Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
ArticlesDiving DestinationsLearning Scuba DivingMarine LifeMiscellaneous
Discussion GroupsGeneralScuba EquipmentScuba LocationsAustralian ScubaUK Scuba
DirectoryScuba Clubs

Scuba Forum / Scuba Equipment / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Camera and underwater housing choices

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
philip_amswych@lineone.net - 21 Dec 2005 17:25 GMT
Hello - am looking for a little impartial advice at this time of
seasonal good will.

Here's the scenario - currently have a barely used MMII Ex with strobe,
wide angle etc. Kind of like the idea of U/w photography but not an
expert and only get diving 2x a year max.
More importantly I'm looking to upgade my digicam and thought to kill
two birds with one stone.

Am seriously tempted by the Minolta Dimage A200 which gets good good
reviews and has loads of flexibility (8megapixels and 7x optic zoom).
Certainly would do for my land-side needs! However when it comes to u/w
it seems to have only ewa-marine housing available (certified to 30m /
100feet) rather than an ikelite or proprietary solid housing.

So who out there has experiences of ewa-marine casings - maybe just a
psychological thing but the ikelite type housing does give a more
secure feeling - watertightness, ease of use on controls etc.

As an alternative I could go for Olympus SP350 with the propietary
PT-030.

Thanks
Dan Bracuk - 22 Dec 2005 00:57 GMT
philip_amswych@lineone.net pounded away at his keyboard resulting in:

:As an alternative I could go for Olympus SP350 with the propietary
:PT-030.

Good idea.

Dan Bracuk
If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure.
philip_amswych@lineone.net - 23 Dec 2005 11:03 GMT
Hi Dan,

Thanks for feedback; it sways me in that direction of course but until
I get some responses from someone that can give me some feedback on ewa
bags, I'll stay neutral. Thanks again and seasons greetings!
Richard Faulkner - 22 Dec 2005 02:20 GMT
>Hello - am looking for a little impartial advice at this time of
>seasonal good will.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>Thanks

Canon, Fuji, Sony, Olympus - all seem to have cameras with solid
housings. Why consider one which doesnt?

I have a Canon ixus 400 with its' housing - works a treat.

One of the dive guides on a recent liveaboard had an older digicam which
took only about 3Mb pics, and he had some incredible photos.

Signature

Richard Faulkner

philip_amswych@lineone.net - 23 Dec 2005 11:06 GMT
Hi Richard,

I guess it's 'cos I'm suckered into thinking that the a200, Fuji9500
type cameras give me more options on land and that's where I'll
primarily do majority of photo work - but you may be right and I'm
keeping options open.

Thanks for response and Season's Greetings

Philip
Richard Faulkner - 23 Dec 2005 12:36 GMT
>Hi Richard,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Philip

I have only done about 65 dives, mostly in the Red Sea, and have never
seen anyone using a bag of any kind for their camera - always the solid
plastic cases.

Why not have a separate camera for diving? I got an Ixus 500 from Canon
on Ebay for a friend for £170 about 12 months ago, (so probably cheaper
now), and a housing for about £80 IIRC.

Signature

Richard Faulkner

philip_amswych@lineone.net - 23 Dec 2005 11:12 GMT
Hi Ray,

Thanks for feedback; is your answer based on personal experience? My
normal diving (on nitrox) would keep me within the limits you mention
but I understand what you're saying. Is the secret of this to have lots
of air in bag on surface before the dive?

Anyway still keeping an open mind,

Season's Greetings

Philip
RayC - 23 Dec 2005 19:36 GMT
> Hi Ray,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Philip

I sold a lot of these when I had a store and had to explain
to every customer that the bag is rated to take the pressure
of the 100 foot depth ... not necessarily so the camera.

And as far as filling the bag up with air before the dive,
well, that's like diving with a soccer ball!  Hard to
submerge, hard to handle in the shallows, hard to get at
controls until compressed ... just plain miserable!

No, the Ewa bag is best used for surface water sports and
snorkeling.

Signature

Ray Contreras
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Webmonkey for:
http://www.ossystems.com
http://www.bobs-garage.com
http://www.clanwolverine.org
http://www.rayzplace.com

RayC - 23 Dec 2005 07:31 GMT
> Hello - am looking for a little impartial advice at this time of
> seasonal good will.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Thanks

While the EWA bag is tested to 100', it gets sucked down to
the camera body so hard that it can sometimes push buttons
on it's own.  It is really more functional in 30' or shallower.

Just my $.02

Signature

Ray Contreras
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Webmonkey for:
http://www.ossystems.com
http://www.bobs-garage.com
http://www.clanwolverine.org
http://www.rayzplace.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.