year should
suffice.  Still, it is a public service announcement, not spam.  No one gets
any commercial benefit from the chamber.
bullshark - 07 Apr 2004 23:36 GMT
>Can you tell us, please, how the chamber has been used, and how many divers
>have been treated in it?

I'm really more interested in why the poor people of Kalifornia
cannot afford to fund their chamber.

There are chambers everywhere. Why does this one come begging
EVERY YEAR?

safe diving,

bullshark
Scott - 07 Apr 2004 23:45 GMT
> >Can you tell us, please, how the chamber has been used, and how many divers
> >have been treated in it?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> There are chambers everywhere. Why does this one come begging
> EVERY YEAR?

OK, just come bustin' on through and ruin a perfectly good set up.
Matthew Endo - 08 Apr 2004 22:24 GMT
> I'm really more interested in why the poor people of Kalifornia
> cannot afford to fund their chamber.

I suppose you haven't seen the sorry economic state of affairs Kali is
in even with the new Guv.

> There are chambers everywhere. Why does this one come begging
> EVERY YEAR?

Well, methinks that the Kalifornia one just has a very very good
organizer doing the fundraising.

P.S.  Ken, I fixed your Subject line spelling of "Challenge".

P.P.S.  "Check is in the mail" for the Flying Dutchman.  However, I
looked all over the Chamber Day and Chamber web pages, but did not see
who to make the check out to.  Finally, after downloading the PDF donor
file, it says "USC Catalina Hyperbaric Chamber".  Ken, please confirm
this is correct before I send my check.

Also, for the Flying Dutchman, why don't you sell the extra T-shirts on
Ebay?  Any additional money would help...

Signature

Matt
matt@gol.com

Matthew Endo - 10 Apr 2004 00:04 GMT
Ken Kurtis kindly replied via e-mail to me directly, so I am posting a
followup to my own post.  Here are his answers:

> P.P.S.  "Check is in the mail" for the Flying Dutchman.  However, I
> looked all over the Chamber Day and Chamber web pages, but did not see
> who to make the check out to.  Finally, after downloading the PDF donor
> file, it says "USC Catalina Hyperbaric Chamber".  Ken, please confirm
> this is correct before I send my check.

"USC Catalina Hyperbaric Chamber" is correct.

> Also, for the Flying Dutchman, why don't you sell the extra T-shirts on
> Ebay?  Any additional money would help...

Ken says that the t-shirts are exclusive to Flying Dutchman crew only,
so all you rec.scuba divers be sure to donate and get yours soon!

Signature

Matt
matt@gol.com

Scott - 10 Apr 2004 00:18 GMT
Hi Matt,

I am still waiting for someone to explain to me why I should donate my hard
earned money to a chamber on an island of well
to do people in Southern Kalifornia, to the exclusion of other facilities,
especially those located in less affluent and remote area's.

Additionally, I am waiting to hear how many divers were treated in said
chamber in the past year.
Greg Mossman - 10 Apr 2004 01:27 GMT
> I am still waiting for someone to explain to me why I should donate my hard
> earned money to a chamber on an island of well
> to do people in Southern Kalifornia, to the exclusion of other facilities,
> especially those located in less affluent and remote area's.

No one asked you for money.  They asked people with money for money.  And
some people in Southern California are as poor as some people in Washington.
If you want to start a fund-raiser for your chamber in well-off Washington,
go right ahead.

> Additionally, I am waiting to hear how many divers were treated in said
> chamber in the past year.

I already told you.  Open your ears and close your mouth.  Information will
stick better that way.
Scott - 10 Apr 2004 01:54 GMT
> No one asked you for money.

Really? Then why the f.ck is it posted here?

> They asked people with money for money.

You are an arrogant cocksucker.

My money is different green than yours?

Again, why should I aor anyone else who desont support Kens shop or dive
Catalina island support this endeavour?

> And some people in Southern California are as poor as some people in
Washington.
> If you want to start a fund-raiser for your chamber in well-off Washington,
> go right ahead.

I dont see anyone from Washington posting a "Chamber Challenge" every year
to draw business and free bucks.

We take care of our own, and we dont have to beg to do it, shitbag.

> > Additionally, I am waiting to hear how many divers were treated in said
> > chamber in the past year.
>
> I already told you.  Open your ears and close your mouth.  Information will
> stick better that way.

Thats funny, since 99% of what you post is either a bald faced lie or a self
serving lie.

*You* can kiss my a.s.

If you really want to help the chamber, you will disassociate yourself from
it.

Piss ant.
bullshark - 10 Apr 2004 19:53 GMT
>And some people in Southern California are as poor as some people in Washington.

