"Ed" <SpammerdontbotherEd.Bell@NOSPAM.invalid> > the plane could have
shifted wouldn't take much with that surface
> area, but it could also be scour marks from current
If there's that much current, she would have "flown" and been torn to bits-
especially considering the advanced age of any likely airframe of that
dimension.
I have seen evidence of many "placed airplane wrecks" doing this.
The easiest one to relate to, and most known by divers was the DC3 at
CoCoView. That placement was botched by an eager but inept neighboring
property that simply plopped it into 30fsw that has occasional storm
currents. She was placed nose up and into the potential heavy current. It
arrived ultimately- now she lays in pieces, moved 60' and turned 90 degrees.
Once- at another location- I even saw a UW 'flight' in person. whoooeeeeeee.
doc.
Ed schrieb:
> >What about the professional opinion of someone who uses sidescan sonar
> >as a part of his professional activity?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> can then figure out approx size of the object and height above the
> bottom (from shadow)
There may be reasons for this, same as for the line shown on the right
side. I have seen similar lines at archeologocal sites.
> the starboard wing has shadow on both leading and trailing edge
> I'm trying to figure out where the fish would have to be placed to
> create that shadow, AND keep in mind the rest of the shadows.
> Acoustic shadows are perpendicular to the transducer face and should
> be consistent in regards to orientation
I have seen shadows, and even signal traces in areas which were shadowed
to the signal. Maybe some sort of echo signals.
> note: a depression will display a shadow , current can create
> turbulence at an object and dig a depression in front of the object,
> which will create an acoustic shadow, though the shadow seems to be
> too even .. it's not what I would expect, but image interpretation is
> as much voodoo as science :^)
May an overlaying deflection of a thermocline, or something else.
> image id and date are mucked with in the upper left hand corner
> I get 24/12/0(?) looks like a 03 the text before is ? seems to be WTCH
> ... (?)
Wndehi?ner e 24/12/03 / my guess. May PGP ;-)
> I could be a sidescan image from a long range unit (freq 100 khz or
> less) with the fish held high and the target is at the far edge of
> the field ... it does look like there was some image manipulation to
> degrade the image, and the obscuring of the id tag
My opinion as well.
Matthias
rnf2 - 07 Mar 2004 18:44 GMT
> > image id and date are mucked with in the upper left hand corner
> > I get 24/12/0(?) looks like a 03 the text before is ? seems to be WTCH
> > ... (?)
>
> Wndehi?ner e 24/12/03 / my guess. May PGP ;-)
Go look in uk.rec.scuba for the name... can't remember it, but it's the
location of the Shorts plane factory.
> > I could be a sidescan image from a long range unit (freq 100 khz or
> > less) with the fish held high and the target is at the far edge of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Matthias