None of them scuba dive, and none of them live on Catalina.

safe diving,

bullshark
Greg Mossman - 10 Apr 2004 20:36 GMT
> >And some people in Southern California are as poor as some people in Washington.
>
> None of them scuba dive, and none of them live on Catalina.

I know plenty of poor scuba divers - they beach dive.  And there are literal
shanties on Catalina a few blocks inland from the pretty hotels and shops of
Avalon.
bullshark - 11 Apr 2004 15:46 GMT
>I know plenty of poor scuba divers - they beach dive.  

Seriously Greg, you need to learn what "poor" is. I don't think you
know, or I missed the smiley face....

>And there are literal
>shanties on Catalina a few blocks inland from the pretty hotels and shops of
>Avalon.

...shanties on Catalina. Poor people indeed. You may not like the look
of the property Greg, but again, you need an education in "poor".

safe diving,

bullshark
Greg Mossman - 11 Apr 2004 18:45 GMT
> >I know plenty of poor scuba divers - they beach dive.
>
> Seriously Greg, you need to learn what "poor" is. I don't think you
> know, or I missed the smiley face....

Poor is relative and vague.  Are we talking below-the-poverty-line poor, or
have-to-work-two-jobs-to-make-ends-meet poor, or
can't-afford-to-spend-money-on-boat-diving poor?

> >And there are literal
> >shanties on Catalina a few blocks inland from the pretty hotels and shops of
> >Avalon.
>
> ...shanties on Catalina. Poor people indeed. You may not like the look
> of the property Greg, but again, you need an education in "poor".

I've had a few seminars on poor at the graduate level, during a year-long
course in Public Interest Law.  I grew up in the homeless capital of the
U.S.  When I say shanties, I mean shanties.  Just like the ones you used to
see in Tijuana as you headed up the mountains on the toll road before they
cleaned up the area.  Not starving-in-Ethiopia poor, but pretty f.cking poor
by U.S. standards.

Who do you think cleans up after the tourists in their hotels and washes
their dishes in the restaurants?

"The median income for a household in the city [of Avalon] is $39,327, and
the median income for a family is $46,406. Males have a median income of
$30,789 versus $24,643 for females. The per capita income for the city is
$21,032. 10.4% of the population and 9.2% of families are below the poverty
line. Out of the total people living in poverty, 11.5% are under the age of
18 and 4.6% are 65 or older."

One tenth of the residents live below the poverty line on an island where
the cost of living is probably double that on the mainland.  Where do you
think they live, luxury yachts in the harbor or beachfront mansions?  Get a
clue.
bullshark - 10 Apr 2004 20:17 GMT
>No one asked you for money.  They asked people with money for money.  And

I keep forgetting how new you are. They have asked here for money plenty of
times in the past, and so much so and with such a tone and constancy that
the "updates" as you call them are indistinguishable from a telethon begging
for pledges.

>some people in Southern California are as poor as some people in Washington.

Almost all of them are very poor, depending on what you count. How that figures
into the Catalina Chamber panhandling for support is beyond me. Where is the
Alumnus?

>If you want to start a fund-raiser for your chamber in well-off Washington,
>go right ahead.

I doubt he does, but I'm sure he would have the good sense to raise the funds
in Washington and not on the Internet.

>> Additionally, I am waiting to hear how many divers were treated in said
>> chamber in the past year.

10.

BTW Greg I'm not too keen on the site. To me it looks like a Deep Dish Apple
Pie that USC keeps open so that faculty and Alumni can go there "on business" and
probably stay for free. Whoever gets "the post" is certainly on to a honey teat.
Who knows, if USC sold the property they could probably afford to pay their other
bills, too.

I don't see any advantage to operating a chamber on Catalina. Treating "only
divers" is not just a disadvantage, it's a dumb waste of resources. The truth is, they
treat "only divers" because the other useful applications are not very economic when
the chamber is 20 miles offshore.

For bent divers, treatment on the mainland is only minutes away by helicopter.

safe diving

bullshark
Greg Mossman - 10 Apr 2004 20:53 GMT
> >No one asked you for money.  They asked people with money for money.  And
>
> I keep forgetting how new you are. They have asked here for money plenty of
> times in the past, and so much so and with such a tone and constancy that
> the "updates" as you call them are indistinguishable from a telethon begging
> for pledges.

I've been here long enough to see it happen six times now.  That's why I
suggested that one single annual post wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing.

> I doubt he does, but I'm sure he would have the good sense to raise the funds
> in Washington and not on the Internet.

That's because few outside Washington dive in Washington.  You can't say the
same about Southern California.

> BTW Greg I'm not too keen on the site. To me it looks like a Deep Dish Apple
> Pie that USC keeps open so that faculty and Alumni can go there "on business" and
> probably stay for free. Whoever gets "the post" is certainly on to a honey teat.
> Who knows, if USC sold the property they could probably afford to pay their other
> bills, too.

I don't know about faculty and alumni staying there "on business".  Believe
me, the habitations are kind of dorm-like, not the usual Four Seasons where
the alumni and faculty stay.  They're better suited to the marine biology
students and chamber volunteers.  It's hardly a "honey teat".  But that's
the USC Wrigley Marine Science Center, not the Catalina Hyperbaric Chamber.

> For bent divers, treatment on the mainland is only minutes away by helicopter.

Maybe.  But not 18 minutes away.

"Due to its proximity to the Los Angeles area, and to its excellent dive
sites, Catalina Island attracts a large number of divers each year. On any
given summer weekend day, one can look out along the coast towards the west
end of the island and see up to ten dive boats anchored. If each boat
carries 20-30 divers and each diver does 2-3 dives a day, then in a single
summer day there is the potential of 400-900 dives being done within sight
of the USC Catalina Hyperbaric Chamber. Some of the dive boats bring
Check-Out Dive trips to Isthmus Reef because the chamber is just minutes
away (the fastest response time from the time the diver hit the surface
until they were being compressed in the chamber is 18 minutes). The
proximity of the chamber to this heavy concentration of diving makes it a
valuable resource to the diving community."

Not only is the Catalina Chamber closer, which may make a difference in
saving lives, but it's staffed 24x7 by specialists in diving injuries.
bullshark - 11 Apr 2004 15:51 GMT
>Not only is the Catalina Chamber closer, which may make a difference in
>saving lives, but it's staffed 24x7 by specialists in diving injuries.

Greg,

According to the helicopter service flies to Catalina, Catalina is only
15 minutes away from the mainland. That's 3 minutes closer than the
Chamber on Catalina.

I am unimpressed with "the possibility" of your quoted, unbelievably
exaggerated numbers that assume all boats carry 30 divers doing 3 dives
from ten boats all filled to capacity.

Apparently when it comes to CATTLE BOATS, Catalina wrote the book.

I am equally unimpressed with the quality of Scuba Instruction and
supervision in California which is apparently so poor that the instructors
fear to let their students dive unless they are within sight of a Chamber.

I'm just funnin with ya, Greg.

I think you are way overblown on the dangers of DCS, and certainly on
any life-threatening aspect of it. That hyperbole you quoted off the chamber
brochure is for idiots, er, marks, um, donors to believe in. It's not that
important. For the TEN divers that were treated, it would be far more economical
to fly them by chopper to the mainland than to staff and maintain a chamber
24/7. Anyone with fiscal sense would shut that thing down in a NY minute if
it came to choosing between 10 helicopter rides or salaries and maintenance
for a chamber that isn't suitable or positioned for economic use.

If you want a chamber on Catalina I couldn't't care less. Pay for it yourself.
Ever since Prop 13, California has been at the root of financial catastrophes
throughout the country, again and again. In terms of California budget the
funding for a little chamber is minuscule and evidently the state thinks it
unnecessary.

Sinecures are part and parcel of educational institutions.
It is a silly luxury for somebody, I don't know who, but not a necessity.

safe diving,

bullshark
Greg Mossman - 11 Apr 2004 19:16 GMT
> According to the helicopter service flies to Catalina, Catalina is only
> 15 minutes away from the mainland. That's 3 minutes closer than the
> Chamber on Catalina.

It's not just the flight.  The helipad at the Chamber is a hundred feet
away.  The Chamber operators are on permanent standby for dive-related
injuries and their training is up to date.  I'd hate to be dying at some
local emergency room while the hyperbaric tech is furiously thumbing through
his manual looking for the scuba section.

> I am unimpressed with "the possibility" of your quoted, unbelievably
> exaggerated numbers that assume all boats carry 30 divers doing 3 dives
> from ten boats all filled to capacity.
> Apparently when it comes to CATTLE BOATS, Catalina wrote the book.

Oh yeah.  Some of our boats carry 40.  And they are often filled to
capacity.

Lately I've been diving off the Psalty V, a "six pac" even though it's 50'
long and has two heads and bunks and hot food for lunch.  It cruises at 17
knots.  Downside is $125 for the trip, versus cattleboats which get you
(slowly) to and from the island for $80.

> I am equally unimpressed with the quality of Scuba Instruction and
> supervision in California which is apparently so poor that the instructors
> fear to let their students dive unless they are within sight of a Chamber.

Obviously it's a bit more dangerous out here where we have real ocean water
to contend with, not the Disneyworldesque warm clear coral reefs you
Floridians suffer.

> I'm just funnin with ya, Greg.

Fun is not in my vocabulary.  I take my diving seriously.  Almost as
seriously as I take rec.scuba.

> I think you are way overblown on the dangers of DCS, and certainly on
> any life-threatening aspect of it. That hyperbole you quoted off the chamber
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> it came to choosing between 10 helicopter rides or salaries and maintenance
> for a chamber that isn't suitable or positioned for economic use.

Thankfully it's run by a university, so fiscal sense is not an issue.  How's
about, the chamber looks really cool and it's nice to brag about the fact
that we have one and the rest of the country, especially poor S. Floridians,
are jealous.

> If you want a chamber on Catalina I couldn't't care less. Pay for it yourself.
> Ever since Prop 13, California has been at the root of financial catastrophes
> throughout the country, again and again. In terms of California budget the
> funding for a little chamber is minuscule and evidently the state thinks it
> unnecessary.

California is the most important state in the U.S., hands down.  We deserve
special treatment.  Our divers deserve their own chamber.

> Sinecures are part and parcel of educational institutions.
> It is a silly luxury for somebody, I don't know who, but not a necessity.

When it's not in use, the Chamber makes a great training tool.  And did I
mention that it looks really cool?
Jack Farmer - 13 Apr 2004 09:49 GMT
>>According to the helicopter service flies to Catalina, Catalina is only
>>15 minutes away from the mainland. That's 3 minutes closer than the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Oh yeah.  Some of our boats carry 40.  And they are often filled to
> capacity.

Psalty is a good boat. Wife and i took her on a 2 day charter one time.
Lot's of fun and great crew. Tell gary hi for me next time ya see him
and i miss the scuba pup they had.

> Lately I've been diving off the Psalty V, a "six pac" even though it's 50'
> long and has two heads and bunks and hot food for lunch.  It cruises at 17
[quoted text clipped - 66 lines]
> When it's not in use, the Chamber makes a great training tool.  And did I
> mention that it looks really cool?
Dan Bracuk - 10 Apr 2004 03:33 GMT
"Scott" <scottk@localaxess.com> pounded away at his keyboard resulting
in:
:I am still waiting for someone to explain to me why I should donate my hard
:earned money to a chamber on an island of well
:to do people in Southern Kalifornia, to the exclusion of other facilities,
:especially those located in less affluent and remote area's.

Whether to donate to charity, how much, to which charity, and the
reasons behind those descisions are entirely up to the donor,

Dan Bracuk
If at first you don't succeed, you run the risk of failure.
The Best of rec.scuba http://www.pathcom.com/~bracuk/RecScuba/
Matthew Endo - 10 Apr 2004 04:44 GMT
> I am still waiting for someone to explain to me why I should donate my hard
> earned money to a chamber on an island of well
> to do people in Southern Kalifornia, to the exclusion of other facilities,
> especially those located in less affluent and remote area's.

Probably the reason is that the Chamber Day is an annual event and they
have a well organized committee with Ken Kurtis.

I think the biggest factor for me to donate started a few years ago when
Mike Kane ponied up 10 grand of his own money to match contributions
from our fellow rec.scuba community.  Since then, I guess I just
contribute when I feel like it rather than every year since I don't dive
So. Kal much any more.  And, it always hurts a little to give money to a
crosstown rival USC... (remind me to support Reef Check at UCLA)

> Additionally, I am waiting to hear how many divers were treated in said
> chamber in the past year.

Yes, that would be some interesting information.  I think that Greg
posted some info on that.

Actually, Ken tends to send e-mail replies instead of posting to the
newsgroup, so if you want a response from him, maybe you should send a
courtesy copy via e-mail.  I can't send e-mail copies due to the
configuration of my mail server.

Signature

Matt
matt@gol.com

bullshark - 10 Apr 2004 20:17 GMT
>I think the biggest factor for me to donate started a few years ago when
>Mike Kane ponied up 10 grand of his own money to match contributions

What makes you think it was *his* money?

Sweet child, you just don't know how things work do you?
Matthew Endo - 11 Apr 2004 04:25 GMT
> >I think the biggest factor for me to donate started a few years ago when
> >Mike Kane ponied up 10 grand of his own money to match contributions
>
> What makes you think it was *his* money?

Ooh, details, details!

> Sweet child, you just don't know how things work do you?

I'm willing to be educated...

Signature

Matt
matt@gol.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